不同胜任力水平下大学生自谦归因对他人评价的影响

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2017.05.05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 从人际吸引力和胜任力评价两个维度探讨大学生自谦归因对他人评价的影响。以120名大学生为样本，采用2*2的组间情景实验设计，让被试观测情景材料中不同胜任力水平个体的自谦归因后作出评价，研究发现，不同胜任力水平下大学生自谦归因对人际吸引力和胜任力评价上存在交互效应，当材料中大学生胜任力水平高时，自谦归因能提高大学生的人际吸引力。然而，当材料中大学生胜任力水平低时，自谦归因不仅不能提高人际吸引力，反而减少了他人对大学生的胜任力评价。

关键词: 自谦归因, 人际吸引力, 胜任力评价

Abstract: A 2 (high real competence, low real competence)*2 (high self-effacing attribution, low self-effacing attribution) experiment was designed to explore how the interaction between undergraduates' self-effacing attribution and actual competence affect others' evaluation on interpersonal attraction and perceived competence. Data from 120 undergraduate samples indicated that there were significant interaction effects between self-effacing attribution and individual's real competence on observers' perception of interpersonal attraction and competence evaluation. Specifically, when individual's real competence is high, the individual who shows high level of self-effacing attribution has higher interpersonal attraction. When individual's real competence is low, the individual who shows low level of self-effacing attribution gets higher competence evaluation.

Key words: self-effacing attribution, interpersonal attraction, competence evaluation

中图分类号:

B844

毛江华, 魏炜, 廖建桥, 景珍思. 不同胜任力水平下大学生自谦归因对他人评价的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(5): 554-560.

MAO Jianghua, WEI Wei, LIAO Jianqiao, JING Zhensi. The Effect of Others' Interpersonal Evaluation toward Undergraduates' Self-Effacing Attribution[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2017, 33(5): 554-560.

参考文献

Auld, C. J., & Case, A. J. (1997). Social exchange processes in leisure and non-leisure settings:A review and exploratory investigation. Journal of Leisure Research, 29(2), 183-200.

Baumeister, R. F., & Jones, E. E. (1978). When self-presentation is constrained by the target's knowledge:Consistency and compensation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(6), 608-618.

Bond, M. H., Leung, K., & Wan, K. C. (1982). The social impact of self-effacing attributions:The Chinese case. The Journal of Social Psychology, 118(2), 157-166.

Chen, Z., Takeuchi, R., & Shum, C. (2013). A social information processing perspective of coworker influence on a focal employee. Organization Science, 24(6), 1618-1639.

Cheng, H., & Furnham, A. (2001). Attributional style and personality as predictors of happiness and mental health. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2(3), 307-327.

Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 335-362.

Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition:warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77-83.

Han, K. H. (2011). The self-enhancing function of Chinese modesty:From a perspective of social script. Asian Journal of Psychology, 14(4), 258-268.

Hareli, S., & Weiner, B. (2000). Accounts for success as determinants of perceived arrogance and modesty. Motivation and Emotion, 24(3), 215-236.

Ho, D. Y. F., & Chiu, C.-Y. (1994). Component ideas of individualism, collectivism, and social organization:An application in the study of Chinese culture. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S.-C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism:Theory, method, and applications (pp. 137-156). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.

Jones, E. E., Davis, K. E., & Gergen, K. J. (1961). Role playing variations and their informational value for person perception. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(2), 302-310

Kim, J., Kim, M. S., Kam, K. Y., et al. (2003). Influence of self-construal on the perception of different self-presentation styles in Korea. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 6(2), 89-101.

McCabe, D. L., & Dutton, J. E. (1993). Making sense of the environment:The role of perceived effectiveness. Human Relations, 46(5), 623-643.

Mezulis, A. H., Abramson, L. Y., Hyde, J. S., & Hankin, B. L. (2004). Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 711-747.

Owens, B. P., Johnson, M. D., & Mitchell, T. R. (2013). Expressed humility in organizations:Implications for performance, teams, and leadership. Organization Science, 24(5), 1517-1538.

Rosenberg, S., & Sedlak, A. (1972). Structural representations of implicit personality theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 235-297

Schneider, D. J. (1969). Tactical self-presentation after success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13(3), 262-268.

Spencer-Oatey, H., & Ng, P. (2002). Reconsidering Chinese modesty:Hong Kong and mainland Chinese evaluative judgements of compliment responses. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 11(2), 181-201.

Tice, D. M., Butler, J. L., Muraven, M. B., & Stillwell, A. M. (1995). When modesty prevails:differential favor ability of self-presentation to friends and strangers. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 69(6), 1120-1138.

Welbourne, J. L., Eggerth, D., Hartley, T. A., Andrew, M. E., & Sanchez, F. (2007). Coping strategies in the workplace:Relationships with attributional style and job satisfaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70(2), 312-325.

Yoshida, T., Kojo, K., & Kaku, H. (1982). A study on the development of self-presentation in children. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 30(2), 120-127.

陈丽, 邹泓, 刘艳. (2011). 中学生自我提升的特点及其与人际适应的关系. 心理与行为研究, 9(3), 161-167.

胡金生, 黄希庭. (2009). 自谦:中国人一种重要的行事风格初探. 心理学报, 41(9), 842-852.

胡金生, 黄希庭. (2006). 华人社会中的自谦初探. 心理科学, 29(6), 1392-1395.

刘肖岑, 桑标, 张文新. (2007). 自利和自谦归因影响大学生人际交往的实验研究. 心理科学, 30(5), 1068-1072.

苗元江, 梁小玲. (2012). 谦虚研究述评. 上海教育科研, (1), 42-45.

杨国枢. (2004). 华人自我的理论分析与实证研究:社会取向与个人取向的观点. 本土心理学研究, 22(3), 1-80.

温忠麟, 侯杰泰, 马什赫伯特. (2003). 潜变量交互效应分析方法. 心理科学进展, 11(5), 593-599.

徐江, 任孝鹏, 苏红. (2015). 中国人独立性自我构建和依存性自我构建的代际变迁. 心理学进展, 5(6), 67-74.

袁莉敏, 张日昇. (2007). 大学生归因方式, 气质性乐观与心理幸福感的关系. 心理发展与教育, 23(2), 111-115.

张野, 李其维. (2010). 初中生师生关系, 归因方式, 成就目标定向与学业成绩的关系. 心理科学, 33(4), 785-788.

相关文章 15

[1]	陈庆秋, 徐华, 吴南. 助人情境中幼儿知恩图报意识的发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 403-409.
[2]	徐璐璐, 吴佩佩, 贺雯. 贫困大学生元刻板印象威胁对群际关系的影响:群际焦虑的中介和自尊的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 426-433.
[3]	李维佳, 胡清芬. 空间再定向任务中心理表征的多样性——来自虚拟现实实验的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 385-394.
[4]	向玲, 范淑娴, 陈家利, 王宝玺. 学习困难青少年认知控制特点研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 410-416.
[5]	侯芬, 伍新春, 邹盛奇, 刘畅, 黄彬彬. 父母教养投入对青少年亲社会行为的影响:亲子依恋的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 417-425.
[6]	阚佳琦, 刘斯漫, 时嘉惠, 闫琦, 郭俊斌, 王争艳. 祖辈共同看护背景下母亲和祖辈将心比心、母子依恋与婴幼儿认知的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 395-402.
[7]	田云龙, 喻承甫, 林霜, 叶诗敏, 张晓琳, 刘毅, 路红, 张卫. 父母体罚、学校参与与青少年网络游戏成瘾:亲子关系的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 461-471.
[8]	李若璇, 朱文龙, 刘红瑞, 姚梅林. 家长教育期望对学业倦怠的影响:家长投入的中介及家庭功能的调节[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 489-496.
[9]	彭源, 朱蕾, 王振宏. 父母情绪表达与青少年问题行为:亲子依恋、孤独感的多重中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 504-512.
[10]	江永强, 邵云天, 蔺秀云, 何先友. 初中生班级团体依恋、自悯与学习倦怠的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 472-480.
[11]	范航, 朱转, 苗灵童, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突对青少年抑郁情绪的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 481-488.
[12]	叶宝娟, 朱黎君, 方小婷, 刘明矾, 王凯凯, 杨强. 压力知觉对大学生抑郁的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 497-503.
[13]	丁子恩, 王笑涵, 刘勤学. 大学生自尊与网络过激行为的关系:社交焦虑和双自我意识的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(2): 171-180.
[14]	刘雪萍, 陈子卓, 黄文, 彭华茂. 成功老化内涵及影响因素分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(2): 249-256.
[15]	颜志强, 苏彦捷. 共情的性别差异:来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(2): 129-136.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed