心理发展与教育 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 338-345.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2018.03.10
朱进杰, 姚计海, 吴曼
ZHU Jinjie, YAO Jihai, WU Man
摘要: 以北京、河北、宁夏、广东等地24所中小学923名中小学教师为被试,采取教学自主权量表、教学自主性量表、教师工作满意度量表,探讨了教师的教学自主权、教学自主性与工作满意度之间的关系。研究结果发现:(1)教学自主权与教学自主性均可显著预测教师工作满意度;(2)教学自主性在教学自主权与教师工作满意度之间起着完全中介作用,即教学自主权通过教师的教学自主性,对教师工作满意度有正向预测作用。
Ai, N. L., & Nie, Y. (2014). Understanding teacher empowerment:Teachers' perceptions of principal's and immediate supervisor's empowering behaviours, psychological empowerment and work-related outcomes. Teaching & Teacher Education, 41, 67-79.Banerjee, N., Stearns, E., Moller, S., & Mickelson, R. A. (2017). Teacher job satisfaction and student achievement:The roles of teacher professional community and teacher collaboration in schools. American Journal of Education, 123(2), 203-241.Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471-482.Conley, S., & Levinson, R. (1993). Teacher work redesign and job-satisfaction.Educational Administration Quarterly, 29(4), 453-478.Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits:Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.Dinham, S., & Scott, C. (1998). A three domain model of teacher and school executive career satisfaction. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(4), 362-378.Erss, M., Kalmus, V., & Autio, T. H. (2016). "Walking a fine line":teachers' perception of curricular autonomy in Estonia, Finland and Germany. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(5), 589-609.Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.Gagne, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362.Hini?, D., Grubor, J., & Bruli?, L. (2017). Followership styles and job satisfaction in secondary school teachers in serbia. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(3), 503-520.Kurland, H., & Hasson-Gilad, D. R. (2015). Organizational learning and extra effort:The mediating effect of job satisfaction. Teaching & Teacher Education, 49, 56-67.Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago:Rand McNally. 1293-1349.Morgado, J. C., & Sousa, F. (2010). Teacher evaluation, curricular autonomy and professional development:trends and tensions in the Portuguese educational policy. Journal of Education Policy, 25(3), 369-384.Nasra, M. A., & Heilbrunn, S. (2015). Transformational leadership and organizational citizenship behavior in the Arab educational system in Israel:The Impact of trust and job satisfaction. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 72(3), 1389-1409.Nie, Y., Chua, B. L., Yeung, A. S., Ryan, R. M., & Chan, W. Y. (2015). The importance of autonomy support and the mediating role of work motivation for well-being:Testing self-determination theory in a Chinese work organisation. International Journal of Psychology, 50(4), 245-255.Oberfield, Z. W. (2016). A Bargain half fulfilled:Teacher autonomy and accountability in traditional public schools and public charter schools. American Educational Research Journal, 53(2), 296-323.Pearson, L. C., & Hall, B. W. (1993). Initial construct validation of the teaching autonomy scale. Journal of Educational Research, 86(3), 172-177.Pearson, L. C., & Moomaw, W. (2005). The Relationship between teacher autonomy and stress, work satisfaction, empowerment, and professionalism. Educational Research Quarterly, 29(1), 37-53.Pearson, L. C., & Moomaw, W. (2006). Continuing validation of the teaching autonomy scale. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(1), 44-51,64.Philippou, S., Kontovourki, S., & Theodorou, E. (2014). Can autonomy be imposed? Examining teacher (re) positioning during the ongoing curriculum change in Cyprus. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(5), 611-633.Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539-569.Runhaar, P., Konermann, J., & Sanders, K. (2013). Teachers' organizational citizenship behaviour:Considering the roles of their work engagement, autonomy and leader-member exchange. Teaching And Teacher Education, 30, 99-108.Scudella, C. M. (2015). Teachers' perceptions of administrative autonomy-supportive versus controlling behaviors:Factors that influence teacher intrinsic motivation and relationships with administrators. (10014010 Ph.D.), Cardinal Stritch University, Ann Arbor.Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2011). Teacher job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession:Relations with school context, feeling of belonging, and emotional exhaustion. Teaching & Teacher Education, 27(6), 1029-1038.Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2014). Teacher self-efficacy and perceived autonomy:relations with teacher engagement, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion. Psychological Reports, 114(1), 68-77.Smaller, H. (2015). The teacher disempowerment debate:historical reflections on "slender autonomy". Paedagogica Historica, 51(1-2), 136-151.Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.Ulas, J., & Aksu, M. (2015). Development of teacher autonomy scale for turkish Teachers. In C. Hursen (Ed.), Proceedings Of 5th World Conference on Learning, Teaching And Educational Leadership (Vol. 186, pp. 344-349). Amsterdam:Elsevier Science Bv.Wang, Q., & Zhang, H. (2014). Promoting teacher autonomy through university-school collaborative action research. Language Teaching Research, 18(2), 222-241.Wanous, J. P., & Lawler, E. E. (1972). Measurement and meaning of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56(2), 95-105.White, P. A. (1992). Teacher empowerment under "ideal" school-site autonomy. Educational Evaluation And Policy Analysis, 14(1), 69-82.Wermke, W., & Höstfält, G. (2014). Contextualizing teacher autonomy in time and space:a model for comparing various forms of governing the teaching profession. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(1), 58-80.Wilson, S. M. (1993). The self-empowerment index:a measure of internally and externally expressed teacher autonomy. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 727-737.Xu, H. (2015). The development of teacher autonomy in collaborative lesson preparation:A multiple-case study of EFL teachers in China. System, 52, 139-148.冯伯麟. (1996). 教师工作满意及其影响因素的研究. 教育研究(2), 42-49.贾汇亮. (2014). 教师教学自主权的缺失及保障. 课程.教材.教法(8), 38-43.黎婉勤. (2010). 中小学教师专业自主权缺失分析. 教育评论(5), 53-55.林成堂, 江玲. (2011). 论教师专业自主权的实践尺度.华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)(3), 28-32.罗杰, 周瑗, 陈维, 潘运, & 赵守盈. (2014). 教师职业认同与情感承诺的关系:工作满意度的中介作用. 心理发展与教育(3), 322-328.罗茜, 李洪玉, 何一粟. (2012). 高校教师人格特质、工作特征与工作满意度的关系研究. 心理与行为研究(3), 215-219.穆洪华, 胡咏梅, 刘红云. (2016). 中学教师工作满意度及其影响因素研究. 教育学报(2), 71-80.苏尚锋. (2007). 个体与组织:教师自主性的二重维度. 教师教育研究(6), 1-5.王济川, 王小倩, 姜宝法. (2011). 结构方程模型:方法与应用:高等教育出版社.22.王永丽, 邓静怡, 何熟珍. (2009). 角色投入对工作满意度和生活满意度的影响. 管理评论(5), 61-69+85.温忠麟, 侯杰泰, 马什赫伯特. (2004). 结构方程模型检验:拟合指数与卡方准则. 心理学报, 36(2), 186-194.温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰, & 刘红云. (2004). 中介效应检验程序及其应用.心理学报, 36(5), 614-620.姚计海. (2014). 中小学教师教学自主性特点的实证研究. 教师教育研究(6), 31-39.姚计海, 申继亮. (2007). 中小学教师教学自主权量表的修订. 应用心理学(4), 329-333.姚计海, 申继亮. (2010). 教师教学自主性问卷的编制与修订. 心理发展与教育(3), 302-307. |
[1] | 王鑫强, 李金文, 卢红燕, 赖正伟, 李佳源. 择偶优劣势对师范大学生教师职业认同的影响:择偶价值感的中介及自尊的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 64-73. |
[2] | 姚计海, 蒋雨含, 邹弘晖. 教师教学自主权与教学反思的关系:心理授权和职业承诺的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 842-849. |
[3] | 杨振芳. 工作支持对乡村教师工作激情的影响:基本心理需要满足的多重中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 850-858. |
[4] | 黄杰, 朱丹, 杨澳. 实习初期教师职业认同的发展轨迹及其与主动性人格的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 40-47. |
[5] | 邓林园, 高诗晴, 王婧怡, 李蓓蕾. 新冠疫情期间中小学教师工作-家庭冲突和抑郁:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 121-131. |
[6] | 李玉华, 王桐, 刘悦, 俞劼, 林崇德. 教师创造性教学行为与小学生创造性思维的关系:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 513-519. |
[7] | 李蓓蕾, 高婷, 张莉莉, 周楠, 邓林园. 学生感知的教师欺凌态度与学生欺凌行为的关系——学生欺凌态度的中介作用及其性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 348-357. |
[8] | 王国霞, 赵扬. 教师自主支持与学生学业成就关系的元分析:心理需要满足、动机及投入的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 380-390. |
[9] | 吴甲旺, 李红霞, 司继伟. 小学低年级儿童的计算流畅性与数学焦虑:基于变量为中心与个体为中心的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 72-80. |
[10] | 周思妤, 王艺卓, 李晓巍. 幼儿园新教师学历与离职意向的关系:入职适应、工作满意度的多重中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 675-682. |
[11] | 贾绪计, 蔡林, 林琳, 林崇德. 高中生感知教师支持与学习投入的关系:学业自我效能感和成就目标定向的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 700-707. |
[12] | 汪海彬, 张鹏程, 卢家楣, 瞿琼, 张燕. 职前教师情绪觉察能力对情绪信息注意偏向的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 462-468. |
[13] | 张云运, 刘思辰, 任萍, 牛丽丽. 学生学业和行为特征如何影响教师支持?来自个体和圈子层面的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 318-328. |
[14] | 黎光明, 陈子豪, 张敏强. 高校教师教学水平评价概化理论预算限制下最佳样本量估计[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 378-384. |
[15] | 林颐宣. 主动性人格对小学教师工作满意度的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 103-112. |
|