Psychological Development and Education ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 182-189.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.02.05

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Social Class and College Students' Internet Altruistic Behavior: Moderated Mediating Effect

ZHENG Xianliang1, XIE Fangwei1, DING Liang2, WANG Xue3   

  1. 1. Educational Science School, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou 341000;
    2. The Forth People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei 230022;
    3. Automotive Mechatronics School, Jiangxi Environmental Engineering Vocational College, Ganzhou 341000
  • Published:2021-03-23

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Abstract: A questionnaire survey was conducted among a sample of 813 college students to explore the relationship among social class, belief in a just world, online social support and Internet altruistic behavior (IAB). The results indicated that: (1) Subjective social class could significantly predict IAB, while objective social class could not; (2) Belief in a just world acted as a mediator between the relationship of subjective social class and IAB; (3) The mediating effect of belief in a just world was moderated by online social support. That is to say, belief in a just world played a partial mediating effect between subjective social class and IAB for the individuals of high online social support; However, for the individuals of low online social support, the mediating effect of belief in a just world was not significant, the subjective social class only had direct effect on IAB.

Key words: social class, internet altruistic behavior, college students, moderated mediating effect

CLC Number: 

  • B844
Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning:Preliminary data in healthy, white women.Health Psychology, 19(6), 586-592.
Bègue, L., Charmoillaux, M., Cochet, J., Cury, C., & de Suremain, R. (2008). Altruistic behavior and the bidimensional just world belief. The American Journal of Psychology, 121,47-56.
Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life, New York:Wiley.
Calvete, E., Orue, I., & Padilla, P. (2010). Cyberbullying in adolescents:Modalities and aggressors' profile.Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1128-1135.
Carolia, M. E. D., & Sagone, E. (2014). Belief in a just world, prosocial behavior, and moral disengagement in adolescence.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 596-600.
Dalbert, C. (1999). The world is more just for me than generally:About the personal belief in a just world scale's validity.Social Justice Research, 12(2), 79-98.
Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., Schroeder, D. A., & Penner, L. (2006).The social psychology of prosocial behavior. Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
Freis, S., & Gurung, R. (2013). A facebook analysis of helping behavior in online bullying.Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2(1), 11-19.
Hafer, C. L. (2005). Experimental research on just-world theory:Problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 128-167.
Harrison, D. A., Mclaughlin, M. E., & Coalter, T. M. (1996). Context, cognition, and common method variance:Psychomeric and verbal protocol evidence.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 68(3), 246-261.
Joinson, A. N. (2003).Understanding the psychology of internet behavior:Virtual worlds, real lives. Basingstoke, UK:Palgrave Macmillan.
Joyce, F., Joanna. P., & Nicola, R. (2007). Children's altruistic behavior in the dictator game. Evolution and Human Behavior, (3),168-175.
Kraus, M., & Callaghan, B. (2016). Social class and prosocial behavior:The moderating role of public versus private contexts.Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(8), 769-777.
Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., Mendozadenton, R., Rheinschmidt, M. L., & Keltner, D. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism:How the rich are different from the poor.Psychological Review, 119(3), 546-572.
Kraus, M. W., Tan, J. J., & Tannenbaum, M. B. (2013). The social ladder:A rank-based perspective on social class. Psychological Inquiry, 24(2), 81-96.
Miller, J., Kahle, S., & Hastings, P. (2015). Roots and benefits of costly giving:Children who are more altruistic have greater autonomic flexibility and less family wealth. Psychological Science. 26(7), 1038-1045.
Molm, L. D., & Cook, K. S. (1995).Social exchange and exchange networks. Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 852-863.
Nicolas, G. (2008). Helping on the web:Ethnic stereotypes and computer-mediated communication. Research Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 1-3.
Nowak, M. A., & Roch, S. (2007). Upstream reciprocity and the evolution of gratitude. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(10), 605-610.
Scarpa, A., & Haden, S. C. (2006). Community violence victimization and aggressive behavior:the moderating effects of coping and social support.Aggressive Behavior, 32(5), 502-515.
Turner, J. W. Grube, A., & Meyers, J. (2001). Developing an optimal match within online communities:An exploration of CMC support communities and traditional support.Journal of Community, 55(6), 231-251.
Wallace, P. M. (2001). The Psychology of the Internet. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 209-223.
Whyte, M. K.,& Han, C. (2008). Popular attitudes toward distributive injustice:Beijing and Warsaw compared. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 13(1), 29-51.
Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 215-240.
Wright, M. F., & Li, Y. (2011). The associations between young adults' face-to-face prosocial behaviors and their online prosocial behaviors.Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1959-1962.
Zheng, X., Wang, Y., & Xu, L. (2016). Internet altruistic behavior and subjective well-being:Self-efficacy as a mediator.Social Behavior & Personality:An International Journal. 44(9), 1575-1583.
Zheng, X., Xie, F., & Ding, L. (2018). Mediating role of self-concordance on the relationship between internet altruistic behaviour and subjective well-being. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, (1), e1,1-7.
鲍振宙,张卫,李董平,李丹黎,王艳辉.(2013).校园氛围与青少年学业成就的关系:一个有调节的中介模型, 心理发展与教育, 29(1),61-70.
郭永玉,杨沈龙,李静, 胡小勇. (2015). 社会阶层心理学视角下的公平研究.心理科学进展, 23(8), 1299-1311.
郭永玉,周春燕.(2014).公正世界信念对低社会阶层的双重作用.西南大学学报(社会科学版),40(1), 63-67.
姬旺华,张兰鸽,寇彧. (2014).公正世界信念对大学生助人意愿的影响:责任归因和帮助代价的作用.心理发展与教育, 30(5), 496-503.
胡小勇,李静,芦学璋,郭永玉. (2014).社会阶层的心理学研究:社会认知视角.心理科学, 37(6), 1509-1517.
胡月. (2015).主观阶层对大学生社会公平感的作用及其心理机制(硕士学位论文).华中师范大学,武汉.
蒋雪.(2010).网络环境下大学生亲社会行为研究(硕士学位论文).吉林大学,长春.
李薇,陈晓梅,金晓君,赵妍,李丽娜.(2014).大学生公正世界信念与利他行为的相关性.中国健康心理学杂志,22(6), 946-948.
梁晓燕. (2008).网络社会支持对青少年心理健康的影响机制研究(博士学位论文).华中师范大学,武汉.
梁羽.(2015).大学生公正世界信念与利他行为关系的研究——社会支持的调节和感戴的中介作用(硕士学位论文). 河南大学,开封.
刘勤为,徐庆春,刘华山,刘勤学.(2016).大学生网络社会支持与网络利他行为的关系:一个有调节的中介模型.心理发展与教育, 32(4),426-434.
芦学璋,郭永玉,李静. (2014). 社会阶层与亲社会行为:回报预期的调节作用.心理科学,37(5), 1212-1219.
陆学艺. (2004).中国社会阶层研究报告之二, 当代中国社会流动. 北京:社会科学文献出版社.
任春荣. (2010). 学生家庭社会经济地位(SES)的测量技术.教育学报, 6(5), 77-82.
王伟,王兴超,雷雳,付晓洁.(2017).移动社交媒介使用行为对青少年友谊质量的影响:网络自我表露和网络社会支持的中介作用.心理科学, 40(4),1671-6981.
解晓娜,李小平. (2018).主观社会阶层对亲社会行为的影响.心理与行为研究,16(4), 563-569.
杨欣欣,刘勤学,周宗奎.(2017).大学生网络社会支持对网络利他行为的影响:感恩和社会认同的作用.心理发展与教育, 33(2),183-190.
叶宝娟,杨雪,雷希,郑清.(2018).网络社会支持对大学生网络助人行为的影响机制.中国临床心理学杂志,26(6), 1208-1214.
赵倩.(2018).大学生道德认同与网络利他行为:网络道德与性别的作用.中国临床心理学杂志, 26(6), 1226-1229.
郑显亮. (2010).大学生网络利他行为:量表制作与多层线性分析(博士学位论文),上海师范大学.
郑显亮. (2013). 现实利他行为与网络利他行为:网络社会支持的作用.心理发展与教育, 29(1), 31-37.
郑显亮,张婷,袁浅香.(2012).自尊与网络利他行为的关系:通情的中介作用.中国临床心理学杂志,20(4), 550-551.
周春燕,郭永玉. (2013a).公正世界信念——重建公正的双刃剑.心理科学进展, 21(1), 144-154.
周春燕,郭永玉. (2013b).家庭社会阶层对大学生心理健康的影响:公正世界信念的中介作用.中国临床心理学杂志, 21(4),636-640.
周浩,龙立荣. (2004).共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法.心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.
[1] LIU Ying, LIU Rude, MAO Chenying, LIN Jingmin, LIU Jiabin. Influence of Teacher Feedback Timing and Feedback Complexity on College Students’ Learning Engagement during Online Video Learning [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2026, 42(3): 408-417.
[2] WAN Huanlan, NIU Yujie, WANG Bochen, JIN Cancan. The Relationship between Purpose in Life, Self-control and Academic Burnout of College Students: A Longitudinal Study [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2026, 42(3): 418-426.
[3] ZHANG Mei, HUANG Yang, YU Jiawen, HUANG Silin. The Impact of Media Multitasking on College Students’ Reading Performance: The Moderating Roles of Task Difficulty and Type [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2026, 42(2): 222-233.
[4] ZHAO Xiaomei, ZHAO Xinrui, WANG Keke. The Processing of Text-graphic Information Knowledge Integration of College Students: Evidence from ERP [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2026, 42(1): 18-27.
[5] DING Yue, LIU Lijia, KOU Yu. Interpersonal Relationship Satisfaction in the Digital Age: The Role of Online Positive Feedback and Perceived Social Support [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2026, 42(1): 39-49.
[6] WANG Zhen, SHI Baoying, ZHAO Haoli, GUO Yunfei, WANG Enguo. Effects of Emotional Expression and Role of Affective Pedagogical Agent on Video Learning: The Moderating Role of Learners’ Experience [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2026, 42(1): 60-69.
[7] WEI Jun, YI Cong, ZHOU Xiting. College Students’ Academic Contingent Self-worth and Academic Involution Behaviors: Analyses Based on Latent Growth Modeling [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2025, 41(5): 692-700.
[8] JIAO Jiao, MU Dan, SHI Lu. Intimate Relationship Satisfaction on College Students’ Subjective Well-being: A Diary Method Study [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2025, 41(5): 720-729.
[9] HU Xinyi, CHEN Yinghe. The Relationship among College Students’ Goal Reengagement Capacity, Ego-depletion and Well-being: Moderation Effect of Meaning in Life [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2025, 41(3): 348-356.
[10] XIE Li, JIN Hui, WANG Zhiying, HU Yufei, YANG Xilan, XI Juan. The Influence of Endogenous Power for Poverty Elimination on Impoverished College Students’ Learning Engagement: The Mediating Effect of Self-control and the Moderating Effect of Social Support [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2025, 41(3): 386-397.
[11] ZHAO Xiaomei, CHENG Shi, LIU Zihan, LIU Hong. The Effects of Different Language Conditions and Executive Functions on Memory Integration in College Students [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2025, 41(2): 153-162.
[12] LIAO Chenxi, WANG Dahua. The Influence of Attachment on Self-esteem and Interpersonal Adjustment in College Students [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2025, 41(2): 196-205.
[13] GUO Ying, CHEN Xiaodan, LIU Wenzhi, LIU Yutong, ZHU Bi. Development of Semantic False Memories in Adolescents: Study and Test Factors [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2025, 41(1): 12-21.
[14] SHI Zifu, ZHOU Zhihao, XU Lei, CHEN Huohong, GUAN Jinliang, LIU Chengzhen. The Relationship between Negative Parenting Style and College Students’ Malevolent Creativity Behaviors: A Moderated Mediation Model [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(6): 808-815.
[15] JIA Lina, YIN Xiaojuan. The Relationship between Inhibitory Differences and the Continued Influence Effect of Misinformation: The Role of Information Relevance [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(5): 609-615.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright 2018 © Editorial office of Psychological Development and Education
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd