心理发展与教育 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 338-345.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2018.03.10

• 教与学心理 • 上一篇    下一篇

教师的教学自主权与工作满意度的关系:教学自主性的中介作用

朱进杰, 姚计海, 吴曼   

  1. 北京师范大学教育学部, 北京 100875
  • 出版日期:2018-05-15 发布日期:2018-05-15
  • 通讯作者: 姚计海,E-mail:yaojihai@bnu.edu.cn E-mail:yaojihai@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    北京市教育科学规划重点课题(AAFA16004)。

Extrinsic Autonomy of Teaching and Job Satisfaction: Mediating Role of Intrinsic Autonomy of Teaching

ZHU Jinjie, YAO Jihai, WU Man   

  1. Faculty of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
  • Online:2018-05-15 Published:2018-05-15

摘要: 以北京、河北、宁夏、广东等地24所中小学923名中小学教师为被试,采取教学自主权量表、教学自主性量表、教师工作满意度量表,探讨了教师的教学自主权、教学自主性与工作满意度之间的关系。研究结果发现:(1)教学自主权与教学自主性均可显著预测教师工作满意度;(2)教学自主性在教学自主权与教师工作满意度之间起着完全中介作用,即教学自主权通过教师的教学自主性,对教师工作满意度有正向预测作用。

关键词: 教师, 教学自主权, 教学自主性, 工作满意度

Abstract: 923 primary and middle school teachers were investigated in this study to complete extrinsic autonomy of teaching scale, the intrinsic autonomy of teaching scale and teacher's job satisfaction scale. The results indicated that:(1) there were significant correlations among extrinsic autonomy, intrinsic autonomy of teaching, and job satisfaction; and (2) intrinsic autonomy of teaching played completely mediating role between extrinsic autonomy of teaching and teacher's job satisfaction.

Key words: teacher, extrinsic autonomy of teaching, intrinsic autonomy of teaching, job satisfaction

Ai, N. L., & Nie, Y. (2014). Understanding teacher empowerment:Teachers' perceptions of principal's and immediate supervisor's empowering behaviours, psychological empowerment and work-related outcomes. Teaching & Teacher Education, 41, 67-79.

Banerjee, N., Stearns, E., Moller, S., & Mickelson, R. A. (2017). Teacher job satisfaction and student achievement:The roles of teacher professional community and teacher collaboration in schools. American Journal of Education, 123(2), 203-241.

Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471-482.

Conley, S., & Levinson, R. (1993). Teacher work redesign and job-satisfaction.Educational Administration Quarterly, 29(4), 453-478.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits:Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.

Dinham, S., & Scott, C. (1998). A three domain model of teacher and school executive career satisfaction. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(4), 362-378.

Erss, M., Kalmus, V., & Autio, T. H. (2016). "Walking a fine line":teachers' perception of curricular autonomy in Estonia, Finland and Germany. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(5), 589-609.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.

Gagne, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362.

Hini?, D., Grubor, J., & Bruli?, L. (2017). Followership styles and job satisfaction in secondary school teachers in serbia. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(3), 503-520.

Kurland, H., & Hasson-Gilad, D. R. (2015). Organizational learning and extra effort:The mediating effect of job satisfaction. Teaching & Teacher Education, 49, 56-67.

Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago:Rand McNally. 1293-1349.

Morgado, J. C., & Sousa, F. (2010). Teacher evaluation, curricular autonomy and professional development:trends and tensions in the Portuguese educational policy. Journal of Education Policy, 25(3), 369-384.

Nasra, M. A., & Heilbrunn, S. (2015). Transformational leadership and organizational citizenship behavior in the Arab educational system in Israel:The Impact of trust and job satisfaction. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 72(3), 1389-1409.

Nie, Y., Chua, B. L., Yeung, A. S., Ryan, R. M., & Chan, W. Y. (2015). The importance of autonomy support and the mediating role of work motivation for well-being:Testing self-determination theory in a Chinese work organisation. International Journal of Psychology, 50(4), 245-255.

Oberfield, Z. W. (2016). A Bargain half fulfilled:Teacher autonomy and accountability in traditional public schools and public charter schools. American Educational Research Journal, 53(2), 296-323.

Pearson, L. C., & Hall, B. W. (1993). Initial construct validation of the teaching autonomy scale. Journal of Educational Research, 86(3), 172-177.

Pearson, L. C., & Moomaw, W. (2005). The Relationship between teacher autonomy and stress, work satisfaction, empowerment, and professionalism. Educational Research Quarterly, 29(1), 37-53.

Pearson, L. C., & Moomaw, W. (2006). Continuing validation of the teaching autonomy scale. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(1), 44-51,64.

Philippou, S., Kontovourki, S., & Theodorou, E. (2014). Can autonomy be imposed? Examining teacher (re) positioning during the ongoing curriculum change in Cyprus. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(5), 611-633.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539-569.

Runhaar, P., Konermann, J., & Sanders, K. (2013). Teachers' organizational citizenship behaviour:Considering the roles of their work engagement, autonomy and leader-member exchange. Teaching And Teacher Education, 30, 99-108.

Scudella, C. M. (2015). Teachers' perceptions of administrative autonomy-supportive versus controlling behaviors:Factors that influence teacher intrinsic motivation and relationships with administrators. (10014010 Ph.D.), Cardinal Stritch University, Ann Arbor.

Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2011). Teacher job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession:Relations with school context, feeling of belonging, and emotional exhaustion. Teaching & Teacher Education, 27(6), 1029-1038.

Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2014). Teacher self-efficacy and perceived autonomy:relations with teacher engagement, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion. Psychological Reports, 114(1), 68-77.

Smaller, H. (2015). The teacher disempowerment debate:historical reflections on "slender autonomy". Paedagogica Historica, 51(1-2), 136-151.

Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.

Ulas, J., & Aksu, M. (2015). Development of teacher autonomy scale for turkish Teachers. In C. Hursen (Ed.), Proceedings Of 5th World Conference on Learning, Teaching And Educational Leadership (Vol. 186, pp. 344-349). Amsterdam:Elsevier Science Bv.

Wang, Q., & Zhang, H. (2014). Promoting teacher autonomy through university-school collaborative action research. Language Teaching Research, 18(2), 222-241.

Wanous, J. P., & Lawler, E. E. (1972). Measurement and meaning of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56(2), 95-105.

White, P. A. (1992). Teacher empowerment under "ideal" school-site autonomy. Educational Evaluation And Policy Analysis, 14(1), 69-82.

Wermke, W., & Höstfält, G. (2014). Contextualizing teacher autonomy in time and space:a model for comparing various forms of governing the teaching profession. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(1), 58-80.

Wilson, S. M. (1993). The self-empowerment index:a measure of internally and externally expressed teacher autonomy. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 727-737.

Xu, H. (2015). The development of teacher autonomy in collaborative lesson preparation:A multiple-case study of EFL teachers in China. System, 52, 139-148.

冯伯麟. (1996). 教师工作满意及其影响因素的研究. 教育研究(2), 42-49.

贾汇亮. (2014). 教师教学自主权的缺失及保障. 课程.教材.教法(8), 38-43.

黎婉勤. (2010). 中小学教师专业自主权缺失分析. 教育评论(5), 53-55.

林成堂, 江玲. (2011). 论教师专业自主权的实践尺度.华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)(3), 28-32.

罗杰, 周瑗, 陈维, 潘运, & 赵守盈. (2014). 教师职业认同与情感承诺的关系:工作满意度的中介作用. 心理发展与教育(3), 322-328.

罗茜, 李洪玉, 何一粟. (2012). 高校教师人格特质、工作特征与工作满意度的关系研究. 心理与行为研究(3), 215-219.

穆洪华, 胡咏梅, 刘红云. (2016). 中学教师工作满意度及其影响因素研究. 教育学报(2), 71-80.

苏尚锋. (2007). 个体与组织:教师自主性的二重维度. 教师教育研究(6), 1-5.

王济川, 王小倩, 姜宝法. (2011). 结构方程模型:方法与应用:高等教育出版社.22.

王永丽, 邓静怡, 何熟珍. (2009). 角色投入对工作满意度和生活满意度的影响. 管理评论(5), 61-69+85.

温忠麟, 侯杰泰, 马什赫伯特. (2004). 结构方程模型检验:拟合指数与卡方准则. 心理学报, 36(2), 186-194.

温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰, & 刘红云. (2004). 中介效应检验程序及其应用.心理学报, 36(5), 614-620.

姚计海. (2014). 中小学教师教学自主性特点的实证研究. 教师教育研究(6), 31-39.

姚计海, 申继亮. (2007). 中小学教师教学自主权量表的修订. 应用心理学(4), 329-333.

姚计海, 申继亮. (2010). 教师教学自主性问卷的编制与修订. 心理发展与教育(3), 302-307.
[1] 王鑫强, 李金文, 卢红燕, 赖正伟, 李佳源. 择偶优劣势对师范大学生教师职业认同的影响:择偶价值感的中介及自尊的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 64-73.
[2] 姚计海, 蒋雨含, 邹弘晖. 教师教学自主权与教学反思的关系:心理授权和职业承诺的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 842-849.
[3] 杨振芳. 工作支持对乡村教师工作激情的影响:基本心理需要满足的多重中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 850-858.
[4] 黄杰, 朱丹, 杨澳. 实习初期教师职业认同的发展轨迹及其与主动性人格的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 40-47.
[5] 邓林园, 高诗晴, 王婧怡, 李蓓蕾. 新冠疫情期间中小学教师工作-家庭冲突和抑郁:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 121-131.
[6] 李玉华, 王桐, 刘悦, 俞劼, 林崇德. 教师创造性教学行为与小学生创造性思维的关系:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 513-519.
[7] 李蓓蕾, 高婷, 张莉莉, 周楠, 邓林园. 学生感知的教师欺凌态度与学生欺凌行为的关系——学生欺凌态度的中介作用及其性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 348-357.
[8] 王国霞, 赵扬. 教师自主支持与学生学业成就关系的元分析:心理需要满足、动机及投入的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 380-390.
[9] 吴甲旺, 李红霞, 司继伟. 小学低年级儿童的计算流畅性与数学焦虑:基于变量为中心与个体为中心的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 72-80.
[10] 周思妤, 王艺卓, 李晓巍. 幼儿园新教师学历与离职意向的关系:入职适应、工作满意度的多重中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 675-682.
[11] 贾绪计, 蔡林, 林琳, 林崇德. 高中生感知教师支持与学习投入的关系:学业自我效能感和成就目标定向的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 700-707.
[12] 汪海彬, 张鹏程, 卢家楣, 瞿琼, 张燕. 职前教师情绪觉察能力对情绪信息注意偏向的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 462-468.
[13] 张云运, 刘思辰, 任萍, 牛丽丽. 学生学业和行为特征如何影响教师支持?来自个体和圈子层面的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 318-328.
[14] 黎光明, 陈子豪, 张敏强. 高校教师教学水平评价概化理论预算限制下最佳样本量估计[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 378-384.
[15] 林颐宣. 主动性人格对小学教师工作满意度的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 103-112.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!