心理发展与教育 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 640-650.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2026.05.04

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

价值指导时机对价值导向记忆的影响:一项基于8~22岁样本的发展性研究

李琼1,2, 唐卫海3, 王莹1,4, 张亚辉1, 储月1, 刘希平3   

  1. 1. 天津师范大学心理学部, 天津 300387;
    2. 江西环境工程职业学院, 赣州 341000;
    3. 三亚学院, 三亚 572022;
    4. 齐齐哈尔医学院, 齐齐哈尔 101006
  • 发布日期:2026-09-12
  • 通讯作者: 刘希平 E-mail:lxp3771@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    三亚学院人才引进项目(USYRC25-03;USYRC25-04)。

The Impact of Value Instruction Timing on Value-directed Remembering: A Developmental Study across Ages 8~22

LI Qiong1,2, TANG Weihai3, WANG Ying1,4, ZHANG Yahui1, CHU Yue1, LIU Xiping3   

  1. 1. Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
    2. Jiangxi Environmental Engineering Vocational College, Ganzhou 341000;
    3. University of Sanya, Sanya 572022;
    4. Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar 101006
  • Published:2026-09-12

摘要: 价值指导(value instruction)时机指的是在记忆加工的不同阶段向被试呈现项目的价值信息。研究以1401名8~22岁被试为样本,考察了四种不同的价值指导时机(编码前、编码前后、编码后、无指导)对价值导向记忆的影响及其发展特征。结果发现:(1)在编码前和编码前后指导条件下,儿童(8~12岁)、青少年(13~17岁)和成人(18~22岁)均表现出显著的价值选择性效应,主要体现在对高价值词语的优先回忆。在编码前指导条件下,成人的选择性水平显著高于儿童和青少年;在编码前后指导条件下,年龄间的差异不显著,且该条件并未比编码前单独指导产生更强的价值选择性效应;(2)在编码后指导条件下,仅青少年和成年人出现价值选择性效应,但表现为低价值项目优先回忆模式;(3)在无指导条件下,整体未表现出显著的价值选择性效应,但在回忆顺序上,儿童仍倾向于高价值项目优先,成年人则转向低价值项目趋势,青少年处于两者之间的过渡状态。以上结果说明,价值指导时机是影响价值导向记忆的重要因素,其中编码阶段的价值整合对高价值信息的优先记忆至关重要。随着年龄增长,个体在编码阶段整合价值信息的能力逐渐成熟,价值导向记忆的选择性优势也变得更加稳固,反映了这一能力随着认知发展和经验积累的优化过程。

关键词: 价值指导时机, 价值导向记忆, 元认知, 儿童和青少年

Abstract: The timing of value instruction refers to the presentation of value-related information to participants at different stages of memory processing. The study, conducted with a sample of 1401 participants aged 8~22, examined the effects of four different value instruction timings (pre-encoding, pre- and post-encoding, post-encoding, and no instruction) on value-directed remembering and its developmental characteristics. The results showed that: (1) Under the pre-encoding and pre- and post-encoding conditions, children (8~12 years), adolescents (13~17 years), and adults (18~22 years) all exhibited significant value selectivity, primarily manifested in the prioritization of high-value words. In the pre-encoding condition, adults showed significantly higher selectivity levels than children and adolescents, whereas no significant age differences were found under the pre- and post-encoding condition, which did not produce a stronger value selectivity than pre-encoding instruction alone; (2) Under the post-encoding condition, Significant value selectivity emerged only among adolescents and adults, but was Characterized by preferential recall of low-value items; (3) Under the no instruction condition, no overall significant value selectivity were observed. However, in terms of recall sequence, children still tended to prioritize high-value items, while adults shifted towards prioritizing low-value items, with adolescents in a transitional state between the two.These results suggest that value instruction timing is a critical factor influencing value-directed remembering, with the integration of value information during the encoding phase being particularly essential for preferential memory of high-value items. As individuals age, their ability to integrate value information during encoding matures, and the selectivity advantage in value-directed remembering becomes more stable, reflecting a dynamic process of optimization driven by cognitive development and accumulated experience.

Key words: value instruction timing, value-directed remembering, metacognition, children and adolescents

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Adcock, R. A.,Thangavel, A., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., Knutson, B., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2006). Reward-motivated learning: Mesolimbic activation precedes memory formation. Neuron, 50(3), 507-517.
Anquillare, E., & Selmeczy, D. (2023). Developmental differences in value-based remembering: The role of feedback and metacognition. Developmental Psychology, 59(7), 1181-1189.
Bendor, D., & Wilson, M. A. (2012). Biasing the content of hippocampal replay during sleep. Nature Neuroscience, 15(10), 1439-1444.
Braun, E. K.,Wimmer, G. E., & Shohamy, D. (2018). Retroactive and graded prioritization of memory by reward. Nature Communications, 9(1), 4886. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07280-0
Casey, B. J. (2015).Beyond Simple Models of Self-Control to Circuit-Based Accounts of Adolescent Behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 295-319.
Castel, A. D.,Farb, N. A. S., & Craik, F. I. M. (2007). Memory for general and specific value information in younger and older adults: Measuring the limits of strategic control. Memory & Cognition, 35(4), 689-700.
Castel, A. D., Humphreys, K. L., Lee, S. S.,Galván, A., Balota, D. A., & McCabe, D. P. (2011). The development of memory efficiency and valuedirected remembering across the life span: A cross-sectional study of memory and selectivity. Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1553-1564.
Cohen, M. S., Rissman, J., Suthana,N. A., Castel, A. D., & Knowlton, B. J. (2014). Value-based modulation of memory encoding involves strategic engagement of frontotemporal semantic processing regions. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(2), 578-592.
Cohen, M. S., Rissman,J., Suthana, N. A., Castel, A. D., & Knowlton, B. J. (2016). Effects of aging on value-directed modulation of semantic network activity during verbal learning. NeuroImage, 125, 1046-1062.
Cohen, M. S., Rissman, J., Hovhannisyan, M., Castel, A. D., & Knowlton, B. J. (2017). Free recall test experience potentiates strategy-driven effects of value on memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(10), 1581-1601.
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671-684.
Da Silva Castanheira, K., Lalla, A., Ocampo, K., Otto, A. R., & Sheldon, S. (2022). Reward at encoding but not retrieval modulates memory for detailed events.Cognition, 219, 104957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104957
Davidow, J. Y., Insel, C., & Somerville, L. H. (2018). Adolescent development of value-guided goal pursuit. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(8), 725-736.
Elliott, B. L., Blais, C., McClure, S. M., & Brewer, G. A. (2020). Neural correlates underlying the effect of reward value on recognition memory. NeuroImage, 206, 116296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116296
Elliott, B. L., McClure, S. M., & Brewer, G. A. (2020). Individual differences in value-directed remembering. Cognition, 201, 104275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104275
Galván, A. (2013). The Teenage Brain: Sensitivity to Rewards. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(2), 88-93.
Ghetti, S., & Fandakova, Y. (2020). Neural development of memory and metamemory in childhood and adolescence: Toward an integrative model of the development of episodic recollection. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 2(1), 365-388.
Hennessee, J. P., Patterson, T. K., Castel, A. D., & Knowlton, B. J. (2019). Forget me not: Encoding processes in value-directed remembering. Journal of Memory and Language, 106, 29-39.
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Knowlton, B. J., & Castel, A. D.(2022)Memory and Reward-Based Learning: A Value-Directed Remembering Perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 73(1), 25-52.
Li, Q., Tang, W., & Liu, X. (2025). Value-Directed Remembering: A Dual-Process Perspective.Behavioral Sciences, 15(8), 1113. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15081113
Murphy, D. H., & Castel, A. D. (2020). Responsible remembering: How metacognition impacts adaptive selective memory.Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 228(4), 301-303.
Murphy, D. H.,Agadzhanyan, K., Whatley, M. C., & Castel, A. D. (2021). Metacognition and fluid intelligence in value-directed remembering. Metacognition and Learning, 16(3), 685-709.
Murphy, D. H., & Castel, A. D. (2022a).Differential effects of proactive and retroactive interference in value-directed remembering for younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 37(7), 787-799.
Murphy, D. H., & Castel, A. D. (2022b).Responsible Remembering and Forgetting in Younger and Older Adults. Experimental Aging Research, 48(5), 455-473.
Murphy, D. H., & Knowlton, B. J. (2022). Framing effects in value-directed remembering.Memory & Cognition, 50(6), 1350-1361.
Murphy, D. H., Huckins, S. C., Rhodes, M. G., & Castel, A. D. (2022). The effect of perceptual processing fluency and value on metacognition and remembering. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29(3), 910-921.
Murphy, D. H., Schwartz, S. T., & Castel, A. D. (2022). Serial and strategic memory processes in goal-directed selective remembering. Cognition, 225, 105178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105178
Murphy, D. H. (2023). Strategic offloading: How the value of to-be-remembered information influences offloading decision-making. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 37(4), 749-767.
Murphy, D. H., Schwartz, S. T., & Castel, A. D. (2024). Value-directed retrieval: The effects of divided attention at encoding and retrieval on memory selectivity and retrieval dynamics.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 50(1), 17-38.
Ofen, N., Kao, Y.-C., Sokol-Hessner, P., Kim, H., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2007). Development of the declarative memory system in the human brain. Nature Neuroscience, 10(9), 1198-1205.
Patil, A., Murty, V. P., Dunsmoor, J. E., Phelps, E. A., & Davachi, L. (2017). Reward retroactively enhances memory consolidation for related items. Learning & Memory, 24(1), 65-69.
Roumis, D. K., & Frank, L. M. (2015). Hippocampal sharp-wave ripples in waking and sleeping states. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 35, 6-12.
Schneider, W. (2008). The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents: Major trends and implications for education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 2(3), 114-121.
Schwartz, S. T., Siegel, A. L. M.,Eich, T. S., & Castel, A. D. (2023). Value-directed memory selectivity relies on goal-directed knowledge of value structure prior to encoding in young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 38(1), 30-48.
Siegel, A. L. M., & Castel, A. D. (2019). Age-related differences in metacognition for memory capacity and selectivity. Memory, 27(9), 1236-1249.
Silaj, K. M., Agadzhanyan, K., & Castel, A. D. (2023). Value-directed learning: Schematic reward structure facilitates learning. Memory & Cognition, 51(7), 1527-1546.
Somerville, L. H., & Casey, B. (2011). Developmental neurobiology of cognitive control and motivational systems. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 20(2), 236-241.
Stefanidi, A., Ellis, D. M., & Brewer, G. A. (2018). Free recall dynamics in value-directed remembering. Journal of Memory and Language, 100, 18-31.
Stickgold, R., & Walker, M. P. (2013). Sleep-dependent memory triage: Evolving generalization through selective processing. Nature Neuroscience, 16(2), 139-145.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285.
Tipper. S. P. (1985). The Negative Priming Effect: Inhibitory Priming by Ignored Objects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37(4), 571-590.
Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147-177.
严燕, 姜英杰, 杨玲. (2013). 价值导向元记忆中价值顺序效应初探.心理学报, 45(10), 1094-1103.
严燕, 姜英杰. (2013). 价值导向元记忆的研究:理论、方法与进展.东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版), 2, 190-193.
钟玉璇,姜英杰. (2024). 价值影响记忆的作用机制:基于特异性视角.心理科学进展, (01), 75-84.
[1] 董肖肖, 刘岩, 胡亚欣. 儿童、青年与老年人在知觉和高阶元认知监控上的年龄差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 153-160.
[2] 薛笑然, 黄碧娟, 李红霞, 赵晓萌, 司继伟. 小学儿童数学态度与数学成就的纵向联系:学业拖延和数学元认知的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 520-529.
[3] 慕德芳, 陈英和. 小学高年级学生元认知监测对认知操作输出的影响:执行功能的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 305-312.
[4] 雷威, 刘可智, 梁雪梅, 陈晶. 决策信心校准水平对元认知监控作用的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 289-295.
[5] 王雪枫, 严燕. 走神研究的理论、方法与展望[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 367-377.
[6] 贾宁, 容丽卓, 代景华. 掌握程度和社会性线索对元认知监控的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(6): 641-647.
[7] 刘伟方, 张佳佳, 胡冬梅, 张明亮, 司继伟. 元认知监测与算术知识制约小学儿童心算策略运用能力的发展:一年纵向考察[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 439-446.
[8] 张婕, 黄碧娟, 司继伟, 官冬晓. 乡镇小学生的数学焦虑与数学成绩:数学自我效能感和数学元认知的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 453-460.
[9] 刘伟方, 华晓腾, 封洪敏, 胡冬梅, 司继伟. 算术策略运用能力的年龄差异:元认知监测与算术知识的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(3): 234-243.
[10] 慕德芳, 陈英和. 元认知监控的机制:认知灵活性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(2): 113-120.
[11] 张俊, 刘儒德, 贾玲. 反馈在自我调节学习中的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(2): 218-224.
[12] 陈英和, 郝嘉佳. 冲动-思考型儿童在拼图游戏中的问题解决及元认知差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(3): 241-246.
[13] 聂衍刚, 杨安, 曾敏霞. 青少年元认知、大五人格与学习适应行为的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(2): 151-157.
[14] 刘效贞, 张影侠, 司继伟. 初中生的数学估计能力及其与元认知监控的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(2): 35-40.
[15] 吴红云. 教学活动条件下大学生英语写作元认知的特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2006, 22(2): 81-84.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!