Psychological Development and Education ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 165-170.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2015.02.05

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Influence of Nap Deprivation on Prototype Elicitation Effect in Scientific Innovation Problem Solving

LI Wenfu1, GONG Zhengxia2, QIU Jiang2, ZHANG Qinglin2   

  1. 1. Department of Mental Health, Jining Medical University, Jining 272067, China;
    2. Department of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
  • Online:2015-03-15 Published:2015-03-15

PDF (PC)

Abstract: The present study was designed to explore the nap-deprivation effect on the process of prototype heuristic in scientific innovation problem solving. 32 scientific innovation problem were selected from the real world and divided into high-heuristic effect (HHE) problem and low-heuristic effect (LHE) problem. The learning-test paradigm was used. Specifically, we used “1 to 1” and “8 to 8” paradigm, that is, learn 1 heuristic prototype and then solve 1 scientific problem or learn 8 heuristic prototypes and then solve 8 scientific problems. 36 subjects with nap habit were enrolled and distributed randomly into nap-deprivation group (NDG) or normal nap group (NNP). Dependent variables consisted of the rate of prototypal events activation and the rate of scientific problem solving. The results showed that: 1)the main effect of experimental paradigm, group and material were significant on the rate of prototypal events activation and the rate of scientific problem solving;2) any significant interactive effect was found. The results suggested that the nap-deprivation influenced the application process of heuristic information and the activation process of prototype events.

Key words: Creative problem solving, Nap-deprivation, Prototype heuristic theory, Prototypal events activation, Heuristic information application

CLC Number: 

  • G442
Cai, D. J., Mednick, S. A., Harrison, E. M., Kanady, J. C., & Mednick, S. C. (2009). REM, not incubation, improves creativity by priming associative networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(25), 10130-10134.
Dietrich, A., & Kanso, R. (2010). A Review of EEG, ERP, and Neuroimaging Studies of Creativity and Insight.Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 822-848.
Drago, V., Foster, P. S., Heilman, K. M., Aricò, D., Williamson, J., Montagna, P., et al. (2011). Cyclic alternating pattern in sleep and its relationship to creativity.Sleep medicine, 12(4), 361-366.
Gosselin, A., De Koninck, J., & Campbell, K. B. (2005). Total sleep deprivation and novelty processing: implications for frontal lobe functioning.Clinical neurophysiology: official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 116(1), 211-222.
Jones, K., & Harrison, Y. (2001). Frontal lobe function, sleep loss and fragmented sleep. Sleep medicine reviews, 5(6), 463-475.
Maquet, P. (2001). The Role of Sleep in Learning and Memory.Science, 294(5544), 1048-1052.
Mazzarello, P. (2000). What dreams may come? [10.1038/35046170].Nature, 408(6812), 523-523.
Nilsson, J. P., SDerstrM, M., Karlsson, A. U., Lekander, M., ÄKerstedt, T., Lindroth, N. E., et al. (2005). Less effective executive functioning after one night's sleep deprivation.Journal of Sleep Research, 14(1), 1-6.
Smith, S. M. (1995). Getting into and out of mental ruts: A theory of fixation, incubation, and insight. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight. (pp. 229-251): Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press.
Stickgold, R., & Walker, M. (2004). To sleep, perchance to gain creative insight? Trends Cogn Sci, 8(5), 191-192.
Wagner, U., Gais, S., Haider, H., Verleger, R., & Born, J. (2004). Sleep inspires insight.Nature, 427(6972), 352-355.
曹贵康, 杨东, 张庆林. (2006). 顿悟问题解决的原型事件激活:自动还是控制.心理科学, 29(5), 1123-1127.
陈丽, 张庆林, 严霞, 张颖, 廖祥慧, 陈谊. (2008). 汉语字谜原型激活中的情绪促进效应.心理学报, 40(2), 127-135.
邱江, 张庆林. (2007). 字谜解决中的“啊哈”效应:来自ERP研究的证据.科学通报, 52(22), 2625-2631.
任国防, 邱江, 曹贵康, 张庆林. (2007). 顿悟:是进程监控还是表征转换.心理科学, 30(5), 1265-1268.
田燕, 罗俊龙, 李文福, 邱江, 张庆林. (2011). 原型表征对创造性问题解决过程中的启发效应的影响.心理学报, 43(6), 619-628.
吴真真. (2007).字谜作业中顿悟的原型激活事件研究. 西南大学硕士学位论文.
吴真真, 邱江, 张庆林. (2008). 顿悟的原型启发效应机制探索.心理发展与教育, 24(1), 31-35.
吴真真, 邱江, 张庆林. (2009). 顿悟脑机制的实验范式探索.心理科学, 32(1), 122-125.
张庆林, 邱江. (2005). 顿悟与源事件中启发信息的激活.心理科学, 28(1), 6-9.
张庆林, 邱江, 曹贵康. (2004). 顿悟认知机制的研究述评与理论构想.心理科学, 27(6), 1435-1437.
朱丹, 罗俊龙, 朱海雪, 邱江, 张庆林. (2011). 科学发明创造思维过程中的原型启发效应.西南大学学报 (社会科学版), 37(5), 144-149.
朱海雪, 杨春娟, 李文福, 刘鑫, 邱江, 张庆林. (2012). 问题解决中顿悟的原型位置效应的 fMRI 研究.心理学报, 44(8), 1025-1037.
[1] LI Yan, LIANG Lichan, ZHOU Xinran, BIAN Yufang. Parent-teacher Relationships and Primary Students’ School Attitude: The Mediating Role of Teacher-child Relationships and the Difference between Parents [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(1): 74-82.
[2] YANG Baoyan, MA Xifeng, ZANG Hongyu, MAO Haiyan. The Influence of Family Economic Income and Father’s Education Level on Academic Engagement among Rural Junior Middle School Students:The Mechanisms of Family Obligation and Education-dependence Future Identity [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(1): 83-92.
[3] WANG Haolan, CHEN Hongjun, WU Xinchun, ZHAO Ying, SUN Peng. The Effect of Reading Modes to Reading Comprehension in Chinese Children: A Mediated Moderation Model [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(3): 369-378.
[4] CHENG Yangchun, HUANG Jin. Association between the Approximate Number System and Mathematical Competence: A Meta-analysis [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(3): 379-390.
[5] YU Haoxue, LI Hui, WANG Fuxing. The Relationship between Belief in a Just World and Learning Burnout in Undergraduates: The Mediating Role of Coping Style and Boredom Proneness [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(3): 391-401.
[6] CHEN Xu, ZHANG Dajun, CHEGN Gang, HU Tianqiang, LIU Guangzeng. The Effects of Teacher Support and Psychological Suzhi on Middle School Students' Academic Achievement [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2018, 34(6): 707-714.
[7] NIE Qian, ZHANG Dajun, TENG Zhaojun, LU Xingyue, GUO Cheng. How Students Perceived School Climate Effect on Subjective and Objective Academic Achievement: The Mediating Role of Psychological Suzhi [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2018, 34(6): 715-723.
[8] CHENG Gang, TANG Xinyi, NIU Juan, LI Jiajia, ZHANG Dajun. The Relationship between Middle School Students' Family Socioeconomic Status and Academic Achievement: Multiple Mediating Effects of Different Dimensions of Psychological Suzhi [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2018, 34(6): 700-706.
[9] CHEN Chaoyang, LIU Zhifang, SU Yongqiang, CHENG Yahua. The Prediction Effects for Skill and Less-skill Deaf Readers in Chinese Reading: Evidence from Eye Movement [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2018, 34(6): 692-699.
[10] ZOU Yuchen, DING Ying, ZHANG Xuran, LI Yanfang. The Effects of Feedback Type on Children's Learning Performance and the Gender Differences in These Effects [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2018, 34(5): 567-575.
[11] LI Yongzhan. The Impact of Parental Rearing Style on Learning Engagement among Senior High School Students: A Serial Mediation Effect Model [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2018, 34(5): 576-585.
[12] GAO Ruiyan, NIU Meixin, YANG Tao, ZHOU Xinlin. The Accuracy and Form of Fraction Magnitude Representation for 4 to 8 Graders [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2018, 34(4): 443-452.
[13] ZHANG Jie, HUANG Bijuan, SI Jiwei, GUAN Dongxiao. Relationship between Math Anxiety and Mathematical Achievement in Township Pupils: The Chain Mediating Roles of Mathematical Self-efficacy and Metacognition [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2018, 34(4): 453-460.
[14] WANG Mingzhong, WANG Mengran, WANG Jing. Interparental Conflict Compromises Adolescents' Academic Achievement: The Indirect Roles of Effortful Control and Classroom Engagement [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2018, 34(4): 434-442.
[15] CHI Liping, ZONG Zheng, XIN Ziqiang, CHEN Yinghe. The Relationship of Constructivist Pedagogy and Metathinking: The Mediating Role of Cognitive Holding Power [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2018, 34(2): 181-190.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright 2018 © Editorial office of Psychological Development and Education
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd