Psychological Development and Education ›› 2003, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (4): 7-11.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Development of Theory of Mind and Its Relations with Inhibitory Control

XU Fen1, WANG Wei-xing1, GAO Shan1, Mark Sabbagh2   

  1. 1. School of psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
    2. Queen's University, Canada
  • Online:2003-10-15 Published:2003-10-15

Abstract: The present study examined the developmental level of Theory of Mind(Tom for short)between 3-and 4-year olds and whether there is any relationship between the performance of false-belief task and inhibitory control task.The results showed that there is a significant change between 3-and 4-year olds,and the children's who gave correct answer in false-belief task did better in inhibitory conflict task than those who had wrong responses in false2 belief task.Moreover,there were significant correlations between the score in task of false-belief and in the task of inhibitory conflict except for false-belief of others.

Key words: false-belief, theory of mind, Inhibitory control, executive function

CLC Number: 

  • B842.12
[1] Wimmer H, & Mayringer H. False belief understanding in young children: Explanations do not develop before predictions. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 1998,22(3): 403-422.
[2] Gopnik A, & Wellman H. The theory theory. In L Hirschfeld &S Gelman (eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture. NY: Cambridge University Press, 1994:257-293.
[3] Taylor M, & Carlson S. The relation between individual differences in fantasy and theory of mind. Child Development, 1997, 68(2):436-455.
[4] Carlson S, & Moses L. Individual differences in inhibitory control and children's theory of mind. Child Development, 2001, 72(4):1032-1053.
[5] Carlson S, Moses L, & Hix H. The role of inhibitory processes in young children' s difficulties with deception and false belief. Child Development, 1998, 69(3): 673-691.
[6] Moses L. Executive accounts of theory of mind development.Child Development, 2001,72(3): 688-690.
[7] Perner J, & Lang B. Theory of mind and executive function: is there a developmental relationship? In S Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. Cohen (eds.), Understanding other minds: perspectives from autism and developmental cognitive neuroscience. UK: Oxford University Press, 2000: 150-181.
[8] Perner J, Lang B, & Kloo D. Theory of mind and self-control:more than a common problem of inhibition. Child Development, 2002, 73(3): 752-767.
[9] 王益文,张文新.3~6岁儿童"心理理论"的发展,心理发展与教育,2002,18(1):11-15.
[10] 邓赐平,桑标,缪小春.幼儿心理理论发展的一般认知基础.心理科学,2002,25(5):531-534.
[1] LIU Yanchun, DENG Yuting, ZHANG Xi. Sharing Behavior towards Different Recipients in Children with Intellectual Disabilities: The Role of Theory of Mind [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(2): 160-168.
[2] PENG Yue, ZHANG Heyi, CHEN Yinghe, LEI Xiuya, QI Yue, YU Xiao, QIAO Xuewen, LIU Moxuan, YAN Luyi. Age Differences in Analogical Reasoning Strategies and Their Relationships with Working Memory and Inhibitory Control [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(6): 761-771.
[3] YAN Zhiqiang, ZHOU Ke, ZENG Xiao, XU Hui, ZHU Xiaoqian, ZHANG Juan. The Relationship between Preschooler’s Executive Function and Aggressive Behavior: The Mediation Effect of Cognitive Empathy [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(6): 788-797.
[4] YU Xiao, ZHANG Heyi, QI Yue, CHEN Yinghe, LIU Haoning, ZHAO Yuxi, QIAO Xuewen. The Role of Inhibitory Control in the Development of Analogical Mapping: Cognitive Load Matters [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(1): 1-11.
[5] LIU Yu, SU Yanjie, CAO Chunmei, DING Yu, FAN Yu. The Relationship between Executive Function and Processing Speed with Athletic Ability of the Community Elderly [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(6): 769-777.
[6] YAN Yixia, LIU Yanying, DING Fang. The Effects of Theory of Mind and the Pattern of Social Interactions on the Development of Social Mindfulness in Junior High School Students [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(4): 485-494.
[7] WU Guojing, CHENG Xuelin, LI Ye, BAI Rong, XING Shufen, LI Yuhua. The Reciprocal Relations between Executive Functions and Language Ability: The Moderating Effects of Socioeconomic Status [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(2): 186-194.
[8] WANG Ying, ZHU Haidong, ZHANG Xinyi, XIAO Yan. The Influence of Parent-child Attachment on the Executive Function of Left-behind Preschool Children: Grandparent-child Attachment as a Mediator and Moderator [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(2): 195-206.
[9] GE Guohong. The Relationship between Adult Attachment and Theory of Mind: The Mediators of Cognitive Fusion and Experiential Avoidance [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(2): 223-235.
[10] BAI Rong, YAN Rong, WANG Qian, LI Ye, XING Shufen. The Relationships between Executive Functions and Problem Behavior: Situational Specificity and Gender Differences [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(1): 35-44.
[11] REN Yi, HUANG Silin. The Mechanisms of Poverty Impedes Children's Executive Function [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(1): 134-143.
[12] WANG Xinghua, HONG Huifang, ZHU Ruiling. The Relationship between Mother-child Interaction and Executive Function of 2~3-year-old Children: Moderating Effect of Children's Temperament [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(6): 784-791.
[13] ZHAN Shuwei, YANG Ning, ZHAO Bihua. Receptive Language Skills and Social Withdrawal among Chinese Left-behind Preschool Children: A Moderated Mediation Model [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(6): 834-844.
[14] XIAO Xue, LIU Lu, LIU Lisha, XU Liangyuan, ZHANG Xuran, LI Yanfang. Group Bias in Children's Merit-based Resource Allocation: The Role of Theory of Mind [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(4): 498-507.
[15] MU Defang, CHEN Yinghe. How Metacognitive Monitoring Influence WCST of Higher Graders in Primary School: The Moderating Role of Executive Function [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(3): 305-312.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!