Psychological Development and Education ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 274-281.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2019.03.03

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Contrast Effect of the Recipient's Outcomes on Prosocial Performance between Adults and Children

XIAO Fengqiu1, ZHENG Zhiwei2,3, CHEN Yinghe4   

  1. 1. China National Children's Center, Beijing 100035;
    2. Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101;
    3. Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049;
    4. Institute of Developmental Psychology, School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
  • Published:2019-06-19

Abstract: Prosocial performance refers to a broad category of actions that benefit other people or the society. The mechanisms underlying prosocial performance is a hot topic. Compared with other factors that affect prosocial performance, prosocial outcomes relatively received less attention. This research explored the effects of the recipient's outcomes (prosocial gains vs. prosocial non-losses) and age on prosocial performance. The results revealed that, (1) for adults, prosocial non-losses induced more prosocial performance than prosocial gains; (2) for Grade six children, the prosocial willingness to help others avoid negative outcomes was stronger; (3) Grade two children were more willing to help others gain positive outcomes. These results suggest that the recipient's outcomes produced an effect on prosocial performance, and only adults and old children exhibit prosocial loss aversion.

Key words: prosocial performance, recipient's outcomes, adults, children, prosocial loss aversion

CLC Number: 

  • B844
Batson, C. D., Dyck, J. L., Brandt, J. R., Batson, J. G., Powell, A. L., McMaster, M. R., & Griffitt, C. (1988). Five studies testing two new egoistic alternatives to the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(1), 52-77.
Côté, S., Tremblay, R. E., Nagin, D., Zoccolillo, M., & Vitaro, F. (2002). The development of impulsivity, fearfulness, and helpfulness during childhood:Patterns of consistency and change in the trajectories of boys and girls. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43(5), 609-618.
Dunfield, K. A. (2014). A construct divided:prosocial behavior as helping, sharing, and comforting subtypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(3), 958.
Gneezy, A., Imas, A., Brown, A., Nelson, L. D., & Norton, M. I. (2012). Paying to be nice:Consistency and costly prosocial behavior. Management Science, 58(1), 179-187.
Grant, A., & Dutton, J. (2012). Beneficiary or benefactor, are people more prosocial when they reflect on receiving or giving? Psychological Science, 23(9), 1033-1039.
Harbaugh, W. T., Krause, K., & Vesterlund, L. (2002). Risk attitudes of children and adults:Choices over small and large probability gains and losses. Experimental Economics, 5(1), 53-84.
Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention:Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30(2), 1-46.
Idson, L. C., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Imagining how you'd feel:The role of motivational experiences from regulatory fit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(7), 926-937.
Imuta, K., Henry, J. D., Slaughter, V., Selcuk, B., & Ruffman, T. (2016). Theory of mind and prosocial behavior in childhood:A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 52(8), 1192-1205.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory:An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica:Journal of the Econometric Society, 47(2), 263-292.
Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory:Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93(2), 136-153.
Levin, I. P., & Hart, S. S. (2003). Risk preferences in young children:Early evidence of individual differences in reaction to potential gains and losses. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16(5), 397-413.
Li, Y. J., Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., & Neuberg, S. L. (2012). Economic decision biases and fundamental motivations:How mating and self-protection alter loss aversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 550-561.
Liberman, N., Idson, L. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). Predicting the intensity of losses vs. non-gains and non-losses vs. gains in judging fairness and value:A test of the loss aversion explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(5), 527-534.
McGraw, A. P., Larsen, J. T., Kahneman, D., & Schkade, D. (2010). Comparing gains and losses. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1438-1445.
Novemsky, N., & Kahneman, D. (2005). The boundaries of loss aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(2), 119-128.
Paulus, M. (2018). The multidimensional nature of early prosocial behavior:Theoretical perspectives. Current Opinion in Psychology, 20(2), 111-116.
Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., & Schroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior:Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56(1), 365-392.
Polman, E. (2010). Information distortion in self-other decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(2), 432-435.
Polman, E. (2012a). Effects of self-other decision making on regulatory focus and choice overload. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 980-993.
Polman, E. (2012b). Self-other decision making and loss aversion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(2), 141-150.
Robbins, E. E. (2013). Inequity aversion and fairness in development(Doctral Dissertation). Emory University, Atlanta.
Steelandt, S., Broihanne, M. H., Romain, A., Thierry, B., & Dufour, V. (2013). Decision-making under risk of loss in children. PLoS One, 8(1), e52316.
Stocks, E. L., Lishner, D. A., & Decker, S. K. (2009). Altruism or psychological escape:Why does empathy promote prosocial behavior? European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(5), 649-665.
丁凤琴, 陆朝晖. (2016). 共情与亲社会行为关系的元分析. 心理科学进展, 24(8), 1159-1174.
寇彧, 唐玲玲. (2004). 心境对亲社会行为的影响. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),(5), 44-49.
肖凤秋, 郑志伟, 陈英和. (2014). 亲社会行为产生机制的理论演进. 心理科学,37(5), 1263-1270.
[1] WANG Kunyan, HUANG Yinghang, DENG Jue, WANG Xuan, ZHANG Xiangkui. From Social Mindfulness to Prosocial Behavior: The Developmental Association in Children Aged 4 to 7 [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2026, 42(4): 457-466.
[2] YU Xiao, ZHANG Yaxin, QI Yue, CHANG Shangcheng, HE Wenxing, CHEN Yinghe. Nature Connectedness Trajectory and Their Relationship with Creative Tendency in School-age Children: Cumulative or Interactive Effects? [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2026, 42(4): 467-477.
[3] CHEN Ziwei, HUANG Xiaoxiao, YU Guoliang. A Three-level Meta-analysis of the Relationship between Parenting Practices and Children’s Mental Health [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2026, 42(4): 563-576.
[4] WU Min, ZHANG Jie, YE Panqin, GONG Xi, YUAN Keman. Developmental Trajectories of Non-suicidal Self-injury in Left-behind Children: The Impact of Peer Victimization Patterns [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2026, 42(4): 586-595.
[5] SHU Zhan, PENG Shenli, ZHAO Xian, LI Zhihua. Immediate and Delayed Effects of Cumulative Family Risk on Externalizing Problems in Low-income Families: A Moderated Mediation Model [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2026, 42(4): 596-608.
[6] TAN Ruifeng, CHEN Suiqing, GUO Xinying, LI Mengna. Social Mindfulness Preference of Preschool Young Children in Peer Selection from the Perspective of Traits [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2026, 42(3): 305-314.
[7] HAN Yan, GUO Xiaolin, YANG Wenjing, ZHANG Heng, WANG Tengfei. Structural Differentiation of Executive Function in Children with Reading Difficulties Lags behind that of Typically Developing Children [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2026, 42(3): 326-336.
[8] ZHANG Wenjie, YANG Li, WANG Yaqin, ZHANG Xinyue, FAN Wei. The Effect of Adult’s Gesture in Picture Book Shared-reading on Story Retelling of 4- to 6-year-olds [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2026, 42(3): 379-390.
[9] FAN Xinghua, JIN Jianing, YAN Lifei, LI Xiaotong, DENG Huixi. The Effect of Left-behind Adversity on the Developmental Trajectory of Personal Growth Initiative of Left-behind Children in Junior Middle School: The Mediation of the Developmental Trajectory of Social Support [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2026, 42(3): 427-436.
[10] ZHANG Pan, YANG Juan, WANG Xiaoying. The Effects of Iconic Gestures on Memory and Generalization of Chinese Action Verbs in 3~4-year-old Children [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2026, 42(2): 153-161.
[11] LI Jinfeng, ZHAN Jiechen, WANG Dahua. The Influence of Emotional Arousal on the Intention of Older Adults to Forward Health Rumors [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2026, 42(2): 202-211.
[12] YUAN Wen, ZHANG Xuran, GUO Hui, LI Yanfang. Static and Dynamic Structural Characteristics of Children Bullying Networks: A Social Network Analysis Perspective [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2026, 42(2): 234-244.
[13] XIE Yu, HE Huizhong, WANG Lei, DAI Weixi. A Comparative Study on Implicit Learning of Objects’ Contextual Cueing between Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Typically Developing Children [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2025, 41(6): 761-769.
[14] CAO Xiancai, ZHANG Hao, ZHOU Bolin, CHEN Xiantao, CUI Chenghong, WU Jie. A Meta-analysis of the Impact Factors of Technology Acceptance among Older Adults Based on Technology Acceptance Model [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2025, 41(6): 799-816.
[15] FAN Xinghua, YAN Lifei, JIN Jianing, LI Xiaotong, DENG Huixi, YU Si. Effect of the Development of Parental Care on the Development of General Well-being In Grade 4~6 Left-behind Rural Children: The Moderating Role of Positively Interpreting Life [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2025, 41(6): 859-868.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!