心理发展与教育 ›› 2009, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (2): 73-77.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

中文阅读中因果与转折关系理解差异的实验研究

吴妮妮, 何先友, 徐妍娜   

  1. 华南师范大学心理应用研究中心, 广州 510631
  • 出版日期:2009-04-15 发布日期:2009-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 何先友,华南师范大学教育科学学院心理系教授.E-mail:xyhe@scnu.edu.cn E-mail:xyhe@scnu.edu.cn

An Experimental Study on the Comprehension of Adversative Relation and Casual Relation in Chinese

WU Ni-ni, HE Xian-you, XU Yan-na   

  1. Center for Studies of Psychological Application, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631
  • Online:2009-04-15 Published:2009-04-15

摘要: 采用移动窗口阅读技术和探测技术探讨大学生中文阅读过程中对因果与转折关系的理解差异。实验一在句子层面考察因果和转折关系的理解差异,结果发现被试阅读转折句的时间显著长于因果句,但对两种句子中探测词的反应时没有差异。实验二运用探测技术从篇章层面进一步探讨两种关系的理解差异。结果发现,转折关系条件下被试对探测词的反应时显著慢于因果关系条件下。实验结果表明,无论在句子层面还是在篇章层面,被试对转折关系的表征都难于因果关系的表征。

关键词: 中文阅读, 转折关系, 因果关系

Abstract: The purpose of this research was to explore the differences between understanding casual relations and adversative relations in Chinese reading.Two experiments were constructed.Probeverification paradign was used in experiment 1 to examine whether this difference between reading casual sentence and adversaive sentence was existed.The results showed that the time for reading casual sentence was much longer than that of adversative sentence,but there was no differences between the reaction time of probe words in this two different levels.The same technique was applied in experiment 2 to invest igate whether the difference was existed during Chinese passage reading.By comparing the reaction time to probe words in different relations,it could be concluded whether the adversative relations was difficult to comprehend.The results indicated that the reaction time to the probe words in casual relation was much slower than that of adversative relation.It implied that the adversat ive relation was more difficult to comprehend than casual relation.

Key words: Chinese reading, adversative relations, casual relations

中图分类号: 

  • G442
[1] Kint sch W.The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension:A construction-integration model.Psychological review,1988,95:163-182.
[2] Elizabeth J.The comprehension of logical relations in expository texts by students who study through the medium of ESL System,2006,34:432-450.
[3] Van den Broek P R,Discovering the cement of the universe:the development of event comprehension from childhood to adulthood [In]:Van den Broek P R,Bauer P J,Bourg T.Developmental Spans in Event Comprehension and Representation:Lawrens Erlbaum Associates,Mahwah,NJ:1997:321.
[4] Hubbard E H,Some coherence correlates in expository writing.South African Journal of Linguistics,1993,(Suppl.15):55-74.
[5] Irwin J W,Understanding and teaching cohesion comprehension.Delaware:International Reading Association,1986.
[6] Fahnestock J,Semantic and lexical coherence.College Composition and Communication,1983(34):400-416.
[7] Winter E O,A look at the role of cert ain words in informat ion st ructure [In]:Jones,K P.Harsnell,V.Informatics3.Proceedings of a conference held by the Aslib C-oOrdinate Indexing Group,Aslib,London,1975.
[8] Gernsbacher M A,Language comprehension as structure building.[In]:Hillsdale NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associat es,1990.
[9] 王穗苹,莫雷.当前篇章阅读研究的进展.心理学探新,2001,21(3):20-25.
[10] Cain K,Oakhill J.Comprehension skill and inf erence making ability:Issues of causality.[In]:Hulme C,Joshi R M.R eading and spel ling.M ahwah,NJ:Erlbaum,1998:329-342.
[11] Van Den Broek P R,R isden K,Fletcher C R,A landscape view of reading:Fluctuating patterns of activation and the construction of a stable memory representation.[In]:Britton B K,Grasser A C,M odels of understanding text.Hillsdale,NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.1996.
[12] Van Den Broek P R,Rapp D N,Kendeou P.Integrating memory-based and constructionist processes in accounts of reading comprehension.Discourse Processes,2005,39:299-316.
[13] O'Brien E,Albrecht J,Rizzella M,et al.Updat ing a situation model:A memory-based text processing view.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,1998,24:1200-1210.
[1] 刘志方, 仝文, 张骏. 中文阅读中词汇加工的年老化:眼动证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(6): 665-677.
[2] 陈朝阳, 刘志方, 苏永强, 程亚华. 高低阅读技能聋生词汇加工的语境预测性效应特点:眼动证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 692-699.
[3] 苏永强, 付福音, 刘志方, 陈朝阳. 阅读中词汇视觉编码年老化的原因:基于消失文本实验的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(4): 433-440.
[4] 刘志方, 翁世华, 张锋. 中文阅读中词汇视觉编码的年龄特征:来自眼动研究的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 411-419.
[5] 闫国利, 张巧明, 白学军. 中文阅读知觉广度的影响因素研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(2): 121-130.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!