权力感对道德规范敏感性的影响:控制感和秩序需求的作用

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2025.02.06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 传统观点将个体的道德判断分为功利主义或道义论,而CNI模型可进一步将个体的道德判断区分为结果敏感性、道德规范敏感性和一般性行动或不行动偏好。Gawronski等人(2020)基于该模型探究了权力感对道德判断的影响,发现权力感仅影响个体的道德规范敏感性,但并未明确高低权力感对个体道德规范敏感性影响的差异。因此,实验一增设控制组,结果发现低权力感提高个体的道德规范敏感性。实验二通过控制感量表和秩序需求量表验证控制感和秩序需求在低权力感提高个体道德规范敏感性这一过程中的链式中介作用。这一研究基于CNI模型进一步揭示了权力感对个体道德判断的影响及其心理机制,为权力相互依赖理论和补偿性控制理论提供实证支持。

关键词: 权力感, 道德判断, 控制感, 秩序需求, CNI模型

Abstract: The traditional view divides the individual’s moral judgment into utilitarianism or deontology, while the CNI model can further divide the individual’s moral judgment into sensitivity to consequences, sensitivity to moral norms, and general preference for inaction versus action. Based on CNI model, Gawronski and Brannon (2020) explored the influence of the sense of power on moral judgment and found that the sense of power only affects the individual’s sensitivity to moral norms, but failed to clarify the difference in the influence of high and low sense of power on individuals’ sensitivity to moral norms. To further clarify the difference, a control group was added in Experiment 1, and it was found that the low sense of power increases individuals’ sensitivity to moral norms. Based on power-dependence theory and the compensation control theory, Experiment 2 verified that the sense of control and the need for structure played a chain mediating role in the process of the influence of the low sense of power on individual’s sensitivity to moral norms. In conclusion, this study reveals that the low sense of power increases individuals’ sensitivity to moral norms. And the low sense of power increases the need for structure by reducing the sense of control, and then increases the sensitivity to moral norms, providing support for the power-dependence theory and compensatory control theory.

Key words: sense of power, moral judgment, sense of control, need for structure, CNI model

中图分类号:

B844

周雨豪, 张凤, 肖威龙, 范丽婷, 孙炳海. 权力感对道德规范敏感性的影响:控制感和秩序需求的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(2): 206-215.

ZHOU Yuhao, ZHANG Feng, XIAO Weilong, FAN Liting, SUN Binghai. The Influence of the Sense of Power on the Sensitivity to Moral Norms: The Role of Sense of Control and Need for Structure[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2025, 41(2): 206-215.

参考文献

Anderson, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(4), 511-536.
Anderson, C., John, O. P., & Keltner, D. (2012). The personal sense of power.Journal of Personality, 80, 313-344.
Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), 173-187.
Cohen, D. J., & Ahn, M. (2016). A subjective utilitarian theory of moral judgment.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(10), 1359-1381.
Cote, S., Piff, P. K., & Willer, R. (2013). For whom do the ends justify the means? Social class and utilitarian moral dilemma judgment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(3), 490-503.
Cutright, K. M. (2012). The beauty of boundaries: When and why we seek structure in consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(5), 775-790.
Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). Social class, power, and selfishness: When and why upper and lower class individuals behave unethically.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(3), 436-449.
Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations.American Sociological Review, 27(1), 31-41.
Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis.Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1-22.
Fleischmann, A., Lammers, J., Conway, P., & Galinsky, A. D. (2019). Paradoxical effects of power on moral thinking.Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(1), 110-120.
Fast, N, j., Gmuerfeld, D. H., Sivanathan, N., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Illusory contol: A generative force behind power’s far-reaching effects. Psychological Science, 20(4), 502-508.
Guinote, A. (2007). Behaviour variability and the Situated Focus Theory of Power.European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 256-295.
Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 453-466.
Gawronski, B., Armstrong, J., Conway, P., Friesdorf, R., & Hütter, M. (2017). Consequences, norms, and generalized inaction in moral dilemmas: The CNI model of moral decision-making.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(3), 343-376.
Gawronski, B., & Brannon, S. M. (2020). Power and moral dilemma judgments: Distinct effects of memory recallversus social roles. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 86, 103908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103908
Guinote, A. (2017). How power affects people: Activating, wanting, and goal seeking.Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 353-381.
Hayes, A. F. (2013).Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
Inesi, M. E., Botti, S., Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2011). Power and choice: Their dynamic interplay in quenching the thirst for personal control.Psychological Science, 22(8), 1042-1048.
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110(2), 265-284.
Kraus, M. W., Cote, S., & Keltner, D. (2010). Social class, contextualism, and empathic accuracy.Psychological Science, 21(11), 1716-1723.
Kay, A. C., & Friesen, J. (2011). On social stability and social change: Understanding when system justification does and does not occur.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(6), 360-364.
Kay, A. C., Whitson, J. A., Gaucher, D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Compensatory Control: Achieving order through the mind, our institutions, and the heavens.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 264-268.
Korner, A., Deutsch, R., & Gawronski, B. (2020). Using the CNI model to investigate individual differences in moral dilemma judgments.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(9), 1392-1407.
Lachman, M. E., & Weaver, S. L. (1998). The sense of control as a moderator of social class differences in health and well-being.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 763-773.
Lammers, J., Galinsky, A. D., Dubois, D., & Rucker, D. D. (2015). Power and morality.Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 15-19.
Lammers, J., & Stapel, D. A. (2009). How power influences moral thinking.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(2), 279-289.
Leander, N. P., Agostini, M., Stroebe, W., Kreienkamp, J., Spears, R., Kuppens, T., … Kruglanski, A. W. (2020). Frustration-affirmation? Thwarted goals motivate compliance with social norms for violence and nonviolence.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(2), 249-271.
Lucas, B. J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). Is utilitarianism risky? How the same antecedents and mechanism produce both utilitarian and risky choices.Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(4), 541-548.
Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status.The Academy of Management Annals, 2(2), 351-398.
Magee, J. C., & Smith, P. K. (2013). The social distance theory of power.Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(2), 158-186.
Moshagen, M. (2010). multiTree: A computer program for the analysis of multinomial processing tree models.Behavior Research Methods, 42(1), 42-54.
Neuberg, S.L., & Newsom, J. T. (1993). Personal need for structure: Individual differences in the desire for simpler structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 113-131.
Norris, G. (2005).The Authoritarian personality in the 21st century (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Bond University.
Rucker, D. D., Galinsky, A. D., & Dubois, D. (2012). Power and consumer behavior: How power shapes who and what consumers value. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 352-368.
Shepherd, S., Kay, A. C., Landau, M. J., & Keefer, L. A. (2011). Evidence for the specificity of control motivations in worldview defense: Distinguishing compensatory control from uncertainty management and terror management processes.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(5), 949-958.
Skitka, L. J. (2010). The psychology of moral conviction.Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(4), 267-281.
Smith, P. K., & Trope, Y. (2006). You focus on the forest when you’re in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 578-596.
Sturm, R. E., & Antonakis, J. (2015). Interpersonal power: A review, critique, and research agenda.Journal of Management, 41(1), 136-163.
Whitson, J. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008).Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception. Science, 322(5898), 115-117.
白洁, 郭永玉, 杨沈龙. (2017). 人在丧失控制感后会如何?—来自补偿性控制理论的揭示. 中国临床心理学杂志, 25(05), 982-985+981.
崔滢. (2017). 权力状态与结构需求对消费者边界偏好的影响研究(硕士学位论文), 南京师范大学.
管延华, 迟毓凯, 戴金浩. (2014). 权力对风险决策偏好的影响. 心理研究, 7(04), 42-47.
李小平, 杨晟宇, 李梦遥. (2012). 权威人格与权力感对道德思维方式的影响. 心理学报, 44(07), 964-971.
刘传军, 廖江群. (2021).道德困境研究的范式沿革及其理论价值. 心理科学进展, 29(08), 1508-1520.
孙冬青, 傅鑫媛, 辛自强. (2018). 信任者权力对其人际信任的影响. 心理与行为研究, 16(01), 139-144.
田甜. (2017). 权力感可以减轻疼痛:控制感的中介作用(硕士学位论文), 苏州大学.
王雪, 蔡頠, 孙嘉卿, 吴嵩, 封子奇, 金盛华. (2014). 社会心理学视角下权力理论的发展与比较. 心理科学进展, 22(01), 139-149.
熊红星, 张璟, 叶宝娟, 郑雪, 孙配贞. (2012). 共同方法变异的影响及其统计控制途径的模型分析. 心理科学进展, 20(05), 757-769.
云祥. (2020). 权力感对道德判断的影响:基于 CNI 模型的分析. 心理与行为研究, 18(04), 544-551.
袁方舟, 叶琴, 牟芳艳, 七十三. (2021). 权力感对道德判断的影响及其理论解释: 基于CNI模型的视角. 心理学探新, 41(06), 540-546.
杨驰. (2018). 权力感对合作的影响——控制感的中介和支配性动机的调节作用(博士学位论文), 暨南大学, 广州.
张珊明, 钟毅平, 陈芸. (2014). 内隐启动条件下权力对人际敏感性的影响. 心理学探新, 34(04), 355-360.
郑睦凡, 赵俊华. (2013). 权力如何影响道德判断行为: 情境卷入的效应. 心理学报, 45(11), 1274-1282.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	吴晓靓, 盖笑松, 李晓天, 顾婷玉, 王宏. 家庭经济压力与初中生幸福感的关系:歧视知觉的中介作用和控制感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 877-886.
[2]	张陆, 黄雪芳, 游志麒, 叶娜. 儿童期虐待对大学生公正世界信念的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 804-812.
[3]	谢韵梓, 吴继霞, 王诗成, 阳泽. 儿童期情感忽视对大学生抑郁的影响:控制感与情绪调节自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 407-417.
[4]	许郡婷, 鲍未, 罗俊龙. 不稳定控制感剥夺损害工作记忆刷新功能[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 1-9.
[5]	丁凤琴, 王喜梅, 刘钊. 道德概念净脏隐喻及其对道德判断的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(6): 666-674.
[6]	李小晶, 李红. 坏念头，罪几何？意图信息的强弱变化对大学生道德判断的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(3): 244-251.
[7]	杨继平, 王兴超. 青少年道德推脱与攻击行为：道德判断调节作用的性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(4): 361-367.
[8]	朱皕, 雷雳. 中学生受欺负状况与心理控制感的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2005, 21(1): 91-95.
[9]	张向葵, 张林, 马利文. 认知评价、心理控制感、社会支持与高考压力关系的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2002, 17(3): 74-79.
[10]	陈少华, 郑雪. 亲社会情境中儿童的道德情绪判断及归因模式的实验研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2000, 16(1): 19-23.
[11]	寇彧. 青少年道德判断发展及其与家庭亲密度的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1997, 13(4): 46-50.