心理发展与教育 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 1-9.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2022.01.01

• 认知与社会性发展 •    下一篇

不稳定控制感剥夺损害工作记忆刷新功能

许郡婷1,2, 鲍未1, 罗俊龙1   

  1. 1. 上海师范大学教育学院心理系, 上海 200234;
    2. 山东省高密市第一中学, 高密 261500
  • 发布日期:2022-02-17
  • 通讯作者: 罗俊龙 E-mail:luo831023@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“教学设计中认知负荷对心流体验的影响研究”(19YJC190015);上海市教育发展基金会和上海市教育委员会“曙光计划”(19SG43)。

Unstable Control Deprivation Impairs Working Memory Updating

XU Junting1,2, BAO Wei1, LUO Junlong1   

  1. 1. Department of Psychology, College of Education, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234;
    2. Gaomi No.1 High School of Shandong Province, Gaomi 261500
  • Published:2022-02-17

摘要: 控制感剥夺会阻碍工作记忆中的转换功能,但对工作记忆中刷新功能的影响机制尚不清楚。据此,本文通过两个实验来探究控制感剥夺对工作记忆刷新功能的影响。结果发现,相较于基线水平,无论是通过行为无助任务(实验1)还是通过信息无助任务(实验2)操纵的稳定控制感剥夺均未阻碍随后的刷新任务;但在不稳定控制感剥夺的条件下(实验2),刷新任务的成绩显著降低。这表明,控制感剥夺对工作记忆刷新功能的影响依赖于对其操纵的稳定性。

关键词: 控制感剥夺, 稳定性, 工作记忆刷新

Abstract: Updating function is important for working memory. Some studies found control deprivation can impair the cognitive flexibility in working memory, while others believed that control deprivation can improve information processing capabilities. The important function of working memory updating is to process information. Therefore, the relationship between control deprivation and working memory updating is not clear. The present study intended to investigate whether and how updating function changes in a state of control deprivation. Two experiments were conducted to examine the influence of the stability of control deprivation on working memory updating. The result of experiment 1 indicated that no difference was observed between baseline group and deprivation group in terms of response time and accuracy. Meanwhile, there was no interaction effect between sense of control and difficulty of the updating task. Experiment 2 also demonstrated that there was no difference between baseline group and stable deprivation group. However, compared with baseline group, unstable deprivation showed a lower level of accuracy of the updating task, and the discrimination ability was lower than that of the stable deprivation group. In conclusion, the results of these two experiments proved that stable control deprivation did not hinder working memory updating. Interestingly, under the condition of deprivation of unstable control sense, the performance of updating task was significantly reduced. That is to say, the effect of control deprivation on working memory updating might depend on the stability of its manipulation.

Key words: control deprivation, stability, working memory updating

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Brehm, J. W., & Self, E. A. (1989). The intensity of motivation.Annual Review of Psychology, 40(1), 109-131.
Bukowski, M., Asanowicz, D., Marzecová, A., & Lupiáñez, J. (2015). Limits of control:The effects of uncontrollability experiences on the efficiency of attentional control. Acta Psychologica, 154, 43-53.
Bukowski, M., De Lemus, S., Marzecová, A., Lupiáñez, J., & Gocłowska, M. A. (2019). Different faces of (un)controllability:Control restoration modulates the efficiency of task switching. Motivation and Emotion, 43(1), 12-34.
Collette, F., & Linden, M. V. D. (2002). Brain imaging of the central executive component of working memory. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 26(2), 105-125.
DeCarlo, L., T. (2008). Process dissociation and mixture signal detection theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(6), 1565-1572.
Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Corley, R. P., Young, S. E., DeFries, J. C., & Hewitt, J. K. (2006). Not all executive functions are related to intelligence. Psychological Science, 17(2), 172-179.
Gendolla, G. H. E., Wright, R. A., & Richter, M. (2012). Effort intensity:Some insights from the cardiovascular system. In R.M. Ryan (Ed.),The Oxford handbook on motivation(pp.420-438). Oxford University Press.
Gocłowska, M. A., Damian, R. I., & Mor, S. (2018). The Diversifying Experience Model:Taking a broader conceptual view of the multiculturalism-creativity link.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(2), 303-322.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis:A regression-based approach. New York:Guilford Press.
Hiroto, D. S., & Seligman, M. E. (1975). Generality of learned helplessness in man. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31 (2), 311-327.
Karbach, J., & Verhaeghen, P. (2014). Making working memory work:A meta-analysis of executive-control and working memory training in older adults.Psychological Science, 25(11), 2027-2037.
Kessler, Y., & Meiran, N. (2008). Two dissociable updating processes in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(6), 1339-1348.
Kessler, Y., & Oberauer, K. (2014). Working memory updating latency reflects the cost of switching between maintenance and updating modes of operation. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(3), 738-754.
Mikulincer, M. (1988). The relation between stable/unstable attribution and learned helplessness.British Journal of Social Psychology, 27(3), 221-230.
Mikulincer, M., Kedem, P., & Zilkha-Segal, H. (1989). Learned helplessness, reactance, and cue utilization.Journal of Research in Personality, 23(2), 235-247.
Mittal, C., Griskevicius, V., Simpson, J. A., Sung, S., & Young, E. S. (2015). Cognitive adaptations to stressful environments:When childhood adversity enhances adult executive function.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(4), 604-621.
Pittman, N. L., & Pittman, T. S. (1979). Effects of amount of helplessness training and internal-external locus of control on mood and performance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 39-47.
Pittman, T. S., & D'Agostino, P. R. (1989).Motivation and cognition:control deprivation and the nature of subsequent information processing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25(6), 465-480.
Pittman, T. S., & Pittman, N. L. (1980). Deprivation of control and the attribution process.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 39(39), 377-389.
Ric, F., & Scharnitzky, P. (2003). Effects of control deprivation on effort expenditure and accuracy performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 103-118.
Richter, M. (2014). Goal pursuit and energy conservation:Energy investment increases with task demand but does not equal it.Motivation and Emotion, 39(1), 25-33.
Ritter, S. M., Damian, R. I., Simonton, D. K., van Baaren, R. B., Strick, M., Derks, J., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2012). Diversifying experiences enhance cognitive flexibility.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 961-964.
Sedek, G., & Kofta, M. (1990). When cognitive exertion does not yield cognitive gain:Toward an informational explanation of learned helplessness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 729-43.
Sedek, G., Kofta, M., & Tyszka, T. (1993). Effects of uncontrollability on subsequent decision making:Testing the cognitive exhaustion hypothesis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(6), 1270-1281.
Smith, P. K., & Trope, Y. (2006). You focus on the forest when you're in charge of the trees:Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 578-596.
Smith, P. K., Jostmann, N. B., Galinsky, A. D., & Dijk, W. W. V. (2008). Lacking power impairs executive functions. Psychological Science, 19(5), 441-447.
Tang, X., Pang, J., Nie, Q. Y., Conci, M., Luo, J., & Luo, J. (2016). Probing the cognitive mechanism of mental representational change during chunk decomposition:A parametric fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 26(7), 2991-2999.
Willis, G. B., Rodriguezbailon, R., & Lupianez, J. (2011). The Boss is Paying Attention:Power Affects the Functioning of the Attentional Networks.Social Cognition, 29(2), 166-181.
Yin, Y., Yu, T., Wang, S., Zhou, S., Tang, X., Stupple, E. J., & Luo, J. (2018). Event-related potentials support a dual process account of the Embedded Chinese Character Task. Neuropsychologia, 121, 186-192.
Zhou, X., He, L., Yang, Q., Lao, J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2012). Control deprivation and styles of thinking.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 460-478.
白栩嘉. (2019). 负性情境下焦虑型依恋个体的工作记忆刷新能力研究 (硕士学位论文). 西南大学, 重庆.
李静. (2012). 不同社会阶层对贫富差距的归因倾向研究 (博士学位论文). 华中师范大学, 武汉.
闻琪. (2014). 小学高年级学生情绪, 情绪调节策略对注意稳定性的影响 (硕士学位论文). 河北师范大学, 石家庄.
于婷婷, 殷悦, 王舒, 周淑金, 唐晓晨, 罗俊龙. (2018). 不同意识水平下认知资源对直觉优势效应的调节. 心理学报, 50(6), 583-591.
员东婷, 王英春. (2018). 控制感剥夺激发状态毅力:趋近动机的中介作用. 心理科学, 41(5), 170-177.
[1] 李占星, 倪晓莉, 牛更枫, 朱莉琪. 儿童基于心理本质论的种族认知及其影响因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 633-640.
[2] 徐夫真, 张玲玲, 魏星, 张文新, 陈亮, 纪林芹, 陈欣银. 青少年早期内化问题的稳定性及其与母亲教养的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(2): 204-211.
[3] 王岩, 王大华, 付琳, 姜薇, 翟晓艳. 老年人夫妻依恋稳定性及其与配偶支持的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 396-402.
[4] 周雅, 刘翔平. 轻微及中度抑郁者的积极自我[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(3): 312-318,334.
[5] 刘少英, 王芳, 朱瑶. 幼儿同伴关系发展的稳定性[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(6): 588-594.
[6] 张萍, 梁宗保, 陈会昌, 张光珍. 2~11岁儿童自我控制发展的稳定性与变化及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(5): 463-470.
[7] 王岩, 王大华. 成人依恋的稳定性[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(4): 442-448.
[8] 刘亚鹏, 张光珍, 梁宗保, 邓慧华, 陆祖宏. 父亲养育压力的稳定性及对儿童学步期问题行为的预测[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(6): 599-606.
[9] 张光珍, 梁宗保, 陈会昌, 张萍. 2~11岁儿童问题行为的稳定性与变化[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(2): 1-5.
[10] 高雯, 杨丽珠. 3~9岁儿童人格特质稳定性理解的发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(3): 6-12.
[11] 纪林芹, 张文新. 儿童攻击发展研究的新进展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(2): 122-127.
[12] 王争艳, 侯静. 儿童行为抑制性发展的研究综述[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2002, 18(4): 86-90.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!