Psychological Development and Education ›› 2008, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (4): 39-44.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Openness to Experience: Difference Between Urban and Rural Children and Its Relationship to Family and Classroom Environments

SHI Bao-guo1, XU Jing-jing2   

  1. 1. Department of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100037;
    2. Center of Mental Health Education, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088
  • Online:2008-10-15 Published:2008-10-15

PDF (PC)

Abstract: Using questionnaire method,we investigated the openness to experience trait and its relationship to family and classroom environments on 483 primary school students from urban and rural areas.The results were:1)urban children' s score of openness to experience was significantly higher than that of rural children.2)family factors(except controlling)and classroom environment corelated with openness significantly.Classroom environment,family SES and two dimentions of FES—CV(knowledge and independance)could predict significantly the variance of openness to experience even after the school type,grade and gender factor has been controlled.

Key words: openness to experience, difference between urban and rural areas, family environment, classroom environment

CLC Number: 

  • B8.1
[1] Pervin L A.人格科学.周榕,陈红.杨炳钧等译,华东师范大学出版社,2001:48.
[2] McCrae R R.Creativity,divergem thinking.and openness to experience.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1987,52:12.58-1265.
[3] HarrisJ A.Measured intelligence,achievement,opermeu tooxperience,and creauvity.Personality and Individual Diligences,2004,36:913-929.
[4] Baer M,Oldham G R.The Curvilinear Relation Between Experienced Creative Time Pressure and Creativity:Moderating Effects of Openness to Experience and Support for Creativity.Journal of Applied Psychology,2006,91(4):963-970.
[5] McCrac B R,Yik M S M.Trapnell P D.Interpreting personality profiles across cultures:bilingual,acculturation,and peer rating studies of Chinese Undergraduates.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1998,74(4):1041-1055.
[6] Olson K R.why do Geographic Differences Exist in the Worldwide Distribution of Extraversion and Openness to Experience?The History of Human Emigration as Explanation.Individual Differences Research,2007.5(4):275-288.
[7] King L A,Walker L M,Royles S J.Creativity and the Five-Factor Model.Journal of researchin personality,1996,30:189-203.
[8] 刘国雄,施建农.乡镇中小学生创造性思维的发展与教育.中国特殊教育.2004,2:76-79.
[9] 韩琴.胡卫平.小学生创造性文学问题提出能力的发展研究.心理发展与教育.2005,3:83-88.
[10] 聂衍刚,郑雪.儿童青少年的创造性人格发展特点的研究.心理科学,2005,28(2):256-261.
[11] 师保国,申继亮.城乡流动与儿童创造性思维的关系.待发.
[12] Ying Y-W,Zhang X-L.Personality structure of young chinese adults:a contrast of residents in Taiwan and rund end urban China.International Journal of Social Psychiatry,1995,41(4):284-291.
[13] 张海钟.人格心理的城乡跨文化实证研究十年成果综述.社科纵横.2006,21(3):125-127.
[14] 周晖,钮丽丽,邹泓.中学生人格五因素问卷的编制.心理发展与教育.2000,1:48-54.
[15] 向小平,张春妹,邹泓.小学生自我概念的发展特点及其与人格的相关研究.中国临床心理学杂志.2006,14(3):294-299.
[16] 孙中欣.学业失败问题的家庭SES研究.清华大学教育研究.1999,1:47-51.
[17] 师保国,申继亮.家庭社会经济地位、智力和动机与刨造性的关系.心理发展与教育.2007,1:30-34.
[18] Lin N,Bian Y J.Cetting ahead of urban China.American Journal of Sociology.1991,97:657-688.
[19] 海莺,莫文.家庭环境与小学高年级儿童创造个性的相关研究.基础教育研究,2001,2:9-11.
[20] 李金珍.王文忠,施建农.儿童实用创造力发展及其与家庭环境的关系.心理学报.2004,36(6):732-737.
[21] 张玉茹,林世华.全语言教学在国中英语课之实验研究.(台湾)师大学报·教育类,2001,46(2):233-253.
[22] 师保国,申继亮.许晶晶.打工子弟学校班级气氛的特点.教育科学研究,2008,8/9:58-61.
[23] 杨丽珠,张野.小学生人格测评结构的验证性因素分析.心理科学,2006.29(4):933-936.
[24] 张野,杨丽珠.小学生人格类型及发展特点研究.心理科学.2007,30(1):205-208.
[25] 师保国,申继亮.刨造性系统观及其对创新教育的启示.中国教育学刊.2005,8:5-8.
[26] Jeynes W H.The ehallenge of controlling for SES in social science and education research.Educational Psychology Review,2002,14(2):205-221.
[27] Cassidy T,Lynn R.Achievement motivation,educmional attainment.cycle of disadvantage and social competence:Some longitudinal data.British Journal of Educational Paychology,1991,61(1):1-12.
[1] LI Yuhua, WANG Tong, LIU Yue, YU Jie, LIN Chongde. A Study on the Relationship between Creative Teaching Behavior and Pupil’s Creative Thinking: A Moderated Mediation Model [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(4): 513-519.
[2] LIN Lin, WANG Chenxu, MO Juanchan, YANG Yang, LI Huisheng, JIA Xuji, BAI Xuejun. The Relationship between Impulsivity Traits and Suicide Ideation: A Moderate Mediation Model [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2018, 34(3): 369-376.
[3] SHI Baoguo, WANG Lijing, XU Li, LIU Xia. Effects of Teacher-student Relationships on Students' Creativity: A Moderated Mediation Model [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2016, 32(2): 175-182.
[4] WANG Fan, FANG Xiao-yi, HU Wei, CHEN Hai-de, WU Meng-xi, TANG Qin. Family Environment and High School Students' Development:Mediating Effect of Autonomy and its Gender Difference [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2014, 30(6): 585-593.
[5] DENG Lin-yuan, FANG Xiao-yi, WU Ming-ming, ZHANG Jin-tao, LIU Qin-xue. Family Environment, Parent-Child Attachment and Adolescent Internet Addiction [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2013, 29(3): 305-311.
[6] HOU Juan, ZOU Hong, LI Xiao-wei. The Characteristics of the Family Environment and Its Influence on the Life Satisfaction of Migrant Children [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2009, 25(2): 78-85.
[7] GU Chuan-hua, CHEN Hui-chang, XUE Jing-jing. The Historiometric Study of the Early Family Environment and Parental Behavioral Style of Chinese Social Creative Personalities Who Passed Away After A.D. 1840 [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2003, 19(4): 17-22.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright 2018 © Editorial office of Psychological Development and Education
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd