Psychological Development and Education ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 465-472.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2025.04.02

Previous Articles    

Retrieve Key Steps to Promote Problem Solving

MA Xiaofeng, JI Xiying, ZHANG Qiyun, LIU Minghui, ZHANG Jing   

  1. Provincial Key Laboratory of Behavioral and Mental Health, School of Psychology, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070
  • Published:2025-07-12

Abstract: Recent research has shown that example study only(EE) was more effective(higher test performance) and efficient(attained with less effort invested in learning or test tasks) than example-problem pairs(EP). For problem solving, free recall and problem-solving bring a heavy cognitive load. The process of acquiring knowledge is gradual, and fade example can be used as scaffolding to support the transition from schema acquisition to schema application. And Carpenter et al. (2020) showed that the potential of retrieval practice to promote problem solving depends on how well it enhances the memory of the necessary information needed to solve problems. The necessary information needed to solve the problem may be the key step in the solution step. Therefore, in order to reduce the cognitive load and ensure that the necessary information for solving new problems can be retrieved, this study assumes that retrieving the key steps in problem solving in the learning process can promote the performance of problem solving. Through an experiment, this study investigated the influence of retrieving key steps on problem solving. In the experiment, the complementary method is used to determine the key steps in the example. One hundred and twenty college students participated in the material evaluation. One hundred and twenty college students were randomly assigned to four experimental conditions (lack of worked example from step one or step two or step three or step four). Chi-square test was conducted for the number of people who wrote correctly and the wrong number of people. It is found that the fourth step in the example is the key step to solve the problem. For the formal experiment, eighty-nine college students participated in the experiment. The experiment was designed by single factor (learning strategy: worked example repeated learning group, worked example-problem solving group, worked example-key step retrieved group) between subjects. The results show that the main effect of learning strategies is significant, and the test scores of the worked example-key step retrieved group are significantly higher than those of the worked example repeated learning group and the worked example-problem solving group. There is no significant difference between the worked example repeated learning group and the worked example-problem solving group. For cognitive load, the main effect of learning strategies is not significant. As for the comprehensive index of cognitive load, the main effect of learning strategies is significant. And the cognitive load of worked example repeated learning group is significantly higher than that of worked example-key step retrieved group and worked example-problem solving group. There is no significant difference between the cognitive load of the worked example-key step retrieved group and the worked example-problem solving group. The results of this study have a positive influence on actual instructions. For the study of problem solving, teachers can provide appropriate teaching tips for students in the learning process, that students can retrieve the key steps in problem solving, and help students to effectively promote learning and solve problems.

Key words: retrieval practice, worked example, key step

CLC Number: 

  • B844
Butler, A. C., & lii, H. L. R. (2007). Testing improves long-term retention in a simulated classroom setting. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(4-5), 514-527.
Carpenter, S. K., Endres, T., & Hui, L. (2020). Students' use of retrieval in self-regulated learning:Implications for monitoring and regulating effortful learning experiences. Educational Psychology Review, 32(8), 1-26.
Carpenter, S. K., & Pashler, H. (2007).Testing beyond words:Using tests to enhance visuospatial map learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(3), 474-478.
Carpenter, S. K., Pashler, H., & Vul, E. (2006).What types of learning are enhanced by a cued recall test? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(5), 826-830.
Coppens, L. C., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2011). Learning Adinkra symbols:The effect of testing. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(3), 351-357.
Foster, N. L., Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2018). Self-regulated learning of principle-based concepts:Do students prefer worked examples, faded examples, or problem solving? Learning and Instruction, 55, 124-138.
Hanham, J., Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2017). Cognitive load theory,element interactivity, and the testing and reverse testing effects. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(3), 265-280.
Hostetter, A. B., Penix, E. A., Norman, M. Z., Batsell, W. R., & Carr, T. H. (2018). The role of retrieval practice in memory and analogical problem-solving. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(4), 858-871.
Johnson, C. I., & Mayer, R. E. (2009). A testing effect with multimedia learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 621-629.
Karpicke, J. D., & Aue, W. R. (2015). The testing effect is alive and well with complex materials. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 317-326.
Karpicke, J. D., Blunt, J. R., Smith, M. A., & Karpicke, S. S. (2014). Retrieval-based learning:The need for guided retrieval in elementary school children. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(3), 198-206.
Karpicke, J. D., & Iii, H. L. R. (2007). Repeated retrieval during learningis the key to long-term retention. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(2), 151-162.
Mason, L., & Tornatora, M. C. (2016). Analogical encoding with and without instruction phenomena.Educational Psychology, 36(3), 391-412.
McDaniel, M. A., Anderson, J. L., Derbish, M. H., & Morrisette, N. (2007). Testing the testing effect in the classroom. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(4-5), 494-513.
Paas, F. G. W. C. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics:A cognitive load approach.Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(6), 129-434.
Paas, F. G. W. C., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & Gerven, P. W. M. V. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 63-71.
Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2009). Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis:Does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory? Journal of Memory and Language, 60(4), 437-447.
Rittle-Johnson, B., Star. J. R., & Durin, K. (2011). The power of comparison in learning and instruction:learning outcomes supported by different types of comparison. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 55, 199-225.
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-Enhanced Learning Taking Memory Tests Improves Long-Term Retention.Psychological Science, 17(3), 249-255.
Sidney, P. G., Hattikudur, S., & Alibali, M. W. (2015). How do contrasting cases and self-explanation promote learning? Evidence from fraction division. Learning and Instruction, 40, 29-38.
Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous and germane cognitive load.Educational Psychology Review, 22, 123-138.
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296.
van Gog, T., Kester, L., Dirkx, K., Hoogerheide, V., Boerboom, J., & Verkoeijen,P. P. J. L. (2015). Testing after worked example study does not enhance delayed problem-solving performance compared to restudy. Educational Psychology Review, 27(2), 265-289.
Van Gog, T., & Sweller, J. (2015). Not new, but nearly forgotten:the testing effect decreases or even disappears as the complexity of learning materials increases. Educational Psychology Review, 27(2), 247-264.
Yeo, D. J., & Fazio, L. K. (2019). The optimal learning strategy depends on learning goals and processes:Retrieval practice versus worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(1), 73-90.
林洪新. (2009). 初一学生数学运算样例中关键步骤的学习研究(博士学位论文). 辽宁师范大学, 大连.
马小凤, 李增艳, 周爱保. (2022). 提取练习能够促进程序性知识的学习吗?——基于有提示提取的检验. 心理科学, 45(04),849-855.
张奇, 郑伟, 万莹. (2014). "解释法"样例对小学生学习新运算规则的促进. 心理发展与教育, 30(2), 153-159.
[1] LIU Yan, ZHANG Hongfei, LU Xin, QU Kejia. Test Effect in Mathematical Probability Problem Solving Learning and Effective Promotion [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(2): 215-223.
[2] YU Yadi, YANG Lina, QU Kejia. The Effect of Analogical Comparison of Worked Examples on Learning Physical Synthesis Problems [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(5): 675-682.
[3] MA Xiaofeng, ZHOU Aibao, YANG Xiaoe. Cue Strength: The Important Variables of The Examination of Retrieval Practice Effect Mechanism [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2017, 33(3): 313-320.
[4] CAI Chen, QU Kejia, ZHANG Hua, ZHANG Qi. The Similarity Effect and the Cognitive Processing Depth Effect of Learning Correct and Incorrect Worked Examples Combination [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2016, 32(3): 310-316.
[5] ZHANG Qi, ZHENG Wei, WAN Ying. A Positive Impact of Worked Examples Designed by “The Method of Explained” on Pupils’ Learning New Operational Rules [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2014, 30(2): 153-159.
[6] LIU Zhao-min, LUO Liang, ZHANG Wei. Retrieval Practice Enhance Learning: Experimental Evidence and Underlying Mechanism [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2011, 27(4): 441-447.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!