Psychological Development and Education ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4): 513-519.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2022.04.07

Previous Articles     Next Articles

A Study on the Relationship between Creative Teaching Behavior and Pupil’s Creative Thinking: A Moderated Mediation Model

LI Yuhua1, WANG Tong2, LIU Yue1, YU Jie1, LIN Chongde3   

  1. 1. College of Elementary Education, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048;
    2. Beijing No. 156 Highschool, Beijing 100034;
    3. Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
  • Published:2022-07-13

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Abstract: The study conducted a moderated mediation model to give an interpretation for the relationship between creative teaching behavior and pupil's creative thinking and analysed the mediation of children's self-efficacy for creativity and their open personality, with the oral report by 471 primary school students. The results showed that:(1) Under the controlled factors including children's age, gender, and their parent's educational background, teachers' creative teaching behavior had a significant positive predictive effect on the fluency, flexibility, and uniqueness of childen's creative thinking; (2) Perceived teachers' creative teaching behavior influenced children's creative thinking by means of their creative self-efficacy; (3) The mediating effect of creative self-efficacy was moderated by openness to experience. The higher the level of open personality, the stronger the predictive effect of teachers' creative behavior on creative self-efficacy. The findings suggest that creative self-efficacy and openness to experience could be the important mechanisms of the association between teachers' creative teaching behavior and children's creative thinking. Improving teachers' creative behavior, enhancing level of creative self-efficacy and openness to experience help to promote primary school students' creative thinking level.

Key words: teachers’ creative teaching behavior, creative thinking, creative self-efficacy, openness to experience

CLC Number: 

  • G442
Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy:Correlates in middle and secondary students.Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 447-457.
Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 73(6), 1246-1256.
Erceghurn, D. M., & Mirosevich, V. M. (2008). Modern robust statistical methods:An easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research.American Psychologist, 63(7), 591-601.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis.Journal of Educational Measurement, 51(3), 335-337.
Hayes, A. F. (2015). An Index and Test of Linear Moderated Mediation.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1-22.
Ivcevic, Z., & Brackett, M. A. (2015). Predicting creativity:Interactive effects of openness to experience and emotion regulation ability.Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity & The Arts, 9(4), 480-487.
Jussim, L., & Harber, K. D. (2005). Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies:Knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies.Personality & Social Psychology Review, 9(2), 131-155.
Karwowski, M., Gralewski, J., & Szumski, G. (2015). Teachers' effect on students' creative self-beliefs is moderated by students' gender.Learning & Individual Differences, 44, 1-8.
King, L. A., Walker, M. K., & Broyles, S. J. (1996). Creativity and the Five-Factor Model.Journal of Research in Personality, 30(2), 189-203.
Lebuda, I. (2015). The Big Five, the huge two, and creative self-beliefs:A meta-analysis.Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, 10(2), 214-232.
McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 52(6), 1258-1265.
Pervin, L. A. (2003). The Science of Personality(2nd ed.). New York:Oxford University Press.
Puente-Díaz, R. (2016). Creative self-efficacy:An exploration of its antecedents, consequences, and applied implications.The Journal of Psychology, 150(2), 175-195.
Soh, K. (2017). Fostering student creativity through teacher behaviors.Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 58-66.
Torrance, E., P. (1984). The role of creativity in identification of the gifted and talented. Gift Child Q, 28(4), 153-156.
陈丹筠, 梁国栋, 王雨函. (2020). 创造性人格对大学生创新自我效能感的影响:成就动机的中介作用. 中国健康心理学杂志, 28(08), 1272-1277.
顾远东, 彭纪生. (2010). 组织创新氛围对员工创新行为的影响:创新自我效能感的中介作用. 南开管理评论, 13(01), 30-41.
洪素苹, 林姗如. (2004). What ever you say, I can do it"学生创意自我效能量表"之编制. 台湾第二届"创新与创造力"研讨会.
胡琳梅. (2016). 创造性课堂环境与初中生创造性思维的关系研究:创意自我效能感和自主性动机的作用 (硕士学位论文). 华中师范大学, 武汉.
黄小玲. (2011). 小学数学创造性思维的培养. 小学科学:教师, (7), 165-165.
黄四林, 张叶, 莫雷, 张文新, 李红, 林崇德. (2021). 核心素养框架下创新素养的关键指标. 北京师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), (2), 27-36.
荆玲玲, 姜欢. (2015). 高校创新文化对研究生创新行为的影响:创新自我效能感的调节作用. 学位与研究生教育, 276(11), 67-72.
李金德, 余嘉元. (2011). 教师创新支持行为、学生创新自我效能感和创造性思维的关系研究. 宁波大学学报(教育科学版), 33(02), 44-48.
李珺珺. (2018). 教师创造性教学行为与初中生科学创造的关系(博士学位论文). 山西大学, 太原.
林崇德. (2001). 融东西方教育模式,培养"T"型人才. 北京师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), (1), 5-11.
林崇德. (2014). 创造性心理学的几项研究. 山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 59(6), 5-14+2.
林崇德. (2018). 创造性心理学. 北京:北京师范大学出版社.
师保国, 王黎静, 徐丽, 刘霞. (2016). 师生关系对小学生创造性的作用:一个有调节的中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 32(02), 175-182.
王楠, 张立艳, 王洋. (2016). 创新自我效能感对创新行为的影响:多重中介效应分析. 心理与行为研究, 14(6), 811-816.
王双龙. (2017). 教师的教学风格对学生创造力的影响研究. 当代教育科学, (6), 70-73.
王晓玲, 张景焕, 初玉霞, 刘桂荣. (2009). 小学儿童家庭环境、创意自我效能与创造力的关系. 心理学探新, 29(05), 46-50+66.
王亚男. (2009). 压力情境下创意自我效能感与创造力的关系 (硕士学位论文). 山东师范大学, 济南.
王莹. (2016). 教师的创造力内隐观、创造性教学行为与学生创造性倾向的关系研究 (硕士学位论文). 山西师范大学, 临汾.
吴洁清, 董勇燕, 周治金. (2015). 教师创造性教学行为对中学生创造性问题解决的影响. 应用心理学, 21(3), 281-288.
向小平, 张春妹, 邹泓. (2006). 小学生自我概念的发展特点及其与人格的相关研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 14(3), 294-296.
徐小容. (2013). 教师期望的课堂传递机制研究 (硕士学位论文). 西南大学, 重庆.
张晶, 舒曾, 胡卫平, 孙汉银, 贺琼, 冷露, 方晓义. (2017). 教师创造性教学行为与中小学生创造性自我效能感的关系:一个有调节的中介模型. 心理与行为研究, 15(1), 92-100.
张景焕, 初玉霞, 林崇德. (2008). 教师创造性教学行为评价量表的结构. 心理发展与教育, 24(03), 107-112.
张景焕, 付萌萌, 辛于雯, 陈佩佩, 沙莎. (2020). 小学高年级学生创造力的发展:性别差异及学校支持的作用. 心理学报, 52(9), 1057-1070.
张斯娜, 周鹏生. (2017). 创新自我效能的测量及其影响因素研究述评. 民族高等教育研究, 5(05), 57-64.
坚持中国特色社会主义教育发展道路 培养德智体美劳全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人. (2018-09-11). 人民日报. 取自http://edu.people.com.cn/n1/2018/0911/c1053-30286253.html
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-942.
[1] HAN Jiantao, QIAN Junni, ZHANG Jieyu, PANG Weiguo. The Relationship between Creativity and Meaning in Life among College Students: The Role of Positive Emotion and Creative Self-efficacy [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(2): 187-195.
[2] LIU Xiaoxian, GONG Shaoying, ZHOU Zhijin, FENG Xiaowei, YU Quanlei. The Relationship among Parental Autonomy Support, Parental Psychological Control and Junior High School Students' Creative Self-efficacy: The Mediating Role of Academic Emotions [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2020, 36(1): 45-53.
[3] SHI Baoguo, WANG Lijing, XU Li, LIU Xia. Effects of Teacher-student Relationships on Students' Creativity: A Moderated Mediation Model [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2016, 32(2): 175-182.
[4] SUN Peng, ZOU Hong, DU Yao-lin. The Characteristics of Adolescents' Creative Thinking and Their Effects on Creative Behavior: The Mediating Role of Personality [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2014, 30(4): 355-362.
[5] YANG Xiao-yang, LI Xin-yao, ZHOU Hui. The Effects of Middle School Students’ Personal Epistemology on Creative Thinking:Moderation of Self Questioning [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2012, 28(6): 603-610.
[6] WANG Jing, JIN Sheng-hua. A Comparative Study on the Creative Thinking Quality of the Elites and University Students in Social Sciences and Art [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2009, 25(4): 57-62.
[7] SHI Bao-guo, XU Jing-jing. Openness to Experience: Difference Between Urban and Rural Children and Its Relationship to Family and Classroom Environments [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2008, 24(4): 39-44.
[8] WO Jian-zhong, WANG Fu-xing, LIN Chong-de, LIU Cai-mei. A Research on High and Low Academic Achievement Adolescents’ Creativity [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2007, 23(2): 29-35.
[9] LUO Fang, MENG Qing-mao. Construction of Self-assessment Test on Creative Thinking Abilities of High School Students [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2005, 21(4): 94-98.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright 2018 © Editorial office of Psychological Development and Education
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd