心理发展与教育 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 370-378.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2026.03.07

• 教与学心理 • 上一篇    下一篇

自主控制影响自我调节类别学习:“决策驱动”的视角

郑筱星1, 李佩瑾2, 邢强1   

  1. 1. 广州大学心理系, 广州 510006;
    2. 莲洲镇横山中心小学, 珠海 519165
  • 发布日期:2026-05-15
  • 通讯作者: 邢强 E-mail:qiang_xingpsy@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    全国教育科学规划十三五教育学一般项目(BBA200033)。

Active Control Influences Self-regulated Category Learning: The “Decision-driven” Perspective

ZHENG Xiaoxing1, LI Peijin2, XING Qiang1   

  1. 1. Department of Psychology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006;
    2. Hengshan Central Primary School, Zhuhai 519165
  • Published:2026-05-15

摘要: 自我调节学习优势中“决策驱动”观点在记忆领域得到证实,且最低的控制足以改善记忆,尚不明确高阶任务中自主控制的作用。本研究基于类别学习任务,采用共轭设计,逐步提高自主控制程度以检验自我调节学习的优势来源及机制,并使用序列熵表征自主选取类别的有序性。结果表明,在自主控制学习间隔或控制间隔和时长时未发现自我调节学习优势;在自主控制学习间隔、时长和序列时发现自我调节的分类迁移优势,且自我调节个体在学习进程中动态调整其序列决策,在后期偏好交错策略。随着自主控制水平提高,自我调节学习最终促进类别泛化。

关键词: 自我调节学习, 自主控制, 决策驱动, 类别学习, 共轭设计

Abstract: The “decision-driven” view of the self-regulated learning advantage has been demonstrated in the area of memory, and while minimal control is sufficient to improve memory, the role of autonomy in higher-order tasks is not yet clear. In this study, we examined the sources and mechanisms of the self-regulated learning advantage based on a category learning task using the yoked design with progressively higher levels of autonomy, and used sequence entropy to characterize the orderliness of autonomy in the selection of categories. The results showed that no self-regulated learning advantage was found when learning intervals or control intervals and durations were autonomously controlled; a self-regulated categorical transfer advantage was found when learning intervals, durations, and sequences were autonomously controlled, and self-regulated individuals dynamically adapted their sequential decision-making during the learning process, preferring an interleaved strategy at a later stage. Self-regulated learning eventually facilitated category generalization as the level of autonomy control increased.

Key words: self-regulated learning, active control, decision-driven, category learning, yoked design

中图分类号: 

  • G442
Adam,K.C.S.,& de Bettencourt,M.T.(2019).Fluctuations of attention and working memory.Journal of Cognition,2(1),33.https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.70
Anderson,L.W.,Krathwohl,D.R.,Airasian,P.W.,Cruikshank,K.A.,Mayer,R.E.,Pintrich,P.R.,… Wittrock,M.C.(Eds.).(2001).A taxonomy for learning,teaching,and assessing:A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives.Addison Wesley Longman,Inc.
Biwer,F.,Wiradhany,W.,oude Egbrink,M.G.A.,& de Bruin,A.B.H.(2023).Understanding effort regulation:Comparing “Pomodoro” breaks and self-regulated breaks.British Journal of Educational Psychology,93(2),353-367.
Birnbaum,M.S.,Kornell,N.,Bjork,E.L.,& Bjork,R.A.(2013).Why interleaving enhances inductive learning:The roles of discrimination and retrieval.Memory & Cognition,41(3),392-402.
Babineau,A.L.,Witherby,A.E.,Ariel,R.Pelch,M.A.,& Tauber,S.K.(2022).Do Domain Knowledge and Retrieval Practice Predict Students’ Study Order Decisions?Journal of Intelligence,10(4),122.https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10040122
Brunmair,M.,& Richter,T.(2019).Similarity matters:A meta-analysis of interleaved learning and its moderators.Psychological Bulletin,145(11),1029-1052.
Gureckis,T.M.,& Markant,D.B.(2012).Self-directed learning:a cognitive and computational perspective.Perspectives on Psychological Science,7(5),464-481.
Huttenlocher,J.(1962).Effects of manipulation of attributes on efficiency of concept formation.Psychological Reports,10,503-509.
Kaplan,R.,Doeller,C.F.,Barnes,G.R.,Litvak,V.,Duzel,E.,Bandettini,P.A.,& Burgess,N.(2012).Movement-related theta rhythm in humans:Coordinating self-directed hippocampal learning.PLoS Biology,10(2),e1001267.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001267
Leotti,L.A.,Iyengar,S.S.,& Oshsner,K.N.(2010).Born to choose:The origins and value of the need for control.Trends Cognitive Science,14,457-463.
Lu,X.,Penney,T.B.,& Kang,S.H.(2020).Category similarity affects study choices in self-regulated learning.Memory & Cognition,49(1),67-82.
Markant,D.,& Gureckis,T.(2010).Category learning through active sampling.In S.Ohlsson,& R.Catrambone (Eds.),Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society (Vol.32,pp.248-253).Cognitive Science Society.
Markant,D.B.,& Gureckis,T.M.(2014).Is it better to select or to receive?Learning via active and passive hypothesis testing.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,143(1),94-122.
Markant,D.,DuBrow,S.,Davachi,L.,& Gureckis,T.M.(2014).Deconstructing the effect of self-directed study on Episodic memory.Memory & Cognition,42(8),1211-1224.
Markant,D.B.,Ruggeri,A.,Gureckis,T.M.,& Xu,F.(2016).Enhanced memory as a common effect of active learning.Mind,Brain,and Education,10,142-152.
Markant,D.B.(2018).Active transitive inference:When learner control facilitates integrative encoding.Cognition,200(1),104-188.
Markant,D.B.(2019).Effects of biased hypothesis generation on self-directed category learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,45(9),1552-1568.
Metcalfe,J.,& Kornell,N.(2003).The dynamics of learning and allocation of study time to a region of proximal learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,132,530 - 542.
Nelson,T.O.,& Narens,L.(1990).Metamemory:A theoretical framework and new findings.The Psychology of Learning and Motivation,26,125-173.
Ruggeri,A.,Markant,D.B.,Gureckis,T.M.,Bretzke,M.,& Xu,F.(2019).Memory enhancements from active controlof learning emerge across development.Cognition,186,82-94.
Seufert,T.(2018).The interplay between self-regulation in learning and cognitive load.Educational Research Review,24,116-129.
Shannon,C.E.(1948).A mathematical theory of communication,part i,part ii.Bell System Technical Journal,27,623-656.
Sweller,J.,van Merriënboer,J.J.G.,& Paas,F.(2019).Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design:20 Years Later.Educational Psychology Review,31(2),261-292.
Sweller,J.(1988).Cognitive load during problem solving:Effects on learning.Cognitive Science,12(2),257-285.
Voss,J.L.,Gonsalves,B.D.,Federmeier,K.D.,Tranel,D.& Cohen,N.J.(2011).Hippocampal brain-network coordination during volitional exploratory behavior enhances learning.Nature Neuroscience,14,115-120.
Voss,J.L.,Galvan,A.,& Gonsalves,B.D.(2011).Cortical regions recruited for complex active-learning strategies and action planning exhibit rapid reactivation during memory retrieval.Neuropsychologia,49(14),3956-3966.
Zimmerman B.J.(1989).A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning.Journal of Educational Psychology,81(3),329-339.
卡罗尔·塞格,陈剑平,王宇情,刘志雅.(2021).基底核在类别学习中的纽带作用.华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),6,6-15+206.
邢强,夏静静,王彩燕.(2016).工作记忆容量与内容相关性对类别学习的影响.心理发展与教育,32(3),324-329.
岳芳,陈剑平,甘可鑫,王宇情,刘志雅.(2023).交叉重叠类别结构的自主学习优势和集中学习劣势.心理学报,55(10),1597-1607.
[1] 李红霞, 张佳佳, 赵霞, 司继伟, 黄碧娟. 大学生认识论信念、自我调节学习与学业拖延的联系:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(5): 557-565.
[2] 邢强, 夏静静, 王彩燕. 工作记忆容量与内容相关性对类别学习的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(3): 324-329.
[3] 唐志文, 邢强. 类别学习语言标签效应的眼动研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(5): 475-482.
[4] 张俊, 刘儒德, 贾玲. 反馈在自我调节学习中的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(2): 218-224.
[5] 高丙成, 刘儒德, 王丹, 和美君, 袁稹. 初中生自我调节学习的类型及对学习的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(1): 76-82.
[6] 刘凤英, 李红, 张庆林, 姚志刚. 不同类别学习方式的对比研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(4): 61-67.
[7] 张阔, 阴国恩, 王敬欣. 儿童类别学习中知识效应的年龄差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2005, 21(2): 75-80.
[8] 雷雳, 汪玲, Tanja CULJAK. 优生与差生自我调节学习的对比研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2002, 18(2): 6-11.
[9] 汪玲, 雷雳, Tanja CULJAK. 效能信念、加工方式和困难应对策略——关于自我调节学习的特点及各成分间关系的探讨[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2000, 16(3): 30-35.
[10] 刘儒德, 陈琦. 学习目标要求和时间压力对多媒体环境下自我调节学习活动的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1999, 15(2): 32-36.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!