心理发展与教育 ›› 2011, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (2): 164-173.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

语文学习困难儿童汉字记忆编码的神经机制研究

王恩国1, 沈徳立2, 吕勇2, 胡伟2, 李永鑫1, 陈海霞1   

  1. 1. 河南大学教科院心理与行为研究所, 开封 475004;
    2. 天津师范大学心理与行为研究院, 天津 300074
  • 出版日期:2011-03-15 发布日期:2011-03-15
  • 通讯作者: 王恩国,E-mail:wangeg88@163.com E-mail:wangeg88@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社科基金项目(09YJAXLX007和01JAZJDXLX002);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(05JJDXLX003);河南省哲学社会科学规划项目(2009BJY001);省部共建河南大学科研项目(SBGJ090308)

Chinese Language Learning Disabilities in the ERP Study Memory Encoding

WANG En-guo1, SHEN De-li2, LV Yong2, HU Wei2, LI Yong-xin1, CHEN Hai-xia1   

  1. 1. Institute of Psychology and Behavior, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004;
    2. Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin normal university, Tianjin 300074
  • Online:2011-03-15 Published:2011-03-15

摘要: 采用事件相关电位方法,探讨语文学习困难儿童汉字记忆编码过程的特点.研究发现:语文学习困难组和对照组在编码过程的300-700ms均存在显著的相继记忆效应.语文学习困难组与对照组的Dm效应存在着显著的时间与空间上的差异.在Dm效应出现前,语文学习困难组加工的P2潜伏期显著晚于对照组.同时还发现,不同能力组加工的N2和LPC差异与Dm效应十分相似,对照组比语文学习困难组更正,与Dm效应不同,不同能力组加工的分离明显大于Dm效应的分离,且持续时间更长,一直持续到1000ms之后,远远晚于Dm效应的分离时间,对照组比语文学习困难组有一个更正的晚正成分.语文学习困难组与对照组在加工程度上存在差异,使编码项目的记忆痕迹呈现出不同特点.

关键词: 汉字, Dm效应, old/new效应, 语文学习困难

Abstract: The present research used the ERP paradigm of "learning-recognition"to investigate the brain mechanism during encoding process of keeping character of children who have difficulties in learning Chinese.The results indicated that:(1) for all participants,there was a significant subsequent memory effect between 300ms and 700ms of the encoding process;(2) for the occipital,parietal and central areas,the Dm effect was distributed between 400ms and 700ms during encoding phase,and the wave amplitude of correct recognition was significantly greater than that of false recognition;(3) during extraction stage,between 400ms and 500ms there was a significant old/new effect of occipital region and parietal areas;between 500ms and 700ms there was a significant old/new effect of parietal and central areas,and especially in the central area,the wave amplitude of old character reorganization was larger than the new Chinese characters correct recognition;(4) For the two kinds of processing conditions of Chinese learning disabilities group and control group,there was a significant difference on Dm effect in time and space;(5) Before the onset of the Dm effect,the P2 latency of learning difficulties group was significantly later than that of the control group.We also found that the differences between N2 and LPC of different ability groups were very similar with the Dm effect,the control group was more positive relative than the Chinese learning disabilities group;for the Dm effect is more different,the separation of different ability groups was significantly greater and last longer than that of Dm effect,and till 1000ms later,the time of separation was more longer than that of Dm effect.The control group had a more corrective later positive component.There were differences in the degree of processing between the learning disabilities group and the control group,so that the memory trace of the code project showed different characteristics.

Key words: Chinese character, Dm effect, old/new effect, language learning disabilities

中图分类号: 

  • G442
[1] Duarte,A.,Ranganath,C.,Winward,L.,Hayward,D.,& Knight,R.T.(2004).Dissociable neural correlates for familiarity and recollection during the encoding and retrieval of pictures.Cognitive Brain Research,18,255-273.
[2] Elger,C.W,Grunwald,T.,Lehnertz K.,et al.(1997).Human temporal lobe potentials in verbal learning and memory processes.Neuropsychologi,35(5),657-667.
[3] Friedman,D,& Trott,C.(2000).An eventrelated potential study of encoding in young and older adults.Neuropsychologia ,38,542557.
[4] [Greenham,L.,& Stelmack,M.(2003).Learning disability subtypes and the role of attention during the naming of pictures and words:An Event Potential analysis.Developmental Neuropstchology,23(3),339-358.
[5] Guo,C.Y.,Voss,J.L.,& Paller,K.A.(2005).Electrophysiological correlates of forming memories for faces,names,and facename associations.Cognitive Brain Research,22,153-164.
[6] Kujala,T.,& Naatanen,R.(2001).The mismatch negativity in evaluating central auditory dysfunction in dyslexia.Neurosicience and Biobehavioral Review.23,535-543.
[7] Mangina,J.H.(2004).Brain plasticity following psychophysiological treatment in learning disabled preadolescents.International Journal of Psychophysiology,2004,52(2),129-138.
[8] Paller,K.A.,Kutas,M.,& Mayes,A.R.(1987).Neural correlates of encoding in an incidental learning paradigm.Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology,67,360-371.
[9] Paller,K.A.,McCarthy,G.,& Wood,C.C.(1988).ERPs predictive of subsequent recall and recognition performance.Biological Psychology,26,269-276.
[10] Petten,C.V.,& Senltfor,A.J.(1996).Memory for words and novel visual patterns:repetition,recognition,and encoding effects in the eventrelated brain potential.Psychophysiology,33,491-506.
[11] Sluis,S.,Leij,A.,& Peter,F.(2005).Working Memory in Dutch Children with Readingand ArithmeticRelated LD.Journal of Learning Disabilities,38(3),207-221.
[12] Sanquist,T.F.,Rohrbaugh,J.W.,Syndulko,K.,& Lindsley,D.B.(1980).Electrophysiological signs of Levels of processing:perceptual analysis and recognition memory.Psychophysiology,17,568-577.
[13] Simon,F.,Michael,S.H.,Simon,D.G.,et al.(2002).ERP ‘old/new' effects:memory strength and decisional factor(s).Neuropsychologia,40,2288-2304.
[14] Taylor,M.J.,& Keenan,N.K.(1990).Eventrelated potentials to visual and language stimuli in normal and dyslexic children.Psychophysiology,27,318-327.
[15] Wilding,E.L.,& Sharpe,H.(2004).The influence of responsetime demands on.electrophysiological correlates of successful episodic retrieval.Cogn Brain Res,18,185-195.
[16] Weyerts,H.,Tendolkar,I.,Smidhgo,M.,& Heinae,H.J.(1997).ERPs to encoding and recognition in two different interitem associatinon task.Neuroreport,8,1583-1588.
[17] Wilding,E.L.,& Rugg,M.D.(1996).An eventrelated potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source.Brain,119,889-905.
[18] 程灶火,龚耀先.(1998).学习障碍儿童记忆的比较研究.中国临床心理学杂志,6(3),129-135.
[19] 郭春彦,朱滢,丁锦红.(2003).不同加工与记忆编码关系的ERP研究.心理学报,35(2),150-156.
[20] 金志成,隋洁.(1999).学习困难学生认知加工机制的研究.心理学报,31(1),47-52.
[21] 李晓东,聂尤彦,庞爱莲,林崇德.(2003).工作记忆对小学三年级学生解决比较问题的影响.心理发展与教育,3,41-45.
[22] 罗跃嘉,魏景汉,翁旭初,卫星.(2001).汉字视听再认的ERP效应与记忆提取脑机制.心理学报,33(6),489-494.
[23] 聂爱情,郭春彦,吴艳红,屈南,丁锦红.(2004).图形编码和提取的ERP研究.科学通报,49(19),1962-1968.
[24] 张明,隋洁.(2003).分散注意条件下学优生与学困生视空间工作记忆的比较研究.应用心理学,9(1),29-34.
[25] 王恩国,赵国祥,刘昌,吕勇,沈德立.(2008).不同类型学习困难青少年存在不同类型的工作记忆缺陷,科学通报,53(14),1673-1679.
[26] 王恩国,刘昌.(2008).语文学习困难儿童的工作记忆与加工速度,心理发展与教育,1,94-100.
[27] 王恩国,刘昌,赵国祥.(2008).数学困难儿童的加工速度与工作记忆,心理科学,31(4),856-860.
[28] 王恩国,刘昌.(2005).学习困难的 ERP 研究.心理科学,28(5),1144-1147.
[1] 张忠炉, 易俊如, 张竹青, 邢强, 雷怡, 李红. 部件类型还是交错关系信息的习得促进问题解决?[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 609-618.
[2] 古婵媛, 毕鸿燕. 主观声旁家族对汉语儿童汉字命名的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 68-75.
[3] 刘宇飞, 钱怡, 宋耀武, 毕鸿燕. 4~6岁汉语儿童正字法意识的萌芽与发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(1): 65-72.
[4] 李利平, 伍新春, 熊翠燕, 程亚华, 阮氏芳. 元语言意识和快速命名对小学生汉字听写的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(6): 698-705.
[5] 陈钰, 李虹, 张洁, 阮晓彤, 饶夏溦, 伍新春. 书面字形在汉语低年级儿童口语词汇学习中的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 616-623.
[6] 张振军, 丁国盛, 陈宝国. 汉字习得的年龄效应:语音完整性假设的检验[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(6): 577-583.
[7] 胡天婷, 陶沙, 徐琴美, 毕鸿燕. 不同汉字解码技能与小学生阅读理解的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(2): 144-152.
[8] 王恩国, 刘昌. 语文学习困难儿童的工作记忆与加工速度[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(1): 94-100.
[9] 王敬欣, 沈德立. 汉字的特性负启动效应与年龄发展的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2003, 18(2): 9-13.
[10] 栾辉, 舒华, 张大成. 听写任务下儿童汉字输出特点及影响因素的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2001, 17(1): 1-5.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!