Psychological Development and Education ›› 2004, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (4): 7-13.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

A microgenetic study: Children’s Strategy Discovery in Figure Reasoning Task

WO Jian-zhong, ZHANG Hong   

  1. Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University 100875, China
  • Online:2004-10-15 Published:2004-10-15

Abstract: We use the microgenetic design to examine 30 6-age-old children's acquisition of matrix completion proficiency.The results are as follows:from the source of change,experimental manipulation is a important source of strategy discovery in figure reasoning task;from the variability of change,children are followed learner model of strategy discovery;from the path of change,the main error are orientation err and size err in all three groups.In norm group and latter group,there are also other errs displayed.When the children in quick group arrive the crite-rion of strategy discovery,their accuracy would likely come down;but in other two groups,the can maintain high accuracy;from the rate of change,children in the first three sessions display rapid changes in accuracy,however, their accuracy will maintain in high level in other sessions.

Key words: figure reasoning, strategy discovery, microgenetic developmental processing

CLC Number: 

  • B844.1
[1] Groen G J, Parkman J M. A chronometric analysis of Simple addition, Psychological review, 1972, 79, 329-343.
[2] Ashcraft M H. The development of mental arithmetic: A chronometric approach, Developmental review, 1982, 2, 213-236.
[3] Siegler R S. The Perils of Averaging Data Over Strategies: An Example From Children's Addition, Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 1987, 116, 250-264.
[4] Siegler R S, Svetina M. A microgenetic/cross-sectional study of matrix completion: comparing short-term and long-term changes, Child development, 2002, 73, 793-809.
[5] Siegler R S, Lemaire P. Older and younger adults'strategy choices in multiplication: Testing predictions of ASCM using the choice/no-choice method, Journal of experimental psychology: General, 1997,126, 71-92.
[6] Shrager J, Siegler R S. SCADS: A modelof children's strategy choices and strategy discoveries, Psychological Science, 1998, 9, 405-410.
[7] Siegler R S, Crowley K. The microgenetic method: A direct means for studying cognitive development, American psychologist, 46,606-620.
[8] Siegler R S. The Perils of Averaging Data Over Strategies: An Example From Children's Addition, Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 1987, 116, 250-264.
[9] Alibali M W. How children change their minds: Strategy change can be gradual or abrupt? Developmental psychology, 1999, 35 (1), 127-145.
[10] Siegler R S, Elsbeth Stern. Conscious and unconscious strategy discoveries: A microgenetic analysis, Journal of experimental psychology:General, 1998, 127, 377-397.
[11] Siegler R S. Emerging minds: The Process of change in children's thinking, New York: Oxford Press, 1996.
[12] Siegler R S. How does change occur? A microgenetic study of number conservation, Cognitive psychology, 1995, 28, 225-273.
[13] Johnson B R, Siegler R S. Learing to spell: variability,choice, and change in children's strategy use, Child development, 1999,70, 332-348.
[1] WO Jian-zhong, LI Qi, TIAN Hong-jie. The Eye-movements Study on Children With Different Ability Levels in the Figure Reasoning Problem [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2006, 22(3): 6-10.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!