心理发展与教育 ›› 2012, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 184-192.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

小学生学习动机的培养:五年追踪研究

贾小娟1, 胡卫平1,2, 武宝军1   

  1. 1. 陕西师范大学教师专业能力发展中心, 西安710062;
    2. 北京师范大学发展心理研究所, 北京100875
  • 出版日期:2012-03-15 发布日期:2012-03-15
  • 通讯作者: 胡卫平,E-mail:weipinghu@163.com E-mail:weipinghu@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-10-0535);教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目:拔尖创新人才成长规律与培养模式研究(11JZD040);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(07JJDXLX262)

The Cultivation of Primary School Students’ Learning Motivation:a Five-year Longitudinal Study

JIA Xiao-juan1, HU Wei-ping1,2, WU Bao-jun1   

  1. 1. Center for Teacher Professional Ability Development, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710062;
    2. Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
  • Online:2012-03-15 Published:2012-03-15

摘要: 采用聚合交叉研究设计,利用"学思维"活动课程,对某小学1~3年级学生的学习动机进行了4年的干预培养,停止培养一年后,再次收集了数据,分析了变化趋势、即时效果及其长时效应。结果表明:(1)随着年龄的增大,儿童的表层动机和成就动机呈下降趋势;深层动机呈先上升后下降的趋势;(2)男生的表层动机和成就动机都高于女生;(3)年级越高,表层动机、深层动机和成就动机越低;(4)培养一年后,实验组学生的深层动机显著高于控制组,且长时效应显著。

关键词: 小学生, 学习动机, 追踪研究, 多层线性模型

Abstract: The present study adopted cross-sequential design,explored the changing trends of primary school students'learning motivation and the effects of the "Learn to Think" curriculum.Participants were primary school students from Grade 1 to Grade 3,who were randomly ascribed to experimental and control groups.Experimental group students attended the LTT for four years,and the delayed effects were measured one year after terminating the intervention.The results suggested that(1)the surface motivation and achievement motivation showed a descending trend,while the deep motivation showed an ascending first and then descending trend.(2)Boys' surface motivation and achievement motivation were significantly higher than that of girls.(3)The higher the grade was,the lower children's surface motivation,deep motivation and achievement motivation were.(4)After oneyear intervention,the experimental group students'deep motivation was significantly higher than the control group students',and delayed effects were significant.

Key words: Primary School Students, Learning Motivation, Longitudinal Study, Hierarchical Linear Model

中图分类号: 

  • G441
[1] Adey,P.,&Shayer,M.(1994).Really raising standards:Cognitive intervention and academic achievement.London:Routledge.
[2] Amabile,T.M.(1985).Motivation and creativity:Effect of motivational orientation on creative writers.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,48(2),393-399.
[3] Biggs,J.B.(1987).The Learning Process Questionnaire(LPQ): Manual.Hawthorn,Vic.:Australian Council for Educational Research.
[4] Birdsell,B.S.,Ream,S.M.,Seyller,A.M.,&Zobott,P.L. (2009).Motivating students by increasing student choice.Master's thesis.Saint Xavier University,Chicago,Illinois.
[5] Corpus,J.H.,Ogle,C.M.,&Love-Geiger,K.E.(2006).The effects of social-comparison versus mastery praise on children's Intrinsic Motivation.Motivation and Emotion,30,335-345.
[6] Eisenkopf,G.(2010).Peer effects,motivation,and learning. Economics of Education Review,29,364-374.
[7] Frick,R.W.(1992).Interestingness.British Journal of Psychology,83(1),113-128.
[8] Garcia-Sanchez,J.-N.,&Caso-Fuertes,A.-M.(2005).Comparison of the effects on writing attitudes and writing self-efficacy of three different training programs in students with learning disabilities. International Journal of Educational Research,43,272-289.
[9] Grolnick,W.S.,Farkas,M.S.,Sohmer,R.,Michaels,S.,& Valsiner,J.(2007).Facilitating motivation in young adolescents: Effects of an after-school program.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,28,332-344.
[10] Haywood,J.,Kuespert,S.,Madecky,D.,&Nor,A.(2008). Increasing elementary and high school student motivation through the use of intrinsic and extrinsic rewards.Master's thesis.Saint Xavier University&Pearson Achievement Solutions,Inc.Field-Based Master's Program,Chicago,Illinois.
[11] Hu,W.,Adey,P.,Jia,X.,Liu,J.,Zhang,L.,Li,J.,&Dong,X.(2011).Effects of a"Learn to think"intervention programme on primary school students.British Journal of Educational Psychology,81.
[12] Kang,S.,Scharmann,l.C.,&Noh,T.(2004).Reexamining the role of cognitive conflict in science concept learning.Research in Science Education,34,7-96.
[13] Kim,Y.,&Bao,L.(2004).Development of an instrument for evaluating anxiety caused by cognitive conflict.Paper presented at the Physics Education Research Conference,49-52.
[14] Martin,A.J.(2005).Exploring the effects of a youth enrichment program on academic motivation and engagement.Social Psychology of Education,8,179-206.
[15] Martin,A.J.(2008).Enhancing student motivation and engagement: The effects of a multidimensional intervention.Contemporary Educational Psychology,33,239-269.
[16] Noda M.,Purdie,&John,A.Hattie(1995).The effect of motivation training on approaches to learning and self-concept.British Journal of Educational Psychology,65,227-235.
[17] Robertson,J.S.(2000).Is attribution training a worthwhile classroom intervention for K-12 student with learning difficulties?Educational Psychology Review,(1),12.
[18] Saleh,M.,Lazonder,Ard W.,&Jong,T.(2007).Structuring collaboration in mixed-ability groups to promote verbal interaction, learning,and motivation of average-ability students.Contemporary Educational Psychology,32,314-331.
[19] Steinmayr,R.,&Spinath,B.(2009).The importance of motivation as a predictor of school achievement.Learning and Individual Differences,19,80-90.
[20] Stevick,&Earl.(1980).Teaching and learning languages.Cambridge University Press.Yarlas,A.S.,&Gelman,R.(1998,April).Learning as a predictor of situational interest.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association,San Diego,CA.
[21] 程华山.(1998).上海市中小学生心理问题现状调查报告.心理辅导,(1).
[22] 胡卫平,郧海丽.(2006)."学思维"活动课程对初中生创造力影响的实验研究.教育科学,22(1),92-94.
[23] 胡卫平,张蕾.(2009)."学思维"活动课程对小学生思维能力和学业成绩的影响.教育研究与实践,(6),70-74.
[24] 纪红军.(2007).结合元认知训练和学习动机激发提高数学学习成效的干预研究.[硕士学位论文].济南:山东师范大学.
[25] 李嘉华.(2010)."学思维"活动课程对小学生创造性倾向的影响研究.[硕士学位论文].临汾:山西师范大学.
[26] 林文智.(2007).小学生学习动机的调查分析与建议.调查研究,(8),32-33.
[27] 刘加霞,辛涛,黄高庆,申继亮.(2000).中学生学习动机、学习策略与学业成绩的关系研究,教育理论与实践,20(9),54-58
[28] 路晓华.(2010)."学思维"活动课程对初中生学习策略影响的实验研究.[硕士学位论文].临汾:山西师范大学.
[29] 雒力静.(2005).团体心理辅导在初中生学习动机干预策略中的应用研究.[硕士学位论文].兰州:西北师范大学.
[30] 雒淑芸.(2005).在学习情境镇南关激发学习动机—关于如何激发初三学生学习动机的行动研究.[硕士学位论文].北京:首都师范大学.
[31] 牟敏.(2007).运用任务型教学法培养初中学生英语学习的动机.[硕士学位论文].兰州:西北师范大学.
[32] 穆晶.(2010)."学思维"活动课程对初中生同伴互动影响的实验研究.[硕士学位论文].临汾:山西师范大学.
[33] 隋光远.(2005).中学生学业成就动机归因训练效果的追踪研究.心理科学,28(1),52-55.
[34] 王有智.(2003).西北地区小学生学习动机发展特点的研究.心理发展与教育,(1),20-24.
[35] 汪玲,郭德俊,方平.(2005).元认知训练的动机增强效应.心理科学,28(4),881-884.
[36] 武宝军.(2009)."学思维"活动课程对初中生创造性人格、学习动机和自尊影响的实验研究.[硕士学位论文].临汾:山西师范大学.
[37] 谢家树,韩喆.(2008).大学生自主学习干预研究.中国临床心理学杂志,16(4),443-445.
[38] 张宏如,沈烈敏.(2005).学习动机、元认知对学业成就的影响.心理科学,28(1),114-116.
[1] 郑显亮, 陈慧萍, 王雪, 鲍振宙. 青少年网络利他行为的发展趋势及社会阶层的影响:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 333-341.
[2] 张鹏程, 李喜, 韩午阳, 沈永江. 睡眠不足对中小学生负性情绪的影响:一个链式中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 402-409.
[3] 张玉平, 董琼, 宋爽, 舒华. 小学低年级儿童的阅读发展轨迹:早期语言认知技能的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 210-218.
[4] 李继娜, 王玮玮, 张维军, 屈智勇. 累积创伤对儿童复杂性创伤后应激障碍的影响:经验回避与消极认知情绪调节策略的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 683-691.
[5] 汪玥, 张豹, 周晖. 中小学生正念注意觉知与心理健康:情绪调节和积极重评的跨时间中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 692-702.
[6] 张小敏, 陈欣, 务凯, 赵国祥. 学校联结和学业能力对高中生自尊的影响:一个多层线性模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 358-365.
[7] 张潮, 程亚华, 李利平, 范雨婷, 伍新春. 汉语儿童词语结构意识在阅读理解中的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 236-243.
[8] 沈怡佳, 张国华, 何健康, 罗丽兰, 韩锦涛, 江波. 父母学习陪伴与小学生学业不良的关系:亲子学业沟通的中介作用和学习负担的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 826-833.
[9] 周婷娜, 李宜逊, 李虹, 徐钟庚, 张锋, 程亚华. 汉语儿童口语流畅性与阅读理解的关系:一项三年追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 691-700.
[10] 吴鹏, 张琪, 王杨春子. 父母教养方式与初中生网络受欺负行为的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 719-726.
[11] 陈子循, 冯映雪, 宋文莉, 刘霞. 亲子分离与青少年同伴侵害和抑郁的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 429-438.
[12] 梁兴丽, 何津, 周佶俊, 刘萍萍. 认知能力对学业成绩的影响:有中介的调节模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 449-461.
[13] 韩瑽瑽, 陈英和, 于晓, 邓之君, 刘静, 侯江文, 林燕燕. 表面相似性对数量关系和相对大小关系理解的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 257-264.
[14] 郑巧, 耿丽娜, 骆方, 李凌艳. 初中生学生投入的发展特点及其与同伴欺负的关系:一项三年追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(2): 157-167.
[15] 高雯, 朱进慧, 方臻. 父亲参与教养对小学生攻击行为的影响:母亲育儿压力的部分中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 84-93.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!