心理发展与教育 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 406-413.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2020.04.03

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

关系认知与善意认知对大学生人际信任的影响

王沛1, 刘雨婷2, 梁雅君2, 谈晨皓2   

  1. 1. 华东师范大学教育学部, 特殊教育系, 上海 200062;
    2. 上海师范大学心理学系, 上海 200234
  • 发布日期:2020-07-21
  • 通讯作者: 王沛 E-mail:wangpei1970@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学重大招标项目(17ZDA327)的部分成果。

Effects of Trait Cognition and Social Relationship on Chinese Interpersonal Trust: The Role of Social Class

WANG Pei1, LIU Yuting2, LIANG Yajun2, TAN Chenhao2   

  1. 1. Department of Special Education, Faculty of Education, East China Normal University Shanghai 200062;
    2. Department of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University Shanghai 200234
  • Published:2020-07-21

摘要: 采用投资博弈,以大学生为被试探讨关系认知(亲疏关系、阶层关系)和特质认知(以善意为例)对中国人人际信任的影响。结果发现,亲疏关系认知、阶层关系认知和善意认知都会影响中国人的人际信任。关系越近、阶层越高、越善意,信任水平越高。随着亲疏关系下降或善意降低,阶层关系对信任水平的作用之间的差异逐步减弱。亲疏关系认知和阶层关系认知存在交互作用,亲疏、阶层和善意也具有交互作用。人们对上位阶层的信任大于平位大于下位,但是当信任对象存在低善意特质或陌生人身份时,人们对上位阶层的信任会下降至和平位没有差异;当低善意特质和陌生人身份同时存在时,人们对上位、平位和下位的信任无差异。

关键词: 人际信任, 亲疏关系, 阶层关系, 特质认知, 善意

Abstract: Interpersonal trust can be influenced by trait cognition and social relationships. Despite having a close-distant relationship, social class is an important property of social relationships. In this study, we examined the way in which trait cognition (benevolence), close-distant relationship and social class impact the trust of Chinese in an investment game. The results demonstrated that all three factors can influence the tendency of Chinese interpersonal trust and there was a significant interaction among them. Both close-distant relationship and social class have the greatest impact on trustworthiness. Additionally the results demonstrated that close relationships, higher social class and higher level of benevolence lead to higher levels of trust. Moreover, the effect of social class on the level of trust decreased with the decreasing of the degree of close-distant relationships (the level of benevolence). Our findings suggest that social relationships influence the level of Chinese interpersonal trust through the effect of trait cognition.

Key words: trust, benevolence, social relationship, close-distant relationship, social class

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Benn, L., Harvey, J. E., Gilbert, P., & Irons, C. (2005). Social rank, interpersonal trust and recall of parental rearing in relation to homesickness. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(8), 1813-1822.
Ben-Ner, A., & Halldorsson, F. (2010). Trusting and trustworthiness: What are they, how to measure them, and what affects them. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(1), 64-79.
Bergsieker, H. B. (2012). Building, betraying, and buffering trust in interracial and same-race friendships (Doctoral dissertation, PRINCETON UNIVERSITY).
Bereczkei, T., Birkas, B., & Kerekes, Z. (2007). Public charity offer as a proximate factor of evolved reputation-building strategy: An experimental analysis of a real-life situation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(4), 277-284.
Campos-Castillo, C., & Ewoodzie, K. (2014). Relational trustworthiness: How status affects intra-organizational inequality in job autonomy. Social Science Research, 44, 60-74.
Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 12-23.
Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: a meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 909-927.
Deutsch, M. (1960). The effect of motivational orientation upon trust and suspicion. HumanRelations, 13(2), 123-139.
Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611-628.
Duck, S. (2006). Meaningful relationships: Talking, sense, and relating. Bucuresi, Romania: Polirom Publishing House.
Fleig-Palmer, M. M., Rathert, C., & Porter, T. H. (2018). Building trust: The influence of mentoring behaviors on perceptions of health care managers' trustworthiness. Health Care Management Review, 43(1), 69-78.
Fiske, S. T., Moya, M., Russell, A. M., & Bearns, C. (2012). The secret handshake: Trust in cross-class encounters. In S. T. Fiske & H. R. Markus (Eds.), Facing social class: How societal rank influences interaction (pp. 234-252). New York: The Russell Sage Foundation Publications.
Henderson, M. D., Huang, S., & Chang, C. A. (2012). When others cross psychological distance to help: Highlighting prosocial actions toward outgroups encourages philanthropy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 220-225.
Hosmer, L. T. (1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 379-403.
Johnson, D., & Grayson.K. (2005). Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships. Journal of Business Research, 58(4), 500-507.
Lewicki, R. J., Tomlinson, E. C., & Gillespie, N. (2006). Models of Interpersonal Trust Development: Theoretical Approaches, Empirical Evidence, and Future Directions. Journal of Management, 32(6), 991-1022.
Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a Social Reality. Social Forces, 63(4), 967-985.
Lount, R. B., & Pettit, N. C. (2012). The social context of trust: The role of status. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 15-23.
Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self‐reinforcing nature of power and status. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 351-398.
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59.
McEvily, B., & Tortoriello, M. (2011). Measuring trust in organisational research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Trust Research, 1(1), 23-63.
Nan, X. (2007). Social distance, framing, and judgment: A construal level perspective. Human Communication Research, 33(4), 489-514.
Navarro-Carrillo, G., Valor-Segura, I., & Moya, M. (2016). Do you Trust Strangers, Close Acquaintances, and Members of Your Ingroup? Differences in Trust Based on Social Class in Spain. Social Indicators Research, 135(2), 585-597.
Niu, J.H., & Xin, Z.Q. (2012). Trust discrimination tendency oftrust circles in the positive and negative information-sharing/disclosing domains and cultural differences between Canada and China. Journalof Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 6(2), 233-252.
Pesch, A., Suárez, S., & Koenig, M. A. (2018). Trusting others: shared reality in testimonial learning. Current Opinion in Psychology, 23, 38-41.
Poon, J. M. (2013). Effects of benevolence, integrity, and ability on trust-in-supervisor. Employee Relations, 35(4), 396-407.
Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 95-112.
Ridgeway, C. L. (1981). Nonconformity, competence, and influence in groups: A test of two theories. American Sociological Review, 46(3), 333-347.
Ridgeway, C. L. (1982). Status in groups: The importance of motivation. American Sociological Review, 47(1), 76-88.
Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 344-354.
Weigert, A. J. (1981). Sociology of everyday life. New York: Longman.
Yuki, M., Maddux, W. W., Brewer, M. B., & Takemura, K. (2005). Cross-cultural differences in relationship-and group-based trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(1), 48-62.
Zhang, M. J., & Chen, H. (2018). To ask or not to ask: The roles of interpersonal trust in knowledge seeking. International Journal of Knowledge Managment, 14(1), 71-86.
Zinchenkoa, Yu P., Zotovab, O Yu., & Tarasovac, L.V. (2017). Specifics of interpersonal trust among people with different gender identities. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 10(2), 134-148.
李纲, 冯晓岭, 梁姣姣. (2018). 基于社会网络的人际信任:一个整合的研究框架. 华北水利水电大学学报:社会科学版, 34(1), 71-75.
刘春晖, 辛自强, 林崇德. (2013). 主题情境和信任特质对大学生信任圈的影响.心理发展与教育, 29(3), 255-261.
刘嘉庆, 区永东, 吕晓薇, 蒋毅. (2005). 华人人际关系的概念化——针对中国香港地区大学生的实证研究.心理学报, 37(1), 122-135.
牛江河, 辛自强. (2009). 不同主题和风险下的人际信任, “信任圈” 的中, 加比较.心理发展与教育, 25(2), 61-67.
王腾. (2012). “弱关系”运作与我国信任危机之解. 人民论坛(5), 104-105.
张建新, 张妙清, 梁觉. (2000). 殊化信任与泛化信任在人际信任行为路径模型中的作用.心理学报, 32(3), 311-316.
朱虹. (2017). 中国信任模式转向: 从“亲而信”到“利相关”. 领导科学(8), 21-21.
邹宇春, 敖丹, 李建栋. (2012). 中国城市居民的信任格局及社会资本影响——以广州为例. 中国社会科学,(5), 131-148.
[1] 刘聪慧, 董妍, 王鸿飞, 张登浩. 农村老年人的社会排斥体验与健康状况:有调节的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 752-760.
[2] 易梅, 田园, 明桦, 黄四林, 辛自强. 公正世界信念与大学生社会责任感的关系:人际信任的解释作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 282-287.
[3] 曹钰舒, 徐璐璐, 贺雯, 罗俊龙, 李海江. 不同人际情境影响工作记忆的初探[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(2): 139-144.
[4] 侯璐璐, 江琦, 王焕贞. 真实自豪对人际信任的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(4): 435-443.
[5] 刘勤为, 徐庆春, 刘华山, 刘勤学. 大学生网络社会支持与网络利他行为的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(4): 426-434.
[6] 孙晓军, 赵竞, 周宗奎, 谢笑春, 童媛添. 大学生网络社会支持与网络人际信任的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(2): 129-136.
[7] 刘春晖, 辛自强, 林崇德. 主题情境和信任特质对大学生信任圈的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(3): 255-261.
[8] 康廷虎, 白学军. 任务类型和性别属性对人际信任的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(5): 456-462.
[9] 牛江河, 辛自强. 不同主题和风险下的人际信任:“信任圈”的中、加比较[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(2): 61-67.
[10] 李晔, 刘华山. 中小学生对教师的信任及问卷编制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(4): 88-94.
[11] 李红菊, 许燕, 郭永玉. 中国大学生的人际信任-不信任:单因素还是双因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(3): 112-116.
[12] 王美芳, 陈会昌. 错误信念理解后儿童心理理论的发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2001, 17(2): 45-49.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!