儿童攻击行为的多方法测评研究

心理发展与教育 ›› 2004, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (2): 69-74.

儿童攻击行为的多方法测评研究

王益文¹, 林崇德¹, 张文新²

1. 北京师范大学发展心理研究所, 北京, 100875;
2. 山东师范大学心理学系, 济南, 250014

出版日期:2004-04-15 发布日期:2004-04-15
作者简介:王益文(1972- ),男,山东临淄人,北京师范大学发展心理研究所博士生.wangeven@126.com.
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学“十五”规划项目(01JAXLX015)成果

Using multiple methods to measure children’s aggressive behavior

WANG Yi-wen¹, LIN Chong-de¹, ZHANG Wen-xin²

1. Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
2. Department of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014

Online:2004-04-15 Published:2004-04-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 儿童攻击测评方法的有效性和准确性直接决定着该领域研究的水平和质量,因而测评方法的研究是该领域研究的基础性任务。本研究以济南城区三所幼儿园的177名3～4岁儿童为被试,同时运用自然观察法、母亲评定法、教师评定法和同伴提名法评定儿童攻击,采用常规统计方法和结构方程模型评估四种测评的适用特点。得出如下主要结论:1、自然观察法、同伴提名法、教师评定法和母亲评定法具有中高程度的信效度,但各有优缺点,适用研究对象不同;2、测评模型与实测数据拟合良好,同时采用多种方法可以更为准确有效地测评儿童的攻击行为。

关键词: 攻击行为, 测评方法, 信度, 效度, 结构方程模型

Abstract: Effective and accurate assessment of children's aggression determines directly level and quality of the research in the area.Therefore,the study and evaluation of methods for assessing children's aggression constitutes one of the most fundamental tasks for the research in this area.In the present study,a panel of measures including natural observation,mother assessment,teacher assessment and peer nomination were employed in a sample of 177 3-4 years old children from three urban kindergartens.The reliabilities and validities of each method were evaluated for each measure with the traditional statistics and structural equation model (SEM).The main findings of the present study were as follows:1.Natural observation,mother assessment,teacher assess and peer nomination each had comparatively high reliability and criterion validity.But they have respective strongpoint and shortcoming,used to different research objects.2.The theoretical multiple-method model using four measures was very well fitted to the data.Using multiple methods can give more accurate and effective assessment of children's aggressive behaviors.

Key words: aggressive behavior, methods of assessment, reliability, validity, structural equation model

中图分类号:

B844.1

王益文, 林崇德, 张文新. 儿童攻击行为的多方法测评研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2004, 20(2): 69-74.

WANG Yi-wen, LIN Chong-de, ZHANG Wen-xin. Using multiple methods to measure children’s aggressive behavior[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2004, 20(2): 69-74.

参考文献

[1] Achenbach T M,Edelbrock C.Manual for the child behavior checklist and revised child behavior profile.Burlington:University of Vermont,Department of psychiatry,1983.1-12.
[2] Buss A H,Perry M.The aggression questionnaire.Journal of personality and Social Psychology,1992,63:452-459.
[3] Tremblay R E,Loeber R,Gagnon C,et al.Disruptive boys with stable and unstable high fighting behavior patterns during junior elementary school.Journal of abnormal child psychology,1991,19:285-300.
[4] Osterman K,Bjorkqvist K,Lagerspetz K,et al.Cross-cultural evidence of female indirect aggression.Aggressive behavior,1998,24:1-8.
[5] Vuchinick S,Bank L,Patterson G.Parenting,peers,and the stability of antisocial behavior in preadolescent boys.Developmental psychology,1992,28(3):510-521.
[6] Pepler D J,Craig W M.A peek behind the fence:Naturalistic observations of aggressive children with remote audiovisual recording.Developmental psychology,1995 31:548-553.
[7] Dodge K A,Frame C L.Social Cognitive Biases and Deficits in Aggressive Boys.Child development,1982,53:620-635.
[8] 张文新,张福建.学前儿童在园攻击性行为的观察研究.心理发展与教育,1996,12(4):18-22.
[9] Hau K T.Structural equation modeling:why and how to construct latent constructs.Educational research journal,1994,9(1):87-92.
[10] Byme,Barbara M.Structural equation modeling with AMOS,EQS,and LISREL:comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument.International journal of testing,2001,1:55-86.
[11] 张文新.《儿童社会性发展》.北京:北京师范大学出版社,1999.357-365.
[12] O'Connor D,Archer J,Wu F.Measuring Aggression:Self-reports,partner reports,and responses to provoking scenarios.Aggressive behavior,2001,27:79-101.
[13] Grotpeter J,Crick N.Relational Aggression,Over Aggression and Friendship.Child development,1996,67:2328-2338.

相关文章 15

[1]	洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系:情绪安全感和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 726-734.
[2]	刘田田, 李燕, 李有嘉, 姜新苗. 父母协同教养与学前儿童社会行为的关系:亲子关系和同胞关系的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 638-647.
[3]	任萍, 宋子婧, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 张云运. 青少年学业成绩、攻击行为与受欢迎程度的关系:一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 710-718.
[4]	刘啸莳, 刘世宏, 莫碧波, 李丹, 傅锐. 幼儿外倾性与攻击行为的关系:自我控制和母亲温暖教养的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 538-544.
[5]	金童林, 乌云特娜, 张璐, 杨雪, 贾彦茹, 杨宏. 社会逆境感知对大学生攻击行为的影响:反刍思维与领悟社会支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 414-421.
[6]	张云运, 刘思辰, 任萍, 牛丽丽. 学生学业和行为特征如何影响教师支持？来自个体和圈子层面的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 318-328.
[7]	李庆功, 张雯雨, 孙捷元, 马凤玲. 8~12岁儿童同伴信任的发展:特质可信度和面孔可信度的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 38-44.
[8]	高雯, 朱进慧, 方臻. 父亲参与教养对小学生攻击行为的影响:母亲育儿压力的部分中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 84-93.
[9]	马建苓, 刘畅. 错失恐惧对大学生社交网络成瘾的影响:社交网络整合性使用与社交网络支持的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(5): 605-614.
[10]	陆桂芝, 金童林, 葛俭, 任秀华, 张璐, 张亚利, 姜永志. 暴力暴露对大学生网络攻击行为的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 360-367.
[11]	何婷, 宋子婧, 丁菀, 刘伟, 蔺秀云. 父母心理控制与对立违抗障碍儿童抑郁和攻击行为的关系:父子依恋和母子依恋的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(2): 219-228.
[12]	宋明华, 陈晨, 刘燊, 李俊萱, 侯怡如, 张林. 父母教养方式对初中生攻击行为的影响:越轨同伴交往和自我控制的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(6): 675-682.
[13]	金童林, 陆桂芝, 张璐, 金祥忠, 王晓雨. 特质愤怒对大学生网络攻击行为的影响:道德推脱的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(5): 605-613.
[14]	孙丽君, 杜红芹, 牛更枫, 李俊一, 胡祥恩. 心理虐待与忽视对青少年攻击行为的影响:道德推脱的中介与调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(1): 65-75.
[15]	黎光明, 张敏强. 高校教师教学水平评价多元概化理论权重效应分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(1): 122-128.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed