心理发展与教育 ›› 2002, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2): 1-5.

• 认知与社会性发展 •    下一篇

中小学中欺负者、受欺负者与欺负-受欺负者的同伴关系

王美芳, 张文新   

  1. 山东师范大学教育科学学院, 济南250014
  • 出版日期:2002-04-15 发布日期:2002-04-15
  • 作者简介:王美芳(1967- ),女,山东师范大学教育科学学院,副研究员.
  • 基金资助:
    全国教育科学“十五”规划、教育部人文社会科学研究“十五”规划资助项目(项目号分别为DBA010175;01JAXLX015).

Peer Relationships of Bullies, Victims and Bully/victims in Primary and Junior Middle Schools

WANG Mei-fang, ZHANG Wen-xin   

  1. School of Educational Science, Shandong Teachers' University, 250014
  • Online:2002-04-15 Published:2002-04-15

摘要: 采用Olweus欺负问卷和同伴提名测验,以1089名小学和初中学生为被试,考察欺负者、受欺负者与欺负-受欺负者的同伴关系特点.研究发现:(1)小学生的欺负者/受欺负者显著高于初中生;(2)男生中的期负者显著多于女生;(3)欺负者的同伴拒绝水平高于受欺负者、欺负-受欺负者和未参与者,但同伴接纳水平与未参与者无显著差异;(4)受欺负者、欺负-受欺负者的同伴拒绝水平高于、同伴接纳水平低于未参与者.在男性受欺负者中被拒绝的比例显著高于男性非受欺负者,但女性受欺负者中被拒绝的比例与女性非受欺负者之间无显著差异.

关键词: 期负, 同伴接纳, 同伴拒绝, 社交地位, 中小学生

Abstract: Bullies,victims,bully-victims and the not-involved were assigned to1089 primary and junior middleschool children by means of Olweus' Bully/victim Questionnaire.Children's peer acceptance,peer rejection andsocial status in the four groups were examined.It was found:(1) There were significant sex and grade differencesin the distribution of the four groups,with more boys classified as bullies but more girls as not-involved,and morechildren in primary schools involved in bullying than in junior middle schools.(2) Bullies had a highest score inpeer rejection and an average score in peer acceptance.(3) Victims and bully/victims had a higher score in peer rejection and a lower score in peer acceptance than not-involved children,however there existed sex differences in theassociation between victimization and social status,with male victims underrepresented in popular group,relative tomale non-victims,while female victims not.

Key words: bully, peer acceptance, peer rejection, social status, primary and middle school students

中图分类号: 

  • B844.1
[1] Olweus D.Bullying at school:what we know and what we can do.Oxford:Blackwell,1993.
[2] Whitney I,Smith P K.A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in junior/middle and secondary schools.Educational Research,1993,35:3-25.
[3] Sharp S,Smith P K.Tackling bullying in your school:A practical handbook for teachers.London:Routledge,1994.
[4] 张文新,武建芬,程学超.儿童欺负问题研究综述,心理学动态,第三期,1999,37-42.
[5] Bouhon M J,Smith P K.Bully/victim problems in middle-school children:stablity,serf-perceived competence,peer perceptions and peer acceptance.British Journal of Developmental Psychology,1994,12:315-319.
[6] Smith P K.The silent nightmare:bullying and victimization in school peer groups.The Psychologist,1991,4:243-248.
[7] Owleus D.Aggression in schools:Bullies and Whipping Boys.Washington:D.C.:Hemisphere.1978.
[8] Lindman R.,&Sinclair S.Social roles and aspirations of bullies and victims.Paper presented at 8th World Biennial ISRA Conference,Swansoa,Wales,July 2-6,1988.
[9] Chen X,Rubin K H.Social reputation and peer relationship in Chinese and Canadian children:a cross-cultural study.Child Development,1992,63:1336-1443.
[10] Rubin K H.Introduction:peer relationships and social skill in childhoodan international perspective.Human development,1988,33:221-224.
[11] Menesini E.,Eslea M.,Smith P K.,Genta M L.,Giannetti E.,Fonzi,A.,Costabile A.Croas-national comparison of children's attitudes towards bully/victim problems in school.Aggressive Behavior,1997,23,245-257.
[12] Bowers L.,Smith P.K.,Binney V.Perceived family relationships of bullies,victims and bully/victims in middle childhood.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,1994,11,215-232.
[13] 张文新,武建芬,&Jones K.Olweus 儿童欺负问卷中文版的修订.心理发展与教育,1999,第2期,2-7.
[14] Coie J D.,Dodge K A.Continuity and changes in children's social status:a five-year longitudinal study.Merrill-Plamer Quarterly,1983,29,261-282.
[15] Coie J D.,Dodge K A.,Coppotelli H.Dimensions and typesof social status:a crossage perspective.Developmental Psychology,1982,18,557-570.
[16] Stephenson P.,Smith D.Bullying in the junior school.In D.P.Tattum,&D.A.Lane(Eds),Bullying in Schools.Stokeon-Trent:Trentham Books.1989.
[17] Rodkin P C.,Farmer T W.,Pearl R.,Aeker R V.Heterogeneity of popular boys:antisocial and presocial configurations.Developmental Psychology,2000,36,14-24.
[18] Perry D G.,Kusel S J.,Perry L C.Victims of peer aggression.Developmental Psychology,1988,24,807-814.
[19] Salmivalli C.,Lagerspetz K.,Osterman K.,Kaukiainen A.Bullying as a group process:participant roles and their relation to social status within the group.Aggressive Behavior,1996,22,1-15.
[1] 秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响:同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[2] 牛湘, 冉光明. 同伴关系与幼儿问题行为关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 473-487.
[3] 张鹏程, 李喜, 韩午阳, 沈永江. 睡眠不足对中小学生负性情绪的影响:一个链式中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 402-409.
[4] 雷晓玲, 赵冬梅, 杨文娇, 田晓红. 青少年家庭功能与亲社会行为的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 786-792.
[5] 汪玥, 张豹, 周晖. 中小学生正念注意觉知与心理健康:情绪调节和积极重评的跨时间中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 692-702.
[6] 王靖民, 郭明宇, 常淑敏. 儿童父母拒绝与同伴拒绝的关系:问题行为的中介作用和家庭环境纷杂度的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 845-853.
[7] 褚晓伟, 周宗奎, 范翠英. 同伴拒绝与网络欺负的关系:愤怒的中介作用和感知匿名性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 584-593.
[8] 曹衍淼, 林小楠, 纪林芹, 张粤萍, 张文新. COMT基因Val158Met多态性与同伴关系对青少年抑郁的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(2): 216-227.
[9] 王玥, 赵丽娟, 许志星. 课业负担对学校生活满意度的影响:学校氛围的多水平调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(2): 205-213.
[10] 陈晓惠, 石文典. 中小学生学业自我概念与学业成绩的交叉滞后分析:符合交互影响模型,还是发展观?[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(1): 81-88.
[11] 马虹, 姚梅林, 吉雪岩. 家长投入对中小学生学业投入的影响:有中介的调节模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(6): 710-718.
[12] 李庆功, 吴素芳, 傅根跃. 儿童同伴信任和同伴接纳的关系:社会行为的中介效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(3): 303-310.
[13] 林崇德, 伍新春, 张宇迪, 臧伟伟, 周宵, 戴艳. 汶川地震30个月后中小学生的身心状况研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(6): 631-640.
[14] 伍新春, 张宇迪, 林崇德, 臧伟伟. 中小学生的灾难暴露程度对创伤后应激障碍的影响:中介和调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(6): 641-648.
[15] 张静, 田录梅, 张文新. 同伴拒绝与早期青少年学业成绩的关系:同伴接纳、友谊支持的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(4): 353-360.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!