累积生态风险与初中生受欺凌的关系模式：心理弹性的调节效应

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2022.05.05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用整群抽样法对重庆等7省市24所中学3879名初一、初二和初三年级学生进行问卷调查,以考察累积生态风险与初中生受欺凌的关系模式,并探讨心理弹性在其中的作用。结果表明:(1)累积生态风险显著正向预测初中生受欺凌水平,呈现“负加速模式”,即随着累积生态风险的增加,新增风险因素对受欺凌的影响越来越小;(2)心理弹性对受欺凌的保护作用随着累积生态风险的增加而削弱,呈现“保护-反应”的调节子模型。研究结果为开展针对性地干预受欺凌提供了实证依据。

关键词: 受欺凌, 累积生态风险, 心理弹性, 调节效应, 初中生

Abstract: To explore the relationship between cumulative ecological risk and bullying victimization, and to test whether resilience moderates this relationship, a total 3879 junior high school students from 24 middle schools in China participated in this study. The results showed that:(1) the cumulative ecological risk was positively associated with bullying victimization. The relationship was characterized by the nonlinear pattern of the quadratic function (negative acceleration model) between cumulative ecological risk and bullying victimization; (2) The moderating effect of resilience was significant in the nonlinear relationship of the quadratic function between cumulative ecological risk and bullying victimization. This relationship showed protective-reactive model. In conclusion, the cumulative ecological risk has huge influence on bullying victimization, and we should not be over-optimistic about the protective function of resilience in those students who experience severe adversity. This study provides an inspiration for preventing bullying victimization in junior high school students.

Key words: bullying victimization, cumulative ecological risk, resilience, moderating effect, junior high school students

中图分类号:

B844

肖雪, 郭磊, 赵永萍, 陈富国. 累积生态风险与初中生受欺凌的关系模式：心理弹性的调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 648-657.

XIAO Xue, GUO Lei, ZHAO Yongping, CHEN Fuguo. Cumulative Ecological Risk on Bullying Victimization in Junior High School Students: The Moderating Effects of Resilience[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(5): 648-657.

参考文献

Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.),Handbook of child psychology:Theoretical models of human development (pp. 993-1028). John Wiley & Sons.
Chalamandaris, A. -G., & Piette, D. (2015). School-based anti-bullying interventions:Systematic review of the methodology to assess their effectiveness.Aggression and Violent Behavior, 24, 131-174.
Choi, J.-K., Teshome, T., & Smith, J. (2021). Neighborhood disadvantage, childhood adversity, bullying victimization, and adolescent depression:A multiple mediational analysis.Journal of Affective Disorders, 279, 554-562.
Cook, C. R., Williams, K. R., Guerra, N. G., Kim, T. E., & Sadek, S. (2010). Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence:A meta-analytic investigation.School Psychology Quarterly, 25(2), 65-83.
Demol, K., Leflot, G., Verschueren, K., & Colpin, H. (2020). Revealing the transactional associations among teacher-child relationships, peer rejection and peer victimization in early adolescence.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(11), 2311-2326.
Donnon, T. (2010). Understandinghow resiliency development influences adolescent bullying and victimization. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 25(1), 101-113.
Erceg-Hurn, D. M., & Mirosevich, V. M. (2008). Modern robust statistical methods:An easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research.American Psychologist, 63(7), 591-601.
Evans, G. W., Li, D., & Whipple, S. S. (2013). Cumulative risk and child development.Psychological Bulletin, 139(6), 1342-1396.
Gadaire, D. M., Henrich, C. C., & Finn-Stevenson, M. (2017). Longitudinal effects of parent-child interactions on children's social competence.Research on Social Work Practice, 27(7), 767-778.
Gerard, J. M., & Buehler, C. (2004). Cumulativeenvironmental risk and youth maladjustment:The role of youth attributes. Child Development, 75(6), 1832-1849.
Gini, G., & Pozzoli, T. (2013). Bulliedchildren and psychosomatic problems:A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 132(4), 720-729.
Goldweber, A., Waasdorp, T. E., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2013). Examining the link between forms of bullying behaviors and perceptions of safety and belonging among secondary school students.Journal of School Psychology, 51(4), 469-485.
Hebron, J., Oldfield, J., & Humphrey, N. (2017). Cumulative risk effects in the bullying of children and young people with autism spectrum conditions. Autism, 21(3), 291-300.
Holt, T. J., Turner, M. G., & Lyn Exum, M. (2014). The impact of self control and neighborhood disorder on bullying victimization.Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(4), 347-355.
Hong, J. S., Kim, D. H., & Piquero, A. R. (2017). Assessing the links between punitive parenting, peer deviance, social isolation and bullying perpetration and victimization in South Korean adolescents.Child Abuse & Neglect, 73, 63-70.
Jones, D. J., Forehand, R., Brody, G., & Armistead, L. (2002). Psychosocial adjustment of african american children in single-mother families:A test of three risk models. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(1), 105-115.
Li, D., Li, X., Wang, Y., Zhao, L., Bao, Z., & Wen, F. (2013). School connectedness and problematic internet use in adolescents:A moderated mediation model of deviant peer affiliation and self-control.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41(8), 1231-1242.
Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). Theconstruct of resilience:A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3), 543-562.
Masten, A. S. (2014). Globalperspectives on resilience in children and youth. Child Development, 85(1), 6-20.
Moore, B., & Woodcock, S. (2017). Resilience to bullying:Towards an alternative to the anti-bullying approach.Educational Psychology in Practice, 33(1), 65-80.
Murray-Harvey, R., & Slee, P. T. (2010). School and home relationships and their impact on school bullying.School Psychology International, 31(3), 271-295.
Olson, D. H., Russell, C. S., & Sprenkle, D. H. (1980). Marital andfamily therapy:A decade review. Journal of Marriage & Family, 42(4), 973-993.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research:A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Richardson, G. E. (2002). The metatheory of resilience and resiliency.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(3), 307-321.
Sapouna, M., & Wolke, D. (2013). Resilience to bullying victimization:The role of individual, family and peer characteristics.Child Abuse & Neglect, 37(11), 997-1006.
Seo, H.-J., Jung, Y.-E., Kim, M.-D., & Bahk, W.-M. (2017). Factors associated with bullying victimization among Korean adolescents.Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 13, 2429-2435.
Serdiouk, M., Berry, D., & Gest, S. D. (2016). Teacher-child relationships and friendships and peer victimization across the school year.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 46, 63-72.
Thornberg, R., Wänström, L., Pozzoli, T., & Gini, G. (2018). Victim prevalence in bullying and its association with teacher-student and student-student relationships and class moral disengagement:A class-level path analysis.Research Papers in Education, 33(3), 320-335.
Tippett, N., & Wolke, D. (2014). Socioeconomic status and bullying:A meta-analysis.American Journal of Public Health, 104(6), 48-59.
Tucker, C. J., Finkelhor, D., & Turner, H. (2020). Family predictors of sibling versus peer victimization.Journal of Family Psychology, 34(2), 186-195.
Zhao, Y. P., Zhao, Y. F., Lee, Y.-T., & Chen, L. (2020). Cumulative interpersonal relationship risk and resilience models for bullying victimization and depression in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 155, Article 109706.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109706
Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). Themultidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30-41.
Zimmerman, M. A., Stoddard, S. A., Eisman, A. B., Caldwell, C. H., Aiyer, S. M., & Miller, A. (2013). Adolescentresilience:Promotive factors that inform prevention. Child Development Perspectives, 7(4), 215-220.
鲍振宙, 李董平, 张卫, 王艳辉, 孙文强, 赵力燕. (2014). 累积生态风险与青少年的学业和社交能力:子女责任感的风险补偿与调节效应. 心理发展与教育, 30(5),482-495.
常淑敏,张丽娅,王玲晓. (2019). 发展资源在减少青少年外化问题行为中的累积效应及关系模式. 心理学报, 51(11), 1244-1255.
邓林园, 王凌霄, 徐洁, 黎坚. (2018). 初中生感知的父母冲突、亲子冲突与其欺负行为之间的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 26(01), 118-122+128.
胡月琴, 甘怡群. (2008). 青少年心理韧性量表的编制和效度验证. 心理学报, 40(8), 902-912.
江光荣. (2004). 中小学班级环境:结构与测量. 心理科学, 27(4),839-843.
李董平, 周月月, 赵力燕, 王艳辉, 孙文强. (2016). 累积生态风险与青少年网络成瘾:心理需要满足和积极结果预期的中介作用. 心理学报, 48(12),1519-1537.
李海垒, 张文新. (2006). 心理韧性研究综述. 山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 51(3), 149-152.
吕梦思, 席居哲, 罗一睿. (2017). 不同心理弹性者的日常情绪特征:结合体验采样研究的证据. 心理学报, 49(07),928-940.
谭千保, 伍牧月, 常志彬. (2018). 累积生态风险影响农村儿童校园欺凌的实证调查. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报, 17(5),51-57.
席居哲, 左志宏, Wei,W. (2012). 心理韧性研究诸进路. 心理科学进展, 20(9),1426-1447.
徐伦, 林崇德, 刘力, 杨萌. (2012). 金融危机背景下家庭社会地位对大三学生择业动机的影响:社会支配倾向的中介作用. 心理科学, 35(02),472-476.
于肖楠, 张建新. (2007). 自我韧性量表与Connor-Davidson韧性量表的应用比较. 心理科学, 30(5),1169-1171.
喻承甫, 张卫, 曾毅茵, 叶婷, 李月明, 王姝君. (2011). 青少年感恩与问题行为的关系:学校联结的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 27(4),425-433.
张文新, 武建芬. (1999). Olweus儿童欺负问卷中文版的修订. 心理发展与教育, 15(2),7-11+37.

相关文章 15

[1]	秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响：同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[2]	吴晓靓, 盖笑松, 李晓天, 顾婷玉, 王宏. 家庭经济压力与初中生幸福感的关系:歧视知觉的中介作用和控制感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 877-886.
[3]	陈颖, 张野, 韩娜, 王凯. 校园排斥对初中生网络偏差行为的影响:相对剥夺感与自我控制的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 887-894.
[4]	周晓慧, 刘妍希, 陈欣, 王一集. 父母教育卷入对初中生生活满意度的影响:校内人际关系和学业自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 691-701.
[5]	牛湘, 冉光明. 同伴关系与幼儿问题行为关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 473-487.
[6]	辛国刚, 张李斌, 常睿生, 张云运. 青少年早期受欺凌发展轨迹:抑郁、自尊和学业成就的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 568-579.
[7]	冯全升, 周宗奎, 孙晓军, 张艳红, 连帅磊. 负性生活事件与初中生内化问题:反刍思维的中介作用与同伴依恋的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 419-428.
[8]	鲁明辉, 王融, 张丽敏. 父母心理弹性与自闭症谱系障碍儿童情绪行为问题的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 247-254.
[9]	刘志国, 齐冰, 李亚平, 王润洲, 崔佳, 宋耀武. 成就目标定向在学业自我概念与学业成绩关系中的调节作用:基于内/外参照模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 68-76.
[10]	蒋索, 丁金琦, 刘艳, 陆元圆, 李小青, 陈静. 青少年早期网络欺凌/受欺凌对睡眠质量的影响:社交焦虑和抑郁情绪的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 85-96.
[11]	高峰, 白学军, 章鹏, 曹海波. 中国青少年父母教养方式与自杀意念的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 97-108.
[12]	邓林园, 高诗晴, 王婧怡, 李蓓蕾. 新冠疫情期间中小学教师工作-家庭冲突和抑郁:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 121-131.
[13]	余思, 张春阳, 徐慰. 特质正念与大学生焦虑和攻击性的纵向关系：心理弹性的中介和留守经历的调节[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 711-719.
[14]	严益霞, 刘颜蓥, 丁芳. 心理理论与社会互动方式对初中生社会善念发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 485-494.
[15]	陈建文, 刘艳, 谭千保. 累积生态风险与高职生学习倦怠：消极自我图式和网络成瘾的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 576-583.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed