Psychological Development and Education ›› 2009, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (3): 68-76.
Previous Articles Next Articles
JIANG Qiu-rong, LI Hong
CLC Number:
| [1] Hongwanishkul D, Happaney K R, Lee W S.Assessment of hotand cool executive function in young children:age related changes and individual differences.Developmental Neuropsychology, 2005, 28(2):617-644 [2] Zelazo P D, Mller U.Executive function in typical and atypi cal development.In.Goswami U, Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development.Oxford:Blackwell, 2002:445-469 [3] Zelazo P D, Craik F M.EF across the life span.Acta Psychologia, 2004, 115(3):167-183 [4] Zelazo P D.The dimensional change card sort task(DCCS):a method of assessing executive function in children.N at Protocols, 2006, 3 (1):297-301 [5] Zelazo P D, Frye D.Cognitive complexity and cont rol:Ⅱ. Development of executive function.Current Directions in Psychologi cal Science, 1998, 7(3):121-126 [6] Bialystok E, Martin M M.Attention and inhibition in bilingual children:evidence from the dimensional change card sort task. Developmental Science, 2004, 7(3):325-339 [7] Zelazo P D, Muller U, Frye D.The development of executive function in early childhood:IV.what do children perseverate on when they perseverate.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. 2003, 2(1):65-72 [8] Zelazo P D, Frye D, Rapus T.An age-related dissociation between knowing rules and using them.Cognitive Development, 1996, 11(3):37-63 [9] Jacques S, K irkham N Z, Semcesen T K.Rule selection versus rule execution in preschoolers:an error-detection approach.Developmental Psychology, 1999, 35(3):770-780 [10] Graeme S H, Bunc K.Problem decomposability as a factor in complexity of the dimensional change card sort task.Cognitive Development, 2007, 22(3):384-391 [11] Diamond A, K irkham N, Amso D.Conditions under which young children can hold two rules in mind and inhibita preponderate response. Developmental Psychology, 2002, 38(3):352-362 [12] Rennie D A, Bull R, Diamond A.Executive functioning in preschoolers:reducing the inhibitory demands of the dimensional change card sort task.Developmental Neuropsychology, 2004, 26(1):423-443. [13] Towse J, Redbond J.Understanding the dimensional change card sort perspectives from task success and failure.Cognitive Development, 2000, 15:347-365 [14] Bohlmann N L, Fenson L.The effect's of feedback on preservative errors in preschool aged children.Journal of Cognition and Development, 2005, 6(1):119-131 [15] Kirkham N Z, Cruess L, Diamond A.Helping children apply their knowledge to their behavior on a dimension-switching task.Developmental Science, 2003, 6(5):449-476 [16] M llera U, Zelazo P D, Luryec L E.The effect of labeling on preschool children's performance in the D imensional Change Card Sort Task. Cognitive Development, 2008, 23(3):395-408 [17] Lang B.What causes 3-year olds difficulty on the dimensional change card sorting task.Infant&Child Development, 2001, 7(3):21-25 [18] Kloo D, Perner J.Disentangling dimensions in the dimensional change card-sorting task.Developmental Science, 2005, 8(1):44-56 [19] Kloo D, Pernera J, K erschhubera A.Sorting between dimensions: conditions of cognitive flexibility in preschoolers.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2008, 100(2):115-134 [20] Mack W.Improving post-switch performance in the dimensional change card-sorting task:the importance of the switch and of pertaining by r-e describing the test cards.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2007, 98(4):243-251 [21] Towse J N, Lewisa C, Knowles M.When knowledge is notenough the phenomenon of goal neglectin preschool children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2007, 96(4):320-332 [22] Paulitzki J R, Riskoa E F, Oakmana J M.Doing the unpleasant: how the emotional nature of a threat-relevant task aff ects task-swit ching. Personality and Individual Dif ferences, 2008, 45(5):350-355 [23] Qu L, Zelazo P D.The facilitative effect of positive stimulion 3-year-olds flexible rule use.Cognitive Development.2007, 22(4):456-473 [24] Ravizzaa S M, Carter C S.Shifting setabout task swit ching: behavioral and neural evidence for distinct forms of cognitive flexibility. Neuropsychologia, 2008, 46(12):2924-2935 [25] Zelazo P D, Muller U, Frye D.The development of executive function in early childhood:V.negative priming and executive function. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 2003, 2(1): 73-92 [26] Grison S, Tipper S P, Hewitt O.Long-term negative priming: support for retrieval of prior attention processes.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2005, 58(7):1199-1224. [27] Zelazo P D, Muller U, Frye D.The development of executive function in early childhood:.The development of executive function: Cognitive complexity and contro-l revised.Monographs of the society for research in child development, 2003, 3(1):93-119 [28] Bestgen Y, Dupont V.Is negative priming a reliable measure for studying individual differences in inhibition?Current Psychology of Cognition, 2002, 19(2):287-305 [29] Amso D, Johnson S P.Selection and inhibition in infancy: evidence from the spatial negative priming paradigm.Cognition, 2005, 95 (B):27-36 [30] Carlson S M.Developmentally sensitive measures of executive function in preschool children.Developmental Neuropsychology, 2005, 28 (2):595-616 [31] Simone P M, Ahrens K, Foerde K E G.Influence of attended repetition trials on negative priming in younger and older adult s.Memory& Cognition, 2006, 34(1):187-195 [32] Muller U, Dick A S, Zelazo P D.The role of negative priming in preschoolers flexible rule use on the dimensional change card sort task. Child Development, 2006, 77(2):395-412 [33] McArthur A D.Inhibitory mechanisms, interference, and the attritional blink in younger and older adults.1996. [34] Espy K A Using developmental, cognitive, and neuroscience approaches to understand executive control in young children.Developmental Neuropsychology, 2004, 26(1):379-384 [35] Bugg J M.Mechanisms of executive control:behavioral investigations of the confl ictadaptation effect.2001. [36] Waszak F, Hommel B, Allport A.Interaction of task readiness and automatic retrieval in task switching:negative priming and competit or priming.Memory&Cognition, 2005, 33(4):595-610 [37] Engle R W, Conway A R, Tuholski S W.A resource account of inhibition.Psychological Science, 1995, 6(2):31-40. |
|
||
