复杂问题解决：计划与目标导向行为的动态耦合关系探究

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2026.02.04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 提升学生的复杂问题解决能力是当前心理和教育研究的重要课题。本研究利用计算机模拟测试工具和行为序列分析方法,探讨了42个国家/经济体27,802名15岁学生在复杂问题解决过程中计划与目标导向行为的动态耦合关系。研究发现:(1)成功组表现出更多目标导向行为,而不成功组倾向于更多计划和非目标导向行为;(2)两组在计划行为序列上均呈现出显著的类型差异,反映了参与动机、认知负荷和人格特质等个体因素的影响;(3)成功组能维持计划与目标导向行为的动态耦合,而不成功组则较为不足。这些发现揭示了维持计划与目标导向行为的动态耦合在复杂问题解决中的关键作用,并为教学干预策略设计提供了理论依据。

关键词: 复杂问题解决, 计划, 目标导向行为, 过程数据, 行为序列分析

Abstract: Enhancing students’ complex problem-solving skills is a crucial focus in contemporary psychological and educational research. This study utilizes computer-simulated tests and behavioral sequence analysis to investigate the dynamic coupling relationship between planning and goal-directed behaviors in complex problem solving among 27802 fifteen-year-old students from 42 countries/economies. The findings are as follows: (1) The successful group demonstrated more goal-directed behaviors, while the unsuccessful group tended to engage in more planning and non-goal-directed behaviors; (2) Both groups exhibited significant typological differences in planning behavior sequences, reflecting the influence of individual differences in engagement motivation, cognitive load, and personality traits; (3) The successful group maintained dynamic coupling between planning and goal-directed behaviors, while the unsuccessful group showed relative inadequacy. These findings highlight the crucial role of maintaining dynamic coupling between planning and goal-directed behaviors in complex problem-solving and provide a theoretical basis for the design of educational intervention strategies.

Key words: complex problem-solving, planning, goal-directed behavior, process data, behavioral sequence analysis

中图分类号:

B844

田伟, 高沁晖, 辛涛, 张佳慧. 复杂问题解决：计划与目标导向行为的动态耦合关系探究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 182-192.

TIAN Wei, GAO Qinhui, XIN Tao, ZHANG Jiahui. Complex Problem-solving: An Investigation into the Dynamic Coupling of Planning and Goal-directed Behaviors[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2026, 42(2): 182-192.

参考文献

Albert, D., & Steinberg, L. (2011). Age differences in strategic planning as indexed by the tower of London. Child Development, 82(5), 1501-1517.
Asato, M. R., Sweeney, J. A., & Luna, B. (2006). Cognitive processes in the development of TOL performance. Neuropsychologia, 44(12), 2259-2269.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Taylor & Francis Group.
Colvin, M. K., Dunbar, K., & Grafman, J. (2001). The effects of frontal lobe lesions on goal achievement in the water jug task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(8), 1129-1147.
Crescentini, C., Seyed-Allaei, S., Vallesi, A., & Shallice, T. (2012). Two networks involved in producing and realizing plans. Neuropsychologia, 50(7), 1521-1535.
Csapó, B., & Funke, J. (2017). The nature of problem solving: Using research to inspire 21st century learning. Educational research and innovation, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Eichmann, B., Goldhammer, F., Greiff, S., Brandhuber, L., & Naumann, J. (2020). Using process data to explain group differences in complex problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(8), 1546-1562.
Eichmann, B., Goldhammer, F., Greiff, S., Pucite, L., & Naumann, J. (2019). The role of planning in complex problem solving. Computers & Education, 128, 1-12.
Eichmann, B., Greiff, S., Naumann, J., Brandhuber, L., & Goldhammer, F. (2020). Exploring behavioural patterns during complex problem‐solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(6), 933-956.
Gabadinho, A., Ritschard, G., Müller, N. S., & Studer, M. (2011). Analyzing and Visualizing State Sequences in R with TraMineR. Journal of Statistical Software, 40(4), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v040.i04
Goel, V., & Grafman, J. (1995). Are the frontal lobes implicated in “planning” functions? Interpreting data from the Tower of Hanoi. Neuropsychologia, 33(5), 623-642.
Goel, V., Vartanian, O., Bartolo, A., Hakim, L., Ferraro, A. M., Isella, V., … Nichelli, P. (2013). Lesions to right prefrontal cortex impair real-world planning through premature commitments. Neuropsychologia, 51(4), 713-724.
Greiff, S., Niepel, C., Scherer, R., & Martin, R. (2016). Understanding students’ performance in a computer-based assessment of complex problem solving: An analysis of behavioral data from computer-generated log files. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 36-46.
Greiff, S., Wüstenberg, S., & Avvisati, F. (2015). Computer-generated log-file analyses as a window into students’ minds? A showcase study based on the PISA 2012 assessment of problem solving. Computers & Education, 91, 92-105.
Grežo, M., & Sarmány-Schuller, I. (2022). It isnot enough to be smart: On explaining the relation between intelligence and complex problem solving. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(1), 69-89.
Kreibich, A., Hennecke, M., & Brandstätter, V. (2022). Therole of self-awareness and problem-solving orientation for the instrumentality of goal-related means. Journal of Individual Differences, 43(2), 57-69.
Kyllonen, P. C. (2018). Inequality,education, workforce preparedness, and complex problem solving. Journal of Intelligence, 6(3), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence6030033
Lämsä, J., Hämäläinen, R., Koskinen, P., Viiri, J., & Mannonen, J. (2020). The potential of temporal analysis: Combining log data and lag sequential analysis to investigate temporal differences between scaffolded and non-scaffolded group inquiry-based learning processes. Computers & Education, 143, 103674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103674
McCormack, T., & Atance, C. M. (2011). Planning in young children: A review and synthesis. Developmental Review, 31(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2011.02.002
Mustafic, M., Yu, J., Stadler, M., Vainikainen, M.-P., Bornstein, M. H., Putnick, D. L., & Greiff, S. (2019). Complex problem solving: Profiles and developmental paths revealed via latent transition analysis. Developmental Psychology, 55(10), 2090-2101.
Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (2005). Planning, attention, simultaneous, successive (PASS) theory: A revision of the concept of intelligence. In D. P. Flanagan,& P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 120-135). The Guilford Press.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Prentice-Hall.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. OECD Publishing, Paris.
Szczepanski, S. M., & Knight, R. T. (2014). Insights into human behavior from lesions to the prefrontal cortex. Neuron, 83(5), 1002-1018.
Unterrainer, J. M., & Owen, A. M. (2006). Planning and problem solving: From neuropsychology to functional neuroimaging. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 99(4-6), 308-317.
Zhang, X.-Q., Gao, Q.-H., Tian, W., & Xin, T. (2024). Dynamic and typological explanations of planning in complex problem-solving. Learning and Individual Differences, 110, 102417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102417

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	杨丽珠, 李晓溪, 高雯. 应对计划对女大学生减肥效果的影响：情绪调节和理想体型有调节的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(3): 319-326.
[2]	邓赐平, 傅丽萍, 李其维, Jagannath P. Das. D-N认知评估系统在AD/HD儿童认知评估中的应用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(3): 77-82.
[3]	戴健林, 莫雷. 西方关于写作过程的自我调控研究的进展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1999, 15(3): 54-57.