心理发展与教育 ›› 2010, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (5): 449-456.

• 论文 •    下一篇

儿童数概念发展的影响因素:表面相似性效应与标签效应

韩瑽瑽, 陈蒲晶, 陈英和   

  1. 北京师范大学发展心理研究所, 北京100875
  • 出版日期:2010-09-15 发布日期:2010-09-15
  • 通讯作者: 陈英和,E-mail:yhchenpsy2008@yahoo.cn E-mail:yhchenpsy2008@yahoo.cn
  • 基金资助:
    全国教育科学规划国家重点项目(ABA050001);国家自然科学基金项目(30770729);北京市哲学社会科学十一五规划项目(06BaJY010);北京市教育科学十一五规划课题(ACA08017)

Factors Influencing Children’s Numerical Development: Surface Similarity Effect and Shared Labels Effect

HAN Cong-cong, CHEN Pu-jing, CHEN Ying-he   

  1. Instituds of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
  • Online:2010-09-15 Published:2010-09-15

摘要: 本研究主要考查表面相似性效应和标签效应对60名3~5岁儿童数概念发展的影响。实验通过等量匹配任务和数量比较任务测查儿童数概念的发展情况,其中等量匹配任务和数量比较任务都包括了一致和不一致两种条件以考查表面相似性效应对儿童数概念的影响,并通过给物取数任务、给数取物任务和等量匹配任务与数量比较任务的关系测查儿童使用数字标签的能力对儿童数概念形成与发展的影响。结果表明:(1)4岁和5岁组儿童完成等量匹配任务和数量比较任务的正确率显著高于3岁组儿童;(2)儿童在一致条件下完成等量匹配和数量比较任务的正确率显著高于不一致条件的正确率,表明物体的高表面相似性有利于儿童数概念的形成;(3)擅长使用数字标签的儿童完成等量匹配任务和数量比较任务的次数超过几率水平,使用数字标签有利于儿童数概念的发展。

关键词: 数概念, 表面相似性效应, 标签效应

Abstract: This study explored how surface similarity effect and shared labels effect influenced the performance of 60 children aged 3 to 5 on the numerical equivalence task and numerical comparison task.This study tried to examine whether and how the surface similarity effect affected children's performance on two different experimental conditions,congruent vs.incongruent.Further,it was hypothesized that give-objects task would have more advantages over give-a-number task in test number labels.The following conclusions were drawn:(1)the 4-year-olds and 5-year-olds performed significantly better on the numerical equivalence task and numerical comparison task than 3-year-olds did;(2)when surface similarity was congruent(i.e.,all sets contained the same objects),children performed significantly better than they did on the incongruent condition of numerical equivalence and comparison; (3)children who understood the number words for the target sets performed above chance in the equivalence task and comparisons task.

Key words: number concepts, surface similarity effect, shared labels effect

中图分类号: 

  • B844.2
[1] Bruner,J.S.,Olver,R.R.,Greenfield,P.M.,Harvard University,&Center for Cognitive Studies.(1966).Studies in cognitive growth: a collaboration at the Center for Cognitive Studies.New York:John Wiley&Sons.
[2] Gelman,R.(1991).Epigenetic foundations of knowledge structures:Initial and transcendent constructions.In S.Carey&R.Gelman(Eds.),Epigenesis of mind:Essays on biology and cognition(pp.293-322).Hillsdale,NJ:Erlbaum.
[3] Gelman,R.(1996).Domain specificity in cognitive development:Universals andnonuniversals.In Sabourin,M.,Craik,F.and Robert,M.(Eds.)Advances inpsychological science.Psychology Press Ltd.,Vol.2,(25),557-579.
[4] Gentner,D.,&Rattermann,M.J.(1991).Language and the career of similarity.In S.A.Gelman&J.P.Byrnes(Eds.),Perspectives on language and thought:Interrelations in development(pp.225-277).London:Cambridge University Press.
[5] Imai,M.,Gentner,D.,&Uchida,N.(1994).Children's theories about word meaning:The role of shape similarity in early acquisition. Cognitive Development,9,45-75.
[6] Kotovsky,L.,&Gentner,D.(1996).Comparison and categorization in the development of relational similarity.Child Development,67,2797-2822.
[7] Marzolf,D.P.,&DeLoache,J.S.(1994).Transfer in young children's understanding of spatial representations.Child Development,65,1-15.
[8] Mix,K.S.(1999a).Preschoolers'recognition of numerical equivalence:Sequential sets.[Special issue on the Development of Mathe-matical Cognition],Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,74,309-322.
[9] Mix,K.S.(1999b).Similarity and numerical equivalence:Appearances count.Cognitive Development,14,269-297.
[10] Mix,K.S.(2008).Children's equivalence judgments:crossmapping effects.Cognitive development,23,191-203.
[11] Mix,K.S.,Huttenlocher,J.,&Levine,S.C.(1996).Do preschool children recognize auditory-visual numerical corre spondences?Child Development,67,1592-1608.
[12] Mix,K.S.,Huttenlocher,J.,&Levine,S.C.(2002).Multiple cues for quantification in infancy:Is number one of them?Psychological Bulletin,128,278-294.
[13] Piaget,J.(1997).The child's conception of number.London:Routledge.(Original work published 1941)
[14] Rousselle,L.,&Noёl,M.P.(2007).Basic numerical skills in children with mathematics learning disabilities:a comparison of symbolic vs non-symbolic number magnitude.Cognition,102,361-395.
[15] Sandhofer,C.M.,&Smith,L.B.(1999).Learning color words involves learning a system of mappings.Developmental Psychology,35,668-679.
[16] Sarnecka,B.W.,&Carey,S.(2008).How counting represents number:What children must learn and when they learn it.Cognition,108,662-674.
[17] Sarnecka,B.W.,&Lee,M.D.(2009).Levels of number knowledge during early childhood.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,103,325-337.
[18] Siegler,R.S.,&Robinson,M.(1982).The development of numerical understandings.In H.W.Reese&L.P.Lipsitt(Eds.),Advances in child development and behavior(Vol.16).New York:Academic Press.
[19] Smith,L.B.(1993).The concept of same.In H.W.Reese(Ed.),Advances in child development and behavior,Vol.24(pp.215-252).New York:Academic Press.
[20] Waxman,S.R.,&Markow,D.B.(1995).Words as invitations to form categories:Evidence from 12-to 13-month-old infants.Cognitive Psychology,29,257-302.
[21] Wynn,K.(1990).Children's understanding of counting.Cognition,36,155-193.
[22] Wynn,K.(1995).Origins of numerical knowledge.Mathematical Cognition,1(1),35-60.
[23] 林崇德.(1980).学龄前儿童数概念与运算能力发展.北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),(2),67-77.
[24] 西格勒,阿利巴利.(2006).儿童思维发展(刘电芝译).北京:世界图书出版公司.
[25] 阴国恩,李英霞,王敏.(2006).“多少”概念发展的研究.心理与行为研究,4(4),246-251.
[1] 陈英和. 儿童数量表征与数概念的发展特点及机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(1): 21-28.
[2] 龙长权, 李红, 邓小凤, 袁颖, 李军, 雷怡. 相似和相同语言标签对幼儿归纳推理的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(3): 239-247.
[3] 韩瑽瑽, 曹仕莹, 陈英和. 4~6岁儿童加减法反演律概念的发展与影响因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(2): 121-130.
[4] 朱文芳, 林崇德. 初中生函数概念发展的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2001, 16(4): 39-46.
[5] 倪玉菁. 五、六年级小学生对分数的意义和性质的理解[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1999, 15(4): 26-30.
[6] 倪斯杰, 张君达. 小学二年级学生数学能力的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1998, 14(1): 7-11.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!