多维测验分数的报告与解释:基于双因子模型的视角

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2017.04.15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在心理、行为、管理和教育等社科领域，经常使用多维测验。本文评介并比较了各种多维测验的测量模型；总结了基于双因子模型计算得到的统计指标；根据不同研究目的，提出了两个兼顾简洁性和精确性的多维测验分析流程。作为例子，在马基雅维利主义人格量表的研究中，通过双因子模型分析了如何报告、解释多维测验分数以及如何利用多维建模进行后续分析。

关键词: 多维测验, 双因子模型, 同质性系数, 共同变异解释比

Abstract: Empirical psychological, educational and social scientists are often confronted with multifaceted tests which are comprised of several related dimensions or subtests. This study is organized as follows:Firstly, the measurement models of multidimensional scales were reviewed and evaluated. Secondly, some statistical indices (i.e., ECV, PUC and four types of reliability coefficients) based on bi-factor modeling were calculated and interpreted. Thirdly, based on different research purposes, we summarized and proposed two analysis processes about multidimensional measurement, and both of them took the simplicity and accuracy into account simultaneously. Finally, as an example, the bi-factor model of the Machiavellianism Personality Scale (MPS) was analyzed, and the following questions were clarified for applied researchers:Do total scores generally reflect variation on a single latent variable? Is it justified to report the subscale scores? After partitioning out variability attributed to the total score, could subscales still provide reliable information? Could a complex multidimensional measurement be modeled using a simple unidimensional CFA?

Key words: multidimensional test, bi-factor model, homogeneity coefficient, ECV

中图分类号:

B844

顾红磊, 温忠麟. 多维测验分数的报告与解释:基于双因子模型的视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(4): 504-512.

GU Honglei, WEN Zhonglin. Reporting and Interpreting Multidimensional Test Scores:A Bi-factor Perspective[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2017, 33(4): 504-512.

参考文献

Armon, G., & Shirom, A. (2011). The across-time associations of the five-factor model of personality with vigor and its facets using the bifactor model. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 618-627.

Bentler, P. M. (2009). Alpha, dimension-free, and model-based internal consistency reliability. Psychometrika, 74, 137-143.

Bonifay, W. E., Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., & Meijer, R. R. (2015). When are multidimensional data unidimensional enough for structural equation modeling? An evaluation of the DETECT multidimensionality index. Structural Equation Modeling, 22, 504-516.

Caci, H., Morin, A. J., & Tran, A. (2015). Investigation of a bifactor model of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 24, 1291-1301.

Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.

Chen, F. F., Hayes, A., Carver, C. S., Laurenceau, J. P., & Zhang, Z. (2012). Modeling general and specific variance in multifaceted constructs:A comparison of the bifactor model to other approaches. Journal of Personality, 80, 219-251.

Chen, F. F., West, S. G., & Sousa, K. H. (2006). A comparison of bifactor and second-order models of quality of life. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 189-225.

Cole, D. A., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Manifest Variable Path Analysis:Potentially Serious and Misleading Consequences Due to Uncorrected Measurement Error. Psychological Methods, 19, 300-315.

Cornick, J. E. (2015). Factor Structure of the Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 19, 208-218.

Dahling, J. J., Whitaker, B. G., & Levy, P. E. (2009). The development and validation of a new Machiavellianism scale. Journal of Management, 35, 219-257.

Gignac, G. E. (2008). Higher-order models versus direct hierarchical models:g as superordinate or breadth factor? Psychology Science Quarterly, 50, 21-43.

Gu, H., Wen, Z., & Fan, X. (2015). The Impact of Wording Effect on Reliability and Validity of the Core Self-Evaluation Scale (CSES):A Bi-factor Perspective. Personality and Individual Difference, 83, 142-147.

Gu, H., Wen, Z., & Fan, X. (2017a). Structural validity of the Machiavellian Personality Scale:A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 105, 116-123.

Gu, H., Wen, Z., & Fan, X. (2017b). Examining and Controlling for Wording Effect in a Self-Report Measure:A Monte Carlo Simulation Study. Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24, 545-555.

Henry, D., Gorman-Smith, D., Schoeny, M., & Tolan, P. (2014). "Neighborhood Matters":Assessment of Neighborhood Social Processes. American Journal of Community Psychology, 54, 187-204.

Hull, J. G., Lehn, D. A., & Tedlie, J. C. (1991). A general approach to testing multifaceted personality constructs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 932-945.

Hyland, P. (2015). Application of bifactor models in criminal psychology research:a guide to researchers. Journal of Criminal Psychology, 5, 65-74.

Lilleoja, L., Dobewall, H., Aavik, T., Strack, M., & Verkasalo, M. (2016). Measurement equivalence of Schwartz's refined value structure across countries and modes of data collection:New evidence from Estonia, Finland, and Ethiopia. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 204-210.

Mészáros, V., Ádám, S., Szabó, M., Szigeti, R., & Urbán, R. (2014). The Bifactor Model of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS)-An Alternative Measurement Model of Burnout. Stress and Health, 30, 82-88.

Muthén, B. O., Kaplan, D., & Hollis, M. (1987). On structural equation modeling with data that are not missing completely at random. Psychometrika, 52, 431-462.

Reise, S. P. (2012). The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 667-696.

Reise, S. P., Bonifay, W. E., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 129-140.

Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., Widaman, K. F., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling:A bifactor perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1, 5-26.

Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016a). Applying Bifactor Statistical Indices in the Evaluation of Psychological Measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98, 223-237.

Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016b). Evaluating Bifactor Models:Calculating and Interpreting Statistical Indices. Psychological Methods, 21, 137-150.

Wang, M. T., Fredricks, J. A., Ye, F., Hofkens, T. L., & Linn, J. S. (2016). The Math and Science Engagement Scales:Scale development, validation, and psychometric properties. Learning and Instruction, 43, 16-26.

Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition. San Antonio, TX:Pearson Assessment.

顾红磊, 王才康. (2012). 项目表述效应的统计控制:以中文版生活定向测验为例. 心理科学, 35, 1247-1253.

顾红磊, 温忠麟. (2014). 项目表述效应对自陈量表信效度的影响——以核心自我评价量表为例. 心理科学, 37, 1245-1252.

顾红磊, 温忠麟, 方杰. (2014). 双因子模型:多维构念测量的新视角. 心理科学, 37, 973-979.

侯杰泰, 温忠麟, 成子娟. (2004). 结构方程模型及其应用. 北京:教育科学出版社.

温忠麟, 刘红云, 侯杰泰. (2012). 调节效应和中介效应分析. 北京:教育科学出版社.

温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (2011). 测验信度估计:从α系数到内部一致性信度. 心理学报, 43, 821-829.

温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (印刷中). 多变量分析热点:中介效应和调节效应. 见莫雷, 刘鸣(主编). 当代心理学研究. 北京:科学出版社.

吴艳, 温忠麟. (2011). 结构方程建模中的题目打包策略. 心理科学进展, 19, 1859-1867.

叶宝娟, 温忠麟. (2012). 测验同质性系数及其区间估计. 心理学报, 44, 1687-1694.

相关文章 15

[1]	陈庆秋, 徐华, 吴南. 助人情境中幼儿知恩图报意识的发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 403-409.
[2]	徐璐璐, 吴佩佩, 贺雯. 贫困大学生元刻板印象威胁对群际关系的影响:群际焦虑的中介和自尊的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 426-433.
[3]	李维佳, 胡清芬. 空间再定向任务中心理表征的多样性——来自虚拟现实实验的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 385-394.
[4]	向玲, 范淑娴, 陈家利, 王宝玺. 学习困难青少年认知控制特点研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 410-416.
[5]	侯芬, 伍新春, 邹盛奇, 刘畅, 黄彬彬. 父母教养投入对青少年亲社会行为的影响:亲子依恋的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 417-425.
[6]	阚佳琦, 刘斯漫, 时嘉惠, 闫琦, 郭俊斌, 王争艳. 祖辈共同看护背景下母亲和祖辈将心比心、母子依恋与婴幼儿认知的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 395-402.
[7]	田云龙, 喻承甫, 林霜, 叶诗敏, 张晓琳, 刘毅, 路红, 张卫. 父母体罚、学校参与与青少年网络游戏成瘾:亲子关系的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 461-471.
[8]	李若璇, 朱文龙, 刘红瑞, 姚梅林. 家长教育期望对学业倦怠的影响:家长投入的中介及家庭功能的调节[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 489-496.
[9]	彭源, 朱蕾, 王振宏. 父母情绪表达与青少年问题行为:亲子依恋、孤独感的多重中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 504-512.
[10]	江永强, 邵云天, 蔺秀云, 何先友. 初中生班级团体依恋、自悯与学习倦怠的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 472-480.
[11]	范航, 朱转, 苗灵童, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突对青少年抑郁情绪的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 481-488.
[12]	叶宝娟, 朱黎君, 方小婷, 刘明矾, 王凯凯, 杨强. 压力知觉对大学生抑郁的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 497-503.
[13]	丁子恩, 王笑涵, 刘勤学. 大学生自尊与网络过激行为的关系:社交焦虑和双自我意识的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(2): 171-180.
[14]	刘雪萍, 陈子卓, 黄文, 彭华茂. 成功老化内涵及影响因素分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(2): 249-256.
[15]	颜志强, 苏彦捷. 共情的性别差异:来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(2): 129-136.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed