Psychological Development and Education ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 73-80.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2016.01.10
Previous Articles Next Articles
WEN Hongbo, TANG Wenjun, LIU Xianwei
CLC Number:
G442
Gregory, C., Wang, M., & Jacqueline, F. (1995). The effects of dimensionality on equating the law school admission test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32(1), 79-96.Hemker, B. T., Sijtsma, K., & Molenaar, I. W. (1995). Selection of unidimensional scales from a multidimensional item bank in the polytomous Mokken IRT model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19(4),337-352.Jang, E. E., & Roussos, L. (2007). An investigation into the dimensionality of TOEFL using conditional covariance~based nonparametric approach. Journal of Educational Measurement, 44(1), 1-22.Kim, H.R. (1994). New techniques for the dimensionality assessment of standardized test data. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Statistics, University of Illinois at Urbana~Champaign.Marsh, H. W., Liem, G. A. D., Martin, A. J., Morin, A. J. S.,& Nagengast, B. (2011). Methodological measurement fruitfulness of exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM):New approaches to key substantive issues in motivation and engagement. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(4), 322-346.Mokken, R. J.(1971). A theory and procedure of scale analysis.The Hague:Mouton/Berlin:De Gruyter.Roussos, L.A., & Ozbek, O. (2006). Formulation of the DETECT population parameter and evaluation of DETECT estimator bias. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43(3), 215-243.Roussos, L. A., Stout, W. F., & Marden, J. I. (1998). Using new proximity measures with hierarchical cluster analysis to detect multidimensionality. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35(1), 1-30.Sass, D. A., & Schmitt, T. A. (2011). Introduction to the special issue:Moving beyond traditional psychometric approaches. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(4), 299-303.Schmitt, T. A. (2011). Current methodological considerations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(4), 304-321.Slocum, S.L. (2005). Assessing unidimensionality of psychological scales:Using individual and integrative criteria from factor analysis. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of British Columbia, Canada.Wiley, E.W., Shavelson, R.J., & Kurpius, A.A.(2014). On the factorial structure of the SAT and implications for next~generation college readiness assessments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74(5), 859-874.Zhang, J. (1996). Some fundamental issues in item response theory with applications. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana~Champaign, Department of Statistics.Zhang, J. (2007). Conditional covariance theory and detect for polytomous items. Psychometrika, 72(1), 69-91.Zhang, J., & Stout, W. (1999). The theoretical DETECT index of dimensionality and its application to approximate simple structure. Psychometrika, 64(2), 213-249.艾伟.(1949).汉字问题.上海:上海中华书局.陈立伟.(2011).艾伟的《阅读心理-汉字问题》研究.聊城大学学报(社会科学版), (2),152-153.洪俪瑜,王琼珠,张郁雯,陈秀芬. (2008).学童识字量评估测验之编制报告.测验学刊, 55(3),489-508.教育部.(2012).全日制义务教育语文课程标准(2011年版).北京:北京师范大学出版社.雷新勇.(2007).用非参数项目反应理论模型研究大规模教育考试维度的问题.华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),25(3),57-69.李虹,舒华.(2009).学前和小学低段不同识字量儿童的认知能力比较.心理发展与教育,(3),1-8.钱文.(1998).影响汉字识记的基本因素的研究.教育科学研究,(1),45-49.王孝玲.(1992).汉字频度与小学生认识率的相关性.上海教育科研,64(4),21-22.王孝玲,陶保平.(1996).小学生识字量测试题库及评价量表.上海:上海教育出版社.温红博,唐文君,刘先伟.(2015).义务教育阶段学生识字量的测验编制.语言文字应用,(3),88-100.张军.(2010).非参数项目反应理论在维度分析中的运用及评价.心理学探新,30(3),80-83.张军.(2014).非参数项目反应理论在小规模测验中的运用.考试研究,(1),56-61. |
|