心理发展与教育 ›› 2005, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (2): 7-10.

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

3~6岁幼儿好奇心结构探索与验证性因子分析

张日昇1, 胡克祖2, 杨丽珠2   

  1. 1. 北京师范大学发展心理研究所, 北京, 100875;
    2. 辽宁师范大学教育科学学院, 大连, 116029
  • 出版日期:2005-04-15 发布日期:2005-04-15
  • 作者简介:张日昇(1962- ),男,山东即墨人,北京师范大学发展心理研究所教授.E-mail:risheng@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    全国教育科学"十五"规划项目(课题号:BBB010467).

Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Structure of Teacher Evaluation for Curiosity of Three-to Six-Years-Olds Infants

ZHANG Ri-sheng1, HU Ke-zu2, YANG Li-zhu2   

  1. 1. Developmental Psychology Institute, Beijing Normal Unviersity, Beijing, China 100875;
    2. School of Education, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, China 116029
  • Online:2005-04-15 Published:2005-04-15

摘要: 以幼儿园3~6岁幼儿为对象,通过80名幼儿教师对480名幼儿好奇心行为特征描述的开放式问卷调查,编制出60个项目的初始问卷,对500名幼儿的初测结果进行探索性因子分析后,形成了33个项目的正式问卷,对1000名幼儿的评价结果进行验证性因子分析,结果表明:教师评价的3~6岁幼儿好奇心结构包括敏感、对未知事物的关注、好问、喜欢摆弄、探索持久和好奇体验6个因子。

关键词: 3~6岁幼儿, 好奇心结构, 教师评价, 探索性因子分析, 验证性因子分析

Abstract: This study sought to clarify the construction of preschool children's curiosity.Curiosity characters of 480 preschool children were described by 80 preschool teachers.Based on this,the paper designed a 60 items original Curiosity Questionnaire For Three-to Six-Year-Olds(Teacher Rating),then 500 infants were evaluated by their teacher with this questionnaire.Based on the results of exploratory factor analysis for original questionnaire,formed a 33 items formal questionnaire.The formal questionnaire was administered to 1000 infants.The authors analyzed and tested the formal questionnaire by means of confirmatory factor analysis.As results showed,the questionnaire included six factors:sensitivity,attention to unknown things,intention to ask,intention to manipulate,permanent exploratory and experience of curiosity.

Key words: 3-6 years old child, structure of curiosity, teacher rating, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis

中图分类号: 

  • B844.1
[1] 张春兴.教育心理学[M].杭州:浙江教育出版社,1998年5月,293.
[2] Goodale G. Review for Curiosity: A Cultural History of Early Modern Inquiry (By Barbara M. Benedict). Journal of Social History,Spring 2003, 771-774.
[3] 恩田彰等.创造性心理学陆祖昆译.石家庄:河北人民出版社,1987年11月,4.
[4] Kreitler S, Kreitler H, Zigler E. Congitive Orientation and Curiosity. British Journal of Psychology. 1974, vol. 65, No. 1, 43-52.
[5] Trudewind C, Schneider K. Interindividual Differences in the Development of Exploratory Behavior: Methodlogical Considerations. in Keller H, Schneider K, Henderson B (Eds.), Curiosity and Exploration,Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 1994, 156-168.
[6] 杨丽珠.儿童个性发展与培养的实验研究.长春:吉林人民出版社,2001年1月,161-167,322-327.
[7] 刘云艳,张大均.幼儿好奇心结构的探索性因素分析.心理科学,2004,27(1),127-129.
[8] 侯杰泰,温忠麟,成子娟.结构方程模型及应用.北京:教育科学出版社,2004年7月,120,16.
[9] Byman R. Curiosity and Exploration: Four Dimensions of Gender-Free Exploration-A Methodological Example Study. http://www.edu.helsinki,fi/oppimateriaalit/byman2003/byman2003.pdf, 2004-09-04.
[10] Thomas G, Reio J.Effects of curiosity on socialization-related learning and job performance in adults. Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, April 2,1997, Falls Church, Virginia, unpublished.
[11] Norma D F. Manual of Individual Difference Variables and Measures. Center for the Study of Evaluation (CSE) Report No. 2.published December of 1968.
[12] Day H I.The Measurement of Specific Curiosity. in Day H I,Berlyne D E, Hunt D E(Eds).Intrinsic Motivation: A New Direction In Education. The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 1971, 99-112.
[1] 赵希斌. 不同学段、年级学生对教师评价行为知觉的特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2005, 21(4): 61-67.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!