心理发展与教育 ›› 2012, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 301-307.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

同伴关系与攻击行为稳定性的关系研究

孙晓军1,2, 范翠英1,2, 热娜古丽·艾赛提1,2, 张笑容1,2, 陈洁1,2   

  1. 1. 青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室;
    2. 华中师范大学心理学院暨湖北省人的发展与心理健康重点实验室, 武汉 430079
  • 出版日期:2012-05-15 发布日期:2012-05-15
  • 通讯作者: 范翠英,E-mail:fancy@mail.ccnu.edu.cn E-mail:fancy@mail.ccnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    全国教育科学“十一五”规划教育部青年专项课题(EHA090426);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(11YJC190020);教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(08JAXLX007);华中师范大学教师教育理论创新与实践自选项目(985ZX11)

The stability of the aggression and the peer relationship

SUN Xiao-jun1,2, FAN Cui-ying1,2, Renaguli·Aisaiti1,2, ZHANG Xiao-rong1,2, CHEN Jie1,2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior(CCNU), Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430079;
    2. School of Psychology, Key Laboratory of Human Development and Mental Health of Hubei Province, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079
  • Online:2012-05-15 Published:2012-05-15

摘要: 研究采用同伴提名法、友谊质量问卷和班级戏剧量表,对430名小学3至5年级的儿童进行了为期一年的追踪调查,在此基础上考察了攻击行为的不同发展轨迹与同伴关系之间的联系.结果表明,不同的攻击行为发展轨迹在社会喜好上的主效应显著,但是在友谊质量上的差异不显著,具体来说:(1)不同外部攻击亚组之间在社会喜好变化趋势上存在显著差异,相对于先低后高组、持续高组和持续低组,先高后低组的社会喜好存在显著的上升趋势;相对于持续低组和持续高组,先低后高组存在显著的下降趋势.(2)不同关系攻击亚组之间在社会喜好变化趋势上存在显著差异,相对于先高后低组、持续低组和持续高组,先低后高组的社会喜好得分存在显著的下降趋势.

关键词: 外部攻击, 关系攻击, 社会喜好, 友谊质量

Abstract: The present research has probed into the relation between the developmental tendency of aggression and the peer relationship,using peer nomination,"class play" and friendship quality questionnaire.430 elementary school children from Grade 3 to Grade 5 participated in the study,and they completed the questionnaires twice during one year.According to aggressive scores,participants were divided into four groups:the continuing high group,the continuing low group,the increasing group and the decreasing group.The results indicated that:The different developmental tendency of aggression affected the social preference significantly,but there is no significant difference on the friendship quality.Specially speaking:(1) For the overt aggression,the decreasing group increased significantly on the social preference compared with the other three groups.Besides,the decreasing tendency of the continuing low group is lower significantly than that of the continuing high group,which is lower significantly than that of the increasing group.(2) For the relational aggression,the increasing group showed an increasing tendency significantly compared with the decreasing group and the continuing low group.

Key words: overt aggression, relational aggression, social preference, friendship quality

中图分类号: 

  • B844.1
[1] August,G.,J.,Egan,E.,A.,Realmuto,G.,M.,& Hektner,Joel.M.(2003).Four Years of the Early Risers Early-Age-Targeted Preventive Intervention:Effects on Aggressive Children's Peer Relations.Behavior Therapy,34(4),453-470.
[2] Bagwell,C.L.,& Coie,J.D.(2004).The best friendships of aggressive boys:Relationship quality,conflict management,and rule-breaking behavior.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,88(1),5-24.
[3] Coie,J.D.,& Dodge,K.A.,& CoPPotelli,H.(1982).Dimensions and types of social status:Across-age perspective.Developmental Psychology,18,557-570.
[4] Coie,J.D.,& Dodge,K.A.(1988).A Multiple source of data on social behavior and social status in the school:Across-age comparison.Child Development,59,815-829.
[5] Coie,J.D.,& Kupersmidt,J.B.(1983).A behavioral analysis of emerging social status in boys' groups.Child Development,54,1400-1416.
[6] Dodge,K.A.(1983).Behavioral' antecedents of Peer social status.Child Development,54,1386-1399.
[7] Dumas,J.E.,Neese,D.E.,Prinz,R.J.,& Blechman,E.A.(1996).Short-term stability of aggression,peer rejection,and depressive symptoms in middle childhood.Abnormal Children Psychology 24,105-119.
[8] French,D.C.,Jansen,E.A.,& Pidada,S.(2002).United states and Indonesian children's and adolescents' reports of relational aggression by disliked peers.Child Development,73(4),1143-1150.
[9] Hartup,W.W.(1996).The company they keep:friendships and their developmental significance.Child Development,67,1-13.
[10] Henington,C.,Hughes,H.N.,Cavell,T.A.,& ThomPson,B.(1998).The role of relational aggression in identifying boys and girls.Journal of School Psychology,36(4),457-477.
[11] Huesmann,L.R.,Eron,L.D.,Lefkowitz,M.M.,& Walder,L.O.(1984).Stability of aggression over time and generations.Developmental Psychology,20,1120-1134.
[12] Ladd,G.W.,Priee,J.M.,& Hart,C.H.(1988).Predicting Preschoolers' peer status from their playground behaviors.Child Development,59,586-992.
[13] Loeber,R.,& Hay,D.(1997).Key issues in the development of aggression and violence from childhood to early adulthood.Annual Review of the Psychology,48,371-410.
[14] LaFontana,K.M.,& Cillessen,A.H.(2002).Children's preceptions of popular and unpopular peers:A multimethod assessment.Developmental Psychology,38(5),635-647.
[15] Nangle,D.W.,& Foster,S.L.(1992).The effects of a Positive behavioral context on the social impact of aggressive behavior.Abnormal Child Psychology,20,543-555.
[16] Nagin,D.,& Tremblay,R.E.(1999).Trajectories of boys' physical aggression,opposition,and hyperactivity on the path to physically violent and nonviolent juvenile delinquency.Child Development,70,1181-1196.
[17] Olweus,D.(1984).Stability in aggressive and with-drawn inhibited behavior patterns.In:Kaplan RM,Konecni VJ,Novaco RM,editors.Aggression in children and youth.Hague:Martinus Nijoff.p 104-137.
[18] Olweus,D.(1977).Aggression and peer acceptance in adolescent boys:two short-term longitudinal studies of ratings.Child Development,48,1301-1313.
[19] Patterson,G.R.,DeBaryshe,B.,& Ramsey,E.(1990).A Developmental Perspective on Antisocial Behavior.American Psychologist,44,329-335.
[20] Rose,M.J.(2003).Relational manipulation in middle childhood:Mechanisms of relationship adaptation within friendships.Dissertation Abstracts International:Section B:The Sciences and Engineering,64(6-B),2960.
[21] Tomada,G.,& Sehneider,B.H.(1997).Relational aggression,gender,and Peer acceptance:invariance across culture,stability over time,and concordance among informants.Developmental Psychology,33(4),601-609.
[22] Warman,D.M.,& Cohen,R.(2000).Stability of aggressive behaviors and children's peer relationships.Aggressive Behavior,26,277-290.
[23] 蔡春凤.(2006).小学儿童的心理行为特征、同伴接纳/拒绝与受欺负的关系研究.硕士学位论文.华中师范大学.
[24] 纪林芹,张文新.(2007).儿童攻击发展研究的新进展.心理发展与教育,2,122-127.
[25] 覃玉宇.(2004).童年中期儿童的攻击行为对同伴关系的影响研究.硕士学位论文.华中师范大学.
[26] 谭雪晴.(2005).童年中期关系攻击行为对儿童同伴关系的影响研究.硕士学位论文.华中师范大学.
[27] 万晶晶,周宗奎.(2005).社会退缩青少年的友谊特点.心理发展与教育,3,33-36.
[28] 王姝琼.(2008).儿童攻击亚类型、同伴地位与其适应不良的关系.硕士学位论文.山东师范大学
[29] 魏华,范翠英,周宗奎,田媛,亓艳丽.(2011).不同性别儿童的关系攻击、友谊质量和孤独感的关系研究.中国临床心理学杂志,19(5),681-683.
[30] 赵冬梅,周宗奎.(2010).儿童同伴交往中的攻击行为:文化和性别特征.心理科学,33(1),144-146.
[31] 赵冬梅,周宗奎,孙晓军,Yeh,&Robert.(2008).小学儿童互选友谊的发展趋势及攻击行为的影响:3 年追踪研究.心理学报,40(12),1266-1274.
[32] 邹泓.(1998).同伴关系的发展功能及其影响因素.心理发展与教育,14(2),40-46.
[1] 苏志强, 马郑豫. 童年期友谊质量与孤独感的纵向发展关系:应对方式的共变作用分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 31-39.
[2] 王浩, 俞国良. 大学生依恋焦虑与抑郁的关系:恋爱中关系攻击和关系质量的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 879-885.
[3] 牛凯宁, 李梅, 张向葵. 青少年友谊质量和主观幸福感的关系:一项元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 407-418.
[4] 张豪, 马田雨, 王媛, 李彩娜. 初中生友谊质量与孤独感的变化轨迹:一项多元潜变量增长模型分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 230-239.
[5] 祁迪, 林悦, 刘勤学. “打”出来的手机成瘾?父母粗暴养育对青少年智能手机成瘾的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 677-685.
[6] 余思, 刘勤学. 青少年身体不满意与自杀意念的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 486-494.
[7] 田媛, 宋友志, 周宗奎, 黄淳, 赵一倩. 青少年公正世界信念的发展轨迹及其影响因素:一项多水平分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(2): 146-156.
[8] 陈秀珠, 赖伟平, 麻海芳, 陈俊, 单彦彤. 亲子关系与青少年心理资本的关系:友谊质量的中介效应与学校联结的调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(5): 544-553.
[9] 苏志强, 邵景进, 张大均, 蒲坚. 童年中晚期友谊质量与抑郁的关系:一项纵向研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(4): 449-456.
[10] 崔曦曦, 孙晓军, 牛更枫. 社交网站中的自我呈现对青少年友谊质量的影响:积极反馈的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(3): 294-300.
[11] 赵冬梅, 周宗奎, 范翠英, 柯善玉. 童年期攻击行为发展的追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(4): 30-36.
[12] 李小青, 邹泓, 刘艳, 杨颖. 中学生同伴依恋的特点及其与友谊质量的关系:社会交往目标的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(3): 32-38.
[13] 孙晓军, 周宗奎. 儿童同伴关系对孤独感的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(1): 24-29.
[14] 于海琴, 周宗奎. 小学高年级儿童亲子依恋的发展及其与同伴交往的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2002, 18(4): 36-40.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!