Psychological Development and Education ›› 2014, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 1-8.

    Next Articles

Relationship between the Magnitude Representation of Whole Numbers and Fractions for 3 to 6 Graders

ZHANG Li1, LU Cai-fang1, YANG Xin-rong2   

  1. 1. Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715;
    2. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715
  • Online:2014-01-15 Published:2014-01-15

Abstract: In order to explore the relationship between whole number magnitude representation and fraction magnitude representation as well as the influence of grade on the relationship, this study examined the performance of 155 third to sixth graders in the 0-1000 whole number line and 0-1 fraction line estimation tasks. The results showed (1) For whole number estimate, the estimates of most children fitted a linear function; (2) But for symbolic fractions only fifth and sixth graders produced estimates consistent with a linear function; (3) As a whole, whole number magnitude representation (WMR) was positively related to symbolic fraction magnitude representation (SFMR). However, the grade had significant influence on the relationship between WMR and SFMR: only fifth and sixth grader's WMR could significantly predict SFMR but third and fourth grader's WMR could not.

Key words: number line estimation, magnitude representation, logarithmic function, linear function

CLC Number: 

  • B844.1

Bonato, M., Fabbri, S., Umiltà, C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). The mental representation of numerical fractions: Real or integer? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1410-1419.

Bright, G. W., Behr, M. J., Post, T. R., & Wachsmuth, I. (1988). Identifying fractions on number lines. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(3), 215-232.

Booth, J. L., & Siegler, R. S. (2006). Developmental and individual differences in pure numerical estimation. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 189-201.

Booth, J. L., & Siegler, R. S. (2008). Numerical magnitude representations influence arithmetic learning. Child Development, 79 (4), 1016-1031.

Carpenter, T. P., Corbitt, M. K., Kepner, H., Jr., Lindquist, M. M., & Reys, R. (1981). Results from the second mathematics assessment of the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Fazio, L. K., Bailey, D. H., Thompson, C. A., & Siegler, R. S. (2013, Apr). Relations of symbolic and non-symbolic fraction and whole number magnitude representations to each other and to mathematics achievement. Spoken presentation to be given at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research on Child Development, Seattle, WA.

Hecht, S., Vagi, K., & Torgensen, J. (2007). Fraction skills and proportional reasoning. In: Berch, D., Mazzocco, M. (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children (pp.121-132). Paul H. Brookes Publishing, Baltimore.

Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. (1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation. Cognition, 44(1), 43-74.

Geary, D. C., Frensch, P. A., & Wiley, J. G. (1993). Simple and complex mental subtraction: Strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 8, 242-256.

Iuculano, T., & Butterworth, B. (2011). Understanding the real value of fractions and Decimals.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(11), 2088-2098.

Laski, E. V., & Siegler, R. S. (2007). Is 27 a big number? Correlational and causal connections among numerical categorization, number line estimation, and numerical magnitude comparison. Child Development, 76,1723-1743.

Mack, N. (1995). Confounding whole-number and fraction concepts when building on informal knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 422-441.

Mix, K. S., Huttenlocher, J., & Levine, S. C. (2002). Multiple cues for quantification in infancy: Is number one of them?. Psychological Bulletin, 128(2), 278-294.

Ni, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2005). Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: The origins and implications of whole number bias. Educational Psychologist, 40 (1), 27-52.

Opfer, J. E., & Devries, J. M. (2008). Representational Change and Magnitude Estimation: Why Young Children can Make More Accurate Salary Comparisons than Adults. Cognition, 108(3), 843-849.

Opfer, J. E., & Siegler, R. S. (2007). Representational change and children's numerical estimation. Cognitive Psychology, 55, 169-195.

Pearn, C., & Stephens, M. (2004). Why do you have to probe to discover what Year 8 students really think about fractions. In I. Putt, R. Faragher, & M. McLean (Eds.), Mathematics education for the third millennium: Towards 2010 (Vol. 2, pp. 430-437). Sydney: MERGA.

Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. P. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.

Stafylidou, S., & Vosniadou, S. (2004). The development of student's understanding of the numerical value of fractions. Learning and Instruction, 14(5), 508-518.

Smith, C. L., Solomon, G. E. A., & Carey, S. (2005). Never getting to zero: Elementary school students' understanding of the infinite divisibility of number and matter. CognitivePsychology, 51, 101-140.

Siegler, R. S., & Booth, J. L. (2004). Development of numerical estimation in young children. Child Development,75(2), 428-444.

Siegler, R. S., Fazio, L. K., Bailey, D. H., & Zhou, X. (2013). Fractions: The new frontier for theories of numerical development. Trends in Cognitive Science, 17, 13-19.

Siegler, R. S., & Opfer, J. (2003). The development of numerical estimation: Evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity. Psychological Science, 14, 237-243.

Siegler, R. S., & Ramani, G. B. (2008). Playing linear numerical board games promotes low-income children's numerical development. Development Science, 11(5), 655-661.

Siegler, R. S., Thompson, C. A., & Opfer, J. E. (2009). The logarithmic-to-linear shift: One learning sequence, many tasks, many time scales. Mind, Brain, and Education, 2, 143-150.

Siegler, R. S., Thompson, C. A., & Schneider, M. (2011). An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development. Cognitive Psychology,62 (4), 273-296.

Thompson, C. A., & Opfer, J. E. (2008). Costs and benefits of representational change: Effects of context on age and sex differences in symbolic magnitude estimation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 101(1), 20-51.

Thompson, C. A., & Opfer, J. (2010). How 15 hundred is like 15 cherries: Effect of progressive alignment on representational changes in numerical cognition. Child Development, 81, 1768-1786.

Thompson, C. A., & Siegler, R. S. (2010). Linear numerical magnitude representations aid children's memory for numbers. Psychological Science, 21, 1274-1281

周广东, 莫雷,温红博. (2009). 儿童数字估计的表征模式与发展. 心理发展与教育, 25(4), 21-29.

张丽, 辛自强, 王琦, 李红. (2012). 整数构成对分数加工的影响. 心理发展与教育, 1, 37-44.

李晓芹. 小学儿童数字线估计的发展研究. 曲阜师范大学, 2008.

郭红力. 小学高年级儿童的分数数量表征. 山东师范大学, 2010.
[1] GAO Ruiyan, NIU Meixin, YANG Tao, ZHOU Xinlin. The Accuracy and Form of Fraction Magnitude Representation for 4 to 8 Graders [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2018, 34(4): 443-452.
[2] ZHANG Fan, LAI Yinghui, CHEN Yinghe. Development of Children's Number Line Estimation: the Influence of Mental Distance [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2015, 31(2): 149-156.
[3] CHEN Yinghe. The Developmental Characteristics and Psychological Mechanisms of the Magnitude Representation and Number Concept in Children [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2015, 31(1): 21-28.
[4] LU Chun, GUO Hong-Li, SI Ji-wei, SUN Yan. Representation Patterns of Children’s and Adults’ Fraction Estimation on Different Number Lines [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2014, 30(5): 449-456.
[5] WANG Jing, CHEN Ying-he, CAO Shi-ying. Representation of Analog Magnitude:Discrete Quantity or Continuous Quantity [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2011, 27(1): 1-8.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!