Psychological Development and Education ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 377-384.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2018.03.15

Previous Articles    

The Chinese Researches of Internet Psychology and Behavior of Teenagers, Current Status and Future

XU Bibo1, XIE Han1, LIN Chongde2, WU Peng1   

  1. 1. Department of psychology, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062;
    2. Institute of developmental psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
  • Online:2018-05-15 Published:2018-05-15

Abstract: This paper reviews the research achievements of Internet psychology and behavior of Chinese teenagers in the last 10 years,and carries out clustering analysis on the research topics,and compares those with foreign research. Domestic Internet psychology and behavior research of teenagers mainly focuses on Internet addiction. Meanwhile, Chinese scholars have obtained a number of research achievements in the field of Internet bullying,Internet pro-social behavior and Internet self-disclosure. However, the existing research has the following limitations:the research field is relatively narrow, the contents of the research is not deep enough,and the research method is relatively simple. Based on teenagers' characteristics on using Internet and the development and changes of the times,this paper puts forward the direction of the domestic research on Teenagers' Internet psychology and behavior in the twenty-first Century in three aspects:Big-data research, New Media research and Electronic Sports research,which has theoretical and practical significance for the psychological research in the Internet era.

Key words: teenagers, Internet psychology and behavior, research topics, research methods

Albert Bandura. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31(2), 101-119.

Chen, C. M. (2006). CiteSpace Ⅱ:Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359 -377.

Chookaew, S., Panjaburee, P., Wanichsan, D., & Laosinchai, P. (2014). A personalized e-learning environment to promote student's conceptual learning on basic computer programming. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 11(6), 815-819.

Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Self-regulation differences during athletic practice by experts, non-experts, and novices. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13(2), 185-206.

Despotovic-Zrakic, M., Markovic, A., Bogdanovic, Z., Barac, D., & Krco, S. (2012). Providing adaptivity in moodle LMS courses. Educational Technology & Society, 15 (1), 326-338.

Dillon, K. P., & Bushman, B. J. (2015). Unresponsive or un-noticed? cyberbystander intervention in an experimental cyberbullying context. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 144-150.

Dwic, A., & Basuki, A. (2012). Personalized learning path of a web-based learning system. International Journal of Computer Applications, 53 (7), 17-22.

Ellison,N.B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of facebook friends:social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.

Elphinston, R. A., & Nollen, P. (2011). Time to face it! Facebook intrusion and the implications for romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, 14(11), 631-635.

Graf, S., & Ives, C. (2010). A flexible mechanism for providing adaptivity based on learning styles in learning management systems. IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. IEEE Computer Society, 30-34.

Hamari, J., Shernoff, D. J., Rowe, E., Coller, B., Asbell-Clarke, J., & Edwards, T. (2016). Challenging games help students learn:an empirical study on engagement,flow and immersion in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior,54,170-179.

Isotani, S., Inaba, A., Ikeda, M., & Mizoguchi, R. (2009). An ontology engineering approach to the realization of theory-driven group formation. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(4), 445-478.

Jang, H., Song, J., & Kim, R. (2014). Does the offline bully-victimization influence cyberbullying behavior among youths? application of general strain theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 31(1),85-93.

Li, Q. (2007). New bottle but old wine:a research of cyberbullying in schools. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4),1777-1791.

Müller, K. W., Dreier, M., Beutel, M. E., Duven, E., Giralt, S., & Wölfling, K. (2016).A hidden type of internet addiction? intense and addictive use of social networking sites in adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 55 (A), 172-177.

National Academy of Engineering. (2014). Grand challenges for engineering for the 21st Century, retrieved September 19, 2014, from http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/.

Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought:holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291-310.

Özcan Özyurt, Özyurt, H., Baki, A., & Güven, B. (2013). Integration into mathematics classrooms of an adaptive and intelligent individualized e-learning environment:implementation and evaluation of uzwebmat. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3),726-738.

Park, N., Kee, K. F., & Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being immersed in social networking environment:facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 12(6), 729.

Singleton, A., Abeles, P., & Smith, I.C. (2016). Online social networking and psychological experiences:the perceptions of young people with mental health difficulties. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 394-403.

Smith, A. S. G., & Blandford, A. (2003). MLTutor:An Application of Machine Learning Algorithms for an Adaptive Web-based Information System. IOS Press.

Soller, A. (2004).Computational modeling and analysis of knowledge sharing in collaborative distance learning. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 14(4), 351-381.

Song, J., & Oh, I. (2018). Factors influencing bystanders' behavioral reactions in cyberbullying situations. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 273-282.

Steffgen, G., König, A., Pfetsch, J., & Melzer, A. (2011). Are cyberbullies less empathic? Adolescents' cyberbullying behavior and empathic responsiveness. Cyberpsychology Behavior & Social Networking, 14(11), 643.

Thomas, L., Briggs, P., Hart, A., & Kerrigan, F. (2017). Understanding social media and identity work in young people transitioning to university. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 541-553.

Voner, H. B., Kokol, P., Zavrnik, J., Zavrnik, J., & Zavrnik, J. (2016). A bibliometric retrospective of the journal computers in human behavior (1991-2015). Computers in Human Behavior, 65(C), 46-58.

White, H. D., & Mccain, K.W.(1998). Visualizing a discipline:An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327-356.

Wright, K. B., Rosenberg, J., Egbert, N., Ploeger, N.A., Bernard, D. R., & King, S. (2013). Communication competence, social support, and depression among college students:A model of Facebook and face-to-face support network influence. Journal of Health Communication, 18(1), 41-57

陈超美. (2010). 如何选取 CiteSpace 中的各项参数. Retrieved August 6, 2011, from http://blog.sciencenet.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=496649&do=blog&id=378974.

崔丽娟, 赵鑫, 吴明证, 徐爱红. (2006). 网络成瘾对青少年的社会性发展影响研究. 心理科学, 29(1), 34-36.

戴建华, 杭家蓓. (2011). 国内网络舆论的群体极化现象研究述评.情报科学, 29(11), 1747-1750.

董颖红, 陈浩, 赖凯声, 乐国安. (2015). 微博客基本社会情绪的测量及效度检验. 心理科学, 38(5), 1141-1146.

范翠英, 张孟, 何丹. (2017). 父母控制对初中生网络欺负的影响:道德推脱的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 25(3), 516-519.

方晓义, 刘璐, 邓林园, 刘勤学, 苏文亮, 兰菁. (2015). 青少年网络成瘾的预防与干预研究. 心理发展与教育, 31(1), 100-107.

高文斌, 陈祉妍. (2006). 网络成瘾病理心理机制及综合心理干预研究. 心理科学进展, 14(4), 596-603.

何威. (2004). 电子竞技的相关概念与类型分析. 体育文化导刊,5, 11-13.

侯剑华, 胡志刚. (2013). CiteSpace软件应用研究的回顾与展望. 现代情报, 33(4), 99-103.

雷雳. (2010). 青少年"网络成瘾"探析.心理发展与教育, 26(5), 554-560.

雷雳, 李征, 谢笑春, 舒畅. (2015). 青少年线下攻击与网络欺负的关系:交叉滞后检验. 苏州大学学报教育科学版, (3), 92-101.

李静娴, 唐文清, 武慧多, 杨健. (2016). 青少年网络成瘾与人格特征关系的Meta分析. 岭南师范学院学报, (3), 151-157.

李俊一. (2015). 网络欺负vs.传统欺负:欺负对青少年心理健康影响的元分析(硕士学位论文).四川师范大学,成都.

李文静, 童钰, 王福兴, 康素杰, 刘华山, 杨超. (2016). 动画教学代理对多媒体学习的影响:学习者经验与偏好的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 32(4), 453-462.

林绚晖, 阎巩固. (2001). 大学生上网行为及网络成瘾探讨. 中国心理卫生杂志, 15(4), 281-283.

刘勤学, 方晓义, 周楠. (2011). 青少年网络成瘾研究现状及未来展望. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 011(3), 65-70.

刘则渊, 王贤文, 陈超美. (2009). 科学知识图谱方法及其在科技情报中的应用. 数字图书馆论坛, 10(10), 14-34.

刘志华, 罗丽雯. (2010). 初中生网络成瘾的社会因素:人际关系的相关研究. 电化教育研究,(8), 111-115.

鲁婷, 江光荣, 魏华, 林秀彬, 韦辉, 应梦婷. (2016). 青少年自伤网络展示的动机及其影响. 心理科学,39(1), 103-108.

梅松丽, 柴晶鑫, 郭金花. (2015). 青少年主观幸福感与网络成瘾:自尊及自我控制的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 31(5), 603-609.

彭庆红, 樊富珉. (2005). 大学生网络利他行为及其对高校德育的启示. 思想理论教育导刊,(12), 49-51.

彭阳, 周世杰. (2007). 青少年网络成瘾与家庭环境、父母教养方式的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 15(4), 418-419.

钱铭怡, 章晓云, 黄峥, 张智丰, 聂晶. (2006). 大学生网络关系依赖倾向量表的初步编制. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 42(6), 802-807.

邱芬, 姚家新. (2007). 现代运动心理技能训练研究现状及未来走向. 武汉体育学院学报, 41(2), 44-48.

孙晓军, 柴唤友, 牛更枫, 崔曦曦, 连帅磊, 田媛. (2017). 社交网站中的自我表露对青少年孤独感的影响:一个有调节的中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 33(4), 477-486.

涂涛, 李文. (2015). 新媒体与未来教育. 中国电化教育, (1), 34-38.

王盼, 甘怡群, 李敏. (2006). 高中生电脑游戏成瘾倾向与父母教养方式的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 14(5), 460-462.

叶宝娟, 郑清, 姚媛梅, 赵磊. (2016). 道德推脱对大学生网络欺负的影响:网络道德的中介作用与道德认同的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志,(6), 1105-1107.

叶艳晖, 李秋琼. (2015). 同伴关系自我效能感与青少年网络成瘾的关系. 中国学校卫生, 36(3), 384-386.

王伟, 王兴超, 雷雳, 付晓洁. (2017). 移动社交媒介使用行为对青少年友谊质量的影响:网络自我表露和网络社会支持的中介作用. 心理科学, 40(4), 870-877.

谢笑春, 孙晓军, 周宗奎. (2013). 网络自我表露的类型? 功能及其影响因素. 心理科学进展, 21(2), 272-281.

徐碧波, 谢涵. 危险游戏入侵促生命教育升级. 中国教育报, 2017-08-02(002).

喻丰, 彭凯平, 郑先隽. (2015). 大数据背景下的心理学:中国心理学的学科体系重构及特征. 科学通报, 60(5), 520-533.

张兰君. (2009). 团体心理治疗和体育运动处方对大学生网络成瘾的干预. 心理科学,32(3), 738-741.

郑显亮, 王亚芹. (2017). 青少年网络利他行为与主观幸福感的关系——一个有中介的调节模型. 心理科学, 40(1), 70-75.

郑显亮, 赵薇. (2015). 中学生网络利他行为与希望的关系:自我效能感与自尊的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 31(4), 428-436.
[1] ZHANG Hao, MA Tianyu, WANG Yuan, LI Caina. Trajectory of Friendship Quality and Loneliness in Junior High School Students: A Multivariate Growth Model Analysis [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(2): 230-239.
[2] DU Xuan, LIN Jiayi, CHEN Lijing. The Space-time Metaphor of the Children and Teenagers [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2020, 36(5): 513-519.
[3] CHEN Haobin, LIU Jie. The Relations between Family Socioeconomic Status and Teenagers' Wisdom: the Mediating Roles of Positive Parenting Style and Openness Personality [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2018, 34(5): 558-566.
[4] SHI Xiafei, WANG Fang, ZUO Shijiang. Happiness or Meaning? The Orientations to Happiness of Teenagers and Its Effects on Their Learning Behaviors [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2015, 31(5): 586-593.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!