Psychological Development and Education ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5): 609-617.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2022.05.01

    Next Articles

The Attentional Guidance Effect of Visual and Verbal Working Memory Representation

SONG Jiaru1, LIU Yuanyuan2, WANG Xiuli1, LI Shouxin1   

  1. 1. School of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014;
    2. Weifang Industrial School, Weifang 261300
  • Published:2022-09-14

Abstract: Three experiments were conducted to explore the different attentional guidance effects from visual and verbal working memory (WM) representation in different stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA) conditions. In Experiment 1, we explored how the effect of verbal WM on visual attention were influenced by SOA when the visual guidance task and visual detection task were presented simultaneously. The results showed when the SOA was 300ms and 1000ms, the attentional guidance effect of verbal WM was observed, while when the SOA was 3500ms, the attentional guidance effect wasn't observed. In Experiment 2 and 3, we explored how the effects of verbal WM and visual WM on visual attention were influenced by SOA when the visual guidance task and visual detection task were presented seguentially. The results showed the attentional guidance effect was observed in all WM representation and SOA conditions. These results indicate that the effect of verbal WM representation on attentional guidance is influenced by task paradigm. Attentional guidance effect can be observed from visual WM representation under more widely conditions than verbal WM representation.

Key words: visual working memory representation, verbal working memory representation, visual attention, attentional guidance

CLC Number: 

  • B844
Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory:Looking back and looking forward.Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829-839.
Bae, G. Y., & Luck, S. J. (2017). Interactions between visual working memory representations.Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(8), 2376-2395.
Brown, M., & Sacco, D. F. (2017). Unrestricted sociosexuality predicts preferences for extraverted male faces. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 123-127.
Calleja, M. O., & Rich, A. N. (2013). Guidance of attention by information held in working memory.Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(4), 687-699.
Carlisle, N. B., & Woodman, G. F. (2011). Automatic and strategic effects in the guidance of attention by working memory representations.Acta Psychologica, 137(2), 217-225.
Corbetta, M., Kincade, J. M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002).Neural systems for visual orienting and their relationships to spatial working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(3), 508-523.
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18(1), 193-222.
Downing, P. E. (2000). Interactions between visual working memory and selective attention.Psychological Science, 11(6), 467-473.
Dombrowe, I., Olivers, C. N., & Donk, M. (2010). The time course of working memory effects on visual attention.Visual Cognition, 18(8), 1089-1112.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1:Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160.
Foerster, R. M. & Schneider, W. X. (2018). Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features:Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.Cognition, 172, 37-45.
Greene, C. M., Kennedy, K., & Soto, D. (2015). Dynamic states in working memory modulate guidance of visual attention:Evidence from an n-back paradigm.Visual Cognition, 23(5), 546-560.
Gunseli, E., Olivers, C. N., & Meeter, M. (2014). Effects of search difficulty on the selection, maintenance, and learning of attentional templates.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(9), 2042-2054.
Houtkamp, R., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2006). The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 32(2), 423-442.
Johnston, W. A., Hawley, K. J., Plewe, S. H., Elliott, J. M. G., & DeWitt, M. J. (1990). Attention capture by novel stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 119(4), 397-411.
Kawashima, T., & Matsumoto, E. (2017). Cognitive control of attentional guidance by visual and verbal working memory representations.Japanese Psychological Research, 59(1), 49-57.
Knapp, W. H., & Abrams, R. A. (2012). Fundamental differences in visual search with verbal and pictorial cues. Vision Research, 71(5), 28-36.
Kok, A. (2001). On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology, 38(3), 557-577.
Kristjansson, A., Saevarsson, S., & Driver, J. (2013). The boundary conditions of priming of visual search:From passive viewing through task-relevant working memory load.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(3), 514-521.
Kusak, G., Grune, K., Hagendorf, H., & Metz, A. M. (2000). Updating of working memory in a running memory task:An event-related potential study.International Journal of Psychophysiology, 39(1), 51-65.
Moores, E., & Maxwell, J. P. (2008). The role of prior exposure in the capture of attention by items in working memory.Visual Cognition, 16(5), 675-695.
Olivers, C. N. L., Peters, J., Houtkamp, R., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2011). Different states in visual working memory:When it guides attention and when it does not.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(7), 327-334.
Polich, J. (2012). Neuropsychology of P300. In S. J. Luck & E. S. Kappenman (Eds.), Oxford handbook of ERP components(pp. 159-188). New York:Oxford University Press.
Soto, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2007). Automatic guidance of visual attention from verbal working memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 33(3), 730-737.
Soto, D., Rotshtein, P., Hodsoll, J., Mevorach, C., & Humphreys, G. W. (2012). Common and distinct neural regions for the guidance of selection by visuoverbal information held in memory:Converging evidence from fMRI and rTMS.Human Brain Mapping, 33(1), 105-120.
Soto, D., Rotshtein, P., & Kanai, R. (2014). Parietal structure and function explain human variation in working memory biases of visual attention. Neuroimage, 89, 289-296.
Sun, S. Z., Shen, J., Shaw, M., Cant, J. S., & Ferber, S. (2015). Automatic capture of attention by conceptually generated working memory templates.Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(6), 1841-1847.
Sutton, S., & Ruchkin, D. S. (2006). The late positive complex.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 425, 1-23.
Tan, J. F., Zhao, Y. F., Wang, L. J., Tian, X., Cui, Y., Yang, Q., … Chen, A. (2015). The competitive influences of perceptual load and working memory guidance on selective attention.PLoS One, 10(6), e0129533.https://doi.org/10.13711/journal.pone.0129533
Towse, J. N., & Hitch, G. J. (1995). Is there a relationship between task demand and storage space in tests of working memory capacity? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48(1), 108-124.
Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97-136.
Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., Kenner, N., Hyle, M., & Vasan, N. (2004). How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search. Vision Research, 44(12), 1411-1426.
Zhang, B., Zhang, J. X., Kong, L., Huang, S., Yue, Z., & Wang, S. (2010). Guidance of visual attention from working memory contents depends on stimulus attributes.Neuroscience Letters, 486(3), 202-206.
潘毅. (2011). 基于言语工作记忆内容的视觉注意捕获. 浙江大学学报理学版, 38(6), 727-732.
张豹,黄赛,候秋霞. (2014). 工作记忆表征捕获眼动中的颜色优先性. 心理学报, 46(1), 17-26.
张豹,胡岑楼,黄赛. (2016). 认知控制在工作记忆表征引导注意中的作用:来自眼动的证据. 心理学报, 48(9), 1105-1118.
[1] LIU Hanlong, ZHAO Jing. The Development of Visual Attention Span And Its Effect on Reading Fluency in Chinese Children with Developmental Dyslexia [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2018, 34(5): 533-540.
[2] MA Yu, ZHANG Xue-min, ZHANG Ying-li, WEI Liu-qing. Attention Processing Characteristics of Children with Autism:Evidence from the Multiple Objects Tracking Task [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2013, 29(6): 571-577.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!