优生与差生自我调节学习的对比研究

心理发展与教育 ›› 2002, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2): 6-11.

优生与差生自我调节学习的对比研究

雷雳¹, 汪玲¹, Tanja CULJAK²

1. 首都师范大学教科院心理学系, 北京100037;
2. University of Zagreb, 克罗地亚

出版日期:2002-04-15 发布日期:2002-04-15
作者简介:雷雳(1968- ),男,首都师范大学教科院心理学系副教授.
基金资助:
国家攀登计划项目(95-专-09)资助.

The Contrast Between LD Students and Talent Students on Self-Regulated Learning

LEI Li¹, WANG Ling¹, Tanja CULJAK²

1. The Department of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing, 100037;
2. University of Zagreb, Croatia

Online:2002-04-15 Published:2002-04-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对优生与差生的自我调节学习进行了对比,力图从这一角度探讨差生学习不良的原因.被试为小学高年级学生(差生37名,优生44名),考察其目标定向、认知加工方式及失败应对策略.结果表明,两组被试在自我调节学习上存在一定差异,差生在学习活动中倾向于进行回避定向,对学习材料多进行表层加工或产生自我阻碍,遭遇失败时多采用情绪发泄的策略进行应对;两组被试在自我调节学习各成分之间的关系上也存在一定差异,最主要表现为成绩定向对优生的学习有一定的促进作用,但对差生的学习则有破坏作用.此外,两组被试在自我调节学习各成分之间的关系上也表现出一定相似性.

关键词: 自我调节学习, 优生, 差生

Abstract: The present study probed into the difference of self-regulated learning between LD students and talent students,in order to discover the possible cause of LD students' low performance.The subjects were 37 LD studentsand 44 talent students,all of which were selected from primary school students,and then 3 questionnaire were conducted to them.The result suggested that:①there was difference on the slef-regulated learning between two kindsof subiects,for example,LD students showed avoidance goal-orientation,preferred surface processing style orshowed self-handicap,and adopted emotional strategy when facing school failure.②there was also some differenceon the relationship among the components of self-regulated learning between two kinds of subjects for example,forthe talent students performance goal-orientation could facilitate learning,while for the LD students performance goalorientation would handicap learning.However,these two kinds of subjects still showed some similar on the relationship among the components of self-regulated learning.

Key words: self-regulated learning, talent students, LD students

中图分类号:

B844.1

雷雳, 汪玲, Tanja CULJAK. 优生与差生自我调节学习的对比研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2002, 18(2): 6-11.

LEI Li, WANG Ling, Tanja CULJAK. The Contrast Between LD Students and Talent Students on Self-Regulated Learning[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2002, 18(2): 6-11.

参考文献

[1] Zimmerman B J.Self-fegulation in volves more than metacognition:A social cognitive perspective.Educational Psychologist,1995,30(4):217-221.
[2] 王振宏,刘萍.动机因素、学习策略、智力水平对学生学业成就的影响.心理学报,2000,32(1):65-69.
[3] Tero PF.,Connol P J.When children think tyey' ve failed:an academic coping inventory.Unpublished manuscript.University of Rocheser.1984.
[4] Mantzicopeulos P.Coping with school failure:Characteristics of students employing successful and unsuccessful coping strategies.Psychology in the Schools,1990,27:138-143.
[5] Greene B A.,Miller R B.Influence on achievement:goals,personality,and congnitive engagement.Contemporary Educational Psychology,1996,21:181-192.
[6] 雷雳,汪玲,CULJAKT.目标定向在自我调节学习中的作用.心理学报,2001,33(4):349-353.
[7] Markku Niemivirta.Individual Differences in Motivational and Cognitive Factors Affecting Self-Rcgulated Leaming-A Pattern-Oriented Approach.In:P Nenniger,R S Jager,A Frey,M Wosnitza eds.Advances in Motivation.Landau:Verlag Emplrische Padagogik,1998.

相关文章 7

[1]	李红霞, 张佳佳, 赵霞, 司继伟, 黄碧娟. 大学生认识论信念、自我调节学习与学业拖延的联系:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(5): 557-565.
[2]	张俊, 刘儒德, 贾玲. 反馈在自我调节学习中的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(2): 218-224.
[3]	高丙成, 刘儒德, 王丹, 和美君, 袁稹. 初中生自我调节学习的类型及对学习的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(1): 76-82.
[4]	葛操, 沈德立, 白学军. 学优生与学困生内隐与外显协同学习的比较研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(1): 79-82,91.
[5]	白学军, 刘海娟, 沈德立. 优生和差生FOK判断发展的实验研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2006, 22(1): 18-22.
[6]	汪玲, 雷雳, Tanja CULJAK. 效能信念、加工方式和困难应对策略——关于自我调节学习的特点及各成分间关系的探讨[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2000, 16(3): 30-35.
[7]	刘儒德, 陈琦. 学习目标要求和时间压力对多媒体环境下自我调节学习活动的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1999, 15(2): 32-36.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed