Psychological Development and Education ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 550-558.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.04.11

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Teacher-student Relationship on Class Level Moderated the Relation between Students' Anti-bullying Attitudes and Bullying Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis

YU Yida, PAN Bin, MIAO Xinyu, CHEN Guanghui   

  1. School of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014
  • Published:2023-07-19

Abstract: In a sample of 1725 students in 46 classes from fifth to eighth grade (940 boys and 785 girls, Mage= 12.78, SDage = 1.14), multilevel model was used to explore the association between students' anti-bullying attitudes and bullying behavior, as well as the moderating effects of individual-level and classroom-level teacher-student relationship. The multilevel models revealed that students' anti-bullying attitudes were negatively associated with peer-reported bullying behavior; perceived teacher-student relationship was negatively associated with peer-reported bullying behavior; and classroom-level teacher-student relationship moderated the association between students' anti-bullying attitudes and bullying behavior. Specifically, the negative association between students' anti-bullying attitudes and bullying was stronger in the classrooms where teachers had better relationship (warm and trustworthy) with students. In the classrooms where teachers had bad relationship with students, however, there were no significant association between students' anti-bullying attitudes and bullying. These results indicated that the effectiveness of bullying prevention and intervention should not only aim to improve anti-bullying attitudes of students, but also for teachers to create positive teacher-student relationship with whole classes.

Key words: anti-bullying attitudes, bullying behavior, teacher-student relationship, multilevel models

CLC Number: 

  • B844
Abrams, D., Rutland, A., Ferrell, J. M., & Pelletier, J. (2008). Children's judgments of disloyal and immoral peer behavior: Subjective group dynamics in minimal intergroup contexts.Child Development, 79(2), 444-461.
Ajzen, I. (2012). The theory of planned behavior. In Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.),Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 438-459). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Aldrup, K., Klusmann, U., Lüdtke, O., Göllner, R., & Trautwein, U. (2018). Social support and classroom management are related to secondary students' general school adjustment: A multilevel structural equation model using student and teacher ratings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(8), 1066-1083.
Babad, E. Y. (2009).The social psychology of the classroom. New York: Routledge.
Chen, G., Zhang, W., Zhang, W., & Deater-Deckard, K. (2020). A “defender protective effect” in multiple-role combinations of bullying among Chinese adolescents.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(7-8), 1587-1609.
Chen, G., Zhao, Q. L., Dishion, T. & Deater-Deckard, K. (2018). The association between peer network centrality and aggression is moderated by moral disengagement.Aggressive Behavior. 44(6), 571-580.
Farmer, T. W., Lines, M. M., & Hamm, J. V. (2011). Revealing the invisible hand: The role of teachers in children's peer experiences.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 247-256.
Gest, S. D., & Rodkin, P. C. (2011). Teaching practices and elementary classroom peer ecologies. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 288-296.
Golmaryami, F. N., Frick, P. J., Hemphill, S. A., Kahn, R. E., Crapanzano, A. M., & Terranova, A. M. (2016). The social, behavioral, and emotional correlates of bullying and victimization in a school-based sample.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44(2), 381-391.
Hendrickx, M. M. H. G., Mainhard, M. T., Boor-Klip, H. J., Cillessen, A. H. M., & Brekelmans, M. (2016). Social dynamics in the classroom: Teacher support and conflict and the peer ecology.Teaching and Teacher Education, 53, 30-40.
Jansen, P. W., Verlinden, M., Dommisse-van Berkel, A., Mieloo, C., van der Ende, J., Veenstra, R., ··· Tiemeier, H. (2012). Prevalence of bullying and victimization among children in early elementary school: Do family and school neighbourhood socioeconomic status matter?BMC Public Health, 12(1), 1-10.
Longobardi, C., Iotti, N. O., Jungert, T., & Settanni, M. (2018). Student-teacher relationships and bullying: The role of student social status.Journal of Adolescence, 63, 1-10.
McCuddy, T., & Esbensen, F-A. (2017). After the bell and into the night: The link between delinquency and traditional, cyber-, and dual-bullying victimization.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 54(3), 409-441.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012).Mplus statistical modeling software. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Norwalk, K. E., Dawes, M., Hamm, J. V., & Farmer, T. W. (2021). Improvingmiddle school teachers'self-reported use of social dynamics management practices. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 37(2), 109-126.
Nosek, B. A. (2005). Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 134(4), 565-584.
Olweus, D. (2013). School bullying:Development and some important challenges. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9(1), 751-780.
Ortega, R., & Mora-Merchan, J., (1999). Spain. In P. K. Smith, Y. Morita, J. Junger-Tas, D. Olweus, R. Catalano & P. Slee (Eds.),The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective (pp. 166-169). London: Routledge.
Pan, B., Li, T., Ji, L., Malamut, S., Zhang, W., & Salmivalli, C. (2021). Whydoes classroom-level victimization moderate the association between victimization and depressive symptoms? The “Healthy Context Paradox” and two explanations. Child Development, 92(5), 1836-1854.
Pan, B., Zhang, L., Ji, L., Garandeau, C. F., Salmivalli, C., & Zhang, W. (2020). Classroom status hierarchy moderates the association between social dominance goals and bullying behavior in middle childhood and early adolescence.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(11), 2285-2297.
Peugh, J. L. (2010). A practical guide to multilevel modeling.Journal of School Psychology, 48(1), 85-112.
Reijntjes, A., Kamphuis, J. H., Prinzie, P., & Telch, M. J. (2010). Peer victimization and internalizing problems in children: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.Child Abuse & Neglect, 34(4), 244-252.
Rodkin, P. C., & Ryan, A. M. (2012). Child and adolescent peer relations in educational context. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, S. Graham, J. M. Royer, & M. Zeidner (Eds.),APA educational psychology handbook, Vol 2: Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors (pp. 363-389). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Roorda, D. L., & Koomen, H. M. (2021). Student-teacher relationships and students' externalizing and internalizing behaviors: A cross-lagged study in secondary education. Child Development, 92(1), 174-188.
Rudasill, K. M., Reio, T. G., Stipanovic, N., & Taylor, J. E. (2010). A longitudinal study of student-teacher relationship quality, difficult temperament, and risky behavior from childhood to early adolescence.Journal of School Psychology, 48(5), 389-412.
Saarento, S., Boulton, A. J., & Salmivalli, C. (2015). Reducing bullying and victimization: Student- and classroom-level mechanisms of change.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(1), 61-76.
Sabol, T. J., & Pianta, R. C. (2012). Recent trends in research on teacher-child relationships.Attachment and Human Development, 14(3), 213-231.
Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review.Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(2), 112-120.
Salmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviors associated with bullying in schools.International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28(3), 246-258.
Scholte, R., Sentse, M., & Granic, I. (2010). Do actions speak louder than words?Classroom attitudes and behavior in relation to bullying in early adolescence. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 39(6), 789-799.
Sentse, M., Veenstra, R., Kiuru, N., & Salmivalli, C. (2015). A longitudinal multilevel study of individual characteristics and classroom norms in explaining bullying behaviors.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(5), 943-955.
Sjögren, B., Thornberg, R., Wänström, L., & Gini, G. (2020). Bystander behaviour in peer victimisation: Moral disengagement, defender self-efficacy and student-teacher relationship quality.Research Papers in Education, 36(5), 588-610.
Thornberg, R., Wänström, L., & Pozzoli, T. (2017). Peer victimization and its relation to class relational climate and class moral disengagement among school children. Educational Psychology, 37(5), 524-536.
Thornberg, R., Wänström, L., Pozzoli, T., & Gini, G. (2018). Victim prevalence in bullying and its association with teacher-student and student-student relationships and class moral disengagement: A class-level path analysis. Research Papers in Education, 33(3), 320-335.
Troop-Gordon, W., & Kopp, J. (2011). Teacher-child relationship quality and children's peer victimization and aggressive behavior in late childhood.Social Development, 20(3), 536-561.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2019) Behind the numbers: Ending school violence and bullying. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en.
van Goethem, A. A., Scholte, R. H., & Wiers, R. W. (2010). Explicit-and implicit bullying attitudes in relation to bullying behavior.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(6), 829-842.
Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Huitsing, G., Sainio, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2014). The role of teachers in bullying: The relation between antibullying attitudes, efficacy, and efforts to reduce bullying.Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 1135-1143.
Yun, H. Y. (2020). New approaches to defender and outsider roles in school bullying.Child Development, 91(4), 814-832.
Zhang, W., Chen, L., & Chen, G. (2016). Research on bullying in mainland China. In P. Smith, K. Kwak, & Y. Toda. (Eds.),School bullying in different cultures: Eastern and western perspectives (pp. 113-132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
纪林芹, 张文新, Jones, K., Smith, N. (2003). 中国与英国儿童对待欺凌问题态度的比较研究. 心理与行为研究, 1(2), 122-127.
江光荣. (2004). 中小学班级环境: 结构与测量. 心理科学, 27(4), 839-843.
刘晓薇, 潘斌, 陈亮, 李腾飞, 纪林芹, 张文新. (2021). 受欺负与青少年外化问题关系的 “健康环境悖论”: 敌意性归因的中介作用. 心理学报, 53(2), 170-181.
张文新, 王丽萍, 宫秀丽, 武建芬, 张坤. (2002). 儿童对待欺凌问题态度的研究. 心理科学, 25(2), 226-227.
张文新, 武建芬. (1999). Olweus儿童欺凌问卷中文版的修订. 心理发展与教育, 15(2), 7-11.
[1] TIAN Huidong, ZHANG Yuhong, SUN Haoxiang, LI Ying, Hanixia. The Effect of Teacher-student Relationship on Social Competence with Peers for Students with Intellectual Disabilities: A Moderated Mediation Model [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(1): 44-54.
[2] LI Beilei, GAO Ting, ZHANG Lili, ZHOU Nan, DENG Linyuan. Relationship between Student’s Perceived Teacher Bullying Attitude and Student Bullying Behavior:Mediating Effect of Student Bullying Attitude and Moderating Effect of Gender [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(3): 348-357.
[3] WU Han, WEI Chang, LU Huishi, LAI Weiping, XING Jintao, YU Chengfu, ZHEN Shuangju, ZHANG Wei. Peer Victimization and Adolescent Depression: The Mediating Effect of Social Withdrawal and the Moderating Effect of Teacher-student Relationship [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(2): 249-256.
[4] LUO Haifeng, LIU Jian, ZHOU Da. The Mediating Role of Parental Involvement in the Relationship between Family Socioeconomic Status and Senior High School Students' Approaches toward Learning:The Moderating Role of Teacher-student Relationship [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(2): 199-210.
[5] ZHANG Jie, CHEN Liang, ZHANG Liang, PAN Bin, LI Tengfei, JI Linqin, ZHANG Wenxin. Effects of Parental Psychological Control on Elementary Students' Bullying Behavior: The Roles of Hostile Attribution Bias and Callous-unemotional Traits [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2020, 36(6): 715-724.
[6] ZHANG Xingxu, GUO Haiying, LIN Danhua. A Study on the Relationship between Parent-child, Peer, Teacher-student Relations and Subjective Well-being of Adolescents [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2019, 35(4): 458-466.
[7] SHI Baoguo, WANG Lijing, XU Li, LIU Xia. Effects of Teacher-student Relationships on Students' Creativity: A Moderated Mediation Model [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2016, 32(2): 175-182.
[8] ZOU Hong, QU Zhi-yong, YE Yuan. The Characteristics of Teacher-Student Relationships and its Relationship with School Adjustment of Students [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2007, 23(4): 77-82.
[9] YANG A-li, FANG Xiao-yi, LI Hui, LIN Xiu-yun, LIU Qian-qian. The Development Trend of Teacher-students Relationship and Its Effect on School Adaptation in Yunnan Province Students of Middle-school and Elementary-school [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2007, 23(2): 49-56.
[10] LIU Gui-zhen, XIN Zi-qiang, CHI Li-ping. The Correlates of Teacher-student Interpersonal Behavior [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2005, 21(4): 68-72.
[11] DU Hong-mei, FENG Wei. An Experimental Study on the Influence of Training in Empathy and Consequence Cognition on The Children-Bullying [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2005, 21(2): 81-86.
[12] LIU Wan-lun, WO Jian-zhong. Teacher-student Relationships in Primary and Junior Middle Schools Affect on Students’ School Adjustment [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2005, 21(1): 87-90.
[13] WANG Yun, WANG Xiao-hua. Development of Teacher-Student Relationships and Its relation to Factors in Primary School [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2002, 17(3): 18-23.
[14] . Teacher-student Relationship and Children’s Self-Concept in Elementary School [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2001, 16(4): 17-22.
[15] . Teacher-Student Relationship in Grade 3-6 of Primary School: Its Structure, Patterns and Development [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2001, 17(3): 16-21.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!