汉语阅读障碍高危儿童的早期筛选

心理发展与教育 ›› 2007, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (3): 89-92.

汉语阅读障碍高危儿童的早期筛选

彭虹^1,4, 梁卫兰², 张致祥², 李虹³, 舒华¹, Tardif T.⁵, Fletcher P.⁶

1. 北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室, 北京, 100875;
2. 北京大学第一医院, 北京, 100034;
3. 北京师范大学心理学院, 北京, 100875;
4. 北京市残疾人康复服务指导中心, 北京, 100028;
5. 美国密西根大学, 美国;
6. 香港大学, 香港

出版日期:2007-07-15 发布日期:2007-07-15
通讯作者: 舒华,北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习研究所教授.E-mail:shuh@bnu.edu.cn E-mail:shuh@bnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
攀登项目(95-专-09);国家自然科学基金项目(30470574,60534080)资助

Screen of Chinese Reading at-risk children

PENG Hong^1,4, LIANG Wei-lan², ZHANG Zhi-xiang², LI Hong³, SHU Hua¹, TARDIF T.⁵, FLETCHER P.⁶

1. State Key Lab for Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
2. Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034;
3. School of psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
4. Beijing Disabled Persons Rehabilitation Service & Guidance Centre, Beijing 10028;
5. University of Michigan, U. S. A.;
6. University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Online:2007-07-15 Published:2007-07-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过对309名平均年龄为3岁半的儿童(35～49个月)进行词汇、语素识别、句法、非词重复和看图说词5个任务的测试,探索了汉语阅读障碍高危儿童的早期筛选方法。结果显示高危儿童在所有任务上都显著落后于正常儿童;句法缺陷和语音缺陷所占比例最大;高危儿童存在的缺陷数量越多,则测验成绩越差。这一结果对汉语阅读障碍高危儿童的早期干预具有一定的理论和实践意义。

关键词: 阅读障碍, 高危儿童, 筛选, 认知缺陷

Abstract: By testing 309 35～49 month children on vocabulary, morphological awareness, grammar, non-word repetition and picture naming tests, the present study examined the screening of Chinese reading at risk children and their cognitive character.The results showed that reading at risk children were significant poorer than normal children on all tasks; grammar and phonological deficit had the largest perception; the more deficits had, the poorer of score of at risk children.The finding of present study have theory and practical meaning for Chinese reading at risk children's early intervention.

Key words: Dyslexia, At Risk, Screen, Cognition Deficit

彭虹, 梁卫兰, 张致祥, 李虹, 舒华, Tardif T., Fletcher P.. 汉语阅读障碍高危儿童的早期筛选[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(3): 89-92.

PENG Hong, LIANG Wei-lan, ZHANG Zhi-xiang, LI Hong, SHU Hua, TARDIF T., FLETCHER P.. Screen of Chinese Reading at-risk children[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2007, 23(3): 89-92.

参考文献

[1] Hatcher P,Hulme C,Ellis A W.Ameliorating early reading failure by integrating the teaching of reading and phonological skills.Child Development,1994,65,41-57.
[2] Scarborough H S.Very early language deficits in dyslexia children.Children Development,1990,61,1728-1743.
[3] Muter V,Hulme C,Snowling M.The phonological abilities test,PAT.London:The Psychological Corporation,1997.
[4] Nicilson R I,Fawcett A J,Moss H,et al.An early reading intervention study:Evaluation and implications.British Journal of Educational Psychology,1999,69,47-62.
[5] McBride-Chang C,Shu H,Zhou A,et al.Morphological awareness uniquely predicts young children's Chinese character recognition.Journal of Educational Psychology,2003,95,743-751.
[6] Dunn L M.Peabody picture vocabulary Test-Resived.Minnsota:American Guidance Service,1981.
[7] 郝美玲.汉语儿童词素意识的发展.北京师范大学博士论文.2003.
[8] Snowling M J,Galla gher A,Frith U.Family risk of dyslexia is continuous:individual differences in the precursors of reading skill.Child Development,2003,74(2),358-373.
[9] Ho C S H,Chan D W O,Tsang S M,et al.The cognitive profile and multiple-deficit hypothesis.Developmental Psychology,2002,38(4),543-553.
[10] Wolfgang S,Ellen R,Marco E.Training phonological skills and letter knowledge in children at risk for dyslexia:a comparison of three kindergarten intervention programs.Journal of Educational Psychology,2000,92(2),284-295.
[11] Elbro C,Borstrom I,Petersen D K.Predicting Dyslexia from kindergarten:The importance of distinctions of phonological representations of lexical items.Reading Research Quarterly,1998,33(1),36-60.
[12] Blschman B A,Ball E W,Black R S,et al.Kindergarten teachers develop phoneme awareness in low-income,inner-city classrooms:Does it make a difference? Reading and Writing,1994,6,1-18.
[13] 吴思娜,舒华,王彧.4～6年级小学生发展性阅读障碍的异质性研究.心理发展与教育,2004,(3),46-50.
[14] 彭虹.语音意识、语素意识与汉语儿童早期阅读.北京师范大学硕士论文.2005
[15] Felton R H,Brown I S.Phonological processes as predictors of specific reading skills in children at risk for reading failure.Reading and Writing,1990,2,39-59.

相关文章 15

[1]	孟红霞, 白学军, 谭珂, 苏娟. 发展性阅读障碍的视觉拥挤效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 762-768.
[2]	刘涵隆, 赵婧. 汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童视觉注意广度的发展及其对阅读流畅性的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(5): 533-540.
[3]	李何慧, 陶伍海, 彭聃龄, 丁国盛. 发展性阅读障碍与脑异常的因果关系:研究范式及发现[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(5): 631-640.
[4]	孟泽龙, 张逸玮, 毕鸿燕. 发展性阅读障碍亚类型研究进展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(1): 113-121.
[5]	王晓辰, 李其维, 李清. 小学汉语阅读障碍儿童的PASS认知加工特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(6): 569-576.
[6]	刘文理, 伊廷伟, 杨玉芳. 汉语语音型阅读障碍儿童的范畴知觉技能[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(6): 569-576.
[7]	张微, 刘翔平, 宋红艳. 前摄抑制对儿童注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和阅读障碍的言语工作记忆的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(2): 28-34.
[8]	薛锦, 舒华. 快速命名对汉语阅读的选择性预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(2): 97-101.
[9]	李虹, 舒华, 薛锦, 杨剑峰. 阅读障碍儿童的技能自动化能力[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(1): 101-105.
[10]	田晓梅, 王纯, 李童, 孟祥芝, 周晓林. 汉语双字词的心理词典存储—来自发展性阅读障碍个案的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2006, 22(2): 46-51.
[11]	吴思娜, 舒华, 王彧. 4～6年级小学生发展性阅读障碍的异质性研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2004, 20(3): 46-50.
[12]	刘翔平, 候典牧, 杨双, 杜雯翀. 阅读障碍儿童汉字认知特点研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2004, 20(2): 7-11.
[13]	张向葵, 孙天威, 缴润凯. 阅读障碍学生创造力特征的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2004, 20(2): 1-6.
[14]	曾飚, 周晓林, 孟祥芝. 发展性阅读障碍的注意缺陷研究现状[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2003, 18(2): 91-95.
[15]	丁玎, 刘翔平, 李烈, 赵辉, 姚敬薇, 田彤. 阅读障碍儿童识字特点研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2002, 18(2): 64-67.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed