Psychological Development and Education ›› 2003, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2): 1-8.

    Next Articles

Individual Difference of Pupil Figural Reasoning Strategy in Primary School

WO Jian-zhong, LIN Chong-de, CHIN Hao-ying, CAO Ling-yan   

  1. Developmental Psychology Institute, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
  • Online:2003-04-15 Published:2003-04-15

Abstract: This study examined the individual difference of figural reasoning strategies in 145 children selected from a primary school by 14 figures selected from CRT Raven Progressive Matrix under a series of rules.The results showed that there is significant difference in strategy use between the higher level children and the lower level children whose characteristic is same to the children's in the first grade.Except the Gestalt problems,children with higher reasoning ability and those with lower showed differences while using strategy.No matter what higher level children and the lower level children all use perceptual operation strategy in easy Gestalt problems.The higher and middle level mathematic and reaming ability's children use mostly analytic strategy and perceptual strategy,and low level children use perceptual matching strategy in the Quantitative pair wise progression,Figure addition or subtraction,two level rules,Distribution of two values,Distribution of three values problems.

Key words: strategy, figural reasoning, CRT Raven Progressive Matrix primary scholars

[1] 斯腾伯格著.超越IQ——人类智力的三元理论.华东师范大学出版社,2000年.
[2] 戴斯,纳格利尔里,柯尔比.认知过程的评估——智力的PASS理论.华东师范大学出版社,1999年.
[3] 林苒.思维策略作为智力水平诊断指标的有效性研究.心理科学,1991,2:
[4] Siegler R S. The Perils of Averaging Data Over Strategies: An example from children's addition. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 1987, 116(3):250-264.
[5] Siegler R S. Strategy choice procedures and the development of multiplication skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1988,117(3):258-275.
[6] Geary D C, Dubree M B. external validation of the strategy choice model of addition. Journal of experimental child psychology, 1989,47:175-192.
[7] Foorman B R,Sadowski B R,Basen J A. Children's solutions for figural matrices: developmental differences in strategies and effects of matrix characteristics. Journal of experimental child psychology, 1985,39:107-130.
[8] Carpenter P A, Just M A, Shell P. What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the raven progressive matrices test. Psychological review, 1990,97(3):404-431.
[9] Siegler R S,Patrick Lemaire. Older and younger adults' strategy choices in multiplication: testing predictions of ASCM using the choice/no-choice method. Journal of experimental psychology: General,1997,126(1):71-92.
[10] Lawson,Kirby. Training in information processing algorithms. British Journal of educational psychology, 1981,51: 321-335.
[11] Hunt E. Quote the Revan? Never more. In L. W. Gregg (Ed.). Knowledge and Psychological Measurement, 1974. 235-248.
[12] 林崇德.学习与发展.北京师范大学出版社,1999.
[13] 林崇德,沃建中,陈浩莺,小学生图形推理策略发展特点的研究,心理科学,2003,26(1):2-8.
[1] PENG Yue, ZHANG Heyi, CHEN Yinghe, LEI Xiuya, QI Yue, YU Xiao, QIAO Xuewen, LIU Moxuan, YAN Luyi. Age Differences in Analogical Reasoning Strategies and Their Relationships with Working Memory and Inhibitory Control [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(6): 761-771.
[2] YU Xiao, ZHANG Han, CHEN Yinghe, QI Yue, LIU Aifang, LIU Lili. Eye Movement Research of Analogical Reasoning: An Effective Way to Reveal the Developing Analogical Reasoning Strategies [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(6): 897-903.
[3] LIU Weifang, ZHANG Jiajia, HU Dongmei, ZHANG Mingliang, SI Jiwei. Metacognitive Monitoring and Arithmetic Knowledge Restrict the Development of Strategy Use in Arithmetic Calculation in Primary School Children: One-year Longitudinal Study [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2019, 35(4): 439-446.
[4] LAI Yinghui, YIN Chenxin, CHEN Yinghe. The Performance of Proportional Reasoning Strategies of Children in grade 4 to 6 under Different Types of Tasks [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2016, 32(4): 385-393.
[5] GAO Ting, LIU Rude, LIU Ying, ZHUANG Hongjuan. The Processing of Fractions Comparison Task in Elementary Students: Reaction Time and Trial-by-Trial Strategy Reports as Evidences [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2016, 32(4): 463-470.
[6] DAI Man, LIU Ru-de, DI Miao-ci, MA Xue-ying, XU Le. The Effects of Working Memory Load and Automatic Retrieval on Elementary School Students Mental Addition Strategy Execution [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2014, 30(4): 420-426.
[7] LIU Wei-fang, HUA Xiao-teng, FENG Hong-min, HU Dong-mei, SI Ji-wei. The Age-Related Differences of Arithmetic Strategy Use in Calculation:The Role of Metacognitive Monitoring and Arithmetic Knowledge [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2014, 30(3): 234-243.
[8] SUN Yan, SI Ji-wei, XU Yan-li. The Effect of Math Anxiety on College Students’/Children’s Strategy Use in Computational Estimation:A Comparative Study [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2012, 28(3): 263-270.
[9] LI Qing-gong, XU Fen, ZHOU Xiao-mei. The Development of the 3-to 5-year-olds’ Strategies When Making Trust Judgment Based on Trustee’s Competence [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2012, 28(2): 140-144.
[10] ZHANG Li, XIN Zi-qiang, WANG Qi, LI Hong. The influence of constituent integers on the processing of fractions [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2012, 28(1): 31-38.
[11] TIAN Lan, ZHANG Da-jun. An Experimental Study on Enhancing Story-writing Quality of Pupils with Writing Difficulties through Planning Strategy Instruction [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2011, 27(3): 282-288.
[12] CHEN Ying-he, HAO Jia-jia. Individual Differences in Reflective-Impulsive Cognitive Style: Children’s Problem Solving and Metacognition [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2011, 27(3): 241-246.
[13] ZHOU Shao-xian, WANG Fu-xing, XU Fei-fei, CHEN Jun. Strategies’Utilization Deficiency of Three to Six Grade Students When Solving Multi-Subtraction Problem [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2010, 26(5): 465-472.
[14] JIANG Yuan, SHEN De-li, BAI Xue-jun. The Relationship among Emotion,Emotion Regulation Strategy and Memory of Emotionl materials [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2009, 25(4): 75-80.
[15] ZHANG Rong-hua, KANG Xuan, PENG Wen-bo, LIU Dian-zhi. A study on College Students’ English Learning Strategy Characteristics and Development Trend [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2008, 24(3): 94-99.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!