Psychological Development and Education ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 129-137.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2019.02.01

    Next Articles

The Impact of Subliminal Emotional Faces on the Gaze-cueing Effect

LIU Xiping, WANG Beini, TANG Weihai   

  1. School of Educational Science, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387
  • Published:2019-04-19

Abstract: As the most prominent part in the face, eyes are usually considered as one of the most important information source. Former studies have shown that people's attention tends to shift to certain locations by others' eyes gazing. The gaze-cuing effect (GCE) is that when the eyes in the central face are gazing at the same direction of the targets which would be presented at periphery could accelerate the detection of the targets.
The present study investigated the impact of different emotional faces which are displayed unconsciously on the gaze-cuing effect. A happy, neutral, or fearful cue face with its eyes gazing at left side or right side was presented unconsciously in the center of the computer screen, followed by a capital letter F as target at the gazed (cued) location or the opposite location (uncued) randomly. Participants were asked to accomplish several location judging tasks, which were that subjects should make localization responses to the capital letter F that was appeared randomly on the left side or the right side of the screen as accurately and quickly as they can. Using pseudorandom method to balance the sequence effect and control the Simon Effect by ruling the response keys. Results are (1) RTs were significantly longer and accuracies was significantly smaller in the un-cued condition than the cued condition. (2) In the cued condition, RTs were significantly shorter in the fearful face condition than those in the happy and neutral faces condition. On the contrary, in the un-cued condition, RTs of fearful face condition were significantly longer than those in the happy and neutral faces condition. Results above showed that the gaze-cuing effect (GCE) was significant and was modulated by the emotional faces (happy, neutral, or fearful) presented in the center of the screen before when the cues were presented subliminally. In the cued condition, fearful emotion could accelerate the shifting of attention and lead to the faster detection of targets. However, in the un-cued condition, this way of acceleration could make people shift their attention to the opposite side so that decelerating the detection process of the targets displayed. Take the difference between valid conditions and invalid conditions in the reaction times (gaze cue effect size) as the independent variable, the analysis of result showed that the gaze-cueing effect size in the fearful face condition was larger than the happy and neutral face, while the difference between happy and neutral emotion was not significant.
All the results above indicated that emotional stimulus which are displayed subliminally could get rid of the suppression of the Top-Down attention mechanism, motivating people's primary biological reaction. The gaze-cuing effect (GCE) can be modulated by emotional faces with biological importance that were presented unconsciously. The subliminally presented gazing cue was processed automatically and resulted in attention bias, especially the fearful face cue.

Key words: subliminally, gaze direction, facial expression, gaze-cueing effect, attentional bias

Alexandra, F., Bayliss, A. P., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). Gaze cueing of attention:visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 694-724.
Adams, R. B., Gordon, H. L., Baird, A. A., Ambady, N., & Kleck, R. E. (2003). Effects of gaze on amygdala sensitivity to anger and fear faces. Science, 300(5625), 1536-1536.
Jr, A. R., & Kleck, R. E. (2005). Effects of direct and averted gaze on the perception of facially communicated emotion. Emotion, 5(1), 3.
Balconi, M., & Bortolotti, A. (2013). Conscious and unconscious face recognition is improved by high-frequency rTMS on pre-motor cortex. Consciousness and cognition, 22(3), 771-778.
Balconi, M., & Lucchiari, C. (2016). Consciousness and emotional facial expression recognition:subliminal/supraliminal stimulation effect on n200 and p300 erps. Journal of Psychophysiology, 21(2), 100-108.
Bayliss, A. P., Schuch, S., & Tipper, S. P. (2010). Gaze cueing elicited by emotional faces is influenced by affective context. Visual Cognition, 18(8), 1214-1232.
Bayliss, S. J.,Glover, M., Taylor, M. J., & Itier, R. J. (2011). Is it in the eyes? Dissociating the role of emotion and perceptual features of emotionally expressive faces in modulating orienting to eye gaze. Visual cognition, 19(4), 483-510.
Chen, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2015). Intergroup threat gates social attention in humans. Biology Letters, 11(2).
Chen, Y., Zhao, Y., Song, H., Guan, L., & Wu, X. (2017). The neural basis of intergroup threat effect on social attention. Scientific Reports, 7.
Driver IV, J., Davis, G., Ricciardelli, P., Kidd, P., Maxwell, E., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). Gaze perception triggers reflexive visuospatial orienting. Visual cognition, 6(5), 509-540.
Deng, X.H., Zhang, D.X., Huang, S.X., Yuan, W., & Zhou X.L. (2010). Effects of Supra-and Sub-liminal Emotional Cues on Inhibition of Return. Acta Psychologica Sinica 42(3), 325-333.
Farroni, T.,Massaccesi,S.,Menon,E., & Johnson,M. H. (2007). Direct gaze modulates face recognition in young infants. Cognition, 102(3), 396.
Fichtenholtz, H. M., Hopfinger, J. B., Graham, R., Detwiler, J. M., & Labar, K. S. (2009). Event-related potentials reveal temporal staging of dynamic facial expression and gaze shift effects on attentional orienting. Social Neuroscience, 4(4), 317.
Friesen, C. K., & Kingstone, A. (1998). The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 5(3), 490-495.
Friesen, C. K., & Kingstone, A. (2003). Covert and overt orienting to gaze direction cues and the effects of fixation offset. Neuroreport, 14(3), 489-93.
Gobel, M. S., Kim, H. S., & Richardson, D. C. (2015). The dual function of social gaze. Cognition, 136, 359-364.
Graham, R., Kelland Friesen, C., Fichtenholtz, H. M., & LaBar, K. S. (2010). Modulation of reflexive orienting to gaze direction by facial expressions. Visual Cognition, 18(3), 331-368.
Gregory, S. E., & Jackson, M. C. (2017). Joint attention enhances visual working memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 43(2), 237-249.
Hietanen, J. K., & Leppänen, J. M. (2003). Does facial expression affect attention orienting by gaze direction cues? Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 29(6), 1228.
Keane, J., Calder, A. J., Hodges, J. R., & Young, A. W. (2002). Face and emotion processing in frontal variant frontotemporal dementia. Neuropsychologia, 40(6), 655-665.
Leppänen, J. M., Tenhunen, M., & Hietanen, J. K. (2003). Faster choice-reaction times to positive than to negative facial expressions:The role of cognitive and motor processes. Journal of Psychophysiology, 17(3), 113.
Mele, S., Savazzi, S., Marzi, C. A., & Berlucchi, G. (2008). Reaction time inhibition from subliminal cues:is it related to inhibition of return? Neuropsychologia, 46(3), 810-819.
Michel, C., Pauen, S., & Hoehl, S. (2017). Schematic eye-gaze cues influence infants' object encoding dependent on their contrast polarity. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 7347.
Müller, S., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2016). Relevance drives attention:attentional bias for gain- and loss-related stimuli is driven by delayed disengagement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(4).
Neath, K., Nilsen, E. S., Gittsovich, K., & Itier, R. J. (2013). Attention orienting by gaze and facial expressions across development. Emotion, 13(3), 397.
Putman, P., Hermans, E., & Van Honk, J. (2006). Anxiety meets fear in perception of dynamic expressive gaze. Emotion, 6(1), 94.
Petrova, K., Wentura, D., & Bermeitinger, C. (2013). What happens during the stimulus onset asynchrony in the dot-probe task? exploring the role of eye movements in the assessment of attentional biases. Plos One, 8(10).
Sato, W., Okada, T., & Toichi, M. (2007). Attentional shift by gaze is triggered without awareness. Experimental Brain Research, 183(1), 87-94.
Sato, W., Uono, S., Okada, T., & Toichi, M. (2010). Impairment of unconscious, but not conscious, gaze-triggered attention orienting in Asperger's disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 4(4), 782-786.
Tipples, J. (2006). Fear and fearfulness potentiate automatic orienting to eye gaze. Cognition & Emotion, 20(2), 309-320.
Võ, M. L., Smith, T. J., Mital, P. K., & Henderson, J. M. (2012). Do the eyes really have it? dynamic allocation of attention when viewing moving faces. J Vis, 12(13), 77-78.
陈艾睿, 董波, 方颖, 于长宇, 张明. (2014). 线索类型对阈下注视线索效应的影响.心理学报, 46(9), 1281-1288.
程九清,高湘萍. (2004). 不同意识水平下的情绪启动.心理科学, 27(6), 1506-1508.
邓晓红, 张德玄, 黄诗雪, 袁雯, 周晓林. (2010). 阈上和阈下不同情绪线索对返回抑制的影响.心理学报, 42(3), 325-333.
李夏, 朱洁银, 唐骥, 张文秀, 胡凤培. (2013). 注视方向和面部表情对注意朝向的影响.心理科学,36(6), 1339-1346.
李迎娣,张学民. (2010). 不同类型提示线索提示效应大小的比较.心理科学,33(3), 627-630.
陆颖之. (2014). 不同负性情绪的效价易感性及其神经机制的研究(博士学位论文). 上海体育学院.
张智君, 赵亚军, 占琪涛. (2011). 注视方向的知觉对注视追随行为的影响.心理学报, 43(7), 726-738.
张智君, 唐溢, 张序堃, 张振昊. (2015). 动态和静态注视线索对注意转移的影响:运动线索的作用. 应用心理学, 21(3), 195-202.
张美晨, 魏萍, 张钦. (2015). 阈上阈下不同面孔表情下的注视线索提示效应.心理学报, 47(11), 1309-1317.
[1] YU Linwei, LI Shuang, LIU Shen, PAN Wenpei, XU Qiang, ZHANG Lin. The Positivity Effect of Ambiguous Facial Expressions Recognition and Its Mechanism in Older Adults [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(2): 196-206.
[2] ZHONG Weifang, GUO Yongxing. Electrophysiological Evidence for the Lateralized Effect of Lexical Categories on Perception of Facial Expression [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(3): 313-322.
[3] ZHANG Yan, WANG Zheng, LUO Na, WANG Xiaoying, LI Xiaonan. Influence of Experience of Lovelortedness on Attentional Bias of Love-related Stimuli: Approach or Avoidance? [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(1): 12-20.
[4] WANG Haibin, ZHANG Pengcheng, LU Jiamei, QU Qiong, ZHANG Yan. Attentional Bias in Different Level of Pre-service Teachers' Emotional Awareness [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2020, 36(4): 462-468.
[5] MA Yuanxiao, CHEN Xu. Subliminally Security Priming Improve the Attention Processing among Females with Insecure Attachment [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2019, 35(1): 11-22.
[6] LEI Yuju, HE Jinbo, NIU Gengfeng, ZHOU Zongkui, TIAN Yuan. Impaired Disengagement from Negative Emotional Faces in Youth with Internet Addiction [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2017, 33(6): 691-699.
[7] LI Haijiang, LU Jiamei, ZHANG Qinglin, QIU Jiang. Difficulty in Disengaging Attention from Emotionally Negative Stimuli among Individuals with Sub-threshold Depression [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2016, 32(5): 513-520.
[8] ZHANG Lin, LIU Shen, XIE Wenlan, LI Wentao. Attentional Bias of Individuals in Adulthood with Disabilities for Different Types of Social Cues [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2015, 31(6): 676-684.
[9] ZHU Bi, CHEN Chuan-sheng, Robert, K., Moyzis, LIN Chong-de, DONG Qi, HE Qing-hua, CHEN Chun-hui, LI Jun. Interaction Effects of 5-HTTLPR, Gender, and Family Socioeconomic Status on Facial Expression Recognition in Chinese College Students [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2013, 29(2): 131-138.
[10] LI Hai-jiang, JIA Lei, LUO Jun-long, YANG Juan, ZHANG Qing-lin, LI Bing-bing. Attentional Bias among Individuals with Low Self-Esteem:an Event-Related Potential Study [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2013, 29(1): 2-9.
[11] WANG Gang, ZHANG Da-jun. Review on Attentional Bias to Smoking-Related Cues in Smokers [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2011, 27(5): 543-552.
[12] LI Xiang-yu, ZHENG Xi-fu. A Study on the Attentional Bias to Emotional Information in Pathological Internet User [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2010, 26(4): 357-363.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!