心理发展与教育 ›› 2002, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (4): 82-85.

• 研究方法与工具 • 上一篇    下一篇

Kansas婚姻满意感量表的北京和香港常模

李虹1, 陈启芳2   

  1. 1. 清华大学教育研究所, 北京100084;
    2. 香港浸会大学
  • 出版日期:2002-10-15 发布日期:2002-10-15
  • 作者简介:李虹(1961- ),女,清华大学教育研究所博士,副教授.
  • 基金资助:
    香港浸会大学资助项目

Normative Data of the Chinese Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale: Findings based on Hong Kong and Beijing Samples

LI Hong1, Kai FONG Chan2   

  1. 1. Beijing, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084;
    2. Baptist University of Hong Kong
  • Online:2002-10-15 Published:2002-10-15

摘要: 本研究的目的是建立Kansas(香港-中文版)婚姻满意感量表的北京和香港常模。其意义在于不但提供这两大城市人群的婚姻满意感测量指标,而且为今后进一步研究中国大城市人群的婚姻质量提供依据。被试取自北京和香港的已婚男女,共1218人。本研究包括两个分研究,研究一(599名北京被试)和研究二(619名香港被试)。研究结果表明,Kansas婚姻满意感量表的信度指标非常满意(北京被试:Cronbachα=93,香港被试:Cronbachα=96),同时具有良好效度。北京被试的婚姻满意感常模分数为:1518,香港被试为:1613。

关键词: Kansas婚姻满意感量表, 常模分数, 婚姻满意感

Abstract: The purpose of the study was to establish the normative data of both Beijing sample and Hong Kong sample for Chinese version of Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale (C-KMS).The study would not only provide the normative data of marital satisfaction for those two major cities,but also suggest the references for further studies on Chinese marital satisfaction in major cities of China.The C-KMS was administered to 1218 married people.The study includes two substudies: study one (599 Beijing sample) and study two (619 Hong Kong sample).The C-KMS was found to have high internal consistency (alpha=93 for Beijing sample; alpha=96 for Hong Kong sample),and well established validity as a scale.The results showed that the normative data for Beijing sample is 15.18,and for Hong Kong sample is 16.13.

Key words: Kansas marital satisfaction scale, Normative data, Marital satisfaction

中图分类号: 

  • B849
[1] Schumm W R.,Paff-Bergen L A.,Hatch R C.,Obiorah F.C,,Copeland J M.,Meens L D.,& Bugaighis M A.Concurrent and discriminam validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale.Journal of Marriage and the Family,1986,48:381-387.
[2] Norton R.Measuring marital quality: A critical look at the dependent variable.Journal of Marriage and the Family,1983,45:141-151.
[3] Roach A J.,Larry P F.,& Sharon R B.The marital satisfaction scale: Development of a measure for intervention research.Journal of Marriage and the Family,1981,43: 537-546.
[4] Bradbury,Thomas N.,Fincham,Frank D.,Beach,Steven R H.Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review,Journal of Marriage & Family,2000,62(4):964-986.
[5] Shek D.The Chinese version of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale: Some psychometric and normative data.Social Behavior and Personality,1993,21(3): 205-214.
[6] Shek D.,Lam M.,Tsoi K.,& Lam C.The development of the Chinese version of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale in Hong Kong.Unpublished manuscript,1992.
[7] 国家统计局.中国人口统计年鉴,2000.
[1] 佐斌, 赵菊. 积极情绪对群际关系认知的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(3): 119-123.
[2] 曹科岩, 龙君伟. 教师组织公民行为:结构与影响因素的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(1): 87-92.
[3] 林丹华, 方晓义, 李晓铭, 苏立增. 年轻流动人口的流动模式与其社会适应的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2004, 20(4): 49-55.
[4] 刘春燕. 发展性团体心理咨询改善大学生应对方式及其相关因素的实验研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2003, 19(4): 75-81.
[5] 郝琦, 汪新建. 表演治疗的理论与方法述评[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2003, 19(3): 87-91.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!