心理发展与教育 ›› 2007, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (4): 38-44.

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

大中学生对悲伤与愉快面孔区分的特征比较

蒋长好1,2, 郭德俊2, 赵仑3, 张钦2, 王振宏4, 方平2   

  1. 1. 首都体育学院科研处, 100088;
    2. 首都师范大学心理学系, 北京, 100037;
    3. 徐州师范大学语言研究所, 徐州, 221116;
    4. 陕西师范大学心理系, 西安, 710062
  • 出版日期:2007-10-15 发布日期:2007-10-15
  • 通讯作者: 郭德俊,首都师范大学心理学系.E-mail:guodj1939@yanhoo.com.cn E-mail:guodj1939@yanhoo.com.cn
  • 基金资助:
    北京市教育委员会科技发展计划重点项目资助(KZ200310028011);国家攀登计划项目(95-专-09)

The Features of Sad-Happy Faces Discrimination in Secondary Schools and Universities

JIANG Chang-hao1,2, GUO De-jun2, ZHAO Lun3, ZHANG Qin2, WANG Zheng-hong4, FANG Ping2   

  1. 1. Department of Research, Capital Institute of Physical, Beijing 100088;
    2. Department of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100037;
    3. Institute of Linguistics, Xuzhou Normal University, Xuzhou 221116;
    4. Department of Psychology, Shanxi Normal University, Xian 710000
  • Online:2007-10-15 Published:2007-10-15

摘要: 采用面孔识别研究范式和事件相关电位方法,研究初中生、高中生和大学生三个年龄段被试情绪面孔加工特征。研究发现,在刺激呈现后的550~800ms,三个年龄段被试均产生悲伤效应,悲伤面孔引发的LPC波幅大于愉快面孔引发的LPC波幅,三个年龄段的悲伤效应脑区分布大致相同,表明三个年龄段情绪面孔加工有着类似的神经机制。进一步比较三个年龄段悲伤面孔引发的ERPs发现,在刺激呈现后的200~550ms,悲伤面孔的加工产生年龄效应。年龄段越低的被试N2波幅越大,年龄段越高的被试P3波幅越大。这一结果提示,随着年龄的增长,青少年大脑高级功能的发育日趋成熟。

关键词: 情绪面孔, 事件相关电位, 晚期正成分, 情绪发展

Abstract: The paper applied the event-related potentials studies and facial discrimination pattern to discuss the characteristics of facial expression processing of students in secondary schools and universities.From the research we could see that sad effects presented at 550~800 millisecond after stimulus in three age periods.And the amplitude of LPC of sad faces was stronger than that of happy faces,which indicated that similar neural mechanism of facial expression processing exist in three age periods.In addition,by comparing ERPs of sad expression in three age periods,we found that the younger subjects were,the stronger the amplitude of N2 was.The older subjects were,the stronger the amplitude of P3 was.The result indicated that with growth,adolescents' ability of emotion regulation and advanced brain function become better.

Key words: affective face, event-related potentials, late positive component, emotional development

中图分类号: 

  • B844.2
[1] Orozco S,Ehlers C L.Gender differences in electrophysiological responses to facial stimuli.Biological Psychiatry,1998,44,281-289.
[2] Krolak-Salmon P,Fiseher C,Vighetto A,et al.Processing of facial emotional expression:spatio-temporal data as assessed by scalp eventrelated potentials.Europe Journal of Neurnscience,2001,13,987-994.
[3] Iidaka T,Okada T,Murata T,et al.Age-related differences in the medial temporal lobe responses to emotional faces as revealed by fMRI.Hippocampus,2002,12(3),352-62.
[4] Taylor S F,Batty M,Itier R J.The faces of development:a review of early face processing over childhood.Journal of Cognitive Neuroseience,2004,16(8),1426-1442.
[5] Batty M,Taylor M J.The development of emotional face processing during childhood.Developmental Science,2006,9(2),207-220.
[6] Lang P J,Bradley M M,Cuthbert B N.Emotion,motivation,and anxiety:brain mechanisms and psyehophysiology.Biological Psychiatry,1998,44,1248-1263.
[7] Izard C E.Four systems for emotion activation:Cognitive and noncognitive processes.Psychological Review,1993,100,68-90.
[8] Levesque J,Joanette B,Mensour G,et al.Neural correlates of sad feelings in healthy girls.Neureseience,2003,121,545-551.
[9] Laurian S,Bader M,Lanares J,Ores L.Topography of eventrelated potentials elicited by visual emotional stimuli.International Journal of psychophysiology.1991,10,231-238.
[10] Eimer M,Holmes A.An ERP study on the time course of emotionsl face processing.NeuroReport,2002,13,427-431.
[11] Luu P,Flaisch T,Tueker,D M..Medial frontal cortex in action monitoring.Journal of Neurnscience,2000,20,464-469.
[12] Nieuwenhuis S,Yeung N,Wildenberg W,et al.Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a Go/no Go task:Effects of response conflict and trial-type frequency.Cognitive,Affective & Behavioral Neuroseience,2003,3,17-26.
[13] Van V,Carter C S.The timing of actionmonitoring processes in the anterior cingulate cortex.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscienee,2002,14,593-602.
[14] Luu P,Tucker D M,Derryberry D,et al.Activity in human medial frontal cortex in emotiona1 evaluation and error monitoring.Psychological Science,2003,14,47-53.
[15] Kestenbaum R,Nelson C A.Neural and behavioral correlates of emotion recognition in children and adults.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,1992,54,1-18.
[16] Lewis M D,Stieben J.Emotion regulation in the brain:conceptual issues and directions for developmental research.Child Development,2004,75,371-376.
[17] Polich J.Frequency,intensity,and duration as determinants of P300 from auditory stimuli.Journal of Clinical Neurnphysiology,1989,6,277-286.
[18] Giedd J N.Structural magnetic resonance imaging of the adolescent brain.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,2004,1021,77-85.
[1] 钟伟芳, 郭永兴. 语言范畴影响面部表情知觉的电生理学证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 313-322.
[2] 沈洋, 袁文颖, 赵小淋, 姜珂, 彭茂莹, 陈禹, 杨娟. 死亡凸显对自我姓名注意瞬脱对抗效应的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 520-527.
[3] 陈琼, 赵俊峰, 谷璜, 邢小莉, 李晓铭. 听障儿童认知抑制控制的脑电特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 275-282.
[4] 马原啸, 陈旭. 阈下安全启动改善非安全依恋女性的注意加工[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(1): 11-22.
[5] 宋娟, 吕勇, 沈德立. 物体分类任务中线索效应的ERP研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(2): 113-120.
[6] 卢张龙, 吕勇, 沈德立. 内隐序列学习与注意负荷关系的实验研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(6): 561-568.
[7] 李明芳, 张烨, 贾磊, 李婷, 李伟霞, 张庆林. 面孔识别特异性本质的ERP研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(5): 459-467.
[8] 陈顺森, 白学军, 沈德立, 闫国利, 张灵聪. 7~10岁自闭症谱系障碍儿童对情绪面孔的觉察与加工[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(5): 449-458.
[9] 吕勇, 宋娟. 继时呈现条件下类别归纳过程的ERPs研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(1): 14-23.
[10] 张凤华, 邱江, 杨群, 张庆林. 传递性推理的ERP研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(4): 68-74.
[11] 梁福成, 王雪艳. 认知事件相关电位P300与儿童青少年工作记忆的发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2006, 22(1): 29-34.
[12] 梁福成, 韩玉荣, 董军. 多动症儿童的智力水平、行为与认知事件相关电位的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2002, 18(1): 50-53.
[13] 梁福成, 董军, 王欣. 大学生不同个性特点事件相关电位P300的实验研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1999, 15(1): 31-33.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!