Psychological Development and Education ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 636-644.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2024.05.04
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Jinfeng, LIU Jing
CLC Number:
| Arnett, J. J. (2007). Themyth of peer influence in adolescent smoking initiation. Health Education & Behavior, 34(4), 594-607. Bandura, A. (1978). The self system in reciprocal determinism.American Psychologist, 33(4), 344-358. Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977).Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-hall. Barhight, L. R., Hubbard, J. A., & Hyde, C. T. (2013). Children's physiological and emotional reactions to witnessing bullying predict bystander intervention. Child Development, 84(1), 375-390. Brechwald, W. A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2011). Beyond homophily: A decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 166-179. Brock, D. M., Sarason, I. G., Sanghvi, H., & Gurung, R. (1998). The perceived acceptance scale: Development and validation.Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 15(1), 5-21. Byrne, D., & Griffitt, W. (1973). Interpersonalattraction. Annual Review of Psychology, 24(1), 90-121. Cappella, E., & Hwang, S. H. (2015). Peercontexts in schools: Avenues toward behavioral health in early adolescence. Behavioral Medicine, 41(3), 80-89. Chen, G. H., Zhao, Q. L., Dishion, T., & Deater-Deckard, K. (2018). The association between peer network centrality and aggression is moderated by moral disengagement. Aggressive Behavior, 44(6), 571-580. Chu, X. W., Fan, C. Y., Liu, Q. Q., & Zhou, Z. K. (2018). Stability and change of bullying roles in the traditional and virtual contexts: A three-wave longitudinal study in Chinese early adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(11), 2384-2400. Deptula, D. P., & Cohen, R. (2004). Aggressive, rejected, and delinquent children and adolescents: A comparison of their friendships.Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9(1), 75-104. Dijkstra, J. K., Berger, C., & Lindenberg, S. (2011). Do physical and relational aggression explain adolescents' friendship selection? The competing roles of network characteristics, gender, and social status.Aggressive Behavior, 37(5), 417-429. Dijkstra, J. K., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Borch, C. (2013). Popularity and adolescent friendship networks:Selection and influence dynamics. Developmental Psychology, 49(7), 1242-1252. Dijkstra, J. K., Cillessen, A. H. N., Lindenberg, S., & Veenstra, R. (2010). Basking in reflected glory and its limits: Why adolescents hang out with popular peers. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(4), 942-958. Doehne, M., Grundherr, M. V., & Schäfer, M. (2018). Peer influence in bullying: The autonomy-enhancing effect of moral competence. Aggressive Behavior, 44(6), 591-600. Duffy, A. L., & Nesdale, D. (2010). Peer groups, social identity, and children's bullying behavior. Social Development, 18(1), 121-139. Gallupe, O., McLevey, J., & Brown, S. (2018). Selection andinfluence: A meta-analysis of the association between peer and personal offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 35(2), 313-335. Harris, J. R. (1998).The nurture assumption: Why children turn out the way they do. New York: The Free Press. Hayes, A. F. (2013).Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Huitsing, G., Snijders, T. A. B., Van Duijn, M. A. J., & Veenstra, R. (2014). Victims, bullies, and their defenders: A longitudinal study of the coevolution of positive and negative networks. Development and Psychopathology, 26(3), 645-659. Juvonen, J., & Graham, S. (2014). Bullying inschools: The power of bullies and the plight of victims. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 159-185. Kandel, D. B. (1978). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships.American Journal of Sociology, 84(2), 427-436. Laninga-Wijnen, L., Harakeh, Z., Steglich, C., Dijkstra, J. K., Veenstra, R., & Vollebergh, W. (2017). The norms of popular peers moderate friendship dynamics of adolescent aggression. Child Development, 88(4), 1265-1283. Laninga-Wijnen, L., Steglich, C., Harakeh, Z., Vollebergh, W., Veenstra, R., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2020). The role of prosocial and aggressive popularity norm combinations in prosocial and aggressive friendship processes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(3), 645-663. Logis, H. A., Rodkin, P. C., Gest, S. D., & Ahn, H. J. (2013). Popularity as anorganizing factor of preadolescent friendship networks: Beyond prosocial and aggressive behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(3), 413-423. Long, E.,& Valente, T. W. (2019). Perceived social acceptability and longitudinal trends in adolescent cigarette smoking. Prevention Science, 20(6), 824-832. Marla, E., Eisenberg, J. W., Toumbourou, R. F., & Catalano, S. (2014). Socialnorms in the development of adolescent substance use: A longitudinal analysis of the international youth development study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(9), 1486-1497. Mcpherson, M., & Cook, S. (2001). Birds of afeather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415-444. Mundt, M. P., Mercken, L., & Zakletskaia, L. (2012). Peer selection and influence effects on adolescent alcohol use: A stochastic actor-based model. Bmc Pediatrics, 12(1), 115-125. Olweus, D. (1993).Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd. Park, H., & Jung, H. (2010). Different pathways to problem behaviors in adolescence: Delinquent peer, parent attachment, and the self-control. Studies on Korean Youth, 21(2), 5-34. Perkins, H. W., Craig, D. W., & Perkins, J. M. (2011). Using social norms to reduce bullying.Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 14(5), 703-722. Rambaran, A. J., Dijkstra, J. K., & Stark, T. H. (2013). Status-based influence processes: The Role of norm salience in contagion of adolescent risk attitudes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(3), 574-585. Rimal, R. N., & Real, K. (2003). Understanding theinfluence of perceived norms on behaviors. Communication Theory, 13(2), 184-203. Ripley, R., Snijders, T., Boda, Z., Vörös, A., & Preciado, P. (2017).Manual for SIENA version 4.0. Oxford: University of Oxford, Department of Statistics, Nuffield College. Rodkin, P. C. (2004). Peer ecologies of aggression and bullying. In D. L. Espelage & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American Schools: A social ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 87-106). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Rose, A. J., Swenson, L. P., & Waller, E. M. (2004). Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: Developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. Developmental Psychology, 40(3), 378-387. Rulison, K. L., Gest, S. D., & Loken, E. (2013). Dynamic social networks and physical aggression: The moderating role of gender and social status among peers. Journal of Research on Adolescent, 23(3), 437-449. Sentse, M., Kiuru, N., Veenstra, R., & Salmivalli, C. (2014). Asocial network approach to the interplay between adolescents' bullying and likeability over time. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(9), 1409-1420. Shin, H., & Ryan, A. M. (2014). Early adolescent friendships and academic adjustment:Examining selection and influence processes with longitudinal social network analysis. Developmental Psychology, 50(11), 2462-2472. Sijtsema, J. J., Rambaran, J. A., Caravita, S. C., & Gini, G. (2014). Friendship selection and influence in bullying and defending:Effects of moral disengagement. Developmental Psychology, 50(8), 2093-2104. Smith, P. K., & Sharp, S. (1994).School bullying: insights and perspectives. London: Routledge. Steglich, C., Snijders, T., & Pearson, M. (2010). Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence.Sociological Methodology, 40(1), 329-393. Svensson, Y., Burk, W. J., Stattin, H., & Kerr, M. (2012). Peer selection and influence of delinquent behavior of immigrant and nonimmigrant youths: Does context matter?International Journal of Behavioral Development, 36(3), 178-185. Tafjel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). Anintegrative theory of intergroup conflict. Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 33(1), 94-109. Troop-Gordon, W. (2017). Peer victimization in adolescence: The nature, progression, and consequences of being bullied within a developmental context. Journal of Adolescence, 55(1), 116-128. Turanovic, J. J., & Young, J. T. N. (2016). Violentoffending and victimization in adolescence: Social network mechanisms and homophily. Criminology, 54(3), 487-519. Valente, T. W., Unger, J. B., & Johnson, C. A. (2005). Do popular students smoke? The association between popularity and smoking among middle school students.Journal of Adolescent Health, 37(4), 323-329. Veenstra, R., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2011). Transformations in adolescent peer networks. In B. Laursen & W. A. Collins (Eds.), Relationship pathways: From adolescence to young adulthood (pp. 135-154). New York: Sage. Veenstra, R., Dijkstra, J. K., Steglich, C., & Zalk, M. (2013). Network-behavior dynamics. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(3), 399-412. Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Munniksma, A., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2010). The complex relation between bullying, victimization, acceptance, and rejection: Giving special attention to status, affection, and sex differences.Child Development, 81(2), 480-486. Veenstra, R., & Steglich, C. E. G. (2012). Actor-based model for network and behavior dynamics. In B. Laursen, T. D. Little & N. A. Card (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 598-618). New York, NY: Guilford Press. 邓小平, 徐晨, 程懋伟, 张向葵. (2017). 青少年偏差行为的同伴选择和影响效应: 基于纵向社会网络的元分析. 心理科学进展, 25(11), 1898-1909. 方杰, 温忠麟, 邱皓政. (2021). 纵向数据的中介效应分析. 心理科学, 44(04), 989-996. 刘军. (2014). 整体网分析: UCINET软件实用指南 (第2版). 上海: 格致出版社. 罗家德. (2010). 社会网络分析讲义 (第2版). 北京: 社会科学文献出版社. 师保国, 申继亮. (2007). 家庭社会经济地位、智力和内部动机与创造性的关系. 心理发展与教育, 23(1), 30-34. 孙晓娟, 邓小平, 赵悦彤, 张向葵. (2019). 青少年攻击行为的同伴选择与影响效应: 基于纵向社会网络的元分析. 中国临床心理学杂志, 27(03), 546-554. 张荣伟, Paul, T. P. W., 李丹. (2020). 人际关系和自我概念对生命意义的影响: 一项追踪研究. 心理科学, 43(05), 1154-1161. 张文新, 武建芬, Jones, K. (1999). Olweus儿童欺负问卷中文版的修订. 心理发展与教育, 15(2), 7-11. 张云运, 张其文, 张李斌, 任萍, 秦幸娜, 常睿生. (2022). 青少年友谊网络与受欺凌的共同变化关系: 一项纵向社会网络分析研究. 心理学报, 54(09), 1048-1058. |
|
||
