Psychological Development and Education ›› 2013, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 121-130.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on the Influencing Factors of Perceptual Span in Chinese Reading

YAN Guo-li1, ZHANG Qiao-ming1,2, BAI Xue-jun1   

  1. 1. Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074, China;
    2. Institute of Educational Science, Ludong University, Yantai 264011, China
  • Online:2013-03-15 Published:2013-03-15

Abstract: Perceptual span refers to the area of effective vision from which useful information can be obtained during a fixation in reading (McConkie and Rayner, 1975; Rayner and Pollatsek, 1989;D. Shen et al.,2008). Research has demonstrated that skilled adult readers of Chinese obtain useful information from an asymmetric region extending roughly 1 character spaces to the left of fixation to about 2~3 character spaces to the right of fixation. To determine the size of the perceptual span, the classic gaze-contingent moving-window technique was developed (McConkie and Rayner, 1975 ). In this technique, the text outside a pre-defined window around the point of fixation is masked by Xs or scrambled letters. Thus, wherever the reader looks, the text is visible within the window, but outside the window the text is disrupted in some way. By varying the masking material, the researcher have found the perceptual span is different in English and other alphabetic writing systems. In the present study gaze-contingent moving-window technique was used to explore the development of perceptual span in Chinese reading. 24 third graders, 24 fifth graders and 24 college students participated in the experiment. Their eye movements were recorded with a SR Research EyeLink 2K eye tracker. 120 sentences were presented in six viewing conditions (R0, L1R1,L2R2, L3R3, L4R4 and whole line) to examine the perceptual span of participants in different conditions. The results showed: (1)Ages, material difficulties and reading skill affected perceptual span independently. (2) The third graders could obtain useful information from a region about 1~2 character spaces to the right of fixation, and the perceptual span of the fifth graders and adults was about 2~3 character spaces to the right of fixation. (3) Compared with easy materials, the reading efficiency of reading difficult materials was lower, average fixation time was longer, perceptual span and forward saccade amplitude was smaller. (4)perceptual span of higher readers was larger than that of slower readers, especially in reading easy materials.In summary, the perceptual span is affected by age, difficulty of materials and reading ability. The perceptual span of reading is larger with the development of age and reading ability, and the readers can get larger perceptual span of easy material than difficult ones.

Key words: Chinese reading, perceptual span, gaze-contingent moving-window technique, eye movement

CLC Number: 

  • B844
Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., Liversedge, S. P., Zang, C. L., & Rayner, K. (2008). Reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1277-1287.
Chen, H.-C., & Tang, C.K. (1998). The effective visual field in reading Chinese. Reading and Writing, 10, 3-5.
Gray, W. S. (1956). The teaching of reading and writing: An international survey. Chicago: Scott Foresman.
Häikiö, T., Bertram R., Hyönä, J., & Niemi, P. (2009). Development of the letter identity span in reading:Evidence from the eye movement moving window paradigm. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,102, 167-181.
Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading:Implications for attention and eye movement control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,Memory,and Cognition, 16,417-429.
Inhoff, A. W., & Liu, W. (1998). The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 20-34.
Kennison, S. M., & Clifton, C. (1995). Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: Implications for eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 68-81.
Leong, C.K., Tse, S. K.,Loh,K.Y.,& Hau,K.T. (2008). Text comprehension in Chinese children: Relative contribution of verbal working memory, pseudoword reading, rapid automatized naming, and onset-rime phonological segmentation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100: 135-149.
McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 578-586.
McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1976). Asymmetry of the perceptual span in reading. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 8, 365-368.
Rayner,K. (1986). Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 211-236.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
Rayner, K. (2009). The thirty-fifth Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457-1506.
Rayner, K., & Bertera, J. H. (1979). Reading without a fovea. Science, 206, 468-469.
Rayner, K.,Castelhano,M.S. & Yang, J.(2009). Eye Movements and the Perceptual Span in Older and Younger Readers. Psychology and Aging, 24, 755-760.
Rayner, K., Liversedge, S. P., & White, S. J. (2006). Eye movements when reading disappearing text:The importance of the word to the right of fixation.Vision Research, 46, 310-323.
Rayner, K. & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Rayner, K., Slattery, T. J., & Bélanger, N. N. (2010). Eye movements, the perceptual span, and reading speed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 834-839.
Rayner, K., Well, A. D., & Pollatsek, A. (1980). Asymmetry of the effective visual field in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 537-544.
Shen, D., Bai, X., Yan, G., & Liversedge, S.P. (2008). The perceptual span in Chinese reading. In K. Rayner, D. Shen, X. Bai, & G. Yan (Eds.). Cognitive and cultural influences on eye movements (pp.255-276). Tianjin: Tianjin People's Publishing House.
Sun, F., & Feng, D. (1999). Eye movements in reading Chinese and English text. In J. Wang & A. W. Inhoff & H.-C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 189-206). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
White, S. J., Rayner, K., & Liversedge, S. P. (2005). Eye movements and the modulation of parafoveal processing by foveal processing difficulty: A reexamination.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,12, 891-896
伏干, 闫国利. (2008). 高中二年级学生双字词阅读知觉广度的眼动研究. 心理与行为研究, 6, 285-290.
熊建萍, 闫国利, 白学军. (2007). 高中二年级学生中文阅读知觉广度的眼动研究. 心理与行为研究, 5(1), 60-64.
熊建萍, 闫国利, 白学军. (2009).不同年级学生汉语阅读知觉广度的眼动研究. 心理科学, 32, 584-587.
闫国利, 伏干, 白学军. (2008). 不同难度阅读材料对阅读知觉广度影响的眼动研究. 心理科学, 31, 1287-1290.
闫国利, 王丽红, 巫金根, 白学军. (2011). 不同年级学生阅读知觉广度及预视效益的眼动研究. 心理学报, 43, 249-263.
闫国利, 巫金根, 胡晏雯, 白学军. (2010). 当前阅读的眼动研究范式述评. 心理科学进展, 18, 1966-1976.
闫国利, 巫金根, 臧传丽, 白学军. (2010). 阅读知觉广度眼动研究述评. 心理学探新, 30(2), 23-28.
闫国利, 熊建萍, 白学军. (2008). 小学五年级学生汉语阅读知觉广度的眼动研究. 心理发展与教育, 24(1), 72-77.
[1] WANG Jingxin, ZHAO Sainan, XU Qianqian. Effects of Spacing and Word Frequency on the Reading of Young and Older Adults: An Eye Movement Study [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(6): 781-787.
[2] GAO Zihui, JIAO Yu, WANG Xi, LIU Xiaocen. The Influence of Dynamic and Static Text Presentation of Electronic Picture Books on Children’s Reading Experience and Learning Effect [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(6): 817-824.
[3] YU Xiao, ZHANG Han, CHEN Yinghe, QI Yue, LIU Aifang, LIU Lili. Eye Movement Research of Analogical Reasoning: An Effective Way to Reveal the Developing Analogical Reasoning Strategies [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(6): 897-903.
[4] SHI Fangting, ZHENG Chenye, YAN Xiulin, LU Lu, WANG Jingmei, DI Bo, LU Yingjun. An Eye-movement Research on 5~6-year-old Children's Recognition of Cartoon Faces in Different Culture Backgrounds [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(3): 323-334.
[5] MA Anran, WANG Yanqing, WANG Fuxing, ZHOU Zhijin. Effects of Accelerating the Playback of Micro Teaching Video on Learning Performance [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(3): 391-399.
[6] LIU Zhifang, TONG Wen, ZHANG Jun. Aging Effects on Word Processing in Chinese Reading: Evidences from Eye Movements [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2019, 35(6): 665-677.
[7] ZHANG Jun, TONG Wen, LIU Zhifang. The Aging of Perceptual Span in Different Word Length Sentences: Evidences from Eye Movement [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2019, 35(3): 312-319.
[8] CHEN Chaoyang, LIU Zhifang, SU Yongqiang, CHENG Yahua. The Prediction Effects for Skill and Less-skill Deaf Readers in Chinese Reading: Evidence from Eye Movement [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2018, 34(6): 692-699.
[9] SU Yongqiang, FU Fuyin, LIU Zhifang, CHEN Chaoyang. Exploring the Reasons of Aging Effect on Encoding Multiple Words during Chinese Reading:Evidence from Disappearing Text [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2017, 33(4): 433-440.
[10] LI Wenjing, TONG Yu, WANG Fuxing, KANG Sujie, LIU Huashan, YANG Chao. Effect of Animation Pedagogical Agent in Multimedia Learning: The Role of Learner's Experience and Agent Preference [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2016, 32(4): 453-462.
[11] QIAN Yingying, WANG Fuxing, DUAN Zhaohui, ZHOU Zongkui. The Effect of Animation's Presentation Speed and Learner's Prior Knowledge on Multimedia Learning [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2016, 32(2): 191-197.
[12] ZHANG Yujing, MAI Hefulaiti·Kan ji, ZU Murantiguli·Ranmutula. The Perceptual Span of Different Reading Level Uyghur Students in Fifth Grade in Uyghur Reading [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2015, 31(6): 703-709.
[13] BAI Xuejun, GUO Zhiying, WANG Yongsheng, GAO Xiaolei, YAN Guoli. The Landing Positions of Older and Younger Adults while Reading Spaced Text [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2015, 31(2): 171-179.
[14] BAI Xuejun, LI Xin, YAN Guoli. Eye Movement Control in Chinese Reading: A Summary over the Past 20 Years of Research [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2015, 31(1): 85-91.
[15] LIU Ni-na, TONG Wen, YAN Guo-li. The Development of Chinese Orthographic Awareness in Pre-school Children [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2014, 30(5): 457-465.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!