Psychological Development and Education ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5): 667-674.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2022.05.07

Previous Articles     Next Articles

A Study about Chinese Relative Clause Processing and the Effects of Animacy for Preschool Children

HE Wenguang, YANG Xielan   

  1. School of Psychology, Qufu Normal University, Qufu 273165
  • Published:2022-09-14

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Abstract: One of the important tasks in psycholinguistic literature is to explore the innate mechanisms and the universal principles guiding parsing in sentence processing. To explore whether 3~6 years old children have the ability to utilize semantic cues in comprehension of relative clauses or not, 120 children were recruited in the study. The study employed a 2×2×3 mixed design, with RC type (SRC vs.ORC), the configuration of animacy of the head nouns (animaicy-inanimacy vs. inanimacy-animacy) as within-subject factors, and grade (one vs. two vs. three) as between-subject factors. The data were addressed using general logistic mixed effect regression model (GLMER) and the results indicated that the main effect of grade was significant, but no significant differences were found for type of sentences and animacy of the head nouns. There were significant interactions between type of sentence and grades, simple analyses showed that no significances were found between SRCs and ORCs for grade 1 and grade 2, but for grade 3, there were significant differences between SRCs and ORCs. The three-way sentence×grade×animacy interactions were marginal significant. For children from grade 3, sentences with inanimacy-animacy configuration were more difficult to process than sentences with animacy-inanimacy configuration under conditions of ORCs, but under conditions of SRCs, sentences with inanimacy-animacy configuration were easier to comprehend than sentences with animacy-inanimacy configuration. Under conditions of inanimacy-animacy configuration, children from grade 1 have more difficult in comprehending SRCs compared to children from grade 2 and 3, but no significant differences were found between grade 2 and 3. On the other hand, under conditions of animacy-inanimacyconfiguration, no significant differences were found in comprehending ORCs between grade 1 and grade 2, but their accuracy was lower than children from grade 3.In conclusion, this paper firstly found that 3~4 years old children from China have the ability to comprehend RCs with simple structure, but until about 6 years old, they could utilize the semantic cues in comprehension of RCs.

Key words: Chinese, relative clause, aniamcy, preschool child

CLC Number: 

  • G442
Ambridge, B., Bidgood, A., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., & Freudenthal, D. (2015). Is passive syntax semantically constrained? Evidence from adult grammaticality judgment and comprehension studies.Cognitive Science, 40, 1435-1459.
Aron, I. (2010). Rethinking child difficulty:The effect of NP on children's processing of relative clause in Hebrew. Journal of Children Language, 37(01), 1-31.
Arosio, F., Adani, F., & Guasti, M. T. (2009). Grammatical features in the comprehension of Italian relative clauses by children. In J. M. Brucart, A. Gavarro, & J. Sola(Eds.), Merging Features:Computation, Interpretation, and Acquisition(pp.138-157).Oxford University Press.
Bentea, A., Durrleman, S., & Rizzi, L. (2016). Refining intervention:The acquisition of featural relations in object A-bar dependencies. Lingua, 169, 21-41.
Chen, B. G., Ning, A. H., Bi, H. Y., & Dunlap, S. (2008).Chinese subject-relative clauses are more difficult to process than the object-relative clauses. Acta Psychologica, 129, 61-65.
Felser,C., Marinis, T., & Clahsen, H. (2003). Children's processing of ambiguous sentences:A study of relative clause attachment. Language Acquisition, 11(3), 127-163.
Frank S. L., & Ernst, P. (2018). Judgements about double-embedded relative clauses differ between languages.Psychological Research, 83(7), 1581-1593.
Gallego, C., Martín-Aragoneses.,M. T., López-Higes., R., & Pisón, G. (2016). Semantic and syntactic reading comprehension strategies used by deaf children with early and late cochlear implantation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 49/50, 153-170.
Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity:Locality of syntactic dependencies.Cognition, 68, 1-76.
Hakansson, G., & Hansson, K. (2000). Comprehension and production of relative clauses:A comparison between Swedish impaired and unimpaired children. Journal of Child Language, 27(2), 313-333.
He, W., & Bi, X. (2020). Perspective-shifting is helpful for children in Chinese passive sentence comprehension. Acta Psychologica, 205,103059.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103059
He, W., & Chen, B. (2013). The role of animacy in Chinese relative clause processing.Acta Psychologica, 144 (1),145-153.
He, W., Xu, N., & Ji, R. Q. (2017). Age and location effects in Chinese relative clause processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(5), 1067-1086.
Hisao, F., & Gibson, E. (2003). Processing relative clauses in Chinese.Cognition, 90, 3-27.
Hu, S., Gavarró, A., & Guasti, M. T. (2016). Children's production of head-final relative clauses:The case of Mandarin. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(02), 323-346.
Keenan, K., & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar.Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63-99.
Kidd, E., Brandt, S., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Object relatives made easy:A cross-linguistic comparison of the constraints influencing young children's processing of relative clauses. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(6), 860-897.
Langlois, V. J., & Arnold, J. E. (2020). Print exposure explains individual differences in using syntactic but not semantic cues for pronoun comprehension. Cognition, 197, 104155.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104155
Lin, C. J. C.(2018). Subject prominence and processing dependencies in prenominal relative clauses:The comprehension of possessive relative clauses and adjunct relative clauses in Mandarin Chinese. Language, 94(4), 758-797.
Mak, W. M., Vonk, W., & Schriefers, H. (2006). Animacy in processing relative clauses:The hikers that rocks crush.Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 466-490.
Mimeau, C., Laroche, A., & Deacon, S. H. (2019). The relation between syntactic awareness and contextual facilitation in word reading:what is the role of semantics? Journal of Research in Reading, 42(1), 178-192.
Panda, S., Taranikanti, M., Behara, J., Yasmeen, N., & Tiyyagura, S. (2015). Role of audio visual aids in medical teaching and their impact on students. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5(1), 449-494.
R Core Team. (2017). R:A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org
Sheldon, A. (1979). On strategies for processing relative clauses:A comparison of children and adults.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 6(4),305-318.
Staub, A., Dillon, B., & Clifton, C. (2017). The matrix verb as a source of comprehension difficulty in object relative sentences. Cognitive Science, 41(6), 1353-1376.
Uzundag,B.A., & Küntay, C.A. (2019). The acquisition and use of relative clauses in Turkish-learning children's conversational interactions:a crosslinguistic approach. Journal of Child Language, 46(6), 1142-1168.
Wu, F., Kaiser, E., & Andersen, E. (2011). Animacy effects in Chinese relative clause processing.Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 1-36.
Wu, F., Kaiser, E., & Vasishth, S. (2017). Effects of early cues on the processing of Chinese relative clauses:Evidence for experience-based theories. Cognitive Science, 42(6), 1101-1133.
Xu,K., Wu, D.H., & Duann, J-R. (2020). Enhanced left inferior frontal to left superior temporal effective connectivity for complex sentence comprehension:fMRI evidence from Chinese relative. Brain and Language, 200, 104712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2019. 104712
何文广, 陈宝国. (2016). 汉语主、宾关系从句加工难度及其核心名词生命性效应. 心理科学, 39(1), 43-49.
刘丹青. (2005). 汉语关系从句标记类型初探. 中国语文, 1, 3-15.
杨亦鸣, 刘涛. (2013). 汉语话题句中语迹的神经机制研究. 中国社会科学, 6,146-166.
[1] LENG Xinyi, SU Mengmeng, LI Wenling, YANG Xiujie, XING Ailing, ZHANG Xianglin, SHU Hua. The Relation between Home Environment and Early Language Development in Rural China [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(1): 8-18.
[2] WANG Jingxin, ZHAO Sainan, XU Qianqian. Effects of Spacing and Word Frequency on the Reading of Young and Older Adults: An Eye Movement Study [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(6): 781-787.
[3] WANG Yingjie, LUAN Jinxin, LI Yan. The Relationship between Maternal Parenting Stress and Preschool Children's Anxiety: The Mediating Effect of Mother-child Conflict and the Moderating Effect of Maternal Mindfulness [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(5): 702-709.
[4] ZHANG Yuping, DONG Qiong, SONG Shuang, SHU Hua. The Developmental Trajectories of Reading Abilities in Chinese Lower Graders and the Predictability of Early Reading-related Cognitive Skills [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(2): 210-218.
[5] GAO Feng, BAI Xuejun, ZHANG Peng, CAO Haibo. A Meta-analysis of the Relationship between Parenting Styles and Suicidal Ideation in Chinese Adolescents [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(1): 97-108.
[6] JIANG Yingying, AN Jing, MA Li, ZHU Liqi. 8~15 Year Olds’ Understanding of Wealth and Poverty including a Developmental Comparison between Children and Adults [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(4): 466-474.
[7] XIE Yuntian, SHI Zifu, YIN Lin, LAN Luo. A Meta-analysis of the Relationships between Chinese Parenting Styles and Children’s Academic Achievement [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(3): 366-379.
[8] WANG Ying, ZHU Haidong, ZHANG Xinyi, XIAO Yan. The Influence of Parent-child Attachment on the Executive Function of Left-behind Preschool Children: Grandparent-child Attachment as a Mediator and Moderator [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(2): 195-206.
[9] ZHANG Chao, CHENG Yahua, LI Liping, FAN Yuting, WU Xinchun. The Role of Awareness of Compound Word Structures in Chinese Children's Reading Comprehension [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(2): 236-243.
[10] ZHANG Guangzhen, LIANG Miao, LIANG Zongbao. A Longitudinal Study of the Influence of Parenting Styles on Social Adjustment of Preschool Children: Mediating Effects of Self-control [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(6): 800-807.
[11] WANG Wei, GONG Deying, CHENG Chun, CHEN Ke, LI Yongxin, YAN Jingjing. The Characteristics of Number Sense in 5~7 Years Old Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(6): 818-825.
[12] ZHAN Shuwei, YANG Ning, ZHAO Bihua. Receptive Language Skills and Social Withdrawal among Chinese Left-behind Preschool Children: A Moderated Mediation Model [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(6): 834-844.
[13] ZHANG Zhonglu, YI Junru, ZHANG Zhuqing, XING Qiang, LEI Yi, LI Hong. The Facilitating Effect of Element Type and Crossed Relation on Problem Solving [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(5): 609-618.
[14] ZHOU Tingna, LI Yixun, LI Hong, XU Zhonggeng, ZHANG Feng, CHENG Yahua. The Relation between Oral Reading Fluency and Reading Comprehension among Chinese Children: A 3-year Longitudinal Study [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(5): 691-700.
[15] ZHANG Fan, ZHAO Demao, LIU Xia, BAI Rong, ZHANG Mingliang, XING Shufen. The Co-effect of Parental Negative Parenting Style and MAOA rs6323 Polymorphism on Externalizing Problem Behaviors of Preschool Children [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2020, 36(6): 659-667.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright 2018 © Editorial office of Psychological Development and Education
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd