心理发展与教育 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 894-901.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2022.06.16

• 理论探讨与进展 • 上一篇    下一篇

语音加工的发展、老化及其神经机制

孙赛男, 何文广   

  1. 曲阜师范大学教育学院, 曲阜 273165
  • 发布日期:2022-11-29
  • 通讯作者: 何文广 E-mail:hewenguang1022@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金(18BYY092)。

The Development, Aging and Neural Mechanism in Phonological Processing

SUN Sainan, HE Wenguang   

  1. School of Educational, Qufu Normal University, Qufu 273165
  • Published:2022-11-29

摘要: 作为人类语言活动的重要组成成分,语音加工经历着“习得-发展-老化”的变化过程。本文首先综述了婴儿、儿童、成年人及老年人在语音意识、语音提取,语音工作记忆等方面的表现及相应加工机制。其次,分析了不同年龄段个体语音加工发展变化的神经基础。最后,通过比较不同时期个体语音加工发展进程,围绕语音加工发展过程、语音老化有无关键年龄以及如何干预等问题进行展望。

关键词: 语音加工, 认知老化, 语音意识, 神经机制

Abstract: As an important component of language activities, the developing course of phonological processing includes 3 pivotal stages, e.g., acquisition, development, and aging. On base of the development model in phonological performance and mechanism, literature reviews about phonological awareness, vocabulary extraction, as well as phonological working memory were firstly made in this paper. Then we analyzed the neural basis of the development of speech cognition in infants and the elderly. Finally, by comparing the development of phonological processing at different stages, we discussed 3 key issues about phonological processing mechanism change or not, critical period of and retard of the aging in phonological processing.

Key words: phonological processing, cognition aging, phonological awareness, neural mechanism

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Banks, W. P., Oka, E., & Shugarman, S. (1981). Recoding of printed words to internal speech: Does recoding come before lexical access? In O. J. Tzeng & H. Singer (Eds.), Perception of Print: Reading research in experimental psychology (pp. 137-170). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Best, C. T. (2017). Speech Perception in Infants: Propagating the Effects of Language Experience. In E. M. Fernandez & H. S. Cairns (Eds.), The Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 470-490). Wiley.
Bi, Y., & Du, X. (2018).Study on the application of infants’ brain neural mechanism of native language learning in english teaching. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18 (6), 3312-3320.
Brown, A. S. (1991). A review of the tip-of-the-tongue experience. Psychological Bulletin, 109 (2), 204-223.
Carvalho, C. A., Kida, A. D., Capellini, S.A., & Avila, C. R. (2014). Phonological working memory and reading in students with dyslexia. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 00746. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00746
Church, J. A., Coalson, R. S., Lugar, H. M., Petersen, S. E., & Schlaggar, B. L. (2008). A developmental fMRI study of reading and repetition reveals changes in phonological and visual mechanisms over age. Cerebral Cortex, 18 (9), 2054-2065.
Danielson, D. K., Bruderer, A. G., Kandhadai, P., Vatikiotis-Bateson, E., & Werker, J. F. (2017). The organization and reorganization of audiovisual speech perception in the first year of life. Cognitive Development, 42, 37-48.
Debska, A., ?uniewska, M., Chyl, K., Banaszkiewicz, A., Zelechowska, A., Wypych, M., … Jednoróg, K. (2016). Neural basis of phonological awareness in beginning readers with familial risk of dyslexia-Results from shallow orthography. NeuroImage, 132, 406-416.
Diaz, M. T., Johnson, M. A., Burke, D. M., & Madden, D. J. (2014). Age-related differences in the neural bases of phonological and semantic processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26 (12), 2798-2811.
Ellis, R. (1999). Study of second language acquisition. Shanghai: Foreign Language Education Press.
Fostick, L., Taitelbaum-Swead, R., Kreitler, S., Zokraut, S., & Billig, M. (2020). Auditory training to improve speech perception and self-efficacy in aging adults. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 63 (4), 1270-1281.
Geva, S., Jones, P. S., Crinion, J. T., Price, C. J., Baron, J. C., & Warburton, E. A. (2012).The effect of aging on the neural correlates of phonological word retrieval. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24 (11), 2135-2146.
Gollan, T. H., & Goldrick, M. (2019). Aging deficits in naturalistic speech production and monitoring revealed through reading aloud. Psychology and Aging, 34 (1), 25-42.
Grivol, M. A., & Hage, S. R. D. V. (2011). Phonological working memory: A comparative study between different age groups. Jornal da Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia, 23 (3), 245-251.
Heinrich, A., Gagné, J. P., Viljanen, A., Levy, D. A., Ben-David, B. M., & Schneider, B. A. (2016). Effective communication as a fundamental aspect of active aging and wellbeing: Paying attention to the challenges older adults face in noisy environments. Social Inquiry into Well-Being, 2 (1), 51-68.
Ibrahim, M. (2018). Explicit versus implicit modes of EFL reading literacy instruction: Using phonological awareness with adult arab learners. English Language Teaching, 11 (9), 144-155.
Joseph, L.M. (2011). Phonological Learning. In S. Goldstein & J. A. Naglieri (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Child Behavior and Development (pp. 109-162). Springer-Verlag.
Kovelman, I., Norton, E. S., Christodoulou, J. A., Gaab, N., Lieberman, D. A., Triantafyllou, C., & Gabrieli, J. D. E.(2012). Brain basis of phonological awareness for spoken language in children and its disruption in dyslexia. Cerebral Cortex, 22 (4), 754-764.
Kuhl, P. K. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a perceptual magnet effect for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception and Psychophysics, 50 (2), 93-107.
Kuhl, P. K. (l992). Speech prototypes: Studies on the nature, function, ontogeny and phylogeny of the“centers” of speech categories. In Y. Tohkura, E. Vatikiotis-Bateson, & Y. Sagisaka (Eds.), Speech perception, production and linguistic structure (pp. 239-264). IOS Press.
Kuhl, P. K., Conboy, B. T., Coffey-Corina. S, Padden, D., Rivera-Gaxiola, M., & Nelson, T. (2008). Phonetic learning as a pathway to language:New data and native language magnet theory expanded. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 363 (1493), 979-1000.
Kuhl, P. K., Ramirez, R. R., Bosseler, A., Lin, J. F. L., & Imada, T. (2014). Infants’ brain responses to speech suggest analysis by synthesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111 (31), 11238-11245.
Liu, L., & Kager, R. (2017). Statistical learning of speech sounds is most robust during the period of perceptual attunement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 164, 192-208.
Locke, J. L. (1980). The prediction of child speech errors: Implications for a theory of acquisition. In G. H. Yeni-komshian, J. F. Kavanagh, & C.A. Ferguson (Eds.), Child phonology (pp. 193-209). Academic Press.
Mammarella, N., Fairfield, B., & Cornoldi, C. (2007). Does music enhance cognitive performance in healthy older adults? The vivaldi effect. Aging Clinical & Experimental Research, 19 (5), 394-399.
McBride-Chang, C. (1995). What is phonological awareness? Journal of Educational Psychology, 87 (2), 179-192.
Minagawa-Kawai, Y., Cristià, A., & Dupoux, E. (2011). Cerebral lateralization and early speech acquisition: A developmental scenario. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 1 (3), 217-232.
Mowrer, D. E., & Burger, S. (1991). A comparative analysis of the phonological acquisition of consonants in the speech of two and a half and six years old Xhosa-an English-speaking children. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 5 (2), 139-164.
Ogino, T., Hanafusa, K., Morooka, T., Takeuchi, A., Oka, M., & Ohtsuka, Y. (2017). Predicting the reading skill ofJapanese children. Brain and Development, 39 (2), 112-121.
Pye, C., Ingram, D., & List, H. (1987). A comparison of initial consonant acquisition in English and Quiché. Children’s Language, 6, 175-190.
Rizio, A. A., Moyer, K. J., & Diaz, M. T. (2017).Neural evidence for phonologically based language production deficits in older adults: An fMRI investigation of age-related differences in picture-word interference. Brain and Behavior, 7 (4), Article e00660. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.660
Ronen, M., Lifshitz-Ben-Basat, A., Taitelbaum-Swead, R., & Fostick, L. (2018). Auditory temporal processing, reading, and phonological awareness among aging adults. Acta Psychological, 190, 1-10.
Ruhland, R., & Geert, P. V. (2011).Jumping into syntax: Transitions in the development of closed class words. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16 (1), 65-95.
Shafto, M. A., Burke, D. M., Stamatakis, E. A., Tam, P. P., & Tyler, L. K. (2007). On the tip-of-the-tongue: Neural correlates of increased word-finding failures in normal aging. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19 (12), 2060-2070.
Shafto, M. A., Randall, B., Stamatakis, E. A.,Wright, P., & Tyler, L. K. (2012). Age-related neural reorganization during spoken word recognition: The interaction of form and meaning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24 (6), 1434-1446.
Shafto, M. A., Tyler, L. K., Dixon, M., Taylor, J. R., Rowe, J.B., Cusack, R., … Matthews, F. E. (2014).The Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) study protocol: A cross-sectional, lifespan, multidisciplinary examination of healthy cognitive ageing. BMC Neurology, 14, 204. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-014-0204-1
Sommers, M. S., & Danielson, S. M. (1999). Inhibitory processes and spoken word recognition in young and older adults: The interaction of lexical competition and semantic context. Psychology and Aging, 14 (3), 458-472.
Stamatakis, E. A., Shafto, M. A., Williams, G., Tam, P., & Tyler, L. K. (2011). White matter changes and word finding failures with increasing age. PLoS ONE, 6 (1), Article e14496. https//doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014496
Palmer, S. D., Hutson, J., & Mattys, S. L. (2018). Statistical learning for speech segmentation: Age-related changes and underlying mechanisms. Psychology and Aging, 33 (7), 1035-1044.
Treiman, R. (1993). Beginning to Spell. Oxford University Press.
Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K., (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in theacquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101 (2), 192-212.
Weiss, Y., Cweigenberg, H. G., & Booth, J. R. (2018). Neural specialization of phonological and semantic processing in young children. Human Brain Mapping, 39 (11), 4334-4348.
Werker, J. F.,Gilbert, J. H. V., Humphrey, K., & Tees, R. C. (1981). Developmental aspects of cross‐language speech perception. Child Development, 52 (1), 349-355.
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75 (6), 1866-1878.
White, K. K., & Abrams, L. (2002). Does priming specific syllables during tip-of-the-tongue states facilitate word retrieval in older adults? Psychology and Aging, 17 (2), 226-235.
Wright, H. H. (2016). Cognition, language and aging . Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Yeung, H. H., & Werker, J. F. (2009). Learning words’ sounds before learning how words sound: 9-Month-olds use distinct objects as cues to categorize speech information. Cognition, 113 (2), 234-243.
Yu, X., Raney, T., Perdue, M. V., Zuk, J., Ozernov-Palchik, O., Becker, B. L., … Gaab, N. (2018). Emergence of the neural network underlying phonological processing from the prereading to the emergent reading stage: A longitudinal study. Human Brain Mapping, 39 (5), 2047-2063.
陈媛. (2018). 4~6岁汉语儿童内隐与外显语音意识的发展 (硕士学位论文). 陕西师范大学, 西安.
付雪莹, 杜忆. (2017). 音乐训练对老年人在嘈杂环境下识别言语的影响研究[摘要]. 第二十届全国心理学学术会议——心理学与国民心理健康摘要集(pp.615-616).中国心理学会.
郭翔飞. (2012, 9月). 儿童语言习得与儿童一般认知发展规律. 外语学刊, (4), 131-134.
何文广. (2017). 语言认知老化机制及其神经基础. 心理科学进展, 25 (9), 1479-1491.
李嵬, 祝华, Barbara, D., 姜涛, 彭聃龄, 舒华. (2000). 说普通话儿童的语音习得. 心理学报, 32 (2), 170-176.
刘楚群. (2020). 老年人口语“呃”类填塞语研究. 语言战略研究, 5 (1), 78-89.
祁志强, 彭聃龄. (2010). 语音加工的脑机制研究:现状、困惑及展望. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 4, 40-47.
唐珊, 伍新春. (2009). 不同的拼音教学方式对幼儿拼音水平及汉语语音意识发展的影响. 心理发展与教育, 25 (2), 68-72.
伍秋萍, 郑佩芸, 邢滨钰, 康洁, 郭琎. (2014). 语音记忆和视觉记忆在儿童汉语识字能力中同样重要吗? 一个元分析综述. 心理与行为研究, 12 (4), 501-507.
杨群, 张清芳. (2015). 口语产生中的认知年老化及其神经机制. 心理科学进展, 23 (12), 2072-2084.
曾佑杰, 彭健新. (2018). 广州市老年人听力状况调查与分析. 声学技术, 37 (2), 79-82.
张彦彦. (2014). 工作记忆中的语音回路对二语阅读理解影响的研究 (硕士学位论文). 宁波大学.
[1] 周晓, 赵一燕, 黄砾卉, 雷怡. 恐惧学习的发展认知神经机制研究回顾与展望[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 295-304.
[2] 吴瑕, 钟希苹, 姜云鹏. 不同搜索情境下老化对自上而下注意加工的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 26-34.
[3] 李鹏, 刘霞, 孙炳海, 张文海, 李红. 青少年抑郁的快感缺失的神经机制研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(2): 239-248.
[4] 李何慧, 陶伍海, 彭聃龄, 丁国盛. 发展性阅读障碍与脑异常的因果关系:研究范式及发现[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(5): 631-640.
[5] 宋晓蕾, 李小芳, 赵媛, 何丹. 不同任务难度条件下认知老化对冲突适应能力的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(5): 569-576.
[6] 张玉平, 董琼, 舒华, 吴燕. 语音意识、命名速度和语素意识在汉语阅读发展中的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(4): 401-409.
[7] 濮冰燕, 彭华茂. 认知老化对于老年人决策过程的影响:动机的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(1): 114-120.
[8] 王恩国. 发展性协调障碍的神经机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(4): 503-509.
[9] 姜薇, 张林军, 舒华. 汉语语音范畴性知觉在儿童早期阅读中的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(3): 271-278.
[10] 赵晖, 路浩, 张树东. 发展性计算障碍的最新研究进展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(4): 441-448.
[11] 高悦, 彭华茂, 文静, 王大华. 教育水平在认知老化中的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(6): 591-598.
[12] 李蓓蕾, 陶沙, 董奇. 英语语音意识在汉语儿童英语单词阅读及拼写中的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(4): 388-393.
[13] 李虹, 饶夏溦, 董琼, 朱瑾, 伍新春. 语音意识、语素意识和快速命名在儿童言语发展中的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(2): 158-163.
[14] 刘文理, 伊廷伟, 杨玉芳. 汉语语音型阅读障碍儿童的范畴知觉技能[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(6): 569-576.
[15] 李虹, 舒华. 学前和小学低段不同识字量儿童的认知能力比较[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(3): 1-8.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!