摘要： 元理解关注读者对自己阅读理解过程与结果的监测以及随后的调控,读者的元理解监测影响元理解调控,并进而影响阅读理解的加工状态或加工过程,可见,元理解是一个动态的交互系统,它通过元理解监测和元理解调控的互动来实现读者阅读理解时认知层和元认知层的互动。对元理解监测的精确性、元理解调控的有效性、元理解监测与元理解调控的关系以及二者对阅读理解的效应等问题进行了梳理与剖析,并就未来研究提出建议,以深化对元理解这个动态的交互系统的认识。
中图分类号:
| [1] Anderson,M.C.M.,& Thiede,K.W.(2008).Why do delayed summaries improve metacomprehension accuracy? Acta Psychologica,128(1),110-118. [2] Dunlosky,J.,Baker,J.M.C.,Rawson,K.A.,et al.(2006).Does aging influence people's metacomprehension? Effects of processing ease on judgments of text learning.Psychology and Aging,21(2),390-400. [3] Dunlosky,J.,& Metcalfe,J.(2009).Metacognition.Los Angeles:SAGE,1-34. [4] Dunlosky,J.,& Lipko,A.(2007).Metacomprehension:A brief history and how to improve its accuracy.Current Directions in Psychological Science,16(4),228-232. [5] Dunlosky,J.,Rawson,K.A.,& Hacker,D.J.(2002).Metacomprehension of science text:Investigating the levels of disruption hypothesis.In J.Otero,J.A.León,& A.C.Graesser(Eds.),The psychology of science text comprehension.Mahwah,NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,255-280. [6] Griffin,T.D.,Wiley,J.,& Thiede,K.W.(2008).Individual differences,rereading,and self-explanation:Concurrent processing and cue validity as constraints on metacomprehension accuracy.Memory & Cognition,36(1),93-103. [7] Hacker,D.J.(1998).Self-regulated comprehension during normal reading.In D.J.Hacker,J.Dunlosky,& A.C.Graesser (Eds.),Metacognition in educational theory and practice.Mahwah,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,165-192. [8] Koriat,A.(1997).Monitoring one's knowledge during study:A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning.Journal of ExperimentalPsychology:General,126(4),349-370. [9] Koriat,A.,& Bjork,R.A.(2005).Illusions of competence in monitoring one's knowledge during study.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,Cognition,31(2),187-194. [10] Koriat,A.,Ma'ayan,H.,& Nussinson,R.(2006).The intricate relationship between monitoring and control in metacognition:Lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,135(1),36-69. [11] Kornell,N.,& Bjork,R.A.(2007).The promise and perils of self-regulated study.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,14(2),219-224. [12] Lefèvre,N.,& Lories,G.(2004).Text cohesion and metacomprehension:Immediate and delayed judgments.Memory & Cognition,32(8),1238-1254. [13] Lin,L.M.,& Zabrucky,K.M.(1998).Calibration of comprehension:Research and implications for education and instruction.Contemporary Educational Psychology,23(4),345-391. [14] Lin,L.M.,Zabrucky,K.M.,& Moore,D.(2002).Effects of text difficulty and adults' age on relative calibration of comprehension.American Journal of Psychology,115(2),187-198. [15] Maki,R.H.(1998).Predicting performance on text:Delayed versus immediate predictions and tests.Memory & Cognition,26(5),959-964. [16] Maki,R.H.,& Berry,S.L.(1984).Metacomprehension of text material.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,10(4),663-679. [17] Maki,R.H.,Foley,J.M.,Kajer,W.K.,et al.(1990).Increased processing enhances calibration of comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,16(4),609-616. [18] Maki,R.H.,& McGuire,M.J.(2002).Metacognition for text:Findings and implications for education.In T.J.Perfect,& B.L.Schwartz(Eds.),Applied metacognition.Cambridge,U.K.:Cambridge University Press,39-67. [19] Maki,R.H.,Shields,M.,Wheeler,A.,E.,et al.(2005).Individual differences in absolute and relative metacomprehension accuracy.Journal of Educational Psychology,97(4),723-731. [20] Maki,R.H.,Willmon,C.,& Pietan,A.(2009).Basis of metamemory judgments for text with multiple-choice,essay and recall tests.Applied Cognitive Psychology,23(2),204-222. [21] Matvey,G.,Dunlosky,J.,& Schwartz,B.L.(2006).The effects of categorical relatedness on judgements of learning(JOLs).Memory,14(2),253-261. [22] Metcalfe,J.(2009).Metacognitive judgments and control of study.Current Directions in Psychological Science,18(3),159-163. [23] Metcalfe,J.,Finn,B.(2008).Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,15(1),174-179. [24] Metcalfe,J.,& Kornell,N.(2005).A region of proximal learning model of study time allocation.Journal of Memory and Language,52(4),463-477. [25] Miesner,M.T.,& Maki,R.H.(2007).The role of test anxiety in absolute and relative metacomprehension accuracy.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,19(4-5),650-670. [26] Moore,D.,Lin,L.A.,& Zabrucky,K.M.(2005).A source of metacomprehension inaccuracy.Reading Psychology,26(3),251-265. [27] Nelson,T.O.(1996).Consciousness and metacognition.American Psychologist,51(2),102-116. [28] Rawson,K.A.,& Dunlosky,J.(2002).Are performance predictions for text based on ease of processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,28(1),69-80. [29] Rawson,K.A.,Dunlosky,J.,& Thiede,K.W.(2000).The rereading effect:Metacomprehension accuracy improves across reading trials.Memory & Cognition,28(6),1004-1010. [30] Rawson,K.A.,& Kintsch,W.(2005).Rereading effects depend on time of test.Journal of Educational Psychology,97(1),70-80. [31] Son,L.K.,& Schwartz,B.L.(2002).The relation between metacognitive monitoring and control.In T.J.Perfect,& B.L.Schwartz (Eds.),Applied metacognition.Cambridge,U.K.: Cambridge University Press,15-38. [32] Thiede,K.W.,& Anderson,M.C.M.(2003).Summarizing can improve metacomprehension accuracy.Contemporary Educational Psychology,28(2),129-160. [33] Thiede,K.W.,Anderson,M.C.M.,& Therriault,D.(2003).Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts.Journal of Educational Psychology,95(1),66-73. [34] Thiede,K.W.,Dunlosky,J.,Griffin,T.D.,et al.(2005).Understanding the delayed-keyword effect on metacomprehension accuracy.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,31(6),1267-1280. [35] Verkoeijen,P.P.J.L.,Rikers,R.M.J.P.,& Schmidt,H.G.(2005).The effects of prior knowledge on study-time allocation and free recall:Investigating the discrepancy reduction model.Journal of Psychology:Interdisciplinary and Applied.139(1),67-79. [36] Weaver,C.A.,& Bryant,D.S.(1995).Monitoring of comprehension:The role of text difficulty in metamemory for narrative and expository text.Memory & Cognition,23(1),12-22. [37] Wiley,J.,Thiede,K.W.,& Griffin,T.D.(2007,April).What does it mean to learn from and understand science text? Paper presented at the 2007 annual meeting of the American Education Research Association (AERA),Chicago,IL. [38] 陈启山.(2007).元理解监控的精确性及其延迟关键词效应,心理科学进展,15(2),295-300. [39] 陈启山.(2009).阅读中的元理解监测与元理解调控,心理学报,41(8),676-683. [49] 陈启山,常蕤.(2009).读者的元理解监测为什么不够精确?心理科学进展,17(4),706-713. [41] 陈启山,李利.(2008).理解评估与成绩预测:两种不同的元理解监测形式,心理学报,40(9),961-968 |
| [1] | 董肖肖, 刘岩, 胡亚欣. 儿童、青年与老年人在知觉和高阶元认知监控上的年龄差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 153-160. |
| [2] | 慕德芳, 陈英和. 小学高年级学生元认知监测对认知操作输出的影响:执行功能的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 305-312. |
| [3] | 刘伟方, 张佳佳, 胡冬梅, 张明亮, 司继伟. 元认知监测与算术知识制约小学儿童心算策略运用能力的发展:一年纵向考察[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 439-446. |
| [4] | 刘伟方, 华晓腾, 封洪敏, 胡冬梅, 司继伟. 算术策略运用能力的年龄差异：元认知监测与算术知识的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(3): 234-243. |
| [5] | 慕德芳, 陈英和. 元认知监控的机制：认知灵活性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(2): 113-120. |
| [6] | 董存梅. 幼儿自我调控的中日比较及其跨文化分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(1): 16-23. |
| [7] | 董存梅. 幼儿自我调控的中日比较[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(2): 133-139. |
| [8] | 陈启山. 元理解:动态的交互系统[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(3): 329-336. |
| [9] | 陈启山. 元理解:动态的交互系统[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(3): 329-336. |
| [10] | 黎坚, 袁文东, 骆方, 杜卫. 心理负荷对元记忆监测准确性及偏差的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(3): 61-67. |
| [11] | 张学民, 申继亮, 林崇德, 王萍萍, 刘帅. 小学生选择性注意能力发展的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(1): 19-24. |
| [12] | 唐卫海, 刘希平, 方格. 学生提取自信度判断准确性的发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2005, 21(2): 36-41. |
| [13] | 戴健林, 许尚侠, 莫雷. 作文前构思时间分配及其对写作成绩影响的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2001, 17(2): 36-40. |
| [14] | 姚梅林. 当代迁移研究的趋向[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2000, 16(3): 55-58. |
| [15] | 戴健林, 莫雷. 西方关于写作过程的自我调控研究的进展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1999, 15(3): 54-57. |
|
||
