心理发展与教育 ›› 2009, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (2): 28-34.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

前摄抑制对儿童注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和阅读障碍的言语工作记忆的影响

张微1,2, 刘翔平1, 宋红艳1   

  1. 1. 北京师范大学心理学院, 北京 100875;
    2. 华中师范大学心理学院, 武汉 430079
  • 出版日期:2009-04-15 发布日期:2009-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 刘翔平,北京师范大学心理学院教授.E-mail:lxp599@163.com. E-mail:lxp599@163.com.
  • 基金资助:
    华中师范大学2008“丹桂计划”项目(编号:08DG009);国家社科基金项目(课题号:06BYY021);北京市十一五教育重点课题

The Influence of Proactive Interference on the Verbal Working Memory of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder(ADHD) and Reading Disability(RD) Children

ZHANG Wei1,2, LIU Xiang-ping1, SONG Hong-yan1   

  1. 1, School of psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
    2. School of psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079
  • Online:2009-04-15 Published:2009-04-15

摘要: ADHD和阅读障碍儿童在言语工作记忆上的缺陷得到了大量研究的证实,但是二者机制并不相同,前摄抑制对工作记忆容量产生了不利的影响,主要影响的也是中央执行功能。研究将最近探测任务和n-back任务相结合,直接比较被试在最近负探测和非最近负探测条件下记忆成绩的差异,以考察前摄抑制对两种障碍言语工作记忆的影响,被试是60名障碍儿童(阅读障碍和ADHD)和17名正常儿童,年龄均在7至12岁之间。结果发现,受前摄抑制的影响,正常被试和障碍被试成绩均明显下降,具体而言,ADHD和ADHD伴随阅读障碍组成绩大幅下滑(26.44%,28.44%),程度明显高于正常儿童和阅读障碍儿童(14.62%,15.84%),后两者差异并不明显,这说明前摄抑制是影响工作记忆容量的重要因素,并且ADHD儿童更加容易受到前摄抑制的影响,这是导致其工作记忆成绩缺损的重要原因,而阅读障碍儿童能够像正常儿童一样,在一定程度上处理前摄抑制,ADHD和阅读障碍组在言语工作记忆缺损机制上存在差异。

关键词: ADHD, 阅读障碍, 前摄抑制, 1-back

Abstract: Many studies had showed the verbal working memory problems of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and reading disability (RD) children,but the deficits of the two disorders were different in specific aspects of verbal working memory.Proactive interference was regarded as one of the most important central executives and contributed to the working memory span.In this study,a new task which consisted of recent probe task and verbal nback task was adopted to explore the disadvantageous influence of proactive interference (PI) on the verbal working memory.The effect of PI could be computed by the subtraction from the performance of the no nrecent probes to the performance of the recent negative probes.Sixty disorder children and seventeen normal children engaged in this study,aged between 7~12 years old.Compared with the no nrecent negative probes,all groups deteriorated in the recent negative probes; ADHD only and ADHD+RD groups decreased greatly (26.44%,28.44%),but the control and RD only groups decreased less (14.62%,15.84%) and no significant differences were found between RD only and control children.The results suggested that ADHD was more easily influenced by PI than RD and the ability of resisting PI of RD was not deficient; they also showed that there were different deficit mechanisms of verbal working memory in ADHD and RD.

Key words: ADHD, reading disability, proactive interference, 1-back

中图分类号: 

  • B844.1
[1] Baddeley A D,Hitch G.Working memory.In Bower G A,(Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation:Recent advances in research and theory.New York,Academic Press,1974:48-79.
[2] Biederman J,Faraone S,Milberger S,et al.A prospective 4-year followup study of Attentio n-Deficit Hyperactivity and related disorders.Archives of General Psychiatry,1996,53:437-446.
[3] Faraone S V,Biederman J,Lehman B K,et al.Intellectual performance and school failure in children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and their siblings.Journal of Abnormal Psychology,1993,102:616-623.
[4] McInnes A,Humphries T,Hogg-Johnson S,et al.Listening comprehension and working memory are impaired in Attentio n-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder irrespective of language impairment.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,2003,31:427-443.
[5] Karatekin C,Asarnow R F.Working memory in childhoodonset schizophrenia and Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).Psychiatry Research,1998,80:165-176.
[6] Helena W,Hans F,Torkel K.FMRI and psychometrics of visuo-spatial working memory in children with and without ADHD.Neuroimage,2001,13 (6):761-762.
[7] Castellanos F,Tannock R.Neuroscience of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder:the search for endophenotypes.Neuroscience,2002,3:617-628.
[8] Gathercole S E,Baddeley A D.Phonological memory deficits in language-disordered children:is there a causal connection? Journal of Memory and Language,1990,29:336-360.
[9] Bowers P,Steffey R,Tate E.Comparison of the effects of IQ control methods on memory and naming speed predictors of reading disability.Reading Research Quarterly,1988,23:304-309.
[10] Wolf M,Bowers P G,The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexia.Journal of Educational Psychology,1999,91 (3):415-438.
[11] Ho C S,Chan D W,Leung P,et al.Reading-related cognitive deficits in developmental dyslexia,attentio n-deficit/hyperactivity disorder,and developmental coordination disorder among Chinese children.Reading Research Quarterly,2005,40:318-337.
[12] 刘翔平,丁玎,杨双.阅读障碍儿童语音转录.中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18 (8):564-566.
[13] Joel K,Kathleen D.Verbal memory impairments in dyslexia.Ar 2 chives of Clinical Neurophysiology,2000,15 (1):83-93.
[14] Jonides D E.Brain mechanisms of proactive interference in working memory.Neuroscience,2006,139:181-193.
[15] Kiss I,Charlene P,Andre F,et al.Central executive function in working memory:eventrelated brain potential studies.Cognitive Brain Research,1998,6:235-247.
[16] Barkley R A.Behavioral inhibition,sustained attention,and executive functions:Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD.Psychological Bulletin,1997,121:65-94.
[17] Lustig C,May C P,Hasher L.Working memory span and role of proactive interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology,2001,130 (2):199-207.
[18] Engle R W.Working memory capacity as executive attention.Current Directions in Psychological Science,2002,11:19-23.
[19] Jonides J,Smith E,Marshuetz C,et al.Inhibition in verbal working memory revealed by brain activation.Process of National Academy and Science in USA,1998,95:8410-8413.
[20] D'Esposito M,Postle R,Jonides J,et al.The neural substrate and temporal dynamics of interference effects in working memory as revealed by eventrelated fMRI.Process of National Academy and Science in USA,1999,96:7514-7519.
[21] Nelson K,Reuter-Lorenz A,Sylvester C,et al.Dissociable neural mechanisms underlying response based and familiarity 2 based conflict in working memory.Process of National Academy and Science in USA,2003,100:11171-11175.
[22] Mecklinger A,Weber K,Gunter C,et al.Dissociable brain mechanisms for inhibitory control:effects of interference content and working memory capacity.Cognition and Brain Research,2003,18:28-38.
[23] Postle R,Brush N.The neural bases of the effects of item nonspecific proactive interference in working memory.Cognition Affect Behavior Neuroscience,2004,4:379-392.
[1] 孟红霞, 白学军, 谭珂, 苏娟. 发展性阅读障碍的视觉拥挤效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 762-768.
[2] 刘涵隆, 赵婧. 汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童视觉注意广度的发展及其对阅读流畅性的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(5): 533-540.
[3] 李何慧, 陶伍海, 彭聃龄, 丁国盛. 发展性阅读障碍与脑异常的因果关系:研究范式及发现[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(5): 631-640.
[4] 孟泽龙, 张逸玮, 毕鸿燕. 发展性阅读障碍亚类型研究进展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(1): 113-121.
[5] 丁颖, 杨双. 不同特征维度下ADHD儿童的任务切换特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(6): 581-587.
[6] 丁颖, 杨双. 错误意识判断对ADHD儿童错误觉察的影响特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(4): 362-367.
[7] 王晓辰, 李其维, 李清. 小学汉语阅读障碍儿童的PASS认知加工特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(6): 569-576.
[8] 刘文理, 伊廷伟, 杨玉芳. 汉语语音型阅读障碍儿童的范畴知觉技能[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(6): 569-576.
[9] 金颖, 刘翔平, 张微, 兰彦婷. 激活水平对两亚型ADHD儿童反应执行与抑制能力的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(4): 81-86.
[10] 刘卫卫, 刘翔平, 钟姝. 不同亚型ADHD儿童的视通道时距估计能力[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(3): 30-35.
[11] 薛锦, 舒华. 快速命名对汉语阅读的选择性预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(2): 97-101.
[12] 张微, 刘翔平, 金颍. ADHD儿童的选择性抑制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(2): 29-33.
[13] 李虹, 舒华, 薛锦, 杨剑峰. 阅读障碍儿童的技能自动化能力[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(1): 101-105.
[14] 彭虹, 梁卫兰, 张致祥, 李虹, 舒华, Tardif T., Fletcher P.. 汉语阅读障碍高危儿童的早期筛选[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(3): 89-92.
[15] 田晓梅, 王纯, 李童, 孟祥芝, 周晓林. 汉语双字词的心理词典存储—来自发展性阅读障碍个案的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2006, 22(2): 46-51.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!