摘要： 发展心理学研究表明信念归因与抑制性控制和语言(特别是补充句法,complement syntax)有着密切的联系,儿童抑制性控制能力和补充句法能力与其错误信念任务的表现有较高的相关。但是抑制性控制能力和补充句法能力对于信念归因是不是必须的在发展心理学中并没有得到解决。脑成像研究表明,信念归因与抑制性控制和补充句法有着不同的神经机制,从而在一定程度上表明,至少对于大人,在完成错误信念归因任务过程中可能并不需要抑制性控制和补充句法。
| [1] Saxe R,Carey S,Kanwisher N.Understanding other minds:Linking developmental psychology and functional Neuroimaging.Annual Review of Psychology,2004,55:87-124. [2] Bartsch K,Wellman H M.Children Talk About the Mind.London/New York:Oxford University Press,1995. [3] Malle B F,Moses L J,Baldwin D A,eds.Intentions and Intentionality:Foundations of Social Cognition.Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,2001. [4] Flavell J H.Cognitive development:ehildren's knowledge about the mind.Annual Review of Psychology,1999,50:21-45. [5] Wellman H M,Cross D,Watson J.Meta-analysis of theory-ofmind development:the truth about false belief.Child Development,2001,72:655-684. [6] Wimmer H,Perner J.Beliefs about beliefs:representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception.Cognition,1983,13:103-128. [7] Dennett D.Beliefs about beliefs.Behavior Brain Science,1978,1:568-70. [8] Premack D,Woodruff G.Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavior Brain Science,1978,1:515-526. [9] Leslie A."Theory of Mind" as a mechanism of selective attention.In The New Cognitive Neurosciences,ed.M Gazzaniga,pp.1235-47.Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,2000. [10] Leslie A,Polizzi P.Inhibitory processing in the false belief task:two conjectures.Developmental Science,1998,1:247-253. [11] Moses L J.Executive accounts of theory of-mind development.Child Development,2001,72:688-690. [12] De Villiers J.Language and theory of mind:What are the developmental relationships? In Baron-Cohen S,Tager-Flusberg H,Cohen DJ,eds.Understanding Other Minds.London/New York:Oxford University Press,2000:83-123. [13] Baron-Cohen S,Leslie A,Frith U.Does the autistic child have a theory of mind? Cognition,1985,21:37-46. [14] Bloom P.How Children Leam the Meanings of Words.Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,2000. [15] Happe F.Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism:a test of relevance theory.Cognition,1992,48:101-119. [16] Malle B F.The relation between language and theory of mind in development and evolution.In The Evolution of Language from Pre-Language,ed.T Givon,BF Malle.Amsterdam/Erdenheim,PA:Benjamins,2003. [17] Harris P L.Children and Emotion:The Development of Psychological Understanding.Cambridge,MA:Basil Blackwell,1989. [18] Nelson K.Language in Cognitive Development:Emergence of the Mediated Mind.New York/London:Cambridge University Press.1996. [19] Goel V,Grafman J,Sadato N et al.Modeling other minds.NeuroReport,1995,6:1741-1746. [20] Bloom P,German T P.Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind.Cognition,2000,77:B25-B31. [21] Fletcher P C,Happe F,Frith U et al.Other minds in the brain:a functional imaging study of "theory of mind" in story comprehension.Cognition,1995,57:109-128. [22] Gallagher H L,Happe F,Brunswick N et al.Reading the mind in cartoons and stories:an fMRI study of "theory of mind" in verbal and nonverbal tasks.Neuropsychologia,2000,38:11-21. [23] Saxe R,Kanwisher N.People thinking about thinking people:fMRI investigations of theory of mind.NeuroImage,2003,19(4):1835-1842. [24] Eriksen B A,Eriksen C W.Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics,1974,16:143-149. [25] Botvinick M,Nystrom L E,Fissell K et al.Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex.Nature,1999,402:179-181. [26] Milham M P,Banich M T,Webb A et al.The relative involvement of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex in attentional control depends on nature of conflict.Brain Research Cognitive Brain Research,2001,12:467-473. [27] Stroop J R.Factors affecting speed in serial verbal reactions.Psychological Monographs,1938,50:38-48. [28] Braver T S,Barch D M,Gray J R et al.Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict:effects of frequency,inhibition and errors.Cerebral Cortex,2001,11:825-836. [29] Sylvester C Y,Wager T D,Lacey S C et al.Switching attention and resolving interference:fMRI measures of executive functions.Neuropsychologia,2003,41:357-370. [30] Jiang Y,Kanwisher N.Common neural substrates for response selection across modalities and mapping paradigms.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,2003,15(8):1080-1094. [31] Caplan D.Functional neuroimaging studies of syntactic processing.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,2001,30:297-320. [32] Ferstl E C,yon CramonD Y.What does the frontomedian cortex contribute to language processing:coherence or theory of mind? NeuroImage,2002,17:1599-1612. [33] Friederici A D.Syntactic,prosodic,and semantic processes in the brain:evidence from event-related neuroimaging.Journal of Psycholingnistic Research,2001,30:237-250. [34] Vandenberghe R,Nobre A C,Price C J.The response of left temporal cortex to sentences.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,2002,14:550-560. [35] Just M A,Carpenter P A,Keller T A et al.Brain activation modulated by sentence comprehension.Science,1996,274:114-116. [36] Roder B,Stock O,Neville H et al.Brain activation modulated by the comprehension of normal and pseudo-word sentences of different processing demands:a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.NeuroImage,2002,15:1003-1014. [37] Varley R,Siegal M.Evidence for cognition without grammar from causal reasoning and "theory of mind" in an agTammatic apasic patient.Current Biology,2000,10:723-726. [38] Varley R,SiegalM,Want S C.Severe impairment in grammar does not preclude theory of mind.Neurocase,2001,7:489-493. |
| [1] | 陈传锋, 葛国宏, 卢丹凤, 岳慧兰. 祖辈协同教养与幼儿错误信念理解能力的关系:亲子依恋与祖辈同住的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 21-30. |
| [2] | 古丽努尔·阿扎提, 苏彦捷, 于文. 孤独症个体的谎言理解及其与对自我/他人错误信念理解的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(2): 113-120. |
| [3] | 滕召军, 刘衍玲, 潘彦谷, 尧德中. 媒体暴力与攻击性：社会认知神经科学视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(6): 664-672. |
| [4] | 曹晓君, 陈旭, 刘庆英, 罗乐. 3～5岁幼儿暗示感受性与压力的关系:抑制性控制的调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(4): 353-361. |
| [5] | 张晶晶, 胡清芬. 错误信念任务中的知识偏差[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(2): 210-214. |
| [6] | 张婷, 李红, 曾维希, 张莉, 廖渝. 3～6岁儿童信念理解能力的发展研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(4): 15-20. |
| [7] | 莫书亮, 苏彦捷. 3～4岁儿童的错误信念理解:补语句法, 语义理解和工作记忆的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(3): 15-19,25. |
| [8] | 李艳玲, 陈英和. 3～5岁幼儿错误信念理解能力的发展趋势[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(2): 1-7. |
| [9] | 张长英, 桑标, 马伟娜. 对话环境与心理理论发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(4): 125-128. |
| [10] | 王异芳, 苏彦捷. 7~9岁儿童二级错误信念和失言理解的发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(3): 15-20. |
| [11] | 邓赐平, 刘明. 从假装到心理表征理论:假装认识训练的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(3): 1-8. |
| [12] | 刘娟. 特质标签对儿童错误信念理解的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(2): 13-17. |
| [13] | 李晓东, 周双珠. 幼儿是如何通过错误信念任务的:信念还是规则?[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(3): 1-5. |
| [14] | 刘秀丽, 车文博. 学前儿童欺骗及欺骗策略发展的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2006, 22(4): 1-7. |
| [15] | 桑标, 徐轶丽. 幼儿心理理论的发展与其日常同伴交往关系的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2006, 22(2): 1-6. |
|
||
