Psychological Development and Education ›› 2004, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (1): 12-17.
Previous Articles Next Articles
HU Qing-fen, LIN Chong-de
| [1] Cheng P W, Novick L R. A probabilistic contrast model of causal induction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1990, 58,545-567. [2] Kao S F,Wasserman E A.Assessment of an information integration accout of contingency judgment with examination of subjective cell impertance and method of presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1993,19,1363-1386. [3] White P A. A theory of causal processing. British Journal of Rsychology, 1989,80,431-454. [4] Ahn W, Kalish C W. Medin D L. Gelman S A.The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution. Cognition, 1995,54,299-352. [5] Fugelsang J A, Thompson V A. Strategy selection in causal reeasoning:When beliefs and convariation collide. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,2000,54,15-32. [6] Shultz T R, Mendelson R. The use of covariation as a rpinciple of causal analysis. Child Development, 1975,46:394-399. [7] Cheng P W. From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review, 1997,104,367-405. [8] Schustack M W,Sternberg R J. Evaluation of evidence in causal inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1981,110, 101-120. [9] Shaklee H. Human covariation judgment: Accuracy and strategy.Learning and Motivation, 1983,14,433-448. |
| [1] | HU Qing-fen, LIN Chong-de. Young Children’s Ability of Causal Inferences in Different Patterns of Variation and Covariation [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2002, 18(4): 11-16. |
|
||
