Psychological Development and Education ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 215-223.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2024.02.08

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Test Effect in Mathematical Probability Problem Solving Learning and Effective Promotion

LIU Yan, ZHANG Hongfei, LU Xin, QU Kejia   

  1. School of Psychology, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029
  • Published:2024-03-18

Abstract: Three experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of material complexity on the test effect in mathematical probability problem solving, and on this basis, to further examine the effect of retrieval methods on learners' use of retrieval practice strategies to solve complex probability problems.The results were as follows: (1) Compared with restudy, the post-test results were better when learning simple mathematical probability problems through the retrieval practice strategy, and there was a test effect. When learning complex mathematical probability problems, there was no significant difference on post-test scores between the retrieval practice and restudy, and there was no testing effect; (2) Compared with restudy and initial free recall retrieval practice, learning complex mathematical probability problems through cued retrieval is more effective. The post-test scores were higher; (3) Compared with restudy and no-feedback free recall retrieval practice, the post-test results of learning complex mathematical probability problems through the free-recall retrieval practices with feedback were better. The study implied that, complexity of materials affects the learning effect of learners using retrieval practice strategies to solve problem-solving tasks, and both cued retrieval practice and free-recall retrieval practice with feedback can effectively enhance students' learning of complex probability problem-solving task.

Key words: testing effect, problem solving tasks, complexity of material, retrieval practice condition, feedback

CLC Number: 

  • G442
Adesope, O. O., Trevisan, D. A., & Sundararajan, N. (2017). Rethinking the use of tests:A meta-analysis of practice testing.Review of Educational Research, 87(3), 659-701.
Aslan., A. & Bäuml, K. H. T. (2016). Testing enhances subsequent learning in older but not in younger elementary school children. Developmental Science, 19(6), 992-998.
Agarwal, P. K., Karpicke, J. D., Kang, S. H., Roediger III, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (2008). Examining the testing effect with open and closed book tests.Applied Cognitive Psychology:The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 22(7), 861-876.
Eglington, L. G., & Kang, S. H. (2018). Retrieval practice benefits deductive inference.Educational Psychology Review, 30(1), 215-228.
Fiechter, J. L., & Benjamin, A. S. (2018). Diminishing-cues retrieval practice:A memory-enhancing technique that works when regular testing doesn't. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(5), 1868-1876.
Foster, N. L., Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2018). Self-regulated learning of principle-based concepts:Do students prefer worked examples, faded examples, or problem solving?Learning and Instruction, 55, 124-138.
Friedman, R. B., Sullivan, K. L., Snider, S. F., Luta, G., & Jones, K. T. (2017). Leveraging the test effect to improve maintenance of the gains achieved through cognitive rehabilitation.Neuropsychology, 31(2), 220-228.
Hinze, S. R., & Wiley, J. (2011). Testing the limits of testing effects using completion tests.Memory, 19(3), 290-304.
Jacoby, L. L., Shimizu, Y., Daniels, K. A., & Rhodes, M. G. (2005). Modes of cognitive control in recognition and source memory:Depth of retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 852-857.
Karpicke, J. D. (2017). Retrieval-based learning:A decade of progress. In J. H. Byrne (Eds.), Learning and Memory:A Comprehensive Reference (2nd ed.,pp. 487-514). Oxford, UK:Elsevier.
Karpicke, J. D., & Aue, W. R. (2015). The testing effect is alive and well with complex materials.Educational Psychology Review, 27(2), 317-326.
Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2010). Is expanding retrieval a superior method for learning text materials?Memory and Cognition, 38, 116-124.
Kornell, N., Bjork, R. A., & Garcia, M. A. (2011). Why tests appear to prevent forgetting:A distribution-based bifurcation model. Journal of Memory & Language. 65(2), 85-97.
Lee, H. S., & Ahn, D. (2018). Testing prepares students to learn better:The forward effect of testing in category learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(2), 203-217.
Leahy, W., Hanham, J., & Sweller, J. (2015). High element interactivity information during problem solving may lead to failure to obtain the testing effect. Educational Psychology Review, 27(2), 291-304.
Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2019). Cognitive load theory, resource depletion and the delayed testing effect.Educational Psychology Review, 31(4-5), 1-22.
Lima, M. F. R. de., Venâncio, S., Feminella, J., & Buratto, L. G. (2020). Does item difficulty affect the magnitude of the retrieval practice Effect? An evaluation of the retrieval effort Hypothesis. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 23,e31. https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2020.33
Ossenberg, C., Henderson, A., & Mitchell, M. (2019). What attributes guide best practice for effective feedback? A scoping review. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 24(2), 383-401.
Paas, F. G., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills:A cognitive-load approach.Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 122-133.
Pan, S. C., & Rickard, T. C. (2018). Transfer of test-enhanced learning:Meta-analytic review and synthesis.Psychological Bulletin, 144(7), 710-756.
Rawson, K. A. (2015). The status of the testing effect for complex materials:Still a winner.Educational Psychology Review, 27(2), 327-331.
Rowland, C. A., Littrell-Baez, M. K., Sensenig, A. E., & DeLosh, E. L. (2014). Testing effects in mixed versus pure-list designs. Memory and Cognition, 42(6), 912-921.
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). The power of testing memory basic research and implications for educational practice.Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(3), 181-210.
Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load.Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 123-138.
Tran, R., Rohrer, D., & Pashler, H. (2015). Retrieval practice:The lack of transfer to deductive inferences.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(1), 135-140.
Tse, C. S., Balota, D. A., & Roediger III, H. L. (2010). The benefits and costs of repeated testing on the learning of face-name pairs in healthy older adults.Psychology & Aging, 25(4), 833- 845.
Tullis, J. G., & Benjamin, A. S. (2015). Cue generation:How learners flexibly support future retrieval.Memory & Cognition, 43(6), 922-938.
Van Gog, T., & Kester, L. (2012). A test of the testing effect:Acquiring problem-solving skills from worked examples. Cognitive Science, 36(8), 1532-1541.
Van Gog, T., & Sweller, J. (2015). Testing after worked example study does not enhance delayed problem-solving performance compared to restudy. Educational Psychology Review, 27(2), 265-289.
Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited:A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087
Yang, C., Luo, L., Vadillo, M. A., Yu, R., & Shanks, D. R. (2021). Testing (quizzing) boosts classroom learning:A systematic and meta-analytic review.Psychological Bulletin, 147(4), 399-435.
陈琦, 刘儒德. (2019). 当代教育心理学(第3版). 北京:北京师范大学出版社.
马小凤, 李增艳, 李甜甜, 周爱保. (2019). 提取练习能够促进程序性知识的学习吗?——基于有提示提取的检验[摘要]. 见第二十二届全国心理学学术会议摘要集 (pp. 492-493).中国心理学会.
曲可佳, 杨小彤, 杨立娜, 张丽敏. (2018). 异分母分数加法运算样例学习中的测试效应.辽宁师范大学学报 (社会科学版), 41(06), 38-44.
郑俊, 张玮, 罗良. (2014). 线索强度对测试效应的调节:时间间隔上的差异.心理发展与教育, 30(6), 609-615.
周爱保, 杨天成, 程晨, 马小凤, 赵静. (2015). 多篇章学习中提取练习策略对高阶技能的影响.心理学报, 47(7), 928-938.
[1] YAO Lin, LIU Fuhui, LI Weiqiang, ZHANG Xiaoqi, YUAN Bo. The Influences of Social Comparison and Attribution Feedback on Individual Dishonest Behavior [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(6): 778-785.
[2] YAN Yixia, LIU Yanying, DING Fang. The Effects of Theory of Mind and the Pattern of Social Interactions on the Development of Social Mindfulness in Junior High School Students [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(4): 485-494.
[3] JIANG Yongzhi, BAI Xiaoli, ZHANG Lu, ZHAO Siqi. The Relationship between Adolescents' Online Positive Self-presentation and Well-being: The Role of Online Positive Feedback and Self-esteem [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(1): 45-53.
[4] HENG Shupeng, ZHAO Huanfang, NIU Gengfeng, ZHOU Zongkui. Likes on WeChat Moments and Subjective Well-Being: A Mediated Moderation Model [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2020, 36(3): 341-349.
[5] ZOU Yuchen, DING Ying, ZHANG Xuran, LI Yanfang. The Effects of Feedback Type on Children's Learning Performance and the Gender Differences in These Effects [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2018, 34(5): 567-575.
[6] MENG Nan, WANG Yuhui, LEI Li. The Relationship between Selfie Editing and Subjective Well-being among Female College Students: The Mediating Role of Positive Feedback and Self-concept [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2017, 33(6): 751-758.
[7] SUN Xiaojun, CHAI Huanyou, NIU Gengfeng, CUI Xixi, LIAN Shuailei, TIAN Yuan. The Effect of Self-disclosure on Social Networking Site on Adolescents' loneliness:A Moderated Mediation Model [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2017, 33(4): 477-486.
[8] CUI Xixi, SUN Xiaojun, NIU Gengfeng. The Effect of Self-presentation in Online Social Networking Sites on Adolescents' Friendship Quality: The mediating Role of Positive Feedback [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2016, 32(3): 294-300.
[9] LI Yongfen, TANG Dandan, CAO Bihua, LIANG Xiuling, LI Hong. The Testing Effect in the Process of the Second Foreign Language Vocabulary Learning of College Students [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2016, 32(2): 198-204.
[10] HAO Jiajia, CHEN Yinghe. The Developmental Character of Primary School Children's Sharing and the Effects of Positive Feedbacks [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2015, 31(6): 641-647.
[11] ZHENG Jun, ZHANG Wei, LUO Liang. Cue Strength Regulating the Testing Effect:The Differences between Different Testing Intervals [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2014, 30(6): 609-615.
[12] ZHANG Jun, LIU Ru-de, JIA Ling. The Role of Feedback in Self-regulated Learning [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2012, 28(2): 218-224.
[13] JIN Ying, LIU Xiang-ping, LAN Yan-ting, ZHANG Gong, LI Kai-qiang. The Effect of Feedback on Error Monitoring in Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2011, 27(4): 359-364.
[14] WANG Shu-fang, MO Lei, JIN Hua. Influence of Task Difficulty and Feedback Learning on Ability of Analogical Reasoning in Children [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2010, 26(1): 24-30.
[15] CAO Xin-mei, GUO De-jun. Experimental Study on the Learned Helplessness Mechanism Resulted from Inconsistence of Information Feedback [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2005, 21(2): 42-47.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!