影响教师职业倦怠的多层变量之间的关系

心理发展与教育 ›› 2010, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (5): 521-526.

影响教师职业倦怠的多层变量之间的关系

石雷山^1,2, 高峰强²

1. 南通大学教育科学学院, 南通226007;
2. 山东师范大学心理学院, 济南250014

出版日期:2010-09-15 发布日期:2010-09-15
通讯作者: 石雷山,sls307@163.com E-mail:sls307@163.com
基金资助:
全国教育科学“十一五”规划教育部重点项目“高校教师工作倦怠现状及干预模式研究(DFA090249)”;江苏省教育科学“十一五”青年专项“中小学班级集体效能感的研究与实验”(C-b/2009/01/040)

The Effect of Multilevel Factors on Teacher Burnout

SHI Lei-shan^1,2, Gao Feng-qiang²

1. School of Education Science, NanTong University, NanTong 226007;
2. School of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014

Online:2010-09-15 Published:2010-09-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用问卷法调查了39所学校的370名小学教师,运用多层线性模型在个体和组织的不同层面上对影响教师职业倦怠的因素进行了探讨。结果发现:(1)教师集体效能越高,情感衰竭、低个人成就感和人格解体的得分就越低;校长越关心人,教师的人格解体得分就越高;(2)教师集体效能越高或校长越关心工作,则教师效能对情感衰竭的负向作用就越弱;而校长越关心人,则教师效能对情感衰竭的负向作用就越强;(3)教师集体效能对教师职业倦怠的影响不因教师性别和教龄的不同而不同,但校长领导行为对教师职业倦怠的影响却出现了性别和教龄的差异:关心工作导致了女性的个人成就感更低,对改善高教龄教师的低个人成就感更为有利,而关心人对改善低教龄教师的成就感、人格解体的帮助更大。

关键词: 教师职业倦怠, 教师集体效能, 校长领导行为, 教师效能, 教龄

Abstract: In order to examine the factors that influence on teacher burnout at the individual and organizational levels,370 teachers as subjects from 39 primary schools were chosen.Hierarchical Linear Model(HLM)results revealed that(1)collective teacher efficacy negatively predicted emotional exhaustion,personal accomplishment and depersonalization;and there was a direct positive relationship between the care to people and personal accomplishment;(2)collective teacher efficacy and the care to work weaken the negative relationship of teacher efficacy and emotional exhaustion,but the care to people factor could promote the negative relationship of teacher efficacy and emotional exhaustion;(3)leadership behavior of principle could moderate the relationship of gender and teacher burnout,school ages and teacher burnout.The care to work factor induced the lower personal accomplishment for women,and had much more effect on teachers who had been working many years in school.However,concerning accomplishment and depersonalization,the care to people factor had much more effects on teachers who had been working few years in school.

Key words: teacher burnout, collective teacher efficacy, leadership behavior of principle, teacher efficacy, school ages

中图分类号:

G443

石雷山, 高峰强. 影响教师职业倦怠的多层变量之间的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(5): 521-526.

SHI Lei-shan, Gao Feng-qiang. The Effect of Multilevel Factors on Teacher Burnout[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2010, 26(5): 521-526.

参考文献

[1] Bandura,A.(2001).Social Cognitive Theory:An Agentic Perspective. Annual Review of Psychology,52,1-26.
[2] Bulter,S.K.,&Constantine,G.M.(2005).Collective self-esteem and burnout in professional school counselors.Professional School Counseling,9,55-62.
[3] Demerouti,E.B.,Arnold,B.,Nachreiner,F.,et al(2001).The Job Demands-Resources Model Of Burnout.Journal Of Applied Psychology,86(3),499-512.
[4] Dorman,J.(2003).Testing a model for teacher burnout.Australian Journal of Educational&Developmental Psychology,3,35-47.
[5] Durr,A.J.(2008).Identifying teacher capacities that may buffer against teacher burnout.Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University.
[6] Goddard,R.D.,Hoy,W.K.,&Hoy,A.W.(2000).Collective Teacher Efficacy:Its Meaning,Measure,and Impact on Student Achievement.American Education Research,2,479-507.
[7] Maslach,C,&Jackson,S.E.(1981).Maslach Burnout Inventory.Palo Alto:Consulting Psychologists Press.
[8] Maslach,C.,Schaufeli,W.B.,&Leiter,M.P.(2001).Job Burnout.Annual Review of Psychology,52,397-422.
[9] Leiter,M.P.(1992).Bur-out as a crisis in self-efficacy,conceptual and practical implications,Work and Stress,6(2),107-115.
[10] Schaufeli,W.B.,&Buunk,B.(2003).Burnout:an overview of 25 years of research and theorizing.The handbook of work and health psychology.England Chichester:John Wiley&Sons Ltd,383-425.
[11] Skaalvik,E.M.,&Skaalvik,S.(2007).Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors,perceived collective teacher efficacy,and teacher burnout.Journal of Educational Psychology,99(3),611-625.
[12] Stajkovic,A.D.,Lee,D.,&Nyberg,A.J.(2009).Collective Efficacy,Group Potency,and Group Performance:Meta-Analyses of Their Relationships,and Test of a Mediation Mode.Journal of Applied Psychology,94(3),814-828.
[13] 程正方.(2004).现代管理心理学.北京:北京师范大学出版社,10,371-372.
[14] 甘怡群,王晓春,张轶文等.(2006).工作特征对农村中学教师职业倦怠的影响.心理学报,38,(1),92-98.
[15] 高峰强,王鹏,张文新.(2008).高中阶段教师职业枯竭的多层研究.华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),26(1),81-88.
[16] 李永鑫,张阔.(2007).工作倦怠研究的新趋势.心理科学,30(2),478-481.
[17] 刘红云,张雷,孟庆茂.(2005).小学教师集体效能及其对自我效能功能的调节.心理学报,37(1),79～86.
[18] 刘毅,吴宇驹,邢强.(2009).教师压力影响职业倦怠:教学效能感的调节作用.心理发展与教育,1,108-113.
[19] 石雷山.(2006).教师集体效能及其应用.心理科学进展,14(3),389-393.
[20] 王芳,许燕.(2004).中小学教师职业枯竭状况及其与社会支持的关系.心理学报,36(5),568-574.
[21] 王芳.(2005).中小学校长领导行为的调查研究.硕士论文.华东师范大学.
[22] 王燕,杨卫星.(2005).大中小学教师工作倦怠的比较研究.贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版),23(5),41-44.
[23] 田宝,李灵.(2006).学校组织气氛对教师工作倦怠的影响.心理科学,29(1),189-193.
[24] 俞国良,辛涛,申继亮.(1995).教师教学效能感:结构与影响因素的研究.心理学报,27(2),159-166.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed