教师自主支持与小学生的科学学习无畏：学习兴趣和创造力效能感的中介作用

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2024.03.08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 学习无畏(intellectual risk-taking)是指学生在学习中勇于尝试、不怕失败,这种品质对学生的科学学习和创造力发展非常重要。本研究基于自我决定理论和自我效能理论,采用自我报告式调查问卷,对南方某省方便取样的四所学校的757名四、五、六年级小学生进行调查,探究教师自主支持与学生科学学习无畏的关系,以及科学学习兴趣和创造力自我效能感的中介作用。结果表明:(1)教师自主支持行为对学生的学习无畏具有显著的正向预测作用。学生感受到的教师自主支持越多,越可能在科学学习中勇于尝试、不怕失败;(2)在教师自主支持与学生科学学习无畏之间的关系中,学生的科学学习兴趣和创造力效能感起完全中介作用。即教师自主支持行为可能通过提高学生对科学学习的兴趣和创造力自我效能感,间接提高学生的学习无畏水平。

关键词: 教师自主支持, 学习无畏, 科学学习兴趣, 创造力效能感, 自我决定理论, 自我效能感理论, 小学生

Abstract: Intellectual risk-taking (IRT), which refers to students engaging in adaptive learning behaviors (e.g., sharing tentative ideas, asking questions, attempting to do and learn new things) regardless of failures or making mistakes, played an important role in Students’ science learning and creativity development. Based on self-determination theory and self-efficacy theory, this study aimed to provide a mediation model which examined how students’ perceptions of teacher autonomy support relate to their intellectual risk-taking engagement through the mediation of science learning interest and creative self-efficacy. A self-report questionnaire was completed by 757 primary school students from South China. The structural equation modeling revealed that: (1) Perceptions of teacher autonomy support would positively link to students’ intellectual risk-taking. The more teacher autonomy supports students perceived, the more intellectual risks they would take; (2) The positive association between perceptions of teacher autonomy support and students’ intellectual risk-taking was fully mediated by science learning interest and creative self-efficacy. That means, perceptions of teacher autonomy support did not relate to students’ IRT directly, it contributed to students’ intellectual risk-taking through the full mediation roles of science learning interest and creative self-efficacy. Possible explanations and implications are discussed.

Key words: teacher autonomy support, intellectual risk-taking, science learning interest, creative self-efficacy, self-determination theory, self-efficacy theory, primary school students

中图分类号:

G442

谭利华, 冯士季. 教师自主支持与小学生的科学学习无畏：学习兴趣和创造力效能感的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(3): 375-383.

TAN Lihua, FENG Shiji. Relationships between Perceptions of Teacher Autonomy Support and Pupil’s Intellectual Risk-taking: The Mediation Roles of Science Learning Interest and Creative Self-efficacy[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(3): 375-383.

参考文献

Ahn, I., Chiu, M. M., & Patrick, H. (2021). Connecting teacher and student motivation: Student-perceived teacher need-supportive practices and student need satisfaction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 64, Article 101950.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101950
Alhadabi, A. (2021). Science interest, utility, self-efficacy, identity, and science achievement among high school students: An application of SEM Tree. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 634120.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.634120
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999).Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Springer.
Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students.Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 447-457.
Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Correlates of intellectual risk taking in elementary school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 210-223.
Beghetto, R. A., & Baxter, J. A. (2012). Exploring student beliefs and understanding in elementary science and mathematics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 942-960.
Beghetto, R. A., Karwowski, M., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2021). Intellectual risk taking: A moderating link between creative confidence and creative behavior?Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, 15(4), 637-644.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models.Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246.
Chen, J. A., Tutwiler, M. S., Metcalf, S. J., Kamarainen, A., Grotzer, T., & Dede, C. (2016). A multi-user virtual environment to support students' self-efficacy and interest in science: A latent growth model analysis.Learning and Instruction, 41, 11-22.
Chen, P. P., Zhang, J. H., Xu, N. L., Zhang, K. G., & Xiao, L. J. (2021). The relationship between need for cognition and adolescents' creative self-efficacy: The mediating roles of perceived parenting behaviors and perceived teacher support. Current Psychology.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02122-7
Cheng, M. H. M., & Wan, Z. H. (2016). Unpacking the paradox of Chinese science learners: Insights from research into Asian Chinese school students' attitudes towards learning science, science learning strategies, and scientific epistemological views. Studies in Science Education, 52(1), 29-62.
Ciani, K. D., Sheldon, K. M., Hilpert, J. C., & Easter, M. A. (2011). Antecedents and trajectories of achievement goals: A self-determination theory perspective. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 223-243.
Cole, D. A., Ciesla, J. A., & Steiger, J. H. (2007). The insidious effects of failing to include design-driven correlated residuals in latent-variable covariance structure analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(4), 381-398.
Damon, W., Lerner, R. M., & Eisenberg, N. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of child psychology, social, emotional, and personality development (6 ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
De Loof, H., Struyf, A., Pauw, J. B. D., & Van Petegem, P. (2021). Teachers' motivating style and students' motivation and engagement in STEM: The relationship between three key educational concepts. Research in Science Education, 51(SUPPL 1), 109-127.
Domen, J., Hornstra, L., Weijers, D., van derVeen, I., & Peetsma, T. (2020). Differentiated need support by teachers: Student-specific provision of autonomy and structure and relations with student motivation.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 403-423.
Fensham, P. J. (2016). The future curriculum for school science: What can be learnt from the past?Research in Science Education, 46(2), 165-185.
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development.Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling-a Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
Hung, S. P. (2018). Validating the creative self-efficacy student scale with a Taiwanese sample: An item response theory-based investigation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 190-203.
Jungert, T., & Koestner, R. (2015). Science adjustment, parental and teacher autonomy support and the cognitive orientation of science students. Educational Psychology, 35(3), 361-376.
Kalchman, M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2005). Teaching and learning functions. In M. S. Donovan & J.D. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom (pp. 397-420). The National Academies Press.
Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., & Beghetto, R. A. (2019). Creative Self-Beliefs. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 396-417). Cambridge University Press.
Kline, R. B. (2015).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Publications.
Lehman, A., O'Rourke, N., Hatcher, L., & Stepanski, E. (2013).JMP for basic univariate and multivariate statistics: Methods for researchers and social scientists. Sas Institute.
OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD Publishing.https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264281820-en
Olivier, E., Galand, B., Hospel, V., & Dellisse, S. (2020). Understanding behavioural engagement and achievement: The roles of teaching practices and student sense of competence and task value. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 887-909.
Ozbay, H. E., & Koksal, M. S. (2021). Middle school students' scientific epistemological beliefs, achievements in science and intellectual risk-taking. Science & Education, 30(5), 1233-1252.
Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. E. (2019). Interest Development and Learning. In K. A. Renninger & S. E. Hidi (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Motivation and Learning (pp. 265-290). Cambridge University Press.
Richardson, H. A., Simmering, M. J., & Sturman, M. C. (2009). A tale of three perspectives examining post hoc statistical techniques for detection and correction of common method variance.Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 762-800.
Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2017). Interest development: Arousing situational interest affects the growth trajectory of individual interest. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 175-184.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 299-323.
Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review.Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323-337.
Stroet, K., Opdenakker, M. C., & Minnaert, A. (2013). Effects of need supportive teaching on early adolescents' motivation and engagement: A review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 9, 65-87.
Tang, X. W., Coffey, J. E., Elby, A., & Levin, D. M. (2010). The scientific method and scientific inquiry: Tensions in teaching and learning. Science Education, 94(1), 29-47.
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137-1148.
Wan, Z. H., So, W. M. W., & Hu, W. P. (2021). Necessary or sufficient? The impacts of epistemic beliefs on STEM creativity and the mediation of intellectual risk-taking. International Journal of Science Education, 43(5), 672-692.
Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective.Learning and Instruction, 28, 12-23.
Zhang, D. H., Bobis, J., Wu, X. L., & Cui, Y. R. (2020). The effects of an autonomy-supportive teaching intervention on chinese physics students and their teacher. Research in Science Education, 50(2), 645-671.
陈继文, 郭永玉, 胡小勇. (2015). 教师自主支持与初中生的学习投入: 家庭社会阶层与学生自主动机的影响. 心理发展与教育, 31(2), 180-187.
方杰, 温忠麟, 张敏强, 孙配贞. (2014). 基于结构方程模型的多重中介效应分析. 心理科学进展, 22(3), 735-741.
高申春. (2000). 自我效能理论评述. 心理发展与教育, 16(1), 60-64.
胡卫平, 郭习佩, 季鑫, 严国红, 张睆. (2021). 思维型科学探究教学的理论建构. 课程·教材·教法, 41(6), 123-129.
罗星凯. (2004). 实施科学探究性学习必须正视的问题. 全球教育展望, 33(03), 43-46.
罗云, 赵鸣, 王振宏. (2014). 初中生感知教师自主支持对学业倦怠的影响: 基本心理需要, 自主动机的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 30(3), 312-321.
欧阳丹. (2005). 教师期望, 学业自我概念, 学生感知教师支持行为与学业成绩之间的关系研究 (硕士学位论文).广西师范大学, 桂林.
王国霞, 赵扬. (2022). 教师自主支持与学生学业成就关系的元分析:心理需要满足、动机及投入的中介作用. 心理发展与教育(03), 380-390.
赵兰兰, 汪玲. (2006). 学习兴趣研究综述. 首都师范大学学报 (社会科学版), (6), 107-112.
赵燕梅, 张正堂, 刘宁, 丁明智. (2016). 自我决定理论的新发展述评. 管理学报, 13(7), 1095-1104.
中华人民共和国教育部. (2022). 义务教育科学课程标准(2022年版). 北京师范大学出版社.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	林崇德. 需要是教育与发展的动力源[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 1-7.
[2]	张鹏程, 李喜, 韩午阳, 沈永江. 睡眠不足对中小学生负性情绪的影响:一个链式中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 402-409.
[3]	李继娜, 王玮玮, 张维军, 屈智勇. 累积创伤对儿童复杂性创伤后应激障碍的影响：经验回避与消极认知情绪调节策略的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 683-691.
[4]	汪玥, 张豹, 周晖. 中小学生正念注意觉知与心理健康：情绪调节和积极重评的跨时间中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 692-702.
[5]	王国霞, 赵扬. 教师自主支持与学生学业成就关系的元分析:心理需要满足、动机及投入的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 380-390.
[6]	沈怡佳, 张国华, 何健康, 罗丽兰, 韩锦涛, 江波. 父母学习陪伴与小学生学业不良的关系:亲子学业沟通的中介作用和学习负担的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 826-833.
[7]	高雯, 朱进慧, 方臻. 父亲参与教养对小学生攻击行为的影响:母亲育儿压力的部分中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 84-93.
[8]	郭筱琳, 何苏日那, 秦欢, 刘春晖, 罗良. 亲子间教育期望差异对小学生情感幸福感的影响:学业成绩和学业自我效能感的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 467-477.
[9]	刘涵隆, 赵婧. 汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童视觉注意广度的发展及其对阅读流畅性的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(5): 533-540.
[10]	洪伟, 刘儒德, 甄瑞, 蒋舒阳, 金芳凯. 成就目标定向与小学生数学学习投入的关系:学业拖延和数学焦虑的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(2): 191-199.
[11]	回懿, 周雪莲, 李宜逊, 德秀齐, 李虹, 刘翔平. 小学低年级汉语儿童语言能力的发展轨迹:认知能力的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(1): 73-79.
[12]	刘影, 柴晓运, 龚少英, 桑标. 父母参与作业的自主动机与小学生积极作业情绪:学生作业自主动机与教师支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(5): 577-586.
[13]	胡卫平, 赵晓媚, 贾培媛, 陈英和. 学思维网络活动对小学生创造性的影响:认知风格的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(3): 257-264.
[14]	李利平, 伍新春, 熊翠燕, 程亚华, 阮氏芳. 元语言意识和快速命名对小学生汉字听写的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(6): 698-705.
[15]	王玥, 赵丽娟, 许志星. 课业负担对学校生活满意度的影响:学校氛围的多水平调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(2): 205-213.