高中生数学能力实体观对数学学习投入的影响:学业自我效能感和消极学业情绪的中介作用

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2019.01.06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用数学能力实体观量表、学业自我效能感量表、消极学业情绪量表（羞愧、厌倦）和数学学习投入量表，对1064名高中生进行调查。结果表明：数学能力实体观、学业自我效能感、羞愧、厌倦和数学学习投入之间均存在显著相关；学业自我效能感、厌倦在数学能力实体观和数学学习投入之间的中介作用均显著；且学业自我效能感-厌倦的链式中介作用也显著。这表明，高中生的数学能力实体观不仅可以直接预测数学学习投入，也可分别经由学业自我效能感、厌倦的中介作用、以及二者的链式中介作用影响数学学习投入。

关键词: 数学能力观, 学业自我效能感, 消极学业情绪, 数学学习投入, 高中生

Abstract: Previous studies have highlighted the impact of mathematic engagement on math achievement. Among many factors affecting students' mathematic engagement, the role of mindset has been recognized by researchers over the past few years, but little is known about the mediating mechanisms underlying this relation. The current study aimed to investigate the relationship between mindset and engagement in math, and to explore the mediating effect of academic self-efficacy and negative academic emotions. By using the relevant questionnaires, fixed mindset, academic self-efficacy, negative academic emotions (shame and boredom) and mathematic engagement of 1064 high school students were measured. The results revealed that the negative association between fixed mindset and mathematic engagement was mediated by academic self-efficacy and boredom. These findings contribute to complement and extend the understanding of factors affecting students' engagement in math.

Key words: mindset, academic self-efficacy, shame, boredom, mathematic engagement

中图分类号:

G442

蒋舒阳, 刘儒德, 甄瑞, 洪伟, 金芳凯. 高中生数学能力实体观对数学学习投入的影响:学业自我效能感和消极学业情绪的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(1): 48-56.

JIANG Shuyang, LIU Rude, ZHEN Rui, HONG Wei, JIN Fangkai. Relations between Fixed Mindset and Engagement in Math among High School Students: Roles of Academic Self-efficacy and Negative Academic Emotions[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2019, 35(1): 48-56.

参考文献

Ahmed, W., Greetje, V. D. W., Kuyper, H., & Minnaert, A. (2013). Emotions, self-regulated learning, and achievement in mathematics:a growth curve analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 150-161.
Aronson, J., Fried, C., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 113-125.
Bandura, A. (1986). Fearful expectations and avoidant actions as coeffects of perceived self-inefficacy. American Psychologist, 41(41), 1389-1391.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition:a longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246-263.
Burkley, M., Parker, J., Stermer, S. P., & Burkley, E. (2010). Trait beliefs that make women vulnerable to math disengagement. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(2), 234 -238.
Chen, J. A., & Pajares, F. (2010). Implicit theories of ability of grade 6 science students:relation to epistemological beliefs and academic motivation and achievement in science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 75-87.
Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. New York, NY:Springer.
Covington, M. V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement:an integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 171-200.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset:the new psychology of success. Inventors Digest.
Dweck, C.S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit Theories and Their Role in Judgments and Reactions:A World from Two Perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267-285.
Dweck, C. S., & Henderson, V. L. (1989). Theories of intelligence:background and measures. Unpublished manuscript.
Dweck, C. S., & Molden, D. C. (2005). Self-theories:Their impact on competence motivation and acquisition. The handbook of competence and motivation. New York:Guilford.
Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C, Wigneld, A., Buchman, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C, & Mac Iver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence:The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents' experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90-101.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor:the structure of adolescents' achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(3), 215-225.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational belief, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109-132.
Fan, W., & Williams, C. M. (2010). The effects of parental involvement on students'academic self-efficacy, engagement and intrinsic motivation self-efficacy, engagement and intrinsic motivation. Educational Psychology, 30(1), 53-74.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement:potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
Fredricks, J. A., Hofkens, T., Wang, M. T., & Mortenson, E. (2017). Supporting girls' and boys' engagement in math and science learning:a mixed methods study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(4), 37-54.
Greene, B. A. (2015). Measuring cognitive engagement with self-report scales:reflections over 20 years of research. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 14-30.
Heslin, P. A., Latham, G. P., & Vandewalle, D. (2005). The effect of implicit person theory on performance appraisals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 842-856.
Hong, Y. Y., Chiu, C. Y., Dweck, C. S., Lin, D. M. S., & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping:A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 588-599.
Jones, B. D., Wilkins, J. L. M., Long, M. H., & Wang, F. (2012). Testing a motivational model of achievement:How students' mathematical beliefs and interests are related to their achievement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(1), 1-20.
King, R. B., Mcinerney, D. M., & Watkins, D. A. (2012). How you think about your intelligence determines how you feel in school:the role of theories of intelligence on academic emotions. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 814-819.
Lane, A. M., Whyte, G. P., Terry, P. C., & Nevill, A. M. (2005). Mood, self-set goals and examination performance:the moderating effect of depressed mood. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(1), 143-153.
Lewis, A. D., Huebner, E. S., Reschly, A. L., & Valois, R. F. (2009). The incremental validity of positive emotions in predicting school functioning. Journal of Psycho Educational Assessment, 27(5), 397-408.
Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 119-137.
Liu, R. D., Zhen, R., Ding, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, J., & Jiang, R., et al. (2018). Teacher support and math engagement:roles of academic self-efficacy and positive emotions. Educational Psychology, 38,1-14.
Martin, A. J. (2008). How domain specific is motivation and engagement across school, sport, and music? A substantive-methodological synergy assessing young sportspeople and musicians. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 785-813.
Nett, U. E., Goetz, T., & Hall, N. C. (2011). Coping with boredom in school:an experience sampling perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 49-59.
Op't Eynde, P., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2006). Epistemic dimensions of students' mathematics-related belief systems. International Journal of Educational Research, 45(1), 57-70.
Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions:Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315-341.
Pekrun, R. (2009). Global and local perspectives on human affect:Implications of the control-value theory of achievement emotions. Contemporary motivation research. Cambridge, MA:Hogrefe.
Pintrich, P. R, & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
Putwain, D., Sander, P., & Larkin, D. (2013). Academic self-efficacy in study-related skills and behaviours:relations with learning-related emotions and academic success. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 633-650.
Romero, C., Master, A., Paunesku, D., Dweck, C. S., & Gross, J. J. (2014). Academic and emotional functioning in middle school:the role of implicit theories. Emotion, 14(2), 1-8.
Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2001). The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents' motivation and engagement during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 437-460.
Schafer, J. A., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data:Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147-177.
Shih, S. S. (2011). Perfectionism, implicit theories of intelligence, and taiwanese eighth-grade students' academic engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 104(2), 131-142.
Stodolsky, S. S., Salk, S., & Glaessner, B. (1991). Student views about learning math and social studies. American Educational Research Journal, 28(1), 89-116.
Tempelaar, D. T., Rienties, B., Giesbers, B., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2015). The pivotal role of effort beliefs in mediating implicit theories of intelligence and achievement goals and academic motivations. Social Psychology of Education, 18(1), 101-120.
Tulis, M., & Fulmer, S. M. (2013). Students' motivational and emotional experiences and their relationship to persistence during academic challenge in mathematics and reading. Learning and Individual Differences, 27, 35-47.
Tze, V. M., Klassen, R. M., & Daniels, L. M. (2014). Patterns of boredom and its relationship with perceived autonomy support and engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(3), 175-187.
Ulrike E. Nett, Thomas Goetz, & Nathan C. Hall. (2011). Coping with boredom in school:an experience sampling perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 49-59.
Wang, J., Liu, R. D., Ding, Y., Xu, L., Liu, Y., & Zhen, R. (2017). Teacher's autonomy support and engagement in math:multiple mediating roles of self-efficacy, intrinsic value, and boredom. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1006-1015.
Wang, M., Fredricks, J. A., Ye, F., Hofkens, T. L., & Linn, J. S. (2016). The math and science engagement scales:Scale development, validation, and psychometric properties. Learning and Instruction, 43, 16-26.
陈继文, 郭永玉, 胡小勇. (2015). 教师自主支持与初中生的学习投入:家庭社会阶层与学生自主动机的影响. 心理发展与教育, 31(2), 180-187.
成子娟, 侯杰泰. (2000). 学科能力内隐观的普遍性及其年龄差异. 心理科学, 23(2), 146-150.
董妍, 俞国良. (2007). 青少年学业情绪问卷的编制及应用. 心理学报, 39(5), 852-860.
董妍, 俞国良. (2010). 青少年学业情绪对学业成就的影响. 心理科学, 33(4), 934-937.
龚少英, 韩雨丝, 王丽霞, 高雷, 熊俊梅. (2016). 任务价值和学业情绪与网络学习满意度的关系研究. 电化教育研究(3), 72-77.
李抗, 杨文登. (2015). 从归因疗法到内隐理念:德韦克的心理学理论体系及影响. 心理科学进展, 23(4), 621-631.
李晓文, 彭琴芳. (2011). 3-9年级儿童能力观干预比较研究. 心理科学, 34(5), 1090-1094.
刘影, 龚少英, 熊俊梅. (2016). 初中生数学家庭作业质量、控制感与作业情绪对作业努力的影响. 心理科学, 39(2), 357-363.
龙安邦, 范蔚, 金心红. (2013). 中小学生学习压力的测度及归因模型构建. 教育学报, 9(1), 121-128.
罗荣, 陈京军. (2013). 初中生成就归因、学业自我效能感对外语焦虑的预测模型. 中国临床心理学杂志, 21(2), 300-302.
石雷山, 陈英敏, 侯秀, 高峰强. (2013). 家庭社会经济地位与学习投入的关系:学业自我效能的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 29(1), 71-78.
王道阳, 陆祥, 殷欣. (2017). 流动儿童消极学业情绪对学习自我效能感的影响:情绪调节策略的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 33(1), 56-64.
魏军, 刘儒德, 何伊丽, 唐铭, 邸妙词, 庄鸿娟. (2014). 小学生学习坚持性和学习投入在效能感、内在价值与学业成就关系中的中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 12(3), 326-332.
温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰, 刘红云. (2004). 中介效应检验程序及其应用. 心理学报, 36(5), 614-620.
邢淑芬, 俞国良, 林崇德. (2011). 小学高年级儿童的内隐智力理论及其与表扬的关系. 心理发展与教育, 27(3), 255-259.
熊俊梅, 龚少英, Frenzel, A. C. (2011). 高中生数学学业情绪、学习策略与数学成绩的关系. 教育研究与实验(6), 89-92.
俞国良, 董妍. (2005). 学业情绪研究及其对学生发展的意义. 教育研究, (10), 39-43.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	高斌, 张丹丹, 朱根, 蔡艳香, 郭羽希. 高中生主动性人格与网络学习投入：网络学习自我效能和学业期望的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 224-230.
[2]	杨宝琰, 柳玉姣. 元刻板印象威胁对县城农村高中生学校归属感的影响:身份认同整合和自我肯定的作用机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 645-653.
[3]	周晓慧, 刘妍希, 陈欣, 王一集. 父母教育卷入对初中生生活满意度的影响:校内人际关系和学业自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 691-701.
[4]	张洋, 张婉莹, 王燕青, 赵婷婷, 王福兴. 生成性绘图与合作对高中生科学知识学习的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 830-838.
[5]	张小敏, 陈欣, 务凯, 赵国祥. 学校联结和学业能力对高中生自尊的影响:一个多层线性模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 358-365.
[6]	徐鑫锫, 莫玲菲, 刘明, 邓赐平. 高一学生成就目标特征模式及学业适应:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 81-89.
[7]	罗海风, 刘坚, 周达. 家长参与在家庭社会经济地位和高中生学习品质之间的中介作用——师生关系的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 199-210.
[8]	贾绪计, 蔡林, 林琳, 林崇德. 高中生感知教师支持与学习投入的关系:学业自我效能感和成就目标定向的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 700-707.
[9]	郭筱琳, 何苏日那, 秦欢, 刘春晖, 罗良. 亲子间教育期望差异对小学生情感幸福感的影响:学业成绩和学业自我效能感的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 467-477.
[10]	楚啸原, 理原, 王兴超, 王玉慧, 雷雳. 家庭收入与高中生幸福感:社会支持与性别因素的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 478-485.
[11]	顾婷玉, 盖笑松, 王国霞, 刘芳晴. 高中生价值观对学校投入的影响:未来目标和动机内化程度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(1): 68-75.
[12]	李永占. 父母教养方式对高中生学习投入的影响:一个链式中介效应模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(5): 576-585.
[13]	陈英敏, 刘忠花, 李亮, 曲艺, 韩磊, 高峰强. 高中生羞怯与学业适应的关系:学业求助的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(3): 322-329.
[14]	赵改, 孔繁昌, 刘诏君, 冯雅萌, 黄声普, 王亚丹, 周宗奎. 父母情感温暖对青少年感恩的影响:责任心与公正世界信念的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(3): 257-263.
[15]	洪伟, 刘儒德, 甄瑞, 蒋舒阳, 金芳凯. 成就目标定向与小学生数学学习投入的关系:学业拖延和数学焦虑的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(2): 191-199.